Atlanta Falcons: Birds Face Playoff Questions

Time for the Falcons to Get it Done

Time to Get it Done #2 (AJC)

It’s what we’ve all been waiting for: the playoffs. Falcons players, fans, and everyone associated with the organization have heard it all the way back to last January when they were embarrassed for the second year in a row in the playoffs, losing three out of four. The chorus from the media elite and talking heads has only grown louder every time the Birds won another game. There are literally almost no articles that have been written this season regarding the Falcons, in any capacity, that have not mentioned the “can’t win in the playoffs,” or “0-3 in the playoffs,” meme. Even articles that have been favorable or complimentary always have that backhand tucked in there somewhere. Yes, it’s true the Falcons have fallen short the past three tries in the playoffs under Coach Smith, but the incessant and ridiculous inclusion of that attack line has been preposterous. How could the Falcons change anything about past or the postseason in week 4?

The time has come for this head coach, this quarterback, and this organization to put this garbage to rest. For some, it will never be enough until the Falcons win the Super Bowl outright, and even then some will rationalize it away. However, getting over that hump will do wonders for all associated with the Falcons and blow up that assault once and for all. Fans likely can’t even go to what it will be like if they don’t win this one.

Have Lessons Been Learned? Part 2

This is a sequel to last weeks post regarding planning and preparation on the part of the coaching staff, specifically Head Coach Mike Smith. An article by the AJC’s D. Orlando Ledbetter discussed how different this year’s preparation will be both during the bye week and after. It appears that Smith has learned his lessons, because the details of how truly soft their bye week preparation that was done, is shocking. The idea of a team earning a bye week is just like the bye week during the season, teams can get their team as healthy as possible, working on fundamentals that have been slipping, and fix problems that cropped up.

Time to Cut Julio Loose (AJC)

Smith evidently felt it was a time have cookies and punch. He gave them 3 days off during the bye week, had them report on Thursday, and then gave them the rest of the weekend off. Yes, that’s no joke. It’s actually a wonder the Falcons didn’t get beat worse than 48-21 in the Debacle in the Dome by the Packers. It’s understandable that you don’t want to do Oklahoma drills all day and treat it like training camp battles, but for goodness sake, you’ve got to find a way to keep somewhat of an edge. Smith has said all the right things and it seems he got the message loud and clear after his initial approach. Smith was quoted as saying something along the lines of “we’re going to do do everything completely different than the last time.” That’s surely music to fans ears.

Momentum is a Guarantee of Playoff Success, Right?

Most talking head media elites are ready to crown the Seahawks and the Redskins as NFC champions because they are on a winning streak going into the playoffs. Many writers and so-called experts are all about the recent trends, don’t really do research, and just go with what’s popular. It’s very true that the past two years, the wild card teams have squeaked into the playoffs and gone on to win the Super Bowl, the Packers in 2010 and the Giants in 2011. Both teams were 6th seeds and that has become a very popular theme because that’s what’s in vogue. The Giants were a wild card in 2007 and went on to beat the mighty undefeated Patriots. The Steelers were a wild card in 2005 and they beat a stacked AFC that year.

No More Arm Tackles DeCoud (AJC)

ESPN even went as far as to develop a stat that read “of the 36 most recent playoff teams, 11 that have been on a 5+ game winning streak have gone to the Super Bowl. 5 of those have won the Super Bowl. The Broncos, Redskins, and Seahawks are on a 5+ game winning streak.” What kind of stat is that? And furthermore, that comes to a whopping 30% of success on getting to the Super Bowl and 14% winning it. They might as well done a statistic on cleat colors and playoff success. Talk about curtailing statistics to fit your biased opinion.

