
110801 Flowery Branch - Atlanta Falcons offensive coordinator Mike Mularkey signals to the offense while players run through the first padded practice at training camp in Flowery Branch on Monday, August 1, 2011. Curtis Compton ccompton@ajc.com
FLOWERY BRANCH – Real Falcons ‘fans’ need to step up and send thank you cards to new Jacksonville coach Mike Mularkey.
What he was able to achieve in his four years of unprecedented success in franchise history should be recognized. He doesn’t deserve having some rocks thrown at him on his way out of town.
Some of you, before disrespecting Mularkey, need to reflect and look at his unit’s accomplishments.
The Falcons had to build the offense from scratch, starting with a rookie quarterback, a rookie left tackle, a free agent running back and a new right guard.
The offense was the backbone of the teams that went 11-7, 9-7, 13-3 and 10-6 and made three trips to the playoffs. The good folks of Cleveland and Buffalo would throw parades if they could average double-digit wins.
Here’s more to reflect on about how the unit performed under Coach Mularkey:

New Jacksonville coach Mike Mularkey.
–Ryan tied Hall of Fame quarterback Dan Marino for most wins over his first three seasons in the NFL.
–Michael Turner rushed for more than 1,300 yards in three seasons and went to two Pro Bowls.
–Roddy White led the league in receptions with 115 in 2010 and has gone to four straight Pro Bowls.
–Tony Gonzalez continued his march to Canton, Ohio.
–Turner broke the franchise record, in just four seasons, for most rushing touchdowns with 50.
–Ryan broke the single-season passing record with 4,177 yards.
–Ryan became just the second quarterback in franchise history to pass for more than 4,000 yards in a season.
–Ryan also set a franchise mark for 300-yard passing games in a season with six.
–The offensive line even started to get recognition as right tackle Tyson Clabo went to the Pro Bowl after the 2010 season.
–The line was a finalist in 2010 for John Madden’s “Most Valuable Protector’s Award” which goes to the top unit in the league.
There’s plenty more, but you get the point.
Some Falcons “fans” have a history of blasting the play caller. They didn’t like Dan Reeves’ offense (too conservative), then Greg Knapp’s attack (lack of structure) and now Mularkey’s (too conservative) unwarranted attacks. Bobby Petrino was here long enough and there were several other distractions.
Here’s the deal on playing calling. All of the plays will work if executed properly and everybody wins their battles. There are no bad plays.
You can’t blame the coordinator when your top receiver drops 14 passes (Roddy White last year). You can’t blame the coordinator when your line can’t get a big enough push to get six inches. You can’t blame the coordinator when the line can’t give the quarterback time enough to throw deep passes. (Ryan had to launch early on those two strikes against Houston to open the game.)
Those are not bad plays calls. That’s a failure to execute. But second-guessing the play caller is the easiest thing for fans to do.
Pro coaches spend so much time getting ready that there are rarely any just absolutely bad calls. You’ll

Former Falcons offensive coordiantor Mike Mularkey and quarterback Matt Ryan opened the game against the Bears in the no-huddle attack. (CURTIS COMPTON/AJC).
never see a goal-line defense on a third-and-long. (I mentioned that to Brian VanGorder and he said, “I got five kids to feed. Why would I do that?”)
I don’t preach or rant to you all often, so thanks for let me get this off my chest.
Also, I’ve got to wish Coach Mularkey good luck right here like I did in a couple phone messages.
–D. Orlando Ledbetter, The Atlanta Falcons beat blog
286 comments Add your comment
UcantCLA
January 13th, 2012
6:41 am
1st
CONservative Johnson
January 13th, 2012
6:45 am
You’re better than that DOL; don’t try to tell us who are real fans and who aren’t . . .
Truth Hurts
January 13th, 2012
6:45 am
Thank you Mularkey for 4 years of heartbreak and conservative play calling. I would also like to thank you for some of those great play calls on 4th down.
Mack1124
January 13th, 2012
6:46 am
You are right, D-Led. It was not all on Mularkey and you did a great job pointing it out. I am not in tears that Mularkey is gone, but I hope we are not regretting this next year at this time. My two cents: It starts with the head coach.
UcantCLA
January 13th, 2012
6:48 am
It’s called a screen pass Mike, add it to “play book” that consists of slants and 10 yard curl routes.
When the free agent blog coming up?
dmr
January 13th, 2012
6:49 am
I give Mularkey credit for a lot of the Falcons’ success. I give him credit for building up the offense. I give him credit for helping this team to four (4) consecutive winning seasons. But coaching is sometimes like a four man relay race. You need someone at the end to be the “anchor”.
The Falcons and Georgia have a lot in common in this regard. The Falcons offense has been good. It has been far from great. The offense has been productive in the regular season. The offense has failed miserably in the playoffs.
Mularkey is a good coach but not a great one. Just as Mike Bobo is a good coach but not a great one. You get to a certain level and then plateau. Sometimes you need to find your “anchor” to raise you to the next level. Such is the case with the Falcons and the Dawgs.
falconsrelax
January 13th, 2012
6:51 am
Honestly, this is the truth. I can’t speak for all falcon fans but for me personally its the expectations of the offense instead of the accolades you listed D-Led. It was never, “OH murlarkey is the worst coordinator.” It was just the way the offense looked when going up against a good to great defense. I saw flaws in murlarkeys playcalling and system. Hope he has success in jacksonville. Our offense is known as a good offense but thats not good enough, we have the potential to be a great offense. Again, the giants game showed it all. There had to be change. I agree with most of everything you said though d-led. Its not like we were a top 10 bad offense. But when you look at the numbers we regressed in offense. BEst year was matt ryans rookie year, WITHOUT GONZALEZ AND JULIO. Thats where my problems came in.
Me Too
January 13th, 2012
7:11 am
The fans could have tweeted offensive plays to Matt Ryan and the results would have been better.
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
7:16 am
Me Too — Ungrateful! Was the offense perfect. No! But they carried the Falcons out of the Vick/Petrino abyss.
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
7:18 am
Me too – Opps. I’m sorry. Had an ‘itchy delete” finger this morning. We can take some “unreadiness” here.
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
7:23 am
falconsrelax — Good points. They definitely have to push to the next level.
Me Too
January 13th, 2012
7:25 am
Here is the quote from MM. And earlier, he blamed execution by the players for the offense failure with the Falcons.
“Some guys are very good at managing the game and calling plays. I’m not one of them,” Mularkey said. “Any one mistake can be the difference in the game. I don’t want to be that guy that thinks he can do it all. If I can’t do it, I’m not going to do it. Hopefully I’ll put it in the right hands. That’s what my job is, to get that guy in here, get the right guy in here to do it.” – Mike Mularkey
Me Too
January 13th, 2012
7:27 am
DOL – Why don’t you delete all of the ones that don’t support your article?
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
7:27 am
UcantCLA — There was no sense in calling a screen pass because the linemen couldn’t pull out and hit moving targets. That’s called a dead/busted play. Look at the screen to the left against Carolina (2nd game). The linemen ran right past the guys they were supposed to be blocking. Now, if you don’t have the lockout maybe they could have ran 300 screens in OTAs and got better at it. Their screen/draw game was lacking.
Blue Fender
January 13th, 2012
7:28 am
I wasn’t his fault that some of the players didn’t/couldn’t carry out the plays, but it was his responsibility to get the right plays in with the right players. When he kept calling for runs up the middle when it obviously wasn’t working, that’s just being mule-headed.
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
7:29 am
Blue Fender — I understand that. Missing Ovie was real big this season, too. I’m not making excuses . . .
Me Too
January 13th, 2012
7:30 am
DOL – there were no screen passes last year!
Me Too
January 13th, 2012
7:34 am
In the December New Orleans game last year, we had the offensive line in place and we had Ovie in place. Michael Turner’s number was called two times in a row (same play) on the NO one yard line. No gain twice and a fumble. The problem with the offense has been there for many games. A team cannot justify having a blocking back in this NFL which is based on passing.
King Falcon
January 13th, 2012
7:36 am
D-Led you are right, Mularkey has been a key figure in falcon’s success the last four years. However, there comes a time when a team is no longer content with just being good. This team has reached it plateau under these coordinators and a lot of us real fans have noticed that as much talent as falcons offense and defense have, they are not being maximized. You can compare our skilled players to anybody in the league and we would match up. So why is it that we always come up short in big games or are terrible against other great teams. Falcons fans are not the only ones who questions the offensive and defensive schemes. Other professionals such as former coaches and analyst have also question the same things that we question.
Me Too
January 13th, 2012
7:38 am
With the run first offense of MM, this is the question that was always there:
What’s wrong with being 3rd and 8 all game long?
trolls and such
January 13th, 2012
7:39 am
Really? You have the nerve to tell fans what they should be thinking, feeling, or saying?
Well since we’re being all honest here, how’s this? You can take your gratefulness to Jacksonville along with Mularkey. We miss Steve Wyche, and there’s a reason why the fan blog is more popular than the beat blog.
King Falcon
January 13th, 2012
7:42 am
The NFL is a results based business and falcons have not gotten the results they want or even come close based on how they lose in the playoffs. A championship for this franchise is long overdue. If the paperbag saints can turn their franchise around then there is no excuse for this team with all our talent and an owner dedicated to winning.
Cal
January 13th, 2012
7:49 am
DOL ,
I think you are missing the point. It’s not that Smitty and Mularkey didn’t do a good job of raising the Falcons up from the ashes of the Mike V. and Bobby P. debacle. The issue is they are incapable of taking the team to the next level. A more innovative unit of coaches are needed, also a coordinator who can work better with (ALL) the pieces we have. That’s not saying it’s all on the coordinators backs; as a matter of fact I’m back and forth on if Smitty should have been let go. Look at the last three Super Bowl winning Coaches and their staff and tell me what you see different than the falcons.
falconneil
January 13th, 2012
7:49 am
We have as much talent on our offense as any other team in the playoffs: Ryan, Gonzo, White, Jones, Turner. Our failures are down to coaching pure and simple. Both the OC and the head coach being too damned conservative, and having a poor game plan. Too many times this season the team came out looking unmotivated and unprepared. That is unacceptable.
Markmjtx
January 13th, 2012
7:52 am
You are right DO. Mularkey overall did a good job. People have short memories. There is a mindset here in Georgia to blame Mike Bobo, Willie Martinez and Larry Parrish. Coaching is only a part of it. Players need to execute.
SRF
January 13th, 2012
7:55 am
I am sick and tired of “moral victories” or “good stats” – I want PLAYOFF WINS !!!!
SirReal
January 13th, 2012
7:56 am
D Led,
I kinda agree with falconrelax. His offense saw great at the time. Just grew kind of stale. I agree that he shouldnt be leaving town with rocks thrown at him. It was just time for a change and the winds blew in. He accomplished a lot and will probably turn Gabbert around. He just couldnt do anything else with this offense at this point. I think many fans will always credit him for what he did….it was just like food that tastes pretty good but if you eat it over and over without trying out new sauces,etc….becomes pretty bland.lol Thanks for all your reporting. I heard you at the press conference.LOL They know you quite well.LOL We appreciate what you do sir!
trolls and such
January 13th, 2012
7:59 am
DOL usually misses the point.
Michael M.
January 13th, 2012
8:01 am
Thank-you so much ” Ex OC” ! But I am still glad you left ! Good Byeeeeeeeeeeee !
Ackshun
January 13th, 2012
8:08 am
What a load of crap. But I will send you a case of chapstick which should come in handy when kissing Mularkeys butt in January. Mularkey was incompetent but was surrounded with superior talent that succeeded despite his ineptness. He did an unforgivebly poor job with prep for the Giants game. He has to date wasted the talents of Jerious Norwood, Julio Jones, Jacquizz Rodgers, Harry Douglas, oh hell basically everyone on the offensive side of the ball. He was a FAILURE he let hisunit down by being lazy andthen threwthem under the bus on his way out of town. His unit got beat by teams of equal talent this year because he was outcoached each andevery time. He failed to make adjustments in time when his guys were getting beat and sometimes he just gave up.
I’m glad he’s gone. And after reading this article, Im hoping the Jags need a beatwriter as well.
Rick
January 13th, 2012
8:12 am
The only people I will thank are at the AJC. The day that you are fired and they get a competent journalist to replace you.
Cal
January 13th, 2012
8:18 am
I’ve said it time and time again, Mike Smith can coach but he doesn’t inspire player to play father than their skill set. He’s unable to get them to make that extra yard, block up to that extra level and make that extra tackle (wrap up). The other problem is they don’t have that boiler player on offense or defense. There is no Ray Lewis or Justin Tuck type player to push their team mates. This team is too busy drafting country club guys with spotless images when they should be drafting BALL PLAYERS. They should be turning guys that need a little guidance and direction into men. That’s how you look back and say we have a solid team, because you have built it from the ground up, with players that can relate. You’ll have players that will be thankful for the chance and fight for the extra yard. The game is the game……….period.
MC
January 13th, 2012
8:19 am
You are correct! MM does deserve better on his way out. He did help bring this offense to places it had never been before, but that being said it was time for him to go. Our offense became predictable and stale. I think back to many 4th and shorts and the defense knew exactly what we were going to do. True players have to execute, but the element of suprise plays a lot in that. When they know whats coming there is no suprise.
Falcons4Eva
January 13th, 2012
8:21 am
DLEDWith all due respect to your man-love of Mularkey, It’s my contention that had Sean Payton was our play caller with these exact sample players – we certainly would have scored more than 2 points against the Giants, more than 12 points against the Bears, more than 16 points against the Packers and more than 10 points against the Texans.
Putting aside those assumptions for second, compare this: the Saints had a 4th and 1 play called where Drew Brees (all 6 foot of him) jumps up and simply extend the ball across the line of scrimage and gets the 1st down. Granted, Matt Ryan is not as athlethic as Drew Brees, but the difference in the calls were the Saints had their line of scrimmage spread out and had a runner in the backfield, whereas the Falcons line of scrimmage was tight and NO runner in the backfield.
