Is there a ‘war on women’?

Moderated by Rick Badie

Is there a “war on women” or a mere focus on women’s issues going on these days? Women on both sides of the political aisle are revved up this campaign season. The state director of Maggie’s List writes that Republicans are leading the charge against government overreach, while an official for the Georgia Federation of Democratic Women pledges that voters will remember politicians who supported legislation that harmed women and families.

GOP propels women’s values

By Suzi Voyles

The real reason Democrats manufactured “Julia” and the “war on women” is because women don’t support their policies. It’s Republican women leading the charge against the overreach of government into our lives. In 2010, Republicans won the women’s vote for the first time since Ronald Reagan.

We fired the first woman speaker of the House, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, because we didn’t like the direction the Democrats were taking our country on the economy, health care and especially on the debt. We still don’t like it today.

“Julia’s” life is not typical of American women. Nor is it something to which we Republicans aspire. We don’t see our lives as a product of government handouts.

In fact, we resent the idea that we owe our success to bureaucrats and not to our own initiative. When Republicans talk about freedom, entrepreneurship, patient-centered health care and fiscal responsibility, most women respond positively.

We refuse to be enslaved to the myth that we are “entitled” to something. We know by the example of other countries that have gone down that path that we surrender more personal liberty than we can ever gain in what the government can give to us.

We also believe that government should practice fiscal responsibility and allow individuals to keep more of the money we earn. And when Republicans propose policies grounded in those principles — reducing taxes on small businesses, shrinking the deficit through the Ryan plan and repealing “Obamacare” — women see that it’s the Republican Party that’s advancing their values, not the Democrats. GOP women believe that encouraging individual initiative through free enterprise is what brings opportunity, economic growth and prosperity to our state and country.

When it comes to the empowerment of women, Republican women have always stood on the front lines. GOP women believe in equal rights, equal justice and equal opportunity regardless of race, sex, age, creed, national origin or disability.

We would never spend our time in a party that did not believe the same. We believe strongly that the strength of our nation lies with each individual and that each person’s liberty, dignity, ability and responsibility must be honored.

Republican women believe that America is the most exceptional nation because of our founding principles, recognizing that our rights come from God, not from government. While retaining these principles that have made us strong, we must also develop innovative ideas to meet the challenges confronting each generation. GOP women believe that American values are worth preserving.

We believe the United States must retain its national sovereignty. And we know the Republican Party is the best vehicle for translating these ideals into positive and successful principles and policies from which to govern.

Republicans don’t merely “talk” a good game. A look at our record shows that we produce upon these principles. Republicans were founded on the precept of personal liberty. A Republican woman was the first woman to be voted into Congress, before she could vote for herself (translation: GOP men elected her).

It was a GOP Congress that twice passed women’s suffrage to override the veto of President Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat. The GAGOP chairman is a woman, Sue P. Everhart. Jan Jones is the first female speaker pro tem and Republican majority whip in Georgia. In 1892, Ellen Foster and two other women were elected alternates to the GOP Convention, a first for either major party.

We absolutely do not believe Republicans have mounted a war on women. Foster declared it best: “We are here to help you. And we have come to stay.” Our growing numbers attest to that fact.

Suzi Voyles is Georgia state director of Maggie’s List and serves on the organization’s national board of directors.

Fallout of health law looms

By Elaine Davis-Nickens

“We will remember in November.”

That was the chant of women who walked around the Georgia State Capitol during the 2012 legislative session. Women carpooled to Atlanta from every end of the state because they wanted their voices heard by legislators who were considering bills that were crossing the line of common sense and erasing current recognized health care practices.

During the march, one woman asked me if I thought legislators inside the Gold Dome would pay us any attention. The actions of those who were engaged in the Republican War on Women answered this question loud and clear.

House Bill 954, authored by state Rep. Doug McKillip, R-Athens, was passed in the final minutes of the session and then signed into law by Gov. Nathan Deal. When this new law goes into effect Jan. 1, 2013, there will be major interference with the patient-physician relationship because of the removal of current standards for medical procedures.

The new law forces obstetricians to perform C-sections on women who go into labor early even when standard medical practice doesn’t call for it. According to an article written by Ruth McClatchey Cline, president-elect of the Georgia Obstetrics and Gynecology Society, the new law … “complicates the routine practice of obstetric care.” The C-section “… would involve a vertical incision of the entire length of the uterine wall. Thereafter, the mother would be at a high risk of uterine rupture in future pregnancies.”

Another major change will place a 20-week limit for abortions. The current standard for viability is 23 to 24 weeks when a fetus has a 50-50 chance of surviving outside the womb. There was testimony from medical organizations that births at 22 weeks have less than a 10 percent chance of survival. At 26 weeks, the current law mandate for a cutoff date, the survival rate is 85 percent.

The concerns raised by these issues have been voiced by women and men who are Republicans as well as Democrats. McKillip now faces a tough primary contest by Regina Quick, a Republican attorney who practices family law and who is anti-abortion. She has stated that the issues that McKillip and those who voted for his bill have created has moved into “a legal and medical gray area where decisions are best left up to women and their doctors.”

Then there is the issue of the comparison of women giving birth to stillborn babies to that of livestock on a farm delivering stillborns. That jewel received national attention through various outlets and has received almost 32,000 YouTube hits.