Yes, the past two years and 3 out of 4 have favored the team that has momentum, a fairly mythical construction all on it’s own, but statistics are past numbers for a reason. If the same researchers go back a little further (most statisticians averse to determine a “trend” less than decade), they would see a fairly inconclusive analysis. A list of the past 10 seasons:

Season — Super Bowl Winner — Seed

2011 – Giants – #4 Division Champ

2010 – Packers – #6 Wild Card

2009 – Saints – #1 Bye

2008 – Steelers – #2 Bye

2007 – Giants – #5 Wild Card

2006 – Colts – #3 Division Champ

2005 – Steelers – #6 Wild Card

2004 – Patriots – #2 Bye

2003 – Patriots – #1 Bye

2002 – Bucs – #2 Bye

So there you have the list of the past 10 Super Bowl winners. Even though recent history says that getting hot at the right time, barely getting in the playoffs as a wildcard, or being on a winning streak guarantees you a Super Bowl or playoff success, the fact is that it’s a fairly insignificant probability over the last 10 years, despite what’s “popular” among the media elite. The last 10 years have seen 50% of teams with a bye win the Super Bowl, 30% Wild Cards, and 20% as Division Champs. The point is not to say that momentum can’t play a part in playing well in the playoffs and ultimately winning the Super Bowl, but it’s simply meant to bust all the media elite’s strict adherence to “playing well close to the playoffs guarantees playoff success” and thereby denigrating or outright ignoring the Falcons. After all, the Saints actually lost 3 games in a row before winning the whole thing.

Underdogs Again

The Falcons and everyone associated with their organization won’t lack for any motivation when they tee it up next Sunday at 1 pm. To be fair, the Falcons losing all 3 of their playoff games, with the last two being embarrassing blowouts, have given most “media elite experts” every reason to doubt the Falcons. Unfortunately for Falcons fans, that is the painful truth. However, the experts have taken that meme and ran away with it, all the way back since April and continuing on to mini-camp until now. It seems that it’s a “anyone but the Falcons” in the NFC mantra for most that know everything there is to know about football and the NFL (too bad we can’t use these experts to solve world hunger, eh?).

Spoon's Big Arena (AJC)

The Seahawks and the Redskins are everyone’s darlings because A) they’re not the Falcons and B) they’re the wild cards who are on a winning streak (see point above). The Packers and Niners are the traditional teams who have been their favorites all year, even if they’re not the flavor-of-the-week wild cards, but of course they’re always the backups. Maybe the only other team close to the Falcons are the Vikings, but they have MVP, All-World running back Adrian Peterson and that’s definitely a feel-good storyline better than those terrible Falcons.

Of course this will come across as whiny to any non-Falcon fans, and it might be a little bit, but Falcons fans are sick and tired of hearing it and it’s impossible to imagine how much the players are. Truth be told, the Falcons, particularly Mike Smith, haven’t helped themselves at all. Todd McClure said something to the effect of flying under the radar all the way to February. Looks like he’s going to get his wish. They say that bulletin board material can only go so far and doesn’t win games in the end, but it surely can’t help to add in a little extra fire when the game kicks off or when things get tough.

Which Offense Will Show Up?

The Falcons jekyll and hyde offense surely has some fans worried about next Sunday. To be fair, the Falcons have done a much better job overall with consistency than year’s past, including some really nice offensive explosions like the Chiefs, Eagles, and Giants game. However, they’ve also put up some big clunkers as well. It’s hard to imagine the Birds coming out as flat as they did the previous two years in the playoffs, but some bad offensive outputs may have fans a little nervous. While looking dominant at times, they’ve also looked downright anemic as well, such as they did vs. the Raiders, Cardinals, the Saints second game, and the Panthers second game, not to mention the most recent game vs. the Bucs. Something that may ease fans concerns a bit is the fact that their very best offensive game came against the defending Super Bowl Champion Giants and a darn good one came a week later vs. Detroit that saw them go up 21-3 before they started sitting on their lead. The players keep saying it’s a different attitude and feeling than year’s past and here’s hoping that the clunker offense is gone for good.

Will the Giants/Broncos or the Panthers/Bucs Defense Show Up?