Thats on the Coordinator who called that play with that formation.
trademark
January 13th, 2012
8:41 am
Geez DOL…calling out the “real” fans? I’ve been here since damn near I was old enough to watch TV. I’ve watched this team crush my hopes and rise above more times than I can count…but this isn’t about me, it’s about me and anyone else that would apparently DARE to question Mike Mularkey, because somehow we should all be bowing at his feet. Seriously?
OK, kudos to Mike Mularkey on taking a team that was at the BOTTOM OF THE BARREL and turning them into something slightly better than average. That wasn’t easy. You can post stats all you want, but the fact remains, when you average the Falcon’s Offensive rankings under him (numbers don’t lie, or have opinions, DOL) the Falcons were just that, ranked about 12th in total O and 9th in points scored. ABOVE AVERAGE. Every single team that has played in the Super Bowl in the last 8 years has had a top 10 offense (with the exception of the Steelers, who were allowing around 14 points a game at the time….) Now, since the most criticism came for MM during this last year, when the Falcons were supposed to have taken the next step forward, and seemed mired in the mud, riddles with inconsistency and poor execution, I think that the criticism is deserved, and Mike, being a man, realizes that as well, and has enough a$% to get it chewed out a bit. He should know by now with this many years in the league EXACTLY what those initials stand for for coaches.
Stop babying him. HE KNOWS he underachieved and why he’s out the door. He KNOWS why the fans turned on him. Treat him (and us) like he’s stupid, and he’s just going to get a bunch of pre-read, corporate talking point, soft-garbage. And worse, he might start to believe it and never move forward. Which is a shame, because he is an intelligent, and special coach.
He can just do better than what we saw this season. ADMIT IT:
So, after all that, yes, thank you Mike Mularkey, you deserve praise for rescuing a sunken ship and turning us into something fun to watch (at times) and competitive at a certain level. Good luck in Jacksonville, and some REAL advice, with full respect and wanting to see you do what we should all know is your best:
Turn up the heat and get better.
Falcon in DC (Rupe)
January 13th, 2012
8:45 am
Right on D-Led…. Right on!
He got about as much as one could get out of that group.
Falcons4Eva
January 13th, 2012
8:46 am
What a shame DLED, you call in to question the “REAL FALCON FANS” just because we differ in our opinion of Mularkey, that’s like us calling in to question that the “REAL SPORTS WRITER” would have question Mularkey and his competency sooner and more often – like they way they do in New York TIMES, NY Post and the Philly Enquirer.
How dare you question my fanaticism Sir!
Mack
January 13th, 2012
8:49 am
I am 55 yrs old and a Falcon fan for life. I have never played Football or never even met a NFL player. My football knowledge came from the web. I have tried my best to watch every Falcon game I could. When I can sit on my couch in rural Georgia and call 80-90% of every offensive play just by looking at the formation and knowing down and distance the OC is not very good. PERIOD.
I kinda scan your articles, but I come here to read the comments. I can not remember ever getting
any “inside news” from you, that was not spin. And now you have the nerve to attack the fan base with your flawed arguments? Which is it? The OL was good or bad beacuse of MM?
I miss Steve Wyche. Heck compared to the drivel you put out I miss T. Moore.
IMO you are not a REAL Falcon beat writer
McNasty
January 13th, 2012
9:03 am
Dled
Looks like you are ready to leave town also.
retired
January 13th, 2012
9:10 am
Enter your comments here
Paddy O
January 13th, 2012
9:13 am
Mr. Ledbetter is such a bozo liberal, hard to believe he is such a zombie that he would actually type this manure, let alone hit send.
Paddy O
January 13th, 2012
9:14 am
If you ever actually watch Mr. Ledbetter do a video interview, you know how inept he is.
retired
January 13th, 2012
9:15 am
hey D’ I enjoy your you columns seems you got the angry birds riled thanks for putting the effort. Lots of real bitter folks who call themselves fans. gonna have to take a break ‘ cause of the drivel and hate that gets posted by these creeps. have a good off season . your friend on lake lanier.
Paddy O
January 13th, 2012
9:17 am
Unwarranted? You just got shut out by the 27th ranked Giants, an inferior team. That indicates that the game plan was so utterly worthless, it would have been a better idea to fire MM and let MR2 call his own plays. As Bugs Bunny says, “What a Maroon”. Thank the lord I rarely read the drivel this “journalist” vomits up.
Paddy O
January 13th, 2012
9:18 am
retired – you a liberal like DOL with your strawman arguments?
78dawg
January 13th, 2012
9:19 am
DOL….If this is the best you can come up with you should pack your bags…I have read your posts lately and saw you on a TV interview and you are a very marginal sports writer at best…Maybe you can go with MM..
Paddy O
January 13th, 2012
9:19 am
Why did the AJC let a REAL sportswriter like Wyche go and replace him with this poser? Does he get paid in gum? His stories would MOST likely get an A in English in 2nd grade.
retired
January 13th, 2012
9:20 am
and Paddy O thinks fox is really a news channel. try civility and give a man his due and wave good bye. pack of hyenas this morning.
In consistent BloGGer
January 13th, 2012
9:21 am
Mr Ledbetter,
I\’m not a fan of your blog. I\’m also not a fan of you and your inability to take criticism. I am however, a fan of this blog entry.
So few of us really understand what is going on behind the scenes on an NFL team. It always angered me to hear the average light beer swilling hillbilly say: \”He\’s too predictable!!\”….Oh yeah? then what is NOT predictable? Running on first down…Well, most teams do it most of the time. Although Turner tailed off towards the end of the season, he still put up decent numbers.
You can\’t blame Mularkey for dropped passes, missed assignments, or over matched offensive lineman.
There may be a point next season where we will not miss Mularkey……Then again, there may be a time we do miss him.
Be careful for what you wish for.
Willy
January 13th, 2012
9:24 am
Agreed
Willy
January 13th, 2012
9:25 am
@ Retired. Also agreed
Die Hard Falcon
January 13th, 2012
9:28 am
Wow! Lots of animosity unleashed! I guess sometimes it’s a good idea to open up a can of worms and let frustrations out on a disappointing end to our season.
I agree, Mularkey brought us up to a respectable, consistent level and I am grateful for that, he helped develop our offense and I believe we reached a plateau unfortunately. I am worried that we’ll take a step back, but hopefully a good hire will be made and maybe we can move up to another level, the highest in Falcons history. Personally, I’m pulling for Brian Billick, but whoever gets the nod, I am 100% behind the Falcons, I really just want us to shut the national media, like Michael Lombardi up. In a recent column on NFL.com he really bashes our organization, seems to really be aimed at our GM (he does mention that he’d love to be the GM of a dome team, maybe he’s doing his best to get an interview)and I love my team, from the top to the bottom.
I get frustrated w/ some, Dunta Robinson to name one, but I ALWAYS pull for my guys, b/c that is where we’re at and I hope we make lemonade every year. Here’s to a successful 2012-13 and another hope for a SB to come to my Falcons and what I believe to be a classy owner.
falconsnut
January 13th, 2012
9:30 am
I pay $2600 for one set of season tickets and $800 for two others in the upper deck. How much do you pay DOL?? I think the overwhemling fan opinion has been MM was a terrible play caller. Anyone who watched us knew the first two plays would be Turner up the middle for 2 yards and then a hurried incomplete pass on third down and punt. Just think how far in the playoffs the Falcons could have gone with a decent play caller. I had my picture taken w/ Randy Johnson and Tommy Nobis at a county fair in 67 and have been a die hard fan since. Don’t need you to tell me how to feel. I agree w/ Ackshun above.
In consistent BloGGer
January 13th, 2012
9:32 am
Yeah…..Dunta Robinson has been a huge disappointment. What does it say when he is still a starter on defense when he is out of position so often? Lack of depth?
eastbound and down
January 13th, 2012
9:35 am
ok. so we will blame Dimitroff for not giving Mularkey the tools he needed to make his boneheaded plays work.
also, you have to subtract any calls Ryan made at the line from the totals you provided, since those calls weren’t made by Mularkey
Say what
January 13th, 2012
9:36 am
Paddy O, what does political affiliation have to do with anything? There are bozo liberals and bozo conservatives. And D-Led is just a working man doing his job.
He can have his own opinion on Mularkey. But implying those who differ aren’t “real” fans WAS a major misstep.
mongolikebeer
January 13th, 2012
9:36 am
DLED- You are right on the money- but the monday am qb’s and the locker room lawyers aren’t going to let the FACTS get in the way of their poorly thought out rants. Most D’s rushed 3-4 only so screen game is DOA. Losing OL’s leader last year killed this line- which couldn’t block anyone this year. How that O set records with that line is because the OC is really smart and a really good teacher. I guess we’ll find out next year……
In consistent BloGGer
January 13th, 2012
9:37 am
@ falconsnut
What would you suggest the Falcons do on first and second down? What other plays would YOU call that make your thoughts superior to Mularkey\’s?
Just because you spend a lot of money does not mean you know more. There is no assurance that this team will win a Superbowl every year. Your first love should be the game, your second should be the team.
Get over yourself.
monty
January 13th, 2012
9:38 am
No use kicking dead horses. Good luck Mike. I hope that if the Falcons ever play the Jags and the Jags need 1/2 a yard for a 1st down that you do the same thing you did here, empty the back-field and run a QB keeper.
conalthomas
January 13th, 2012
9:40 am
I think every fan has a right to opinions, even critical ones, but I do agree that they shouldn’t be a jerk about it. I also agree that the Falcons have accomplished a lot during MM’s tenure, but I have to very much disagree with the statement in the article, “There are no bad plays.” Sometimes plays fail because of execution, but sometimes they fail because they’re poorly designed for the personnel involved. It is always the excuse of failed management that the problem was execution – sometimes that’s justified, and sometimes it isn’t.
Falcon Red
January 13th, 2012
9:41 am
DOL – I have to (sort of) disagree with you. As you, and a whole lot of people ‘in football’ say…”it’s a business”. In this business the FANS are the customers. Maybe the Falcons should be thanking the fans that have supported, and continue to support, even though we continue to get what WE percieve as an inferior product. Maybe it’s a bad analogy, but if you supported (lets say) Toyota for years…and over the recent years they have recall after recall, brake failures, gas pedals sticking, and so on – would you expect us to thank the ‘designer’ for his input? I think not…
Die Hard Falcon
January 13th, 2012
9:42 am
@In consistent BloGGer –
I think w/ regards to Dunta that there is a lack of depth, although Franks has shown some promise in limited action, who knows, maybe we can trim some fat off our cap and cut or trade Dunta depending on the cap hit we’d have to take, most often the contracts are front-loaded and parting ways comes easier after the first couple of years. Although I think we should see who takes over the D, if they’re going to be more aggressive and play some press man, Dunta might be good to keep around
monty
January 13th, 2012
9:43 am
How anyone with any integrity can defend Dunta’s play(considering what we gave for him) is not owning up to a mistake. He was supposed to be “the” great corner in the league or at least of of a couple. Laughable!
Eli
January 13th, 2012
9:45 am
How is it that this franchise is in pursuit of greatness but continues to have the less-than-mediocre DOL as our beat writer. Something needs to change.
And there are plenty of bad plays, like that stupid roll out that MM loved so much but Ryan clearly hated since it did nothing but cut the field in half and allow him to make 2 reads at most.
In consistent BloGGer
January 13th, 2012
9:46 am
monty
January 13th, 2012
9:38 am
No use kicking dead horses. Good luck Mike. I hope that if the Falcons ever play the Jags and the Jags need 1/2 a yard for a 1st down that you do the same thing you did here, empty the back-field and run a QB keeper.
=======================================================================
See, it\’s junk like this that expose you as a fair weather fan.
How can you judge Mularkey on ONE play? You have to consider this tenure here and all that went with it…..Including bone headed play calls.
ctfalconsfan
January 13th, 2012
9:48 am
Amen Paddy O… That’s all that needs to be said SHUT OUT AGAINST THE 27TH RANKED DEFENSE!!!
THANK MULARKEY FOR HIS WORK HERE, I THINK NOT!!!
ctfalconsfan
January 13th, 2012
9:51 am
To my knowledge MM won us no play-off games.. In many cases there were games we won inspite of MM.
Alex
January 13th, 2012
9:52 am
D Led, this was a good article and I agree with you. Mike Mularkey did a really good job for us for the most part. Keep up the good work.
ctfalconsfan
January 13th, 2012
10:00 am
Reading this blog DOL are you hoping to get a job with the Jacksonville paper to cover MM?
Living up North these writers tear apart owners, coaches, players and anyone else.
The ajc continues to sugarcoat the play of the Falcons.
- Is there a contractual agreement between the two organizations?
I WILL NEVER FORGET DOL the article in the ajc after we lost to the aints in OT this season stating ” Falcons made the right call to go for it on fouth down”???
- Trying to justify the percentage of stopping aints and getting the ball back..
JUST STUPID JOURNALISM!!! It needs to stop
ctfalconsfan
January 13th, 2012
10:01 am
so DOL I see you are now posting as ALEX… Just terrible
monty
January 13th, 2012
10:02 am
MM was one year away from being canned here. He got out while he was on top, good for him. He will be “OK” even if a few “real fans” think some of his play calling stank. He was one more playoff game with little or no points scored from being dismissed. Do you disagree with that DLED?
Mr. Mustard
January 13th, 2012
10:05 am
Real fan? Come on.
Secondly, this “fake” fan hasn’t been following the Falcons for 40 years, searching for sports bars across the country when traveling to pay more so I can watch the team win a few regular season games.
