Are you Falcons fans ready to head back outdoors?

080730 ATLANTA: The replacement of the questionable mauve and teal exterior at the Georgia Dome with new red and black exterior definitively makse the Dome the home of the Falcons. A peek at the modified Georgia Dome. Wednesday, July 30, 2008. POUYA DIANAT / pdianat@ajc.com

080730 ATLANTA: The replacement of the questionable mauve and teal exterior at the Georgia Dome with new red and black exterior definitively gave the Dome a Falcons flavor. Wednesday, July 30, 2008. POUYA DIANAT / pdianat@ajc.com

Birdland – It’s real simple today, folks.

Are you ready to go back outside?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Are you guys and gals ready to head back outside for some NFL football?

Here’s a snapshot of the stadium situation.

Here’s a look  at the modified Georgia Dome after its 2008 refurbishments.

A lot of work has already been done on this project and they usually take almost a decade to complete, so expect more

The Buc's pirate ship. (D. Orlando Ledbetter/AJC)

The Buc's pirate ship. (D. Orlando Ledbetter/AJC)

twists and turns along the way.

Fortunately, this isn’t our first Stadium Rodeo (worked on the Lambeau Field refurbishment and the building of Miller Park and their retractable roof that never seemed to work in the early stages.)

Falcons president Rich McKay was a key figure in the Tampa stadium build up and they have that cool Pirate Ship in the end zone.

Just check in and let us know where you stand on an outdoor, downtown stadium that could possibly host World Cup games in 2018 or 2022.

204 comments Add your comment

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Darryl Ledbetter, D. Orlando Ledbetter. D. Orlando Ledbetter said: Are you Falcons fans ready to head back outdoors? http://bit.ly/daIgQD [...]

WAYNE P

May 20th, 2010
7:12 am

John

May 20th, 2010
7:23 am

That would mean there would be THREE large football stadiums INSIDE I-285. Ridiculous to build yet another one. If anything, tear down the Ga Dome and go ahead and build one with a retractable roof like Cowboys Stadium….just not as grand, the Falcons haven’t done anything to deserve such a palace. But on a serious note, why should the taxpayers be on the hook for a new stadium with a perfectly good one a few feet away on the GWCC campus?

There has to be a way to retrofit the Ga Dome to include a retractable roof.

shaggy

May 20th, 2010
7:29 am

Pro Football outside again, on grass? YEAH BABY!

The Insider

May 20th, 2010
7:30 am

I don’t care where the Falcons choose to play-as long as they pay for every bit of the new stadium. It is not the taxpayers’ duty to fund playgrounds for billionaires and their millionaire employees.

PMC

May 20th, 2010
7:31 am

Absolutely. I have less of a problem with the dome than some people but domes really don’t do anything for the city landscape. Open stadiums when well done can be beautiful and excellent when outside. If the Dome ends up remaining there I wonder if the Falcons would build a bit smaller facility. 60K or even 70K seats would be a gracious plenty. Hopefully there will be some possible tailgating areas in regards to parking but that’s going to be tough.

Where's my stimulus check

May 20th, 2010
7:39 am

Outdoors would be great.

Maybe we will get a new helmet color about the same time.

The current Black always reminds me of Jerry Glanville

Bobby Dobbins

May 20th, 2010
7:40 am

I LOVE the Dome. So many times I’m headed to the game either where it’s freezing cold, rainy, or hot as junk outside and I’m so glad that we play in a dome. Plus we can get that place pretty loud, which would be harder in an outdoor stadium. Either way, if we build a new stadium, I think the Dome needs to stay too so that ATL can keep the SEC championship, basketball tournaments, etc. I agree that a new stadium should be 60-70K seats so that it’s easier to sell out.

DJ

May 20th, 2010
7:41 am

Outside – YES! But we’re not going to get real grass; the field turf is cheaper in the long run.

Mr. McKay appears opposed to the expensive retractable roof; perhaps he is also against the $20,000 PSL the other clubs have pocketed with their new stadiums here lately. (Do that math – that is how you build a $1Bn stadium).

I would like to hear Mr. Blank’s current opinion on PSL. If he tries to feed you the garbage of how a PSL is an investment, run away and hide your wallet.

SimpleDawg

May 20th, 2010
7:44 am

I like the Dome. You don’t have to sit in the rain while your beer gets diluted……you don’t freeze your ass off when it’s 20 degrees outside with a 10 mph wind…..and you don’t have to sweat in the sweltering heat in September and early October.