Although being a touch more consistent than the offense, the defense has had it’s ups and downs as well. They came to be known as the elite QB killing defense that saw them intercept the Manning brothers and Drew Brees 10 times, not to mention shutting down Phillip Rivers, Michael Vick, and Tony Romo. But they’ve also had their own fair share of issues at times, especially in the run game. Cam Newton had his way both times with the Falcons defense, especially the second time in Charlotte which was arguably one of the best games of his career. Josh Freeman looked like Superman in the last game and Drew Brees put up plenty of points the first time in New Orleans.

Asante's Leadership Will Be Key (AJC)

They’ve generally done pretty good against the pass, but they’ve had major issues at stopping the run at times. They stopped Doug Martin the first time, only to get shredded the second. Alfred Morris ran for over 100 yards, even though he was held to to no TDs. Cam Newton and the Panthers running backs racked up yards like it was going out of style and they even had major problems with Saints running backs, namely Chris Ivory. Although they’ve done light years better in the takeaway department, they’ve only marginally better in the pass rush. The Falcons defense will have their hands full which ever team they play first, be it Russell Wilson / Marshawn Lynch, Robert Griffin III / Alfred Morris, or Christian Ponder / Adrian Peterson. Birds fans are hoping that the Magician Mike Nolan has saved his best for last.

Bird Cager’s Playoff Turn

1) Playoff Push — Has the time finally come to bust the playoff hump once and for all?

2) What things are you looking for as the Falcons come out next Sunday?

3) Do you genuinely feel that lessons have been learned by Mike Smith?

4) What to make of momentum: reality or myth?

5) Nervous, anxious, or confident for playoff game?

6) Are Falcons biggest underdogs in all of playoffs?

7) Which offense do you think will show up: stellar or clunker?

8.) Will the defense be ready to stop the run?

9) Preference of who to play on Sunday?

670 comments Add your comment

Big Lou

January 9th, 2013
9:28 am

Blogmonster ate my long post, too…

Big Lou

January 9th, 2013
9:30 am

Anyone notice how silent the Falcons have been this week so far? It’s a good thing.

Matty Bicep

January 9th, 2013
9:55 am

Falcon silence is a very good thing…..and for TD getting raided, NFL teams know being a consistent winner is what it is all about. Everyone want some of the process.

Arno

January 9th, 2013
10:32 am

Wednesday.
tic……………………..toc……………………tic……………………toc………………

D3

January 9th, 2013
10:49 am

I know a lot of this has to do with agencies like StubHub and such buying a lot of tickets and such, but at the same time, this is another sign that I think Smitty is actually on the hot seat for Sunday. I’ll just give you my viewpoint as a 5 year season ticket holder. We had the opportunity to buy playoffs tickets and, first and foremost, we really didn’t have the dough to shell out for tickets that were double their regular season price. So that’s mostly the underlying reason. However……..

I can’t say that the Debacle in the Dome experience (one of the worst moments in my entire sports-following life, if not the worst) didn’t have at least part to do with it. Some may say that being a coward in refusing to support your team, but I take losses so personally (at least I used to) that it really messed me up for a long while. It took a good little chunk of time to get back to normal. Seeing that in person after having such a great regular season made me angry, pissed, depressed, crazy, (add any bad adjective in here) for a while. It wasn’t the losing, but it was the utter destruction that occurred and how flat-out embarrassed we were.

The point I’m trying to make in all this is that there’s probably a lot of season ticket holders that share my opinion. Many, like me, was likely due to the money aspect, but if I couldn’t live without going I could have used like my next 3 birthdays and Christmases if I wanted to. In other words, the Falcons, specifically Smitty, have to prove to me that they can get it done in the playoffs (at least once) before I feel comfortable forking over that amount of dough for that product. I, like tens of thousands of others have proven that we’re loyal customers by re-upping each year during the season, even when financially it’s probably not in our best interest (two teachers salaries), but we love the Birds and the experience so much that it’s worth it. However, Smitty has to prove that he can win in the postseason at least once before it tips the balance of cost vs. reward. I’m sure that sounds selfish, but when talking about money in this economy for a entertainment, leisure activity, this year wasn’t worth it to me and my family.