I watch them in hopes they will reach a high level and ultimately win a Super Bowl or two.
I wish Mr. Mularkey well, and thank him for his efforts, seriously.
Still glad he’s gone and if his well paid professional football squad does not know how to run a screen play at this point in their careers, then I say you just made our point for us.
Cannot expect a professional lineman to know not to run past their blocks? Baloney.
falconfansince03
January 13th, 2012
10:12 am
More insults to the readers, D-Led? You’re unbelievable. And while we’re at it, yesterday’s “demanding” headline on your “article” was misleading… and in my opinion a fabrication of the actual words. I listened to the entire press conference online. I didn’t hear one single word or phrase that suggested Arthur Blank was “demanding” a championship. I don’t care who writes the headlines – you or your editors. It was a poor reference in the article and a misleading headline. Atlanta deserves better reporting on the Falcons. Someone who has a passion for this city and its teams – especially the Falcons.
North FLA Falcon
January 13th, 2012
10:14 am
With all his phone calls and interviews late in the season, I wonder if MM’s head was in the Giants game at all. Or was he phoning it in? With very little time to prepare, just stick to the vanilla offense … at one point, Turner rant it up the middle 3 times in a row!!! With all that offensive talent it is a disgrace that we could not get any offensive points. Thanks so much MM, don’t let the door hit ya on the way out of Flowery Branch.
vesaversa
January 13th, 2012
10:29 am
Dear Mike Mularkey thank you for resigning as Falcons OC good riddance don’t let the door knob hit yah where the good lord split yah.
Chris
January 13th, 2012
10:30 am
You are right. Thanks Mularkey and good luck in J-ville.
johndawg
January 13th, 2012
10:30 am
Mularkey and VanGorder gave up after the Saints loss. There was no game plan in place to beat the Giants. They both new they were gone win or loose and they knew they would never make it passed Green Bay. So, less than 24 hours after loosing BVG is hired at Auburn. That hire didn’t happen in 7 hours… Less than 4 days, Mularkey was hired in Jax. A head coach hired in 4 days. NOPE!
He was hired the weekend JAX was in ATL when that crazy looking new owner was in town.
They both gave up on the Falcons and the fans. To that, I say screw you both!
Glen
January 13th, 2012
10:39 am
I disagree with this. The 4th down call against the Saints was abysmal, in a game they had to win, as was their entire offensive performance against the Giants. Bottom line is despite all of what you’ve said in this article they haven’t won a playoff game. Period. Where the Falcons are this season a playoff win was the bottom line. The coaches didn’t learn from last years loss to the Packers. Some of the decisions by coach Mike Smith have also be questioned. There was some losses this season where the Falcons were just outcoached. To advance they need to make changes, Mularkey I think had to go.
ddog
January 13th, 2012
10:45 am
Whatever…..your opinions are suspect at best. You lack the same creativity of Mularlky and Van Gorder
PreyDawg
January 13th, 2012
10:46 am
@D-Led- What can I say….you’re right. I have been so upset over the Giants loss that I lost some perspective. I have been on Mularkey pretty hard this week. Oddly, it was my 18 year old son (also a die hard Falcon) that lectured me on my attitude last night and then I read your article this morning. My boy was pointing out many of the same things you are here (only he didn’t have the numbers of course).
Maybe a power running attack can still work in the playoffs but we certainly have to go out and get a FA left Tackle and maybe we can find a big strong guard in the 3rd round. Hawley is well suited as a center but not a guard and the other kid is too tall to play there.
I do hope Mike Johnson is healthy for OTA’s and makes a big push for that spot.
PreyDawg
January 13th, 2012
10:49 am
My comments above notwithstanding, I DO wonder how focused Mularkey was on the game plan for the Giants. Cause that game plan was one of the worst of his tenure here. To open the second half with the same three failed plays of the first half…inexplicable.
jay
January 13th, 2012
10:55 am
Good riddance!
THE INFAMOUS DK
January 13th, 2012
10:57 am
Are you serious!!!??? Man I wouldnt pee on Mularkey if he was on fire.. I’ll send him a Flo from Mel’s diner card. Kiss my GRITS!!!
Falcons 4 life
January 13th, 2012
11:02 am
U guys r to hard on Dled. The offense is what made us competitive. BVG hardly got and scrutiny and our defense couldn’t stop my 11year old pop Warner team, and they’ll probably score on a 65 yard pass play.
Mike
January 13th, 2012
11:04 am
DOL
You continue to show why you are the most ignorant sports writer around. I still cant believe the AJC hasnt found anyone better to write for the Falcons yet.
Seriously this article is trash. You are basically trashing MOST falcons fans.
Yes MM was apart of a staff that brought us up from the depths, but he is obviously heavily flawed in his over conservative mundane repetitive play calling. And its largely his fault that this offense has tanked against good teams. When teams actually say that “they didnt do anything we hadnt seen a million times on tape” that a clue that something has to change, yet MM does not. Even by his own ego filled submission and rants to reporters that he feels that what he is doing is just fine.
And dont give me that “ever play is designed to go for a touchdown” crap. How dumb do you have to be. If thats the case then my grandmother could draw up plays. Being a good play-caller is about adjustments to what is and isnt working, and getting the most out of the pieces you have. Well MM continued to insist upon not using guys like HD, Quizz, Snelling, etc…more often.
MM being gone, regardless of what he did for us in the past, is the best thing this franchise could have done.
Wake-up man, do you even watch the games?
THE INFAMOUS DK
January 13th, 2012
11:14 am
Oh the blame goes all around for the team. Roddy is upset cause Julio is here and cant get it together. Turner wont stay in shape. The Line is atrocious. The D Line gets no push. Dunta needs to be cut. DeCoud needs to be cut, maybe he can go on dancing with the stars. This was just a bad loss. And to top it off.. The Aints broke all necessary records against us, so we will be in thier highlight reels from here on out.
ChiFalcon
January 13th, 2012
11:15 am
Good article overall, I think it’s important to recognize how far this team has come, in a relatively short period of time…the Joey Harrington era was only 5 years ago. I think we all can agree that Mularkey’s offensive scheme (as a whole, not just this past year), and development of Matt Ryan was integral in this team’s evolution from a perennial loser to playoff contender. The fact that lack of playoff success after 3 trips in 4 seasons has fans calling for a franchise overhaul says quite a bit about how successful the team has been in building a tradition of winning football games.
However, it became glaringly apparent over the course of this season that in order for the this team to take the next step in the playoffs, a shift in offensive philosophy was necessary.It’s time to further build on the foundation that Mularkey helped to create.
DOL, as far as being a ‘real’ fan is concerned, I think it’s the real fans who recognize that MM’s time in Atlanta had run it’s course and it was clearly time for some sort of change.
1danielbell
January 13th, 2012
11:19 am
Good points. I think the problem is how quickly the change occurred. A fan base that had grown accustomed to meritocracy suddenly had a really good team to cheer for, so they became eager for the next level.
Still, you can put blame on some of his play calling, because it’s his job to know his players and what they can do well, and it’s his job to know how to properly attack opposing defenses.
ChiFalcon
January 13th, 2012
11:20 am
@THE INFAMOUS DK
Can’t get it together? 54 rec/959 yds/8 td…while missing 3 1/2 games w injury. I think Julio is doing fine.
Turner not in shape? Let’s not forget he finished 3rd in the league in rushing this year. I imagine one probably requires a somewhat high level of physical fitness in order to achieve that.
You sound ignorant and reactionary.
Fan
January 13th, 2012
11:26 am
You must be CRAZY man… Matt Ryan made MM…. It was Ryan that pushed that RAG TAG OFFENSE OUT OF PLAYS AFTER PLAYS. You must be crazy MAN
Shady
January 13th, 2012
11:31 am
Kiss my ass.
Pool guy
January 13th, 2012
11:35 am
How can you not blame the guy. We spent our entire draft last year building on the offensive side of the ball when what we needed was defense. Not saying we did not get a very talented receiver but we needed some help at safety .If you should be thanking anyone I would think it would have been Vangorder.If Mularkey could have put points on the board we would have won that game in New York.You look at our losses this year and count the threee and outs. I dont care what kind of d you run if you dont score points you cripple the defense.And will someone PEASE tell me what happened to that o line. If you ask me you took the nasty out of it when you let Dahl go. Chemistry is everything in this game and that line didnt know who was staring where from week one. I put that directly on mularkeys shoulders. Glad to see him go.
Say what
January 13th, 2012
11:35 am
“Matt Ryan made MM”
co-sign. How many times did MM’s offense stall this year, only to be picked up by Matt taking over the play calling? It wasn’t no huddle to change the tempo, it was no huddle to turn playcalling over to Matt because MM’s plan was pure garbage. Turner up the middle, Turner up the middle, short stop route and a prayer for YAC beyond the first down marker. And Mike Smith should not have accepted that from his OC. He should have torn it up and said either do better, or if you can’t, Matt is calling this entire game.
Falcons 4 Real
January 13th, 2012
11:41 am
Thanks for calling it like it is DLed. MM is one of the more respected coaches around the league and deserves our adulation. Best to him until we play them again in 2015.
David Gay
January 13th, 2012
11:49 am
Great Article – I too was glad to hear he is leaving wanting a more wide open offense. However, he did do a GREAT job in helping this team to be a more consistent winner. The past three years has been better than all of those loosing Sundays since the 1960s.
Mack
January 13th, 2012
11:49 am
Who is your favorite coach?
With all the coaching changes being made here in Falcon Land I thought it might be fun to pick your brains.
I personally love M.Tomlin with the Steelers. Is he the best coach in the NFL? I dunno. I just like the guy’s no BS attitude.
Ivan
January 13th, 2012
11:50 am
Wow, D-Led. Never thought you had it in you. Thank you for pointing out to all the “fans” of Atlanta, who really walked out the door for Jacksonville. And tell Mularkey I said, “Thank you” next time you talk to him.
Ivan
January 13th, 2012
11:59 am
“Seriously this article is trash. You are basically trashing MOST falcons fans”
Maybe MOST Falcons fans should learn football from other sources than Fantasy articles and Madden NFL.
Another thing MOST fans are missing, is how Mularkey covered the huge weakness of the O-line for so long. They forget how Ryan was getting killed dropping back in the beginning of the season. And, thanks to his schemes and play calling, it wasn’t a factor again until around week 16.
The fact the O-line couldn’t convert 4th and one or less is evidence enough of their ineptitude.
JSS
January 13th, 2012
12:03 pm
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
7:27 am
“UcantCLA — There was no sense in calling a screen pass because the linemen couldn’t pull out and hit moving targets. That’s called a dead/busted play.”
Wow, Ledbetter, you put on your brave pair today! The sad thing about Falcons fans is that rarely look realistically at their personnel and their abilities. It does not matter as you pointed out across the regimes, that has been the case. It was the same when Glanville was here.
I’ve been saying it for years (3), you can’t run effective screens when have you max protect and use your backs so much in your protection packages. This team (as constituted) has never been able to block straight up 5 on 4… Mularkey knew it from Day one, and he never really got that fact out of his head (right or wrong). The thing I hate about “Snarky Central” is that they think other teams don’t look at film and that players are not smart enough to see “keys” for what plays are coming. Screen games in the pros are as much about deception as design and desire to execute. College is not like that, talent mismatches allow you to run what you want most of the time… Your choice of the Carolina screen is a perfect example. What you left out as the strong safety smelled it out and the linemen were just not up to it…
Mularkey was what he was, I had my time in Pittsburgh to weigh against this team offensively. When he that O-line, those backs (Bettis), and Stewart, that offense took chances… This offense aside from Gonzalez (an over used crutch), White (people still don’t stop him as much he stops himself), and Turner (an easy scapegoat for the O-line and Dimitroff’s misses)…
The only thing I fault him on is Bratkowski. That man just can’t coherently call a game. Jacksonville will be interesting to watch because if they can get some real wideouts with Jones-Drew and Lewis has what he had in Pittsburgh, multi-dimensional tools.
Falcon James
January 13th, 2012
12:04 pm
DOL- Most of the time you are a good writer, but this takes the cake. Why do you want to dog out the fan and your readers? Other than a few lowly Saint fan that hang it in here, 98% of everyone whe read your blog is a “real” fan. If you want to continue having readers, you might want to think about not dogging them out.
Timmy
January 13th, 2012
12:10 pm
We don’t throw parades for zero playoff wins in 4 seasons, not even in Atlanta.
Falcon James
January 13th, 2012
12:11 pm
And JohnDawg is exactly right!
They both gave up on the Falcons and the fans. To that, I say screw you both!
Falcon Red
January 13th, 2012
12:15 pm
Betcha’ big $$ that Yasinskas has something to say about this article…if he hasn’t already!
Saint Hater
January 13th, 2012
12:18 pm
how about everyone, like myself, who is upset about DLed’s writing take a moment to contact Cox media and let them know of your displeasure. It may be that the bigwigs aren’t Falcons fans and therefore haven’t every taken the time to reasd his writing. I’m sure he has an editor who handpicks the 3-4 good articles a month for review, but I don’t understand how he can lecture fans as if he were our daddy and never once, not a single time ask an in-depth or hard hitting question to a player/coach/exec. So I will contact COX media and let them know how I feel, and I encourage the rest of you to as well.
Preston Thompson
January 13th, 2012
12:21 pm
Think about it folks. If a team goes for a half a yard on forth down and don’t make it, how in tarnation do you expect them to when the offensive line is pushed 3 yard back into the backfield? Come on man, get real. The call was never the problem, the execution stunk. But who would call on rubber legs Ryan to try it? Mercy!
Guess- who be the next coach to leave?
Chris
January 13th, 2012
12:37 pm
Sorry, but 4th and inches is no time for a QB sneak with NOBODY IN THE BACKFIELD.