It just makes for a more comfortable atmosphere for the fans, and your offense isn’t at the mercy of Mother Nature.

Dave

May 20th, 2010
7:45 am

About time they decided to return to playing outdoors, but it a shame that they insist on staying downtown. Move outside the city, where attending the games would not be a logistical nightmare, and they could provide adequate space for parking and tailgating. I was excited when they floated that plan about using the area where the GM plant is, but it looks as if that will not be happening now.

If I owned one of the sports teams here, I would flee downtown as if it was on fire.

Chief Wiggum

May 20th, 2010
7:47 am

Time to take it outdoors. This isn’t somewhere exceedingly hot or cold. Places like south Florida and Wisconsin seem to do fine with open stadiums. Most of the new stadiums built recently are either outdoor, or at least have retractable roofs. Detroit’s stadium is permanently enclosed (I think), but it also lets a LOT of natural light in. Playing in a big, dark room that needs to be artificially lit whenever used is completely out of fashion.

Not that I care about the SEC…but if there wasn’t a Dome, where else could they practically play that IS a dome? Only option is New Orleans, right?

Falcon Dave

May 20th, 2010
7:47 am

DOL, Your survey needs another option. Retractable Dome! I love football in the south in the fall but if you have ever been to a game in late August or early September the humility is murder! Not only on the fans but what about the players? Good ole Rich says it to expensive, why does he care? It looks like the tax payers are footing the bill so build a 1st class stadium with a retractable dome. Keep the SEC Champion Game! Final Four (maybe another Super Bowl one day) and all the other high profile events in Atlanta.
Have the best of both worlds!

FootballFan

May 20th, 2010
7:47 am

Retractable roof is the only way to go. You get the best of both worlds and still leaves the city in a position to host major events like Super Bowls and Final Fours.

TMoney

May 20th, 2010
7:51 am

I’d love the option to play outdoors or indoors. Easiest solution: Retractable Dome. Satisfies the needs of other events by letting the roof be closed while giving the Falcons the option to open the roof on nice days.

DJ

May 20th, 2010
7:55 am

OK so all of you guy’s are chiming in for a retractable dome and the 20K PSL. As a holdover from Fulton County Stadium I can state for a fact that the season ticket holders paid not a single dime in PSLs for the past 18 years.

And now you want to finance a brand new building on our backs? Why, so you can feel secure knowing you are going to be dry and comfortable for the one game a decade you show up for?

Cmon man!

Season TicketHolder

May 20th, 2010
7:56 am

I would not purchase season tickets if I had to sit outside for a football game. The heat, the rain, the wind, the ice…..Oh no count me out.

Ideasbobby

May 20th, 2010
7:56 am

First of all most of the people who write on these blogs do not even attend a game. Second of all I think the SEASON TICKET HOLDERS should have the majority of the input on this plan. If McKay and Blank want to ignore our opinions, then they will have to live with the lack of revenue because even after 30 years, I will not renew in an open air stadium. My three seats may not mean much to them but I am sure I have other season ticket holders who feel the same. I for one will not renew and sit in cold and snow and hot and rain as I used to do at the old Atlanta Stadium. I love the indoors and it is a great atmosphere for football. Mr. Blank can sit in his warm VIP box but I am out in the stands and want to be comfortable as my living room. I will not pay thousands of dollars to sit in the cold, rain or sweat in the hot weather when I can just watch on TV. I love the atmosphere and loud noise for football in a dome. You cannot have that outside, I know I have been there for many years. For all you people who want the outdoor stadiums, go to a Braves game as baseball should be outdoors. But football and the noise lends itself to being indoors.

scott

May 20th, 2010
7:59 am

retractable roof only …not building another dome would be the death of economic depressed atlanta..and big time events… its too humid here in the fall..and too cold here with harsh wind chills here in the winter..a dome is the only way to go..

Jim

May 20th, 2010
7:59 am

Whatever they build it probably won`t be good enough to host a Super Bowl again in the No Fun League`s eyes.

Ideasbobby

May 20th, 2010
8:05 am

Hey Chief Wiggum it is obvious you have never been in the Georgia Dome with your dark artifical light comment. The roof of the Dome is Teflon coated fabric which allows light in similar to a piece of paper held up to the sunlight. It is bright in the daytime and dark at night, just like the outdoors would be. The lights are for TV and safety of the fans. I have been in the Dome for another event during the day without lights and it was just as bright as when the lights are on in the Ga World Congress Center.