Through all the above rambling, my underlying point is that, as evidenced by 9,000 season ticket holders deciding to pass on playoff tickets, Smitty has no room for error in my opinion. A loss will almost force Blank to make a financial decision regarding Smith and his inability to win in the postseason if we come up short Sunday.

This is all for naught of course because we will win on Sunday!

D3

January 9th, 2013
10:51 am

One of the advantages, along with a chance to get players some rest, during the bye week is the extra opportunity to prepare for the next opponent. While the Falcons didn’t find out who they’d play until around 8 p.m. ET Sunday, the coaching staff was hard at work last week preparing for all three of the possible opponents.

http://blog.atlantafalcons.com/jayadams/2013/01/07/extra-day-helps-falcons-in-preparations/

Music to my ears, because I thought I read something that said they couldn’t or wouldn’t try to prepare for 3 different opponents.

D3

January 9th, 2013
10:56 am

BL / trademark — Your posts are out!

D3

January 9th, 2013
11:05 am

trademark — D@mn fine post at 8:18 am. That looks like a helluva scouting report right there. I agree and I’ll just add one thing: Tony Gonzalez should have a career day. If Gonzo can burn the best of the LB’s in the league, he can have a field day with these guys. Wagner – rookie; Leroy Hill – slightly above average; Wright – 2nd year guy. HD, Snelling, and Quizz should be intentional, often targets in this game to exploit their weaknesses, much like the Giants gameplan that was the best offensive gameplan of the year.

D3

January 9th, 2013
11:08 am

My Fear — A small fear I have is that Smitty is going to pull one of his “we’re going to ram down their throats by God!” like he did during the Saints. OK, that’s fine, but you better have a Plan B if that S— doesn’t work, because that’s the absolute worst thing we could do, is start off slow, Ryan doesn’t get into a rhythm and all of a sudden, we’re having to try and turn it on or rely on the defense to win the game, like the Saints game. I got a bad feeling that Turner will play heavily in this gameplan.

Big Lou

January 9th, 2013
11:25 am

I don’t know what it is… maybe it’s just fool gold.

But I feel we’re going to run the ball well against the Seahawks.

You know why? Clemons being out. He’s the big reason why they stuff the run so well, and a big reason why Irvin will be a hindrance to their run D. He is a great pass rusher but slow off the edge. All I know is if we run the ball well, the Falcons are unstoppable on offense. Use the first Saints game, Giants, and Eagles as examples.

Sunday can’t come soon enough!

LRD

January 9th, 2013
11:29 am

I am going with the wisdom of my 6yr old and his friends from yesterday. They were playing their version of football after school. IT was the Falcons vs Green Bay. I asked why Green Bay as we have the seahawks on sunday. Reply from him and his friends.. we are going to crush the seahawks by 2 TDs so we need to get ready for Green Bay….. too funny

trademark

January 9th, 2013
11:33 am

Thanks D3! A lot of work, but worth it…and fun. I think the key stats for us are our middle range passing game is upgraded from last year’s game in Seattle, where we torched the Seahawks for 291 on the mid-range 7-9 yarders and then racked up the YAC. Gonzo might do everything you just said, but Seattle rarely blitzes their LBs and crowds the middle of the field, so he might find himself doubled a lot or in the middle of traffic. Kind of a reason why Seattle doesn’t tend to give up big games to the great Tight Ends in this league. I still say hit them on the edges, at middle-range, and then open them up on play-action/pump fakes. The lack of a running threat could hurt us, though. Turner played a big role last year in the W, the Falcons have to find a way to get the RBs involved, even if it’s screens. Their LBs have to buy that the line of scrimmage needs to be protected to leave our receivers in one-on-ones.
Of course, Seattle might be altering their tendencies and blitzing the LBs. If that happens, Tony G is going to go off. :)