LexLuth
January 13th, 2012
12:41 pm
You are wrong DLed. Why is it every time a Patriot, Packer, Saint receiver or TE catches a pass they are wide open…Huge RAC. Why can I, an arm chair QB sit and almost predict 80% of the plays we will call? He did have accomplishments. But just like this year in most games, other teams adjust at half time, but we did the same old crap. There was no evolution with Mike. He is predictable, flat, uncreative and time for him to move along.
For REAL!
January 13th, 2012
12:45 pm
Thank You DOL! It just comes to show you people will never be satisfied yeah it hurt watching another one and done, but who is already looking forward to next year! Before this bunch came along TD, MM, MS, BVG, Ryan, Turner this whole originazation was built from the ground up after dog-fighting and back-stabbing people ran this place into the ground and turned it around in one season who the hell has ever done that!!!!!!! You people need to wake up and be happy with what you have this isn’t Pittsburgh or New England and being relivent right now is good enough for me! I know will that Lombardi soon just got to have some patience people!
PhiDelt1789
January 13th, 2012
12:55 pm
Mularkey: “Screen’s are stupid…they’re for movies
Mularkey: “Lining up Julio in the slot to avoid being jammed at the line would make way too much sense. It’s not what this offense is about.”
Sounds like a bunch of Mularkey to me. Thanks for nothing.
P.S. Someone give me one good reason not to send 6 men on a rush every pass play?
painter
January 13th, 2012
1:09 pm
Without the fans none of these guys would have a pot to pee in. And why should we thank Mularkey when he wouldn’t thank us till it all froze over?
Great Falconi
January 13th, 2012
1:15 pm
I guess D-Led wants to become a columnist now.
JIM
January 13th, 2012
1:17 pm
ORLANDO,
This is the best and most courageous piece you have ever written (that I am aware of). It shows a real appreciation of the game of football and the tasks that players, coaches, general managers and owners are charged with. My only quibble with what you’ve written is that I would not have labeled the Mularkey spoilers as “not real fans”. Rather, I would say that these spoilers have a simplistic, unrealistic and superficial appreciation of the wonderful and entertaining game of football when it is taken in its totality. My hat is off to you.
URBS
January 13th, 2012
1:20 pm
I am from Canada and have been a falcons fan for over 35 years. I believe that yes the offence was much to predictable in many situations. However I would also agree that the players themselves did not excute when needed. This then becomes a formula for inconsitencies and losses. Unfortunately this league is driven by “WINS, TROPHIES, and RINGS. The onwer is great and this team needs a couple of leaders who will light a fire under them when needed. Which means to be successful there is no “I ” in team and all personal must find a way to stay the course and remain focused throughout each game. The rest will take care of itself.
Veedub
January 13th, 2012
1:21 pm
D Led.. This has been your best article in a while. Ani I quote, “All of the plays will work if executed properly and everybody wins their battles. There are no bad plays”. Well said man!!!!!!!!!!!!
ctfalconsfan
January 13th, 2012
1:33 pm
HONESTLY I THINK THE PICTURE SAYS IT ALL…
Redman throwing in 1 direction and Mularkey looking in the other with his hands up.
- Probably watching Bryant kick…
Clueless, totally clueless
ctfalconsfan
January 13th, 2012
1:37 pm
URBS, fm Canada can imagine Mularkey coaching in CFL with only 3 downs? How could he establish the running game?
- Honestly this guy should be coaching Westpoint or Navy running the bone or veer…
So many weapons and you turn over this offense to I guy that likes to grind it out..
- I dont think GB, the aints or pats grind it out too much and they seem to be doing pretty good airing the ball out..
Big Ray
January 13th, 2012
1:39 pm
Just because you spend a lot of money does not mean you know more. There is no assurance that this team will win a Superbowl every year. Your first love should be the game, your second should be the team.
Get over yourself.
I love hypocrites…
walknbalk
January 13th, 2012
1:54 pm
This “article” is bull. You have NO say how we should be fans. We have absolutely EVERY right to be “true” fans and expect excellence from our team and coaching staff. The facts are that MM could not utilize the talent on his roster, and he refused to adapt. No, not every play call is the right one. No, not every play design is a good one. No, not every utilization of players is the right scheme.
Get your head out of your @ss, DOL. I guess Arthur Blank didn’t spank you hard enough during the press conference!
Pastor Mackdaddy
January 13th, 2012
1:59 pm
Eph. 4:29 “Let no corrupt word proceed out of your mouth, but what is good for necessary edification, that it may impart grace to the hearers”……thanks MM and here’s hoping your time in Jacksonville is successful.
Mack
January 13th, 2012
1:59 pm
Here’s the deal on playing calling. All of the plays will work if executed properly and everybody wins their battles. There are no bad plays.
Well alrighty then, we dont need an OC. We just need about 3 or 4 plays. We don’t need to think about match ups, down/distance, or even disguising what we do. I mean Heck there are no bad plays. I have no idea why all these coaches have these multi-colored sheets with plays on the front and back. THERE ARE NO BAD PLAYS! If we don’t win then it’s on the players because, yep you guessed it…There are no bad plays.
unfraking believable
Falcon Realist
January 13th, 2012
2:10 pm
Regular season is for sissies. Playoffs? How many playoff wins? Offense did not show up. How was his game planning when it counted? What was his input on personnel required to win in big games?
We have a running back who tiptoes to the line of scrimmage and lays on top of his blockers if there isn’t a hole. Red zone offense. Who’s fooling who? Falcons offense showed on average against average teams. Too bad we couldn’t play Tampa every week.
dynasty brewing in the big easy
January 13th, 2012
2:13 pm
The Falcons remind so much of the Saints of not being able to get over that hump. Back in ‘08 we couldnt stop anyone on defense and although we had a dynamic offense, we could never get that yard that really counted. Fast forward to the Super Bowl year in ‘09, we hired Greg Williams and we put a emphasis on running the ball in the offseason. To be honest as I much I hate the Falcons yall are one or two difference makers away whether its a coaching hire or player (i.e Williams and Sharper) from putting together a Super Bowl run…. But in the meantime yall can watch the Saints make a run to the Super Bowl 2 n 3 years baby!!!
abby normal
January 13th, 2012
2:15 pm
D-Led….you may be right about Mularkey but he was never going to get this team to the next level. He was simply unable to maximize the talent he had at his disposal. It will be interesting to see what the new guy can do with more or less the same personnel. But I say, once again, fix the O-Line first!!
Realfalconfan
January 13th, 2012
2:15 pm
i would have much have been 3 13 every year than to only get us all excited for a falure so no credit is due him
Falconidiot
January 13th, 2012
2:18 pm
THANK YOU coach Mularkey for keeping Matt Ryan healthy and teaching him the basics playing with a high percentage game plan keeping the talent on our team in the playoff hunt and THANK YOU for leaving so we can now do what Pittburgh did after you left, go to the next level. Enjoy your three years in Jacksonville. You are great at what you do and that’s getting a team over the first hurdle. Best wishes.
monty
January 13th, 2012
2:22 pm
It’s the OC responsibility to design plays and a scheme that will work with his teams abilities. Take the GA Bulldawgs for example. Bobo knows that his team can’t convert running the ball on 4th and 1 so they pass it, most of the time. It’s MM’s job to understand if his O-line can’t block well enough to run for 1 yard, (as some on here are blaming the O-line). He can’t sit in the booth everytime and keep calling plays that most of us “real fans” know aren’t going to work against a good defense. I guess some on here really thought MR and an empty backfield would work. Shows you how much you know.
JB
January 13th, 2012
2:27 pm
If players do not execute well, who should you blame. I thought it was the coaches’ responsibility to ensure that players are prepared to perform at a high level on the field.
I am thankful to the Jacksonville Jaguars for hiring Mularkey.
nuffsaid
January 13th, 2012
2:28 pm
Yep, We all blame the coach’s..When the blame should go to the inept players at their respective positions..The coach can draw up 100 plays that should work to some degree..But..If you don’t have the player who can execute his assignment, you have 100 BUSTED plays! All it takes is 1 guy to miss his assignment and the whole play falls apart!
To me, that’s where the Falcons fall apart..When you consider the Quality of our players..Or lack thereof..I’m not supprised at the results we have garnered!
We need a staff who are up to date with the current NFL..Who are constantly in the ATTACK mode!
Need I mention NO-GB-PIT-NE-DEN..For the most part these teams have average defense..BUT..they have enough fire power in their offense to out score the other team!!
We are in DIRE need of several KEY positions..The current group is NOT capable of putting up the kind of numbers we need to sustain success against the better teams!
Have yourself a Tebo Saturday night! What A ROOKIE!!
jamie
January 13th, 2012
2:39 pm
Yes i will thank him l Thank you Mularkey for 4 years of heartbreak and conservative play calling. I would also like to thank you for some of those great play calls on 4th down
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
2:43 pm
Great read, Dled, and right on the money. Some of us haven’t forgotten where we came from, and some of us realize Mularkey was part of the resurgence of the Atlanta Falcons. In turn, MM wasn’t solely to blame for the shortcomings of the offense. An adequate o-line would have helped immensely and the Giants game was solid proof of that, as were other games in the 2011 season.
People (fans), fear what they don’t understand, and in cases like this the fear morphs into hate and blame.
An offensive coordinator calls the plays, but the agenda is set by the head coach. Mike Smith’s game plan for the Giants was not to turn the ball over, hence the same conservative safe plan that has failed more than once before against top tier opponents. It failed in the Giants game and it will fail again, no matter who the OC is.
Don’t let the hate in here bother you, Dled. It’s a common thing from classless fans that have a hard time expressing themselves any other way when they can’t see the big picture.
IKillTrollsAllDay
January 13th, 2012
2:44 pm
Why did Harry Douglas and J Rodgers vanish in the playoffs? How many catches did Gonzalez have? Boley is a good LB but he’s not that good. Why wasn’t more passes thrown to Douglas who has great speed and hands? Mike’s playcalling became too predictable. It was only when Matt ran the no huddle that the plays run and pass were balanced and effective. Sure he’s done good things as a OC, but like the coach you’re measured in the playoffs. 0-3. Let’s get real. Thanks Mike. I hope you have an imagination in Jacksonville if not you’re done after 2 seasons. Oh, and after what Sproles did to the Falcons in NO, why wasn’t JR implemented the same way? We have double thunder and lightning in the running game but we got fruity pebble results.
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
2:53 pm
Pastor Mackdaddy — Nice!!!
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
2:55 pm
walknbalk — He led to you to the playoffs THREE times in four years!!! Averaged double-digit wins. Just stating some facts here and y’all want to treat him like he shot your dog. (Opps, better not trot out the dog stories). But you get the picture.
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
2:57 pm
Big Ray — That’s an awesome quote.
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
2:59 pm
Veedub – Just a basic football theory. Thanks!
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
3:00 pm
Jim — Thank you for your kinds words!
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
3:03 pm
Great Falconi – Had six funs years of that earlier. I’m good!!! Stay in my lane.
mongolikebeer
January 13th, 2012
3:04 pm
D LED:
The man’s offense set every record in Falcons history-but lets not let the facts get in the way of emotive drivel. MM was the most desired coordinator by teams looking for a HC- T Bay, Mia, St L- Vikes also wanted him- and Jville talked to him first-and hired him on the spot.
Just becuase you run a fantasy football team doesn’t make you an expert on football.
I guess we’ll see who’s right.
MEMM
January 13th, 2012
3:04 pm
Great blog DOL ! Good to see a little fire in your belly I was beginning to think you did not care. I am as disappointed and frustrated as everyone else about the way the season went. That said, has the Falcons ever entered a season with expectations that were this high? No! Mularkey played a valuable role in where this team is now and I do thank him and Stachetastic for all of their good work.
For every arm chair coordinator banging on non screen calls give it up to DOL for pointing out the fact we had no lineman who could execute it.
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
3:07 pm
I’m pretty sure Coach Mike doesn’t hae a Twitter account or Facebook page. He kind of old school.
But if you really do want to write him a “Thank You” note, here’s the address:
Mr. Mike Mularkey, Head Coach
Jacksonville Jaguars
One EverBank Field Drive
Jacksonville, Fl 322202
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
3:15 pm
Falcons James – Not intended to dog out the real fans. Just the fake ones.
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
3:17 pm
Shady – No thank you. I’m not going to kiss your ass. Absolutely not!
PMC
January 13th, 2012
3:23 pm
Did thank him weeks ago.
We needed change though and both he and Van Gorder got excellent jobs.
No need for hard feelings anywhere.
D. Orlando Ledbetter
January 13th, 2012
3:25 pm
Eli – Thanks for your kind words!
BigTimeTECHFan
January 13th, 2012
3:29 pm
He was best OC ever in Atlanta, best sense Jerry Glanville anway
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
3:32 pm
One of the most common things around the league is OC hate when the offense struggles and the verbiage is always the same; “He’s too predictable!”
When a play doesn’t work, arm chair coordinators will always say; “I wouldn’t have called that play!”
When it does work, it’s usually; “That’s what I would have called! Nice play-call!”
Whether it works or not, folks forget sometimes that the other team gets to play too and have a say in the results.
Our next OC better have a bag full of tricks to satisfy some of the fans. Triple reverses, tackle eligible, the old Statue of Liberty play, flea-flickers galore, etc. Never mind the fundamentals, let’s get razzle-dazzle. “Hey, it works in Madden!”