Dookie

May 20th, 2010
8:07 am

The only sensible solution is the rectractable dome. This allows for the outdoor Falcon game, while also briing in Super Bowls, Finals Fours, SEC Championships, etc. that bring in so much money for the ciuty.

Personnally, I think McKay agrees, and is just seeing if he can get the state to cover the expenses of getting that feature added in on their dime.

SimpleDawg

May 20th, 2010
8:10 am

I could roll with a retractable roof stadium, but no to an outdoor only stadium.

I am a season ticket holder.

bo

May 20th, 2010
8:10 am

if outdoor stadia are so unbearable due to weather, how come all these southern colleges sell out 90k all season long? But actually, the retractable roof isn’t a bad idea…

Roy Hobbs crackpipe

May 20th, 2010
8:15 am

Yes! and lets ditch the silly uniforms too. go back to the red helmets.

P Rose

May 20th, 2010
8:20 am

Build a new outdoor stadium downtown.

blord

May 20th, 2010
8:21 am

My main concern is location. I don’t like the downtown area because of traffic and the current parking is frustrating. I would love to see a retractable roof and would absolutely love the stadium on the North side of town.

D. Orlando Ledbetter

May 20th, 2010
8:23 am

bo

May 20th, 2010
8:25 am

i’d much rather it remain downtown. somehow, a stadium in the middle of 100’s of acres parking in the middle of suburbia doesn’t sound real appealing to me

J

May 20th, 2010
8:26 am

You are in the South. Hot, Humid.. etc. Stay indoors. Its better for ticket sales

blord

May 20th, 2010
8:29 am

I hear ya bo. My main reason for wanting it on the North side is selfish I admit. By the time I get out of church on Sunday’s it is hard to make a 4:00 kickoff and impossible to make it to a 1:00.

Chip

May 20th, 2010
8:30 am

I lived in Nashville when the Titans came to town and the PSL option worked great. Plus LP is an outdoor and works great. Much louder than any crowd I have seen at the Dome.

murray county mystic

May 20th, 2010
8:31 am

build it on the north side (575 around Canton, 75 near Acworth); get it out of downtown (panhandlers, crime, no room for tail gating, MARTA?!?!). ANd move Philips out there with it, so the Thrashers have a chance to survive…

DP

May 20th, 2010
8:34 am

What exactly is supposedly so bad about the Georgia Dome that it must already be replaced? The idea of replacing a facility that is less than 20 years old in the midst of an economy that is terrible and likely will continue to be so for years strikes me as the height of lunacy. Not one nickel from the taxpayers of Atlanta or the state of Georgia should go toward a replacement. Let Arthur Blank pay for it.

Dun

May 20th, 2010
8:36 am

The reason I don’t go to the falcons’ games is because the venue is located in downtown, commute and parking is a nightmare, and don’t even think about taking the MARTA after the game, it is packed like a ’sardin can’. Move the stadium to suburb or rural area with wide open parking spaces and easy access to highways, more people will come to the games.

Kuykendall

May 20th, 2010
8:37 am

Outdoor stadium – no roof (cheaper) – located out at least 50 miles from the ATL Hood – that way people can enjoy themselves tailgating – maybe go south closer to Macon or north closer to Flowery Branch. The artificial lighting and grass makes it hard to focus at times in person and on TV.

Infamous

May 20th, 2010
8:37 am

I am a Falcons Season Ticket owner, but I do not like the idea of playing outdoors. However, I have been to the Seattle Seahawks stadium, which is VERY nice. Although it is an open roof stadium, the majority of the seats are covered by a sort of “ledge” that circles the edge of the roof. If we have to have an open roof stadium, then that would be key. We all know how crazy Atlanta weather can be from year to year and we know how the typical Atlanta fans are. Normal Atlanta fans prob wouldn’t care to show up if there was bad weather and would sell their tickets to opposing teams. Then, we would no longer have a real home field advantage for a lot of games.

I think it is a bad idea overall considering the crazy weather and typical ATL fans. What do you think DOL?