trademark

January 9th, 2013
11:39 am

My biggest fear is the Falcons get too stubborn and try to rush the ball when it isn’t there or (heaven help us), force the ball into that crowded middle when it isn’t there. If that happens, it will turn into a tip-drill and probably a few INTs. (See Arizona…ugh). Hit them where they aren’t. And since Seattle loves to overpursue to the ball, they tend to be out of position at times. But you need the skill players to capitalize on that, and let’s face it, there aren’t a hell of a lot of teams with the skill set of the Atlanta receiving core. In fact, there aren’t ANY.

LRD

January 9th, 2013
11:42 am

Why we win (nonsense reasons) …
The football Gods will allow us to try and set things right by having us play Green Bay at home again.
They will also wish to reward us for stopping against the Giants and not furthering our revenge by running up the score against them.
Finally they will punish the Seahawks for running up scores against their lesser competitors.

Big Lou

January 9th, 2013
11:55 am

Trademark

They might have to blitz with the loss of Clemons.

If they don’t get pressure on Ryan… he will put career high numbers.

DePlane

January 9th, 2013
11:57 am

The Falcons are going to win this game. Naysayers STFU.

DePlane

January 9th, 2013
12:01 pm

The Falcons game is a SELLOUT. Just because scalpers bought up the tix in anticipation of making a buck, don’t blame the Falcons. They have nuttin’ to do with after the ticket brokers buy em’.

A lot of folks might have bought up those 9k tickets from the Falcons at regular prices; but won’t pay broker prices. But likely somebody will. Either way, its a SELLOUT.

Arno

January 9th, 2013
12:01 pm

I do not know if Seattle has the personnel to try this, but others have had success with narrowing Ryan’s field to dump-offs, and limiting his time. So my key to the game– Will time slow down for Matt Ryan? If so, he will make his fakes, get his reads, see whole field, and claim it as HIS territory. And as we have seen– that is a thing of beauty!

DePlane

January 9th, 2013
12:03 pm

I’ve read where a lot of folks are worried about this or scared about that when it comes to Seattle.

Yes, they have a good D. But not unbeatable, and we are just the team to do it. They aren’t going to know what hit em.

I’ll gladly come back on here and eat my crow with the rest of you, but I just don’t see Seattle winning this game, period.

Geo

January 9th, 2013
12:16 pm

Big Lou: “I don’t know what it is… maybe it’s just fool gold.

But I feel we’re going to run the ball well against the Seahawks.”

I do too. The Falcons have had some very good moments all year in their rushing attack, but the passing attack is so good, they’ve been able to live off it. But I have this (possibly way off base) vision of Koetter tinkering and testing throughout the season, making mental notes for an unholy Frankenstein’s monster he will unleash in the playoffs. It just feels like the team and staff have made a committment this year to not just a stellar regular season, but to making the post season much different than in years past.

DePlane

January 9th, 2013
12:27 pm

I expect to see Dent on the field more for this game. He’s usually taken out for the n/d packages.
If we blitz up the middle it will force Wilson out of the pocket…he generally will roll right. We need to extend the play down the line to prevent him from running and force him into throwing it….away.

We’ll need to disguise our blitz packages and confuse him…he is a damn rookie after all; and I think Nolan and team will throw some stuff he hasn’t seen before. Sacks are nice but if we just pressure him consistently we should be able to rattle him enough to waste some plays.

On offense; I’m glad Clemons is out….but even so I believe we have what it takes to handle their D line or any D line after watching our much maligned o-line manhandle the Giants. The oline needs to start fast (whole team for that matter), and don’t letup until the final whistle.

D3

January 9th, 2013
12:36 pm

DePlane — You’re correct about the for-profit, secondary agencies, but season-ticket holders always have first right of refusal. My only point was that the confidence level among the fan base as it pertains to the post-season is shaky at best. All he has to do is win this one and all that garbage goes away. And I would even go as far as say if we lose the NFCCG.