Falcon Freddie
January 13th, 2012
3:42 pm
MM did his finest work in Year 1. However, beyond that year he clearly failed. In year two, he failed to adapt once defenses figured out they could stop the run and make Ryan beat them with the pass. We missed the playoff and had trouble scoring points. In years 3 and 4, efforts were made to help bail him out and make the team more explosive (Gonzo, Julio, Quizz). We began to score more points and handle the bad teams. However, we were never a match for the truly elite defenses. We were still a run first team, although MM did put some decent wrinkles in there. They still beat us by taking away the run and making Ryan beat us with his arm. D3, we regressed and we kept trying to put a round peg in a square hole. The O Line regressed big time and is not built for “ground and pound” anymore…not great pass protectors either. Matty Ice regressed as well to in this system. Seven step drops and long developing patterns are not his gig. He will be much more effective in a 3 step, short pass, get the ball out offense. That was clearly not in MM’s arsenal and after last years loss to GB in the playoffs that should have been apparent to all the coaches. Getting Julio was not adapting. We plugged him in, but still kept trying to fit the round peg in a square hole. By this time the O Line was getting no push and Turner was a step slower. Sure Julio caught a couple of bombs, but more often than not Matt was inaccurate on the long throws or checked it down because he was afraid of the INT. Success in Year 1….beyond that I just don’t see it. We need new blood. We need a fresh look and we need a scheme that better fits the talent that Matt Ryan has.
monty
January 13th, 2012
3:50 pm
FF
Good post.
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
3:51 pm
@ FalconFreddie – in year 2 we were riddled with injuries on offense (Ryan and Turner missed multiple games), and still finished with a winning record, going 9-7 for our first ever B2B winning seasons. By your reasoning, MM gets all of the blame for missing the playoffs and none of the credit for a winning record despite the injuries. Am I reading you right?
monty
January 13th, 2012
3:56 pm
At what point did anyone during the season ever go, “Wow! that play was amazing!’ Such creativity!? The Alabama-LSU game showed some creativity by an OC thinking outside of his usual “box.” At what point did we ever see any of our receivers sprung wide open? Our offense was generally “go 10 yards down field and turn around with a defender draped on you.”
monty
January 13th, 2012
4:02 pm
Seriously, what decent(not great) OC couldn’t take a MR,RW,TG,MT and not do some decent stuff? My guess is pretty much most in the league could take our talent and help sqeeeze out 9-10 wins a year. Not saying he was trash. Just more run of the mill, not exactly cutting edge. I think if we had someone like a Sean Payton they would be good for another 2-3 wins per year regular season, and definitely score some points in the post. Good luck to MM.
11-5
January 13th, 2012
4:04 pm
not 11-7
FalconsFan4Life
January 13th, 2012
4:07 pm
DOL… Yeah, Yeah, Yeah… Spit out all the stats and accolades you want… Bottom line was the offense was PREDICTABLE and NON-EXPLOSIVE… Glad Bratkowski is off the market. He went with Mularkey to JVILLE…
Hope we can trade Turner and get something for him… How we can get someone like Joe Lombardi (QB Coach @ the AINTS) or Clements (QB Coach @ Green Bay)…
Tony Gonzalez is very good, but his style of being a possession TE are about over… I.E. Graham with the CAINTS and Grownkowski & Hernandez with the Patriots…
Mike Franklin
January 13th, 2012
4:09 pm
Good points all but… it’s still like the old school bus driver thing Eisenhower once applied. If your driver wrecks the bus, you get a new bus and driver. If he just sideswipes a tree, runs over a stop sign but gets the kids to school safely, you still replace the driver. It isn’t always the end result that counts. It’s the way you got there and if the team failed to perform… then maybe those plays were designed for another team, not the Falcons. As OC, you write your book to fit your personnel, not the other way around. If Roddy starts dropping passes, you give him a spot on the bench for a spell and write in a few plays without him. If after 4 seasons, you have a nice looking record but didn’t get to where you wanted to go… it’s time to replace the driver.
FalconsFan4Life
January 13th, 2012
4:11 pm
Not to mention Mularkey is PROVEN he can NOT adjust to counter a defense… Going back to the Green Bay game last season… WHY did they go away from SCREEN PASSING in the 3rd QTR? They were keeping GB off guard and was WINNING… 3rd quarter, they went back to the same old BORING and PREDICTABLE offensive SCHEMES that elite teams beat us on… Glad to see Mularkey go, he’s gotten the Falcons as far as he could get us offensively…. Go get Mike Nolan for DC and Clements or Lombardi for OC!!
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
4:11 pm
I think Arthur Blank pointed out something in the press conference that is note worthy. All teams were ham-strung with a lack of training camps heading into 2011, but it hit the Falcons especially hard because they were trying to change schemes. The lack of preparation was evident on the field and the Falcons couldn’t figure out who they were on offense and as Jeff Schultz has pointed out, Smitty and his coordinators rarely seemed to be singing off the same page.
Arthur didn’t offer it as an excuse, just pointed it out.
FalconSTHfromIL
January 13th, 2012
4:23 pm
I completely agree with the spirit of this article. MM should not have rocks thrown through his rear window as he drives down to Jacksonville. However, it was time for a change.
I have not missed a snap of his offensive play calling in Atlanta. Much of it was done in person in the dome and at the road games that were closer to home for me. This does not make me a professional… but believe it or not, that helps my ultimate point.
Our playcalling was overly predictable at most times. There were some formations that telegraphed exactly what was going to happen. Granted you have to load up for the run, and do some things to increase your chances for success, but you also have to mix it up. Going for it twice on 4th and 1ish is an okay decision, but bring in your bowling bowl back with the big fullback, or step back and complete a flair pass to the best TE ever or one of your two 1000yd(ish) receivers. Or at least threaten it. Everyone in that building knew what was coming – BOTH times.
What are the other solutions? Get a better QB? Better WR’s? Better RB’s? Better TE? None of those are really options or needs. You can improve the line probably, get Ovie back, and hope that Roddy doesn’t catch the dropsy’s again. But reality is the offense is fairly stacked. The role players like Quiz, Snelling, and Harry were underutilized too.
But predictable playcalling, failing to score a single point in a playoff game, and watching the offense run noticeably better when the QB is calling the plays are enough points to say good luck in your future endeavors.
Like I said, I am no expert but on a sizable portion of his called plays, I was able to call out exactly what was about to happen based on our limited formations and the personnel on the field. And if I am doing that, I am sure the professionals working for the other teams did too. Especially on 4th and 1 with Turner on the sideline when rushing for 1 yard mattered most.
Not good
January 13th, 2012
4:26 pm
Okay guys, Malarkey was solid, but we need to find out if Matt can push the envelope and pass it down field or not. It’s the chicken egg question. Was matt being held back by the OC or was the OC being held back by matt. We just don’t know. We also don’t know if the head coach is the problem. He is a defensive guy and wants to run the ball at all costs, so he might have kept us back.
The Saints are not holding back, the patriots are not holding back, the Lions are not holding back, the Giants are not holding back. Its time to find out, but I think Matt could do better in a better offensive design. Just look at Drew Brees at the Chargers versus the Saints. Also Matt has to be given the reins in big games. I don’t think he has been unleashed, but maybe I am wrong.
Say what
January 13th, 2012
4:37 pm
monty:At what point did anyone during the season ever go, “Wow! that play was amazing!’ Such creativity!? ”
The wheel route to Quizz in the Carolina game, to answer your question. Matt was calling the plays, set it up and hit it. MM may have designed it (seems out of character though), but Matt called it, and that’s straight from Todd Mclure.
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
4:38 pm
@ FalconSTHfromIL : We used Turner on that 4th &1 in the Saints game (OT) and it failed. O-line is soft. Heck, the whole team is soft,… lacks attitude. I’m laying that at Smitty’s feet, along with the plodding, conservative game-planning.
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
4:43 pm
@ Say what: MM designed ALL of the plays we saw, whether they came from huddle, no huddle, audibles, etc. Ryan doesn’t design plays, he executes them.
GoodbyeMularky
January 13th, 2012
4:43 pm
Mularky deserves high praise for Year One and Year Two of the Smith regime. This was an average talent team and his OC made their record much better than they were.
Year Three he stated to sink.
Year Four Mularky’s play-calling was abysmal.
DOL… I cannot believe how foolish your statement is that all plays are good plays if executed. This indicates you know ZERO about football or any competition.
Sun Tzu pointed out that all war is based on DECEPTION. When the defense KNOWS Turner is going to run the ball between the tackles on first down, it is easy for them to stop that play. (Turner was stopped for no gain on 30% of his 1st down runs).
Mularky was SO predictable, the entire league talked about it.
The Patriots, Saints and Packers are NOT predictable.
The Falcons were predictable so the plays were MUCH harder to execute.
Yes, coach Mularky, thank you for your part for 4 winning seasons. But you never won a playoff game because your ultra conservative PREDICTABLE offense is not going to beat elite teams.
Say what
January 13th, 2012
4:55 pm
OK, SuperFan, seems out of character though, lol
Say what
January 13th, 2012
4:57 pm
The only time the Falcons were not predictable is when Matt called the plays. So, thanks Mularkey, for putting it all on your QB. See ya.
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
5:00 pm
@ GoodbyeMularky: If our next OC (and DC) is strapped with Smitty’s conservative, predictable and safe approach to the game of professional football, what then?
Arno
January 13th, 2012
5:05 pm
Why should we be thankful now??? When Smith came here he promised to deliver a team that was strong along the lines. The OC was Smith’s guy. Four years later we have one of the worst performances from an O line ever managed in a playoff game by any team. ESPN said it perfectly: “Giants handle Falcons.” By the way, I am a real fan since 1976.
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
5:08 pm
@ Arno: MM didn’t install the o-line. You can thank Dimitroff for that. The Giants called ‘em “dirt bags” and treated them as such.
Dawg A
January 13th, 2012
5:10 pm
A “Real Fan” is one that pays for his tickets( six season tickets) and don’t get in free and gets paid to talk about the team he covers. So as a “real fan” I can say that I am thrilled he is gone and that with the talent we have we should have produced a whole lot more. Another article written with the desire to kiss the booties of the people you want unlimited access to.
Terrell
January 13th, 2012
5:26 pm
You guys need to quit overrating our players. They are good players but they aren’t as good as some of you guys think especially the oline. The only guy that was really consistent was Justin Blalock. The other guys showed us they aren’t long term solutions. That’s where our issues started on offense was our oline.
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
5:30 pm
It’s clear to me that some of the folks in here don’t understand what an offensive coordinator is responsible for and what he’s not. I’ll leave it at that.
Say what
January 13th, 2012
5:37 pm
It’s clear to me some people need to get over themselves.
fan of falcons
January 13th, 2012
5:42 pm
If you learn the team’s shortcomings, you further design plays that will be successful in designing a scheme that fits the players.
FalconzAllDay
January 13th, 2012
5:45 pm
4get what he helped us do n tha regular season, I appreciate it, but for all the double digit winning seasons he helped us to, we had not one playoff win(s). Id rather be 8-8 and win tha superbowl all those year than keep getting bounced in tha playoffs every double digit win season. It was time to make some changes…
Say what
January 13th, 2012
5:46 pm
“If you learn the team’s shortcomings, you further design plays that will be successful in designing a scheme that fits the players.”
Right on. Imagine that. Designing plays that fit more than just Michael freaking Turner and Roddy White.
Arno
January 13th, 2012
5:51 pm
So the OC has no idea what his O line is capable of? Oh, I get it now….
FalconSTHfromIL
January 13th, 2012
5:59 pm
@SuperFangelo – I was there, it was an awful effort. It is a little different when he is on the field though versus him being on the sideline. If you see the loaded up run formation and no Turner, you know what to defend. Assuming you can just move the ball a couple of feet against a tough line just because you should be able to is a bad case of pride getting in the way.
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
6:39 pm
@FalconSTHfromIL: Agreed it was an awful call with the empty backfield, but Smitty heard the play-call through his headset. Why didn’t he stop it and demand something else? We may never know…..
BosnianBaller
January 13th, 2012
6:42 pm
Mularkey deserved to be fired even tho he wasn’t.To have that many weapons and do nothing on offense on a consistent basis is flat out embarrassing.From a Real Fan
FalconSTHfromIL
January 13th, 2012
7:02 pm
@SuperFangelo Agreed. I have told people that three things needed to happen. New offensive coordinator, new defensive coordinator, and a stern talking to Smitty. I think he needs to be held accountable “this time” for correcting the course if the coordinators are slipping. We are more likely to get a new HC next time than two MORE coordinators. He sat by too many times in my opinion. His decisions were “okay” for the most part, but his stand by and watch it go downhill is unacceptable.
ALSO ANYONE: Has the topic of taking the two timeouts into halftime been discussed/explained?
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
8:19 pm
ALSO ANYONE: Has the topic of taking the two timeouts into halftime been discussed/explained?
That blew my mind. Me and my buddy were watching that happen and we were like “WTF?!? TIME OUT! TIME OUT!” It was almost like Smitty just wanted the first half over with and didn’t realize he was in a playoff game. I know that’s not the case, but geeeeez! TIME OUT!!!
It’s wasn’t the first time he’s been guilty of poor clock/game management. Look, I like Smitty. He’s the most successful HC we’ve ever had from a win-loss standpoint, winning seasons, all of that. But to put all of the blame for the offensive failures in 2011 purely on MM is just wrong in my book and while I agree it was time to move on and get fresh eyes and minds on the coaching staff, Smitty should in no way be absolved from the 2011 disappointments. And folks, should the team disappoint again in 2012, there will be no one left to blame but…………….Smitty.
AfterTheFall
January 13th, 2012
9:01 pm
There is one blogger who hit the nail on the head by calling out Matt Ryan as being THE guy-who is, IMHO, the ultimate player who hasn’t taken to heart, the mantelpiece of being a leader on this Falcon football team. Being a quarterback isn’t just all about skill set (although it’s paramount to have it); rather-it is about being the Field General on his team. There’s an article out there on the internet about Chad Ohcocinco-talking to the media about Tom Brady’s mindset at this point in the playoffs.