Jaques Strappe

May 20th, 2010
8:37 am

I have been a STH since the 70’s, so I remember playing in Fulton Co stadium. If you like the open air option, you probably can’t relate to suffering in the September humidity, freezing your crystal when it’s cold, or cussing the umbrellas that keep you from seeing when it’s raining. Yes, I loved open air football on a nice balmy fall day too, but that’s not the norm and it is not worth the mostly bad times. If we get open air, I will be watching on TV. I agree with others that STHs should have a strong influence on the decision as they are the fans there for every game, not those who buy a single ticket only when the sun shines. I expect the Falcons could find a way for the STHs to help share the extra cost of a retractable. Maybe someone could answer the question: what is wrong with the current stadium (other than the crappy sound system, and a new stadium seems mandatory to get a superbowl in ATL)?

Jeff

May 20th, 2010
8:38 am

They need a retractable roof. End of story. That satisfies all needs that are being questioned by demolition of the dome. We could host basketball, SEC championships, world cup, etc. Seems like you would easily make up the cost to install a retractable roof. I’ll pitch in 5 bucks if it’ll help.

David

May 20th, 2010
8:39 am

Ok everyone, them bringing up this idea is plain and simple….THE WORLD CUP. Period. Yes, falcons want all this etc..but last year FIFA came to the GA dome and loved the city and loved what we did with the two (sold out) games that were held…i imagine this move if it is done is for us to get the Host site of the WC maybe not 2018..thats probably going to England..but 2022 is def ours for the taking..

Now as a falcon fan, I want an outdoor stadium…we act like we live up in minnesota or something..ya the heat is bad..but…big deal…college kids deal with it..i think a professional..can deal with it as well.

Alan

May 20th, 2010
8:39 am

Simply put-If we get an open air stadium, I’m dropping my season tickets. Too many times walking up to the Dome it has been a pleasure going inside when it was raining or hot as hell. Let people up north look like idiots in the snow and rain.

David

May 20th, 2010
8:39 am

Blank can build his own stadium by going to his local Home Depot, but Lowes has a better selection. The only thing wrong with the Dome is the lower end zone seats are not steep enough to see the other end of the field. Remodel the GA Dome and stop ask for tax money that is not there.

Karl

May 20th, 2010
8:44 am

Retractable roof would be ideal. But McKay says it costs too much. But why build a new place at all if you’re going to do it on the cheap. Better to stick with the dome.

Infamous

May 20th, 2010
8:46 am

And a MUCH bigger issue that needs to be addressed is the horrible parking situation that the current GA Dome has. Parking is absolutely ridiculous. In Seattle, it was very convenient to have large parking structures connected directly to the stadium and a large entrance ramp directly onto the highway. These deserve major consideration as well. The GA Dome is like someone built this huge building in the midst of DT and did not care that there really is no where to park.

One of the reasons people do not want to have another SB here was because of the parking situation, there is nothing to do around the stadium, and the crazy weather that can appear out of no where.

The Real Falcon

May 20th, 2010
8:48 am

I have had season tickets since 1985 so I’ve been inside and outside. I remember the cold Sunday’s at Atlanta Stadium (that was the original name). I don’t want that back. I spend enough time outside when I tailgate for 3 hours.

Old time Dog

May 20th, 2010
8:51 am

It is all about money. The suites sell better if you have an out door stadium. To bad taxpayers take the hit. But somebody has to lose and it’s not going to be the big money.

Frank

May 20th, 2010
8:56 am

An outdoor stadium would be fantastic. BUT I agree with other posters. I do not want to pay a dime for it. I don’;t subscribe to theory that stadiums only last 20 years. The Falcons made a mistake with the dome, and now we all have to live with it.

deegee

May 20th, 2010
8:56 am

If you are for smaller government then you are for letting Arthur Blank figure out how he is going to pay for a new stadium.

“Discussions about the team’s digs intensified over the past few months as the Georgia legislature passed a bill extending the hotel-motel tax for the Dome until 2045.

Money for a new stadium would come from the tax and a contribution by the Falcons. The amount from each is to be negotiated, as is the division of revenue from concessions, parking and other sources.”

David

May 20th, 2010
9:00 am

I didn’t know we had a bunch of weather pansies in GA…geez..

Chris

May 20th, 2010
9:08 am

I am a Falcons fan, and will watch them in a dome, outdoors, high school stadium, or a dirt field. I don’t care where we are as I cheer for my team, I just hope for a great game by my team, and hopefully we get the win!!!!