Big Lou

January 9th, 2013
12:44 pm

D3

If the Falcons win against the Seahawks, they are going to the Superbowl.

Matty Bicep

January 9th, 2013
12:52 pm

I heard somewhere that the Falcons are ranked #1 in first quarter scoring in the past 5 years. I cannot confirm that, but I can confirm year by year.

2008 #2, 6.7
2009 #13 4.9
2010 #13 4.5
2011 #2 7.1 (Behind Green Bay)
2012 #12 5.7

I would imagine that puts us very near the top. Am I worried that we are going to come out flat and that our playcalling is out of rythem,

The 2 prior years, we were 17 and 22.

Matty Bicep

January 9th, 2013
12:53 pm

I am NOT worried. It is not our MO.

Matty Bicep

January 9th, 2013
12:54 pm

Big Boi just picked the Falcons on that stupid Skip Bayless-Steven Smith show….That settle it, bring on the Lombardi.

Geo

January 9th, 2013
1:14 pm

Remember what Mud Duck said, we don’t care if they are talking about us, as long as they’re talking about us in February. Eyes on the prize.

D3

January 9th, 2013
1:19 pm

But I have this (possibly way off base) vision of Koetter tinkering and testing throughout the season, making mental notes for an unholy Frankenstein’s monster he will unleash in the playoffs. It just feels like the team and staff have made a commitment this year to not just a stellar regular season, but to making the post season much different than in years past. Geo

Man, wouldn’t that really be something. Normally, I’d agree that it may be way off base, but their was a glimpse of that in the Giants game. I mean, out of nowhere, we really could do no wrong. At that point, Smitty may have said, “we have 2 games vs. two crappy, eliminated from the playoffs teams (TB, Det) to get the #1 seed and bye. We’ve shown we can put it altogether when needed, let’s not go all out.” Of course, we both may be way off base, but that Giants game was probably one of the best offensive gameplans I’ve ever seen designed and executed in franchise history.

LRD

January 9th, 2013
1:23 pm

Matty: Does that mean that Andre’ 3000 shows up for OutKast reunion with them doing an updated version of BOB? Now entitled BOS (Bombs Over Seattle) for the halftime show?

Matty Bicep

January 9th, 2013
1:47 pm

Lol, maybe…it was classic, he was standing up for the birds while Skip and Steve were being their doushy selves. BB said that we would win because we were home, and they brought up the debacle…then BB said we did not have JJ then, and we are a more mature team…You could almost smell the smoke of misfiring brain synapse as they kept saying…but but but, like it was not on the que card.

JB Falcon

January 9th, 2013
1:56 pm

Seagulls just put their kicker on IR. Pity.

Big Lou

January 9th, 2013
2:11 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHuupmFqlDQ

Something to pump you guys up for Sunday. Highlight fan video for the Falcons this year!

D3

January 9th, 2013
2:21 pm

I don’t normally look at garbage, non-Falcons media, but I saw this is my google news and thought it was pretty hysterical. This is from a dumb@ss poster, Seahawks fan from a really terrible article……

It’s going to be a game of hard hits. I seriously don’t know if Atlanta’s receivers are really ready for this. Everyone keeps saying how Jones will run away from the corners because of his speed. The problem is I don’t see him with 30 TDs and 3000 yards because he is too fast for everyone in the league. It’s a team sport and the corners will have pro bowl support from the safety’s. The Falcon’s haven’t been tested like this Seahawks team so I’m seeing a power offense up against a power defense and history shows what happens there. This means it should come down to what Seattle’s offense can do against the Atlanta D. That is where this game will be won or lost by Seattle.