Georgia leaders need to be focused on creating jobs, improving education and transportation — things that can move our state forward. Instead, we are reduced to hearing about issues that go against acceptable medical practices and further harm the emotional and physical well-being of Georgia women and families.

My heart breaks for those women and men who must deal with the medical procedure of abortion. Their decision should not be complicated by highly questionable decisions by lawmakers when they should be relying on their doctors to help them make the right decisions.

It is reasonable to believe that we will remember in November.

Elaine Davis-Nickens is the public relations chairwoman for the Georgia Federation of Democratic Women.

30 comments Add your comment


June 14th, 2012
11:19 am

“That Republicans and Tea Partiers want to change our rights so that we all follow Rightist ideology, whether we believe in it or not, should be of great concern to everyone who opposes extremism.”

Just an opinion but facturally inaccurate.


June 14th, 2012
11:17 am

“And you have Log Cabin Republicans, too, who stay true to the party that denies them equal treatment”

You are a drive by misinformation terrorist. Show me the sources.


June 14th, 2012
11:16 am


June 14th, 2012
7:02 am
So you went from George Bush to B. Obama? Now that is an educated mind.


June 14th, 2012
10:41 am

Republican women should shut up, because they only have the opinions their tyrant husbands authorize them to have.


June 14th, 2012
10:38 am

When the State of Virginia comes within a whisker of passing a law that would authorize a “trans-vaginal probe” to determine the “lawfulness” of an abortion, when a Republican opinion leader would call a female law student a slut on international radio, when contraceptive technology would be entwined with religion to deny women insurance funded contraception; when Republican controlled state legislatures are getting deeper and deeper into womens’ vaginas we have a war on women.

Marlboro Man

June 14th, 2012
9:06 am

It appears so, if you keep it up.


June 14th, 2012
7:02 am

It comes down to power. An educated woman, free of the constraints of children is not, by and large going to bend to the will of the fat men who run the Catholic Church. Without the ignorant masses the Church has no power. Anyone that has visited a Catholic country such as Mexico or Brazil has to see that the policies of the Catholic Church has destroyed the fabric of their culture. You see thousands of unwanted, unfed, uneducated children in the streets one on the resort beaches begging for food and money. Stealing when all else fails. I always thought it was hilarious the way the Catholic Church chose to deify Mother Theresa, whose only claim to fame was taking care of the thousands of orphans that wouldn’t have been born if The powers that be (not just Catholics!) had an intelligent, coherent policy on birth control. We are outbreeding our poor Earth’s ability to sustain us. The declining resources like water, without which we cannot live, will become a tragedy of epic proportions, yet, instead of trying to make birth control easy and affordable, the ignorant jackasses are making it more and more difficult. The Republicans have lost their collective minds. After forty years of voting for Republicans, I balked when George W. Bush stated he would not be “out Jesused” and changed the way the Republican Party chose to cram women in the tolilet. Suzi Voyles, you are delusional.


June 13th, 2012
11:03 pm

And you have Log Cabin Republicans, too, who stay true to the party that denies them equal treatment. And there are Uncle Toms. And self-hating Jews. And Stockholm Syndrome. The denial of persecution and cooperation with persecutors is more of a psychological phenomenon than a factual question.

Married for Life

June 13th, 2012
10:35 pm

According to Voyles, our rights come from God, not our Constitution. (She used the word “government.”) And I think that is the scariest thing I hear the Republicans and Tea Partiers saying—that however they interpret what they believe a god says should be and is greater than the laws with which we have all chosen to govern each other and ourselves. Our current constitutional rights, I believe, are more in line with the teachings of Jesus than the ideals put forth by the religious and reactionary Right. That Republicans and Tea Partiers want to change our rights so that we all follow Rightist ideology, whether we believe in it or not, should be of great concern to everyone who opposes extremism.


June 13th, 2012
10:33 pm

…….. Women’s rights under Catholic nations is not assurred.
http colon double slash triple w period nrlc period org/Federal/Scorecard/Scorecardexplaination period html
National Right to Life Scorecard on Abortion and Other Right-to-Life Issues

U.S. House of Representatives 1999-2000
Published by the National Right to Life Committee, October 10, 2000
I have a question. Is there a successful Catholic nation in the world? Please name one.
A large majority of congressional Republicans vote consistently pro-life, while a large majority of congressional Democrats vote consistently pro-abortion. During 2000, for example, at least 81% of Republicans voted pro-life on every NRLC-scored vote, and that percentage rose to 96% on the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. Among House Democrats, the average percentage voting pro-life was 20%, rising to 37% on the partial-birth abortion bill.
You can scroll down to the bottom to find out that largely the R’s are in the hands of the Catholic, and are voting a straight bloc of no legal abortion. The non-Catholic D’s by and large do vote to uphold the Roe v Wade, and keep abortion legal .However, there are more D Catholic in government than R Catholic. This is a ” hide behind the smoke screen ” until they have a majority, then watch, and you will see that the Catholic turn the US into another totally failed nation just like every nation south of the US.
Failure of a hundred nations, and a thousand years is their legacy.
Women’s rights under any Catholic nation are non-existent.
Vote the Catholic out of office both R and D, and the bloc will be gone and the Constitution can be restored