Ochocinco talks about how Tom Brady’s mindset is at a whole different level and he is a VOCAL LEADER. I’ve seen clips of Tom Brady passionately arguing with his offensive coordinator. Heck, he’s a passionate genius. Tom has an arm and is laser sharp accurate. Ochocinco said he feels like he’s walking on egg shells-because of Tom Brady’s intensity.
Tom Brady has a genius coach that supports his mentality-that be-winning. With all due respect to Smitty, if your NFL football coach has a marshmallow personality, (never shows his emotions) and is so soft spoken and overly kind in the locker room (even to underachieving players), then other players are going to slack off-they may even lose some respect for you. When has Smitty benched any one in a Falcon uniform? Let’s compare opposites. Smitty/Tuna
This brings me to my response to DOL. I hear ya D, don’t shovel all of the blame on M.M., I got it. But some of that blame needs to put on Matt Ryan, the quarterback. M.M. did a good job the first year with the rookie quarterback. Now, however, its 4 years later-in a “what have you done for me lately?” league-the NFL. And by the way, other NFL teams look at what these Falcons have done to them successfully and make adjustments-accordingly. IMHO-I think a lot more should’ve been done in previous off seasons to strengthen Matt Ryan’s arm and overall core. No one except one blogger mentioned Matt Ryan to take on any responsibility for his role in failure of key drives-where he simply misfired because of his arm. Not only that, but Matt seems like an intelligent guy. He has to know that he has greater a role of leadership. No, he doesn’t have to have Tom Brady’s personality, but he doesn’t seem to take mental ownership with his offensive personnel, except hand’s on when he running the “no huddle”. How does Matt Ryan relate to Roddy with the dropping of many of his footballs? Is he nice with him and hold it in, or does he gets in his face? I know the answer to that, because their good friends. Look at the great Joe Namath. He was never a big runner-but did have that “it” factor. Namath’s arm strength and accuracy was his calling card. Namath rewarded his offensive line, personally. Matt Ryan may personally invest an ownership mentality in his offensive line, but at what level? Other players aren’t looking at him like he’s gonna take them anywhere, because he’s never been to the big dance. The Falcons would serve themselves well to acquire a backup quarterback who’s been there-maybe even one that won a Lombardi Trophy.
I’m rooting for Matt, who wants to win-and looking forward- going into next season, we’ll see different. Maybe Matt will work in the offseason- with those winning quarterbacks or quarterback coaches who’s willing to take an interest in him (current and former greats) -in order to take his game to the next level. Cam Newton developed fast and learned from Matt Ryan, so there is hope and great anticipation for Matt Ryan in what will be his 5th year as an Atlanta Falcon.
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
9:06 pm
@Arno: “So the OC has no idea what his O line is capable of? Oh, I get it now….”
What were they capable of? Ryan spent a good part of the early season flat on his back. They made some changes (Svitek for Baker, etc.), and shored up the pass protection, but then the run blocking suffered. In the Giants game, they could neither run block or pass protect very well. Turner had 41 pitiful yards on 15 carries and Ryan was under duress all afternoon. The o-line was mashed in the mouth by the Giants D, plain and simple. There is no magic scheme when you’re out manned and out gunned.
New coordinators or not, we need some hosses in the trenches, especially on the o-line. When you are stuffed repeatedly trying to gain a few inches for a 1st down whether it be Turner up the middle or Ryan for a QB sneak, you have to look at the o-line and think; “Houston, we have a problem.”
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
9:18 pm
@AfterTheFall: Good post. If the honeymoon is over for Smitty, it’s over for Ryan as well.
The Falcons are at a crossroads and a critical one. What is decided over the next few weeks and months will have everything to bear on Ryan’s progression and success along with the whole team in general.
The honeymoon is over, and everyone in Flowery Branch (with the exception of Mr. Blank), is essentially “on the clock”.
chris
January 13th, 2012
9:44 pm
The players have got to execute period.and if they continue to not perform it wont mat?tter who we get as OC…we seemed to struggle in the big games against teams with winning records….any take on that? I tend to agree with some of the posts that issue goes higher than the coordinators..we have the talent to compete with anyone when we are performing up to…the level we have seen, THere were some boneheaded calls against the Giants on offense…calls that probably didnt help sentiment against him.but overall you’re right with your column
Fred Macmurray
January 13th, 2012
9:45 pm
@trademark at 8:41 am,,,
and this Falcon fan said,, Tell it Brother….. right on point,,
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
10:02 pm
Who really stood out for the Falcons in 2011 on both sides of the ball?
Ryan had a career year overshadowed by disappointing losses. In the end, it didn’t matter so much.
Gonzo did everything he could, played great, and I’m glad he’s coming back.
Turner was 3rd in the league in rushing yards, but to watch some of the games you’d have a hard time believing that. He got most of those yards against teams with losing records.
Julio Jones had a great rookie season and is gonna be a beast, but *whew*, what a heavy price we paid to get him, and it could come back to haunt us.
Spoon is solid, gonna be great. Peters had a solid season. Nichols played very well and Grimes needs to be re-signed.
Who else? Bosher turned it around and did good. Who else really stood out?
Say what
January 13th, 2012
10:04 pm
btw, I agree with you, SuperFan, that Mike Smith should get a large part of the blame for the last two playoff debacles. Hes’ the HC, it’s his team and his ultimate responsibility.
and I think you totally misread me, I was just saying that the wheel route Quizz TD was not called by MM, and was also uncharacteristic of his playbook. Not that he didn’t design it. I know my style can be subtle, but it was another way to call out MM for not using creativity or his other weapons, i.e. Quizz.
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
10:16 pm
@ Say what: Hey, we’re good! Just a couple of Falcons fans trying to figure out what in the %#*^@ went wrong this past season, lol!
One thing overlooked that MM does deserve credit for,… and that’s coaching up Ryan to where he could run the no-huddle. It was done by design to set defenses on their heels and let Ryan read the D and select one of MM’s plays to counter it. Ryan is very good at it. What he lacks in skill sets he can make up for with smarts and the next OC should take advantage of that. If the next OC is himself a smart man, we’re gonna see more no-huddle moving forward.
Eric C.
January 13th, 2012
10:41 pm
Mr. Ledbetter, you stated…
“Here’s the deal on playing calling. All of the plays will work if executed properly and everybody wins their battles. There are no bad plays.”
Wow, if it were only that easy…why even have coordinators? The plays work when they are not predictable and when there are favorable match-ups.
jonk facons fan
January 13th, 2012
10:48 pm
Our offense just cant score high evrytime we play, defense has to step up and, in this case with Giants it didnt happen, sadly defense coudnt do a job in second half.
Ichabod
January 13th, 2012
10:53 pm
Thanks MM for building up the offense when it really needed it. Now that you are gone, will I still see the first play from scrimmage is always Turner bumping into the A-gap? And if so, who will be calling it? Was Smitty running the offense all the time?
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
10:56 pm
Could somebody, anybody, define for me exactly what constitutes a “predictable” play-call? I get so tired of seeing that term,… “predictable”.
There are 2 ways to move the football. You either run it or you pass it. If it’s 4th and inches and you’re gonna go for it, 99% of the time an OC is gonna call for a run or a sneak, because 99% of the time, that’s what’s gonna work (if it works). If it’s 3rd and 12, you’re likely looking to pass, so you call a pass play. Is that too predictable? Because if it is, 99% of the OC’s in the league have no imagination and are “just too predictable”. lol
Jermaine W
January 13th, 2012
10:56 pm
I don’t think so. Not after the comment he made on his showtime. He said “we didn’t have the receivers to throw the ball down field”. Well he doesn’t have any wide outs in FL or none that can match up with the one’s in ATL.
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
11:03 pm
Let’s go back to the Houston game, folks. First couple of plays from our O were bombs from Ryan to Jones and White. Ryan missed, players failed to execute on something that could have set the tone for the game. It was totally “unpredictable” play-calling, but the players failed at something they admittedly had been working on all week prior to the game.
Mularkeys fault?
san diego steve
January 13th, 2012
11:05 pm
DOL – I agree with your points. I’ve never called for anyone to be fired. My mom raised me better than that. I was, however, very disappointed with the offense this year. This is just my opinion, I think there was too much pressure placed on the team to change their identity from a power rushing – time of possession style team to trying to duplicate what the Saints do. 40 pass attempts per game is not Mike Smith’s personality. It is not in his DNA. The question has to be where was the pressure to change initiated from. I can assure you the pressure to change was not from MM. My only knock on MM this season was not taking advantage of the personnel this team put on the field. Why wasn’t Harry Douglas always on the filed in the slot catching 10 yard slants? Why draft a talent like Jacquizz if you’re not going to get him the ball on the run in open space? Heck even a direct snap to Jacquizz or placing him in the wild cat formation for 1 play would have changed the tone of the opposing defenses. Good luck Coach Murlarkey. I wish you success unless you’re playing the Falcons or Chargers.
FalconSTHfromIL
January 13th, 2012
11:33 pm
@SuperFangelo – stand outs? Lofton and Spoon are right at the highest level. Then “strong” performances from Abraham, Ryan, Grimes (sans injury), Peters, Bosher (after the bad punts), Weems (for what he got), Turner for the most part, White & Jones minus the drops… and to a lesser degree Babs, DeCoud (at times), Hayden, and that is about all I’d point out. Cox did fine as a replacement too I suppose.
Predictable plays are when you ONLY run certain plays out of a given formation or with certain players on the field. An occasional misdirection or variation goes a long way to keeping a defense honest.
Eric C.
January 13th, 2012
11:33 pm
SuperFangelo, you asked, “Could somebody, anybody, define for me exactly what constitutes a “predictable” play-call? I get so tired of seeing that term, ‘predictable’.”
Ask the defenses that played the Falcons this year and they will explain it to you. How many quotes did you read from opposing defenses this year…we knew exactly what was coming on that play. I wish Mularkey the best, but he often drove the offense right into the ground without making the proper adjustments. Please don’t ask, “what are adjustments?”
SuperFangelo
January 13th, 2012
11:57 pm
@ FalconSTHfromIL & Eric C: Don’t duck me on the Houston game, fellas. Totally unpredictable play-calling and failed execution, period. As always, the truth lays somewhere in the middle. If the play-calling was too “predictable”, you also have all of the inexplicable drops from White all season. You also have a team that was the least penalized in 2010 to a team that got more than their share in 2011, but that’s another story.
Any OC has to work with the talent he has on the field. We have some talent, some real good talent and weapons, but on offense, the o-line is lacking and that’s where it all starts. Look at the Saints and Packers,…great o-lines.
I am here to say simply that while yes, Mularkey’s time had passed, it’s wrong to lay the blame for the offensive failures solely at his feet. He was part of the failure AND success the Falcons have had over the past 4 seasons and everyone should share in all of it, at least theoretically.
Tell you guys one thing; Don’t address the o-line this off-season and look for much the same in 2012 as in 2011.
Say what
January 14th, 2012
12:11 am
“Let’s go back to the Houston game, folks. First couple of plays from our O were bombs from Ryan to Jones and White. Ryan missed, players failed to execute on something that could have set the tone for the game. It was totally “unpredictable” play-calling, but the players failed at something they admittedly had been working on all week prior to the game.
Mularkeys fault?”
Yes, because there was a disconnect between MM and the team. Yes, let’s ask, “why didn’t they execute it?” If you were coaching and called it, shouldn’t the results show that you understood the players, their ability or preparedness, to achieve the desired result? He called it three times in about four plays. That’s just stupid to me. It’s just firing blanks. But now we will see if another OC can do better…
SuperFangelo
January 14th, 2012
12:25 am
Ahh gosh, we’ve got a 4th year QB making $32 million a year, wide receivers that are amongst the best, they practiced the plays to open the Houston game for days because that’s what they wanted to do,…you know,…be “unpredictable” and all, and failed to execute because of some “disconnect”? Ok.
Turner up the middle for 2 yards to open that game would have had everybody screaming “PREDICTABLE!” Mularkey gets sideways instead, calls something totally unforeseen, the players fail to execute, and it’s STILL his fault? lol
Just curious, are any of you fells regular posters on the Atlanta Falcons message boards?
SuperFangelo
January 14th, 2012
12:31 am
“Just curious, are any of you fells regular posters on the Atlanta Falcons message boards?”
Meant “fellas”. ^^^
Say what
January 14th, 2012
12:43 am
Hey, I can prove I’m upredictable by driving off the road, but that doesn’t make me smart.
Strategy does not equal throwing out the odd different play. Yeah, he helped get us here, but he was mailing it in big time. Did you see that opening series. Give me a @@##$in break. Same old, same old, in the playoffs! NYG was laughing about it. And that’s on the PLAYERS?
SuperFangelo
January 14th, 2012
12:55 am
“And that’s on the PLAYERS?”
I’m gonna tell you something: We weren’t gonna beat the Giants no matter what the play-calling was. Falcons are soft, Giants are hard. Giants had an attitude. Falcons had nothing except a defense that hung in there for as long as it could. Giants had a D-line that the Falcons O-line couldn’t handle. Couldn’t run-block ‘em, couldn’t pass block ‘em. Couldn’t even push for a few inches more than once. What else are ya gonna do?
Say what
January 14th, 2012
1:06 am
“What else are ya gonna do?”
apparently, nothing but pray, lol
SuperFangelo
January 14th, 2012
1:10 am
“apparently, nothing but pray, lol”
I’m with you on that! Good night, friend.
Say what
January 14th, 2012
1:11 am
I’m gonna tell you something (lol), you cannot push a few inches when the defense is packed in there. It’s stupid.
Say what
January 14th, 2012
1:12 am
gnight, SuperFan. Let’s see this commitment from the organization!
SuperFangelo
January 14th, 2012
1:18 am
“Let’s see this commitment from the organization!”