Ryno

May 20th, 2010
9:09 am

If you’re going to build a new stadium – just make it a retractabile roof stadium. Then you can play outdoors when it’s nice and shut the roof when it’s bad.

1. The league will reward you with a Superbowl
2. You can still keep the Chick-Fil-A kick off classic and the Chick Fil A Peach Bowl for extra money for the city.
3. Please make sure it’s Marta accessible since parking down town is a pain!

lamar

May 20th, 2010
9:10 am

Why not remove the roof,from the present dome.The technology is currently available.We Don’t need another stadium built.The state has so many obligations already that we can’t meet.Let’s get real about how we spend taxpayers dollars.Enough is Enough.

JDW

May 20th, 2010
9:10 am

I had season tickets for more than 10 years in the old stadium and have never set foot in the Georgia Dome. I will never attend a Falcons game in the dome. An indoor stadium in Atlanta is just plain stupid. If they go to an outdoor stadium I will go back.

real fan

May 20th, 2010
9:14 am

I have been a season ticjet homder since. 98 and have attaended games at fulton county stadium. I also was a season ticket holder for the jets when I lived in NY. With the price of tickets the way they are and as I come into my mid 40s I would not renew my tickets if we moved back outside. Nothing worse than sitting in the rain trying to watch football . As far as PSLs they are a horrible idea. Falcons cant sell out now. And when we do its because we low ball the cheap seats. Im a little pissed off Rich Mc Kay made this statement without even taking a season ticket holder survey. What happened to theyre fan appreciation for there loyalty through all thoughs crappy seasons.Guess my dad was right. They dont give a rats arse about the fans.

And 1

May 20th, 2010
9:18 am

Rather enjoy the game with my family – less hassles INDOORS INDOORS -

DamntheButcher

May 20th, 2010
9:18 am

If the Falcons pay for all of a new stadium then let them build whatever they want. If taxpayer money is involved in any form then the stadium better at least have a retractable roof. No bowl games and no conventions are going to come to town and sit in the cold or hot. The stadium needs to be used more than the 8 home games per year plus the 2 pre-season games. Spending 400 milling dollars or more needs to be used more than 10 times per season.

And 1

May 20th, 2010
9:18 am

NO ON PSL’S and NO OUTDOORS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And 1

May 20th, 2010
9:19 am

skip

May 20th, 2010
9:19 am

Indoor, outdoor, downtown, northside, southside…..who cares. I’m watching from my living room.

Deon's House

May 20th, 2010
9:20 am

While the Dome has superior sight lines than the old stadium (where a 50 yd line seat was also 50 yds from the field), I’d rather be a mile from the field and outdoors any day of the week. Football in the south in the fall is meant to be outdoors … Seems to work OK for ACC/SEC teams … can you imagine the outrage if UGA announced they were doming Sanford? Problem is politics: if the STate is going to be in the mix, they want a multi-purpose facility downtown which is how the Dome came to be in the first place, after Rankin Smith’s bluff to move the Falcons to Jacksonville. Why can’t we keep the Dome as is for SEC Champ, Peach Bowl, motocross, etc.? Who needs the Super Bowl, really?

Mark

May 20th, 2010
9:24 am

Here we go. All the folks in Vanilla Valley (Alpharetta, Cherokee, Cobb, Gwinnett) are gonna want something that’s close to them (but please keep the “undesirables out till my lawn needs mowing) so they don’t have to go “all the way downtown”. Guys, it’s the Atlanta Falcons NOT the Alpharetta Avarians so get over it. Without downtown, your area would still be tranquil farms instead of strip malls and Dave & Buster’s with cookie cutter developments.

Be a man, like in the traditional NFL cities of Philly, Pittsburgh, Dallas, Houston and the like. New Stadium: Outdoors, in the city the team is representing, tailgating with a skyline in the background and making a day of it. Otherwise, go watch Arena football in Gwinnett.

GO ATLANTA FALCONS!!!!

SirReal

May 20th, 2010
9:26 am

@The Insider. I AGREE WITH YOU TOTALLY!

All,
It seems like the retractable roof is the “chic” thing to do in sports right now. Forget it, the Falcons are too cheap. Its either going to be indoor or outdoor. No sexy tops coming off guys. Sorry.lol

mrj

May 20th, 2010
9:28 am

Come to the Northern Burbs! GM Plant site on PIB would be perfectly suited and easily accessible via Marta and several freeways.