Really? Because so many receivers have had 3,000 yard seasons and 30 TDs? What an effin’ moron-idiot-knuckledragger. We’ve never faced a defense like this, oh I’m petrified and we should just forfeit. S-T-U-P-I-D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Matty Bicep

January 9th, 2013
2:25 pm

Roddy torched Seattle last year.

Matty Bicep

January 9th, 2013
2:25 pm

Guys ain’t doin their homework.

Big Lou

January 9th, 2013
2:27 pm

Actually, MB, Julio Torched Seattle last year…

Big Lou

January 9th, 2013
2:35 pm

Arno

January 9th, 2013
2:36 pm

Warning:

Do NOT watch the video Big Lou posted. If you are already pumped up like me, you will explode.

Big Lou

January 9th, 2013
2:48 pm

Big Lou

January 9th, 2013
2:48 pm

Arno

Yeah, can’t wait for Sunday.

Coop

January 9th, 2013
3:17 pm

Have started to become sick to my stomach…

D3

January 9th, 2013
3:34 pm

I am just churning with anxious energy and the only thing that helps quell it is talking Falcons, matchups, debunking myths, calling media-elite the stupid @ss-clowns they are, etc. etc.

Here’s a good article debunking the myth that this All-World secondary can’t be beat…….

http://www.thefalcoholic.com/2013/1/9/3852598/a-closer-look-is-the-seahawks-secondary-unbeatable

Green Bay – The story of this game was the way in which the GB line fell apart. Rodgers was sacked 8 (8!) times in this game and only ended up throwing for 223 yards with no TDs.

NE Tom Brady had a rough day in Seattle, though his stat line doesn’t look so bad. He threw for 395 yards and 2TDs (along with 2INTs).

Detroit The inconsistent but pass-happy Matthew Stafford managed to put together a very strong day against the Seahawks. He would pass for over 350 yards, 3TD and 1INT on the way to a 28-24 victory.

Chicago – Jay Cutler – a QB known for being as friendly to cornerbacks as he is his own receivers – managed to throw for 233 yards in this game with 2TDs. Brandon Marshall? He went nuts on this secondary – catching 10 balls for 165 yards

They showed to be vunerable to double-moves vs. the Redskins.

If the Falcons are going to succeed against the Seahawks, the easier road will likely be through guys like Tony Gonzalez and Harry Douglas. As well, the screen game could be a huge factor.

Exactly the point I was making, and throw in Quizz and Snelling. Those 4 will be the the key to the game on offense I believe.

LRD

January 9th, 2013
3:39 pm

Pass to Snelling, let him do his version of Beast Mode on their corners and where them down….as one as to admit, Snelling has a knack of running angry and willing to pop people.

Zoomie

January 9th, 2013
3:52 pm

@ D3’s 2:21 PM:

Easy, there D3. These Sea Gull fans are pretty new to winning football. There are bound to be a few “cleats-in-throat” moments.

Matty Bicep

January 9th, 2013
3:52 pm

Correct BL…also, who takes Clemons place? Is it someone we can run at? Somebody who is going to need help?

Matty Bicep

January 9th, 2013
3:58 pm

Lookers like they picked up some bum off the street, Patrick chukwurah, who has not played in the nlf since 07….he beat out ray Edward, lol.

Matty Bicep

January 9th, 2013
4:00 pm

My guess is patrick c get a lot his way.

BobbyDawg

January 9th, 2013
4:19 pm

Bruce Irving (rookie) takes Clemons place. Hopefully we can run on him, but he did set some kind of franchise record for rookie year tackles — I think.

Matty Bicep

January 9th, 2013
4:25 pm

This guy takes Clemons roster spot, weather he gets in the game is another story….But he did beat uot Ray Edwards, so he has that going for him.

http://blog.seattlepi.com/football/2013/01/09/report-seahawks-to-sign-patrick-chukwurah-to-replace-de-chris-clemons/

BobbyDawg

January 9th, 2013
4:31 pm

They also signed Patrick Chukwurah. He hasn’t played since 2007 when he was backup DE for the Bucs.