We better, or we’ll be having this same conversation a year from now, lol! G’night.
waynester
January 14th, 2012
7:50 am
DOL
I appreciate loyalty. I appreciate passion. You demonstrated some of both in this column. We all do things worthy of criticism– and while not all of the heat directed at the OC is warranted(nor that directed at you) some was valid. Yes, we have some pure “haters” on here but most of us read you daily out of love–for the team and (in my case, at least) for sports journalism. I like the fire, though. Hope we’ll see more op-ed from you in future….
native falcon
January 14th, 2012
8:39 am
I thank Mularkey for all he did for the falcons, except in 2 areas, he was always allergic to the screen pass and he could never get us over the hump at playoffs and sorry third, Mr Gadget, where were all the trick plays, he did somein the early part of the falcons, but guess he got bored. Hope he does well in Jax, except against us.
Ws
January 14th, 2012
8:58 am
I think alot of the time we have blamed MM. I think that MIke Smith had his hands tied. I see MM and BVG be scapegoats . Mike Smith getting a pass. With new coaches, it will show who was problem if Smitty doesn’t change.
lombardi
January 14th, 2012
9:15 am
When you break his tenure into 2 parts, ‘08+’09 and ‘10+’11 you see 2 very different coaches, (and 2 very different teams attitude wise).
If I recall, MR2s first play from scrimmage in the regular season as a rookie was a 25yd pass completion down the middle. That’s balls. The birds beat Chicago here in the closing minutes of a thriller w/ Ryan throwing a strike deep down the sideline. That’s confidence. We beat the Chargers, the Packers and the Vikings on their own turf in ‘08. I also remember the game at Philly where we looked bad in the first 1/2 – we didn’t come back to win but I was impressed in the 2nd 1/2 by the team – esp the O – trying to fight back. That was exciting and commendable.
‘09 was disappointing for a number of reasons incl. Matt’s turf toe bug but they still looked like they were basically progressing both talent and attitude wise.
But from ‘10 thru this year we went into serious retrograde and nowhere more noticeably than with the most predictable, old book O most of us – incl You DOL – can remember.
TD said the Debacle in the Dome was an aberration. I’d challenge that by saying this year’s results would reinforce the reality of the results of that game – and that the 13-3 season was the real aberration. And this yrs. 10-7 isn’t any better as we beat just one team (in 5 chances) that made it to the playoffs while for the most part, getting blown out by the heavyweights. I’ don’t think too many on this blog or others that say MM is solely to blame. The whole team top-down, was horrendous. He was just one major gear in a failed mechanism.
I’ll give MM a “good luck” at his new gig and I’ll give him an “A” for the first 2 yrs. here – but for his last 2 years – “Incomplete”.
Blove
January 14th, 2012
9:41 am
Man I see even yall beat writers are Garbage ! Like one commented earlier ! If all you had to do was draw up a play and the players execute . Then you don’t need OC’s or DC’s Just look at the Saints there are plenty off weaknesses on the D , but because we have a good DC . He’s know how to get the most out them.
Chop Buster
January 14th, 2012
10:18 am
Thank him for what? You out your monkey a$$ mind DLed!
CT Falcons Fan
January 14th, 2012
10:20 am
I’m confused, I thought the beat writer was supposed to REPORT on the team. Aren’t op-ed pieces like this more in Bradley and Shultz’s job descriptions? Just another example of an “insider” who gets too close to the subjects he’s supposed to objectively cover. My favorite rationale for Mularkey was “Tony Gonzales continued his march to Canton.” Good grief–he was a HOFer befoer he set foot in ATL. To somehow credit Mularkey with”continuing” that is absurd. But…par for the course with AJC.
And at least we dont’ get stupid song lyrics like the Braves’ beat writer subjects us to.
Mack
January 14th, 2012
10:39 am
“Bobby Petrino was here long enough and there were several other distractions”
did you mean was not?
“Here’s the deal on playing calling. All of the plays will work if executed properly and everybody wins their battles. There are no bad plays.”
playing calling?
IMO, this the dumbest statement I have ever read. Yet, almost all of you are ignoring it.
“I don’t preach or rant to you all often, so thanks for let me get this off my chest.”
I think he meant letting here.
“I’ve got to wish Coach Mularkey good luck right here like I did in a couple phone messages”
well, go ahead wish him good luck…
Did you really go to college? I didn’t. I usually overlook these little mistakes. But the headline had me mad before I ever read the article. I absolutely dispise this real “fan” claptrap. With the abysmal record this team has over it 46 year existence they should be(are?) happy any kind of fan would follow them. This article was written by “professional”. This was not a post written by a real “Fan”. Not only was it poorly written. It includes flawed football knowledge and conflicting statements. Was the OL good or bad because of MM? I’m confused…
I expect better from a “professional”.
Thank all that is good for your comments because without those I would not waste my time reading anything but injury reports from this “professional”.
old man
January 14th, 2012
10:41 am
I’m OK with MM leaving, and his play calling was not the best, but he was ham strung with personnel. He was ham strung by MR because the defense never had to spy #2 because of his lack of any running threat, or modify coverage to account for him extending the play. And with MT, you could forget about screen passes, down-field routes out of the backfield, or any running play which tried to turn the edge of your run defense.
On the whole, I think MT is more one-dimensional than MR, by a lot. And it’s easier to find a diamond in the rough RB than a QB. Snelling and Quizz could come in give us options MT did not, or provide a decoy, when they came in the defense was always alerted that something was up.
You need a RB who is more versatile, to play most of your downs, to allow your OC the ability to be unpredictable in play calling.
Honestly, Antone Smith is the closest to having all the skillsets you need–speed, evasivness, tackle-breaking, pass catching, route-running. Quizz has some of that. Snelling has more toughness, less speed. I’m not saying Smith should start. Overall, he may not excel in any one area to be an NFL back. But he has a more uniform and even set of skills.
The problem is that we can’t afford–cap money or draft picks–to get the kind of RB we need.
So we have a QB and a RB who both tend not to be multi-dimensional in their skill sets. You end up with a predictable set of player selection, formations, and play calling. MT is more one-dimensional than MR, and more easily replaced, so I think that is a much bigger problem for us.
old man
January 14th, 2012
10:48 am
I should say MT is more one dimensional than MR and is more easily replaced than MR, so if we are going to focus on replacing one it ought to be MT.
But based on what we have to work with, we need to draft and sign O-Line first, and probably go with more of a committee of RBs–MT, Snelling, Quizz, Smith, Muhelli. Bringing in someone to replace MT as feature back is just not realistic, based on the resources we have.
If we release D. Robinson, would that money free up money to get a better RB?
lombardi
January 14th, 2012
10:53 am
@oldman Antone Smith = big yes
Runner-
January 14th, 2012
12:06 pm
lol come on… all I see with those arguments is “Ok, those are all a good sign during the regular season, but what about when it matter?” Bottom line is we have been smoked our past 2 playoff games. This season was not a success by no means, we were an average team at best, we feasted on the crap teams but couldn’t win against the good. Do you think execution is the problem there or is it conservative playcalling against teams we can’t be conservative against? Cmon DOL, Mularkey had to go if the Falcons are to go anywhere
JSS
January 14th, 2012
12:28 pm
There are really “no bad plays,” there are stupid plays and stupid play calls in all reality. I’ve seen people win games in the modern NFL running the single wing (Carolina-vs-Atlanta-2006). There is no way that a team should not be able to stop it after seeing it two plays in a row. It is a “bad play” in most circles, but it was executed and no one could stop it on that day… The Wildcat formation is a Pee-Wee league formation, but for nearly 5 seasons, when run correctly, no one has forced teams to have to pass from it… That is a “bad play” in most quarters, but somehow when executed, it works… There is the difference…
old man
January 14th, 2012
12:30 pm
Lombardi:
When I see Antone Smith pay a full quarter in pre-season (maybe twice in each of the past two pre-seasons), my first thought is, “wow, that looks pretty good, we could build on that.” Then you never see him again. Maybe he stinks. I can just go on what I see. And you know he must get zero reps with the 1st team, so who knows. That would be ironic wouldn’t it–if a couple of guys get dinged up and he has to play, and reels off a couple of 125+ yard games in the regular season. But I suppose these coaches have assessed what he can do and don’t think he is even close to NFL caliber.
old man
January 14th, 2012
12:42 pm
Just looked it up. Smith has one carry over the past two years. And he was activated for 21 games. Twenty one games and only one carry? It’s hard to believe that anyone is THAT bad, especially when they show flashes in pre-season. If he has been fully evaluated by the staff and he only merits one carry in 21 games then you need to cut him and get someone else. If we run 30 times, maybe we need to give it to Quizz and Smith and Snelling about 5 times apiece each game, and give each of them 2 touches in the passing game. If you just throw to them each time, the D will figure it out. For whatever reason, MT is good for only 0 or 1 receptions a game.
I know Smith is a special teams stud but one carry in two years seems a little extreme.
Trottsky
January 14th, 2012
1:11 pm
What a bunch of Malarkey……..also known as BS…..for instance, throwing in Gonzales march to Hall of Fame…..what difference did Malarkey make with that !!! And as for “franchise marks”, if the w’s aren’t there, especially in the playoffs, marks don’t matter…….
Mack
January 14th, 2012
1:39 pm
I remember that game JSS. they didn even have a QB in on a couple 3rd down conversions(if I remember right, I am old:))
“Here’s the deal on playing calling. All of the plays will work if executed properly and everybody wins their battles. There are no bad plays.”
OK so if MM calls MT “up the gut” and the other team reads MT “up the gut” and stops him for a loss. That’s not a bad play it’s poor execution and/or poor play calling? Who carries the blame for this loss of yardage?
I think I see your point JSS. The plays themselves are not bad plays it’s their application that determines their success. Why would you use this sentence in an effort to praise MM? Here’s what I got when I read it. All MM calls were good calls the players just screwed them up. i.e. “here’s the deal on playing calling” First he suggest he will explain play calling but he ends by saying nothing about play calling and saying “there are no bad plays”. Two totally different topics, imo
I don’t like to post negative I love my team but this article really eats my lunch.
Tree Rollins
January 14th, 2012
1:53 pm
Mularkey was a good fit for the first 2 years of Ryan and then he got staedily more predictable and conservative and frankly bored me, the fans and the analysts to death and needed to move on.
Falcon fan
January 14th, 2012
3:37 pm
I’m a Falcon Fan but I also watch alot of Jacksonville games as I live in Waycross Ga. Thanks Mularkey for 4 good years..now I hope you turn Jaguars around.
Thanks D-Led for being 1st class all the time.
tyler
January 14th, 2012
3:57 pm
F off Mulaarkey, good riddance.
78Dawg
January 14th, 2012
4:16 pm
DOL….You are a complete idiot !!!!!
BIG JIM
January 14th, 2012
4:42 pm
D-LED you talk about the good thing MM did that is all well and find let’s talk about things he didn’t do and that was to score point in the playoff to get this team to the next row of the play off you talk abou real fans man real fans got treid of this B.S. with this O.C. Look how the saints use GRAHAM and SPROLES and other player falcons got that same thing with there offense.
BosnianBaller
January 14th, 2012
5:12 pm
Look at the 49ers and how they play against the Saints so you go right ahead and thank Mularkey Bedwetter.
Yo Vince
January 14th, 2012
5:13 pm
DOL, you made a good case for MM. We should acknowledge the facts. I will never miss the runs up the middle on 1st down or the QB keepers that killed us. He has a nice new job now, hope him the best.
Yo Vince
January 14th, 2012
5:15 pm
The Ain’ts are stinkin it up… Ha Choke, Hiramtaint
Birdy
January 14th, 2012
6:16 pm
So DOL,
What happened to my earlier post from today? There was nothing inflammatory.
Keith
January 14th, 2012
7:27 pm
Dled I don’t blame Mularkey for it all and yes he has accomplished many good things and maybe he will be a better HC than a OC, but as someone else pointed out the team seems to level out, Mularkey would not push the envelope, Our offence was not so much conservetive as predictible. this year in the match ups with the Better teams (Playoff calibe teams) the Defenses seem to know EXACTLY what our calls were in each critacl down. So ye sthank you Mike for bringing the Falcons to the level they are at, and thank you Jacksonville for taking Mike, cause after the preformance against the Giants I was scared NOBODY would want to take him!!
Big Ray
January 14th, 2012
8:13 pm
AAAAAAAAAHHHHAAAAAAAAHHHAAAAAAAA! Goodbye Saints! You just got beat by Alex Smith, biatchessss!
Big Ray
January 14th, 2012
8:14 pm
No who dats in the Bay Area!
Big Ray
January 14th, 2012
8:16 pm
Ha! That phony arse trickery wasn’t worth a crap at the end! Breesy got his lunch eaten today!
Later, Aints fans…
Seen dis befo
January 14th, 2012
8:17 pm
NFC West is just too much for New Orleans! Looks like the Falcons aren’t the only team with offensive line woes. On yeah, ROLL TIDE too!
Ws
January 14th, 2012
8:23 pm
WHO DAT BEAT THEM SAINTS—- FORTY-NINERS BEAT THEM SAINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHA , GREAT
Stumpknocker
January 14th, 2012
8:25 pm
Outside of the Who-Dat dome the chicken feet and voo-doo dolls don’t work do they Hiram “Mr Hanky” Saint……….Hiiii di Ho…..and back home you go!
falconsrus
January 14th, 2012
8:36 pm
goat daints
falconsrus
January 14th, 2012
8:38 pm
also “thanks” mularky buh bye
Seen This B4
January 14th, 2012
9:07 pm
crickets chirping….
hiramsaint
January 14th, 2012
9:08 pm
crickets chirping….
Aints again.....
January 14th, 2012
9:10 pm
couldn’t of happened to a nicer city !
Aints again.....
January 14th, 2012
9:12 pm
Seen dis befo
January 14th, 2012
8:17 pm
NFC West is just too much for New Orleans! Looks like the Falcons aren’t the only team with offensive line woes. On yeah, ROLL TIDE too!