Andre

May 20th, 2010
9:36 am

A retractable roof stadium would be ideal, it’ll be perfect to keep all the other events that use the Georgia Dome year round. Technology does allow the Falcons to renovate the Georgia Dome and keep it up to date, but I’m sure they would rather new digs. I’ve always felt moving the stadium to the GM plant site was selfish and I live in Gwinnett. I have family and friends that come to the Falcons game from all over the south and moving the stadium that far out, would just make their ride much more longer. I hate those suburban jungles, look at D.C. they’re begging to come back into the inner city. The Detroit Lions, they moved back into the inner city, and I know half of yall wouldn’t fly over Detroit in a plane. Look at Dallas, they were so selfish and cheap, they missed out of the new Cowboys stadium, they had their chance, but didn’t want to pony up. So a suburban city did and now they’re reaping all the benefits. Houston Texans are downtown, Indianapolis Colts are downtown, the game was played in the Metrodome, but if the Vikings move outside, they will lose the final four. Don’t forget, the state legislature passed a provision that would require the Falcons to STAY DOWNTOWN. FOR THE TAX MONEY!!! DUH Why would the super bowl come to Doraville, GA? Why would the Final Four come to Doraville, GA? There are no hotels out there, traffic at the Spaghetti Junction would be a nightmare. Georgia doesn’t want to help pay for MARTA, so that’s unreliable.

dangerousdan88.5

May 20th, 2010
9:37 am

How many dome teams have won a Super Bowl? one? I hate indoor football. Just think Vick would not have broken his leg on that crap turf, Dan Reeves could’ve straightened him out and we’d have a SuperBowl win or 3 by now. No wait, Blank had go through his Home Depot management style 1st by hiring his punk Mora. Oh well. Bring on the grass ,rain slickers.and the Gladitors of steel.

headmofo

May 20th, 2010
9:39 am

If we have an outdoor stadium all bets are off. You can barely get all of the transplant people who live her now to enjoy a game inside the dome….. Why would the Falcons brass think the fans would enjoy the elements?? No one wants an outdoor only stadium!!! A retractable roof is one thing, but when the elements are such that it takes away from the fan experience, I will pass.

Rich, please stop trying to turn Atlanta in to Tampa. Its not warm year around and we do have true winter days.

Focus on improving the fan experience inside the Dome. Scout out an area with better parking and and adequate space for tailgating.

I hate to say this Rich, “we have been spoiled by the Dome”.

David

May 20th, 2010
9:40 am

@Mark, awesome post! Also SirReal…if you didnt see my post..they are doing this also in hopes of the world cup bid…you know how much money is generated through the world cup?…I’ll tell you 3-4 BILLION dollars!…

rebeldawg

May 20th, 2010
9:40 am

Birmingham apparently has plans to build a Dome. The SEC headquarters are in Birmingham. So if we follow through on building an outdoor only stadium then you can pretty much bank on having to drive 2.5 hours west on I-20 for the SEC Championship every year.

Falconsnut

May 20th, 2010
9:41 am

I usually go to see the Falcons at Carolina and I am always glad we have a dome and no PSL’s. Last year, October was nice but won’t go this year in December. Would not renew my season tickets to sit in cold/wet conditions. I would go no matter where it is located.

F-105 Thunderchief

May 20th, 2010
9:49 am

We, the taxpayers have built them a fine stadium. If they want to pay to build a new one, fine. But, the Georgia Dome is 16 years old and has been updated once already. There’s not one thing wrong with it.

FalconFan

May 20th, 2010
9:52 am

Mr. Ledbetter,
Your provide one instance of a retractable roof issue, and you expect everyone to be convinced they do not work? This is beside the fact that the article is dated 2002 … 8 years ago. I am sure Jerry Jones built his 1 billion plus stadium without considering the potential issues with a retractable roof, or Relient stadium, or The University of Phoenix stadium, or Lucas Oil… There should be no issue with a retractable roof if it is engineered and constructed properly.

Alan

May 20th, 2010
9:53 am

I hope Rich McKay and Arthur are outside when the rain comes. Oh no, they will probably be in their box.

mr bobby's gotta go

May 20th, 2010
9:53 am

football is an outside sport. nix the dome pls.

mr bobby's gotta go

May 20th, 2010
9:56 am

the weather is what makes football so exciting at times. rain, sleet, snow, makes for unpredictable outcomes. who didnt like playing in the rain and snow growing up?