Aints again.....
January 14th, 2012
9:13 pm
Some city is having an awful week, Huh ?!
Fred Macmurray
January 14th, 2012
9:23 pm
Go Saints!,, what,, oh,, nevermind
JSS
January 14th, 2012
9:28 pm
“Why would you use this sentence in an effort to praise MM? Here’s what I got when I read it.”
That is why I prefaced it by saying “stupid plays” and “stupid play calls.” It is stupid to call a empty backfield with an unbalanced line, when you have shown that look on tape multiple times… And your QB is not astute enough to see the defense react and call a timeout… Just sayin’
d-bird
January 14th, 2012
9:29 pm
D-led is a joke! Mr Blank, your doing the right thing by cleaning house. Smith only has one more year as well.
blane f.
January 14th, 2012
9:49 pm
no one can believe that jacksonville was stupid enough to take him
Eric C.
January 14th, 2012
10:25 pm
JSS, thank you for cutting out the BS and saying it, “It is stupid to call a empty backfield with an unbalanced line, when you have shown that look on tape multiple times…”
O'Brien
January 14th, 2012
10:48 pm
I hope Matt rayn is watching how Tom Brady does his QB sneaks.
What’s up Big Ray,
Who thought Alex Smith would have a playoff win before Matt Ryan.
tyger
January 14th, 2012
11:28 pm
Rather than becoming an extended arm of the Falcons PR dept., let’s not forget his playoff record of 0-3, most notably the shutout vs the Giants…that is his legacy.
JoeBrave
January 14th, 2012
11:43 pm
not another word, no not one, you who bash on Ryan, you guys can Kiss My @ss! Teblow just pi$$ed his pants on National TV, and that overrated overblown bunch of PATSIES from NOLA well how bout dem one and done Who Dats? you people are JOKES!
realfalconfan
January 15th, 2012
12:52 am
First ESPN tells us we (Atlanta) doesn’t deserve a playoff win or super bowl because of the fans, now this sweet cheeks. Man, what has Atlanta done to deserve all this hatred.
what,what,what??
January 15th, 2012
5:50 am
from a falcon fan since 1966, well put DLED. most of these clowns don’y and won’t ever get it.
NATIVE SON
January 15th, 2012
9:10 am
@DOL
There is truth in what Mularkey has done. When this offense executed, it was a challenge for any team. The problem was when they played like that and won; it looked like the team wasn’t used to winning,( over celebratory mindset) and it almost was never against a top opponent. I’d also add that play calling was a shrinking violet in the face of a big moment. That’s what real fans were upset about. For the love of pete, take some dad’gum chances. The coaching staff has to be tough minded in order for that to translate on the field. Insanity; is not making 1 yd three consecutive times, and trying it a fourth time. Can you see how Sean Payton inspires his club, and I don’t believe I’m saying this, but Todd Grantham; even? Don’t bring the troops to war, if you won’t let them take the shots.
Peace From The “MOST NATIVE”
David
January 15th, 2012
9:39 am
Get Off Your High Horse Sir, We REAL FANS can voice our opinion about play calling in the playoffs. We didn’t score any points knucklehead! You can follow him to Jacksonville too, the writing and coverage you provide is less than stellar, and your softball questions and analysis would be better suited for a bottom dweller team in the AFC South. Take that bow tie and lazy writing to the Jaguars!
RobbE33
January 15th, 2012
10:45 am
Is that just season ticket holders or can others be categorized as ‘real Falcon fans?’
Mularkey and Bratkowski have jumped into a real fine fire, haven’t they?
Doc Dawg
January 15th, 2012
10:48 am
Hey, we had 40 years of utter ineptitude under the Clampetts. Mr. Blank came in meaning well, but made some rookie owner mistakes. Its just going to take time to clean out the system. 4X winning seasons is a start. Skill players on O are there. Now it is time to go back to the basics of football and build O and D lines that can win the battle of the trenches. Please, please don’t succumb to some new philosophy that the league has changed and line play can be deemphasized. Pull the Saints-Niners tape. Watch them protect Brees. Watch them run on the Saints. That’s what we need. Hopefully the “sacred cow” remark is the acknowledgement that Sam Baker is a bust. Lets get some linemen in here.
JoeBrave
January 15th, 2012
11:18 am
Dirk freakin Koetter named Offensive Coach! Oh NO Smitty has brought his insanity to a new level! the same old sh!t offense!
drmondo
January 15th, 2012
11:28 am
DOL, where’s your story on the new OC? How come the home paper gets scooped by ESPN (and every other football blog)?
Kingbyrd
January 15th, 2012
11:46 am
I thank him for leaving.
Phalcon Phil
January 15th, 2012
1:59 pm
homers are hilarious. they think we have this juggernaut offense that mike mularkey is deviously hindering on purpose. get real morons mularkey is the best thing that could have happened to this offense. great article dled, normally i dont think you know your ass from a hole in the wall but this one was right on point. you ryanettes will get it next year when gabbert is putting up ryan type numbers.
WDE
January 15th, 2012
2:05 pm
Well isn’t this so damn typical so many of our “experts” wanted him gone..well you got your wish the OC that lead us to winning seasons more times in a row more playoff games back to back than any OC in team history is gone.Congrats ! Now what will happen is that you won’t get behind the new OC, and will now howl for the HC and AD’s heads..are you folks insane or just new to the ATL? These have been the glory days for the Falcons do we need to get better sure we do….but we may have thrown the baby out with the bathwater. Oh and whoever we get for DC won’t be good enough for the same bunch that are already crying about the new OC.
Help
January 15th, 2012
2:34 pm
Can anyone find accurate stats for team YAC? It seems ATL was near the bottom, but I can’t find out, every site is different.
Hummon
January 15th, 2012
4:20 pm
Right on, D Led. I think the time had come for a change, but the achievements must be acknowledged. Every time we ask “Why aren’t we Green Bay,” fairness ought to have us also asking, “Why aren’t we Cleveland?” Because these guys have done a pretty good job.
KQuark
January 15th, 2012
4:26 pm
Mularkey does deserve credit for designing plays and the success that entailed but he was a terrible play caller. That’s why the offense always does better with Ryan in the hurry up, even in Ryan’s rookie year.
cwltank
January 15th, 2012
4:32 pm
Smith will be the next man fired, if they do not get better offensively. And by the way MM was dirt…..
I hope TD step up and get a proven Def coordinator.
WS
January 15th, 2012
7:17 pm
Watching the Gaint -Packer game. Falcons couldn’t sack Rodgers. Boley has sacked him twice so far in game. Looks like being cheap we are letting wrong players go.
Falcon Fan 24-7
January 15th, 2012
8:24 pm
You cannot get blood out of a turnip.
Falcon Fan 24-7
January 15th, 2012
8:29 pm
A Georgia man allegedly shot at two football fans in a restaurant parking lot — critically injuring one — because he took offense to their cheering for the San Francisco 49ers as they faced off against the New Orleans Saints.
DRAMA KINGS
49ers 36, Saints 32
Donald Ray Ayro, 31, was being held without bond Sunday after the incident, according to a police press release.
Corey Adams, 30, told WSB-TV that he and friend Chris Middleton, also 30, were confronted by Ayro inside an Applebee’s restaurant in Duluth, Ga., as they celebrated a 49ers touchdown in the playoff game.
“The only thing me and my buddy said was, we were excited that the 49ers scored,” Adams said. “It was only one touchdown.”
According to Adams, the Saints fan then left but told the men he would return.
About 90 minutes later, Ayro allegedly fired gunshots at Adams and Middleton in the restaurant’s parking lot.
“I took off running and he started shooting at me and shot like four or five times and he grazed the back of my head,” Adams told WSB.
Middleton was shot in the chest. He was taken to nearby Gwinnett Medical Center in critical condition.
Police found Ayro through Adams’ description of him and his vehicle. He was arrested and charged with two counts of aggravated assault, possession of a firearm by a felon and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, police said.
The 49ers beat the Saints 36-32 Saturday.
DR. FALCON
January 15th, 2012
11:22 pm
ARE YOU KIDDING ME D-LED? THANK MULARKEY? YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO COME STRONGER THAN THAT!! YOUR FAN BASE IS MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE THAN YOU GIVE US CREDIT FOR! ALL THOSE REGULAR SEASON STATS ARE NICE BUT UNDER THE PRIMTIME GLARE, WE FAILED MISERABLY! WHETHER IT’S THE MONDAY NITE GAME LATE IN THE YEAR AGAINS THE SAINTS, OR THE PLAYOFF LOSS TO THE GIANTS, OUR OFFENSE STUNK! ALSO, WHO CAN FORGET THAT PLAYOFF MASACRE TO THE PACKERS AT HOME! 2PTS, IN A PLAYOFF GAME? GOOD RIDDANCE!
mrzizzle
January 16th, 2012
5:09 am
In reply to this story …”Yawn” This team needs to learn how to play in the post season. The fact that the games are over by the start of the 4th quarter against the Giants and Green Bay. I’m not thanking Mularkey, Smith, Thomas or Big Bird! I’ve been a fan of this team since Bartkowski in 1980 and winning seasons are not enough anymore. Now I am figuring this team WILL get it done in the next 4 years (Super Bowl) but the time is now to show up in the Post Season!
Billy Mack
January 16th, 2012
9:23 am
All those records really prove was how pathetic the franchise has historically been, that they could set all these records in such a short period of time. And you’ll excuse me if I’d rather be lumped in with the perennial winners in the league as opposed to bottom feeding Cleveland and Buffalo!
I give credit for bringing “some wins” to a franchise that has long been a bottom feeder itself. However fans are long starved for winning mentality and don’t expect that to go away til we reach
the mountain top!
Big Dude
January 16th, 2012
10:04 am
On a scale of 1-10, MM was a 7 which means he can only take his offense no higher than a 6. Which means he is mediocre at best.
Kelly
January 16th, 2012
10:07 am
I’m a real Falcons fan and I don’t have to thank anyone, save for myself and the dollars that I contribute to their organization and paychecks. Thank me! Falcons fans: Don’t buy into this false deliniation about what a “real” fan is or isn’t. Bottom line is, if you pull for the Falcons, buy tickets, support them, then you don’t owe them anymore than that. What Ledbetter? Should I sign my soul to them? Give me a break. How about thanking me for supporting a team in a city to which I was born for supporting perennial losers no matter what? And buying tickets. Thank me. Screw that *&^% about thanking them. If it weren’t for the fan base (real, unreal, contrived or any other descriptor you choose to modify with), the Falcons wouldn’t exist.
Grow up!
Duke
January 16th, 2012
10:09 am
You can blame a coordinator when you O-line stinks and he runs it up the middle 12 out of 14 time in a game. You can also blame him when HD and Quiz never really touch the field. How many time during the off season did we hear about how explosive HD will be yet how many plays involved HD as the primary receiver? At what time did we run screens to Quiz??? He stunk. When a guy sitting on the couch can see the problem then why can’t he? He was great against GB in the first half this year. Then the creativity stopped and we lost the game. Yeah we should thiank him….for what? By the way Gonzo could stop playing and get tot he Hall. Your reaching.
Kelly
January 16th, 2012
10:14 am
This was a horribly conceived article.
Dukester
January 16th, 2012
12:01 pm
Very good article you hit the nail on the head. This line has done a great job protecting Matt Ryan. Have any of you been watching the playoffs? Look at what the elite QBs do when they are under pressure. They become athletic and make plays. Stop making excuses the 14 drop balls Roddy dropped I bet he caught 14 that he wasnt suppose too. Quit crying. Poor Mike Smith is about to lose his job with this noodle arm fraud at QB!
C from Marietta
January 16th, 2012
1:05 pm
Is it just me or do I see a complete lack of respect for our fellow humans on this blog? You might not agree with his article,but name calling and temper tantrums are the work of 10 year olds. The anger and hatred over a football game? Please grow people.
Chubbyboy
January 16th, 2012
2:00 pm
Great article DOL…I do believe Murlarkey should be given Kudos for his development of Matt Ryan…He is a perfect fit for any team starting and developing a young quarterback..However; for a young starting QB that has been in league 3 or more years (such as Ryan) his playbook is too conservative and more aggresive and unpredictable playcalling is needed…My brother, who is a Denver Fan, watched the Giants game with me and his comment was, “Is this what you have been watching offensively ALL YEAR??? He said he would rather paint dry than the Falcons offense…Now; this is coming from a guy who has had Tim Tebow as his quarterback but at least their play calling against the Steelers was unpredictable.
Murlarkey was a good fit for this young revamped Falcon’s team 4 years ago but some fresher play calling is needed to energize this offense while the weapons are still young and able to make plays.
If Koetter fails to bring an imaginative offense next year and the Falcons don’t make the playoffs or are a “One and Done Again” then Smith and the player make all the money will be held more accountable….A HOUSE CLEANING WILL BE ON THE HORIZON IF THE NEW OC AND DC FAIL NEXT YEAR (WIN A PLAYOFF GAME)…
ChampDavis
January 17th, 2012
2:31 pm
The Falcons made a good hire in ushering in ‘WELCOME BACK KOTTER”. It is useless though because this off-season will sting even more because two of the most prolific offenses (and last two superbowl champions–saints and packers) got eliminated this weekend. That means ANYONE who made the playoffs could have won the superbowl. I thought either the saints or packers were going to win this years superbowl and now both teams are gone. That proves that if the Lions had upset the saints, maybe they would have took the lombardy trophy, or had the falcons gotten by the giants, then maybe the falcons would have played in the nfc title game. The parity in the nfl this year is the best ive ever seen it. Any team remaining in the last four can win the superbowl.
christophorm
January 17th, 2012
11:03 pm
If you think the Falcon Defense is good you are cRAZz_E..only abraham is good.