FalconsFan

May 20th, 2010
9:56 am

Gotta love the Yuppies that think moving a stadium close their homes is the solution. I’d love to know how many people whining about the Falcons playing in downtown Atlanta have been to games at a stand alone stadium such as Giants Stadium/FedEx Field or even the Linc in Philly. Want to talk about logistical nightmares? How about getting 30-50,000 cars in/out of one massive parking lot using a limited number of entrances. Also, have you noticed what happens to the areas around pro stadiums that reside outside of cities? They’re either run down to begin with (cheap property) or they become run down over time (because property becomes cheap).

Bottom line, the World Congress area is a great place for a stadium, which is why the Falcons want to stay there if possible. There are plenty of ways to get in and out of the area and on to the local highways. Panhandlers/the Homeless? Do you not think they would flock to a stadium outside of the city as well? Also how many are there really? I see more annoying religious fanatics creating issues than the one or two guys that consistently pan handle at the Dome.

Dled, I see your point about retractable roofs, however, how many NFL stadiums have had issues?

And 1

May 20th, 2010
9:57 am

@ Rich McKay – Fan experience – Season Tickets – Luxury Boxes – Pays your salary. Focus on the FAN and family. Cold Wet Rain is not sexy or REAL football. The enjoyment of being with like minded folks who care about the FALCONS is fun. As a season ticket holder I WILL NOT renew my SEATS to sit in the COLD WET RAIN SNOW WIND.

Hollywould

May 20th, 2010
9:59 am

Mark, you do realize that DALLAS plays in Irving.

Butts Wagner

May 20th, 2010
10:01 am

I don’t care where the Falcons choose to play-as long as they pay for every bit of the new stadium. It is not the taxpayers’ duty to fund playgrounds for billionaires and their millionaire employees.

Amen. Did I read correctly that the city will be levying a tax to pay off the Georgia Dome until 2045? How does it possibly make sense to spend hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue to build a new stadium? The new stadium wouldn’t be paid off until 2150 at that rate. Let the other cities dig financial holes. The Falcons can take donations or do whatever they can to raise the money themselves. Just don’t turn to the city or state to fund your playhouse. The economy is already a mess.

Sick & Tired Of Being Sick & Tired

May 20th, 2010
10:03 am

If the city’s taxpayers are going to have to foot part of the bill, then it makes more sense to spend the extra money and build a stadium with a retractable roof so that the facility can be utilize in the cold winter months after the Falcons’ season has ended. Otherwise the facility would just be sitting there and not earning any revenue for the city.

Say what you want….but it sure is nice to seat indoors watching the game on rainy and/or cold Sundays at the Dome. I remember the outdoor days at Fulton County Stadium in the rain…believe me, it ain’t a whole lot of fun trying to look around/under umbrella in front of you.

D. Orlando Ledbetter

May 20th, 2010
10:07 am

Seems like you all are all over the place on this. Private-Public partnership. I think the folks complaining about the rain are getting laughed at by Packer and Bear fans. I’m just saying.

MCook

May 20th, 2010
10:07 am

Tear the roof off the dome and replace it with a retractable one.

And 1

May 20th, 2010
10:07 am

@Sick & Tired Of Being Sick & Tired – I totally agree

GetwhatUpayfor

May 20th, 2010
10:07 am

Hell no to outdoors..8 years at Turner field (season tickets) in Ice , rain, Cold, hot and etc. Keep it inside are you will have half empty stands in bad weather. Agree also that it should be in northside of Atlanta. Many fans don’t care to fight the elements where its at now..sin city!

smoore54

May 20th, 2010
10:08 am

It’s fine to sit outside in beautiful September but I really have no interest in sitting outside and freezing my butt off in December if I don’t have to do it. I’ll just watch on tv for those games. At home or in the local sports bar. Yes, that truly is the definition of a “fair weather” fan but I’m not sure I care. I’ll watch every single game but why be freaking uncomfortable while I do it?

And 1

May 20th, 2010
10:08 am

I root for the FALCONS dont care about bears packer oh my!!

D. Orlando Ledbetter

May 20th, 2010
10:09 am

INDOOR OPTION — Perhaps indoor fans (afraid of rain crowd) can pool together and purchase a suite. http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/2010/05/20/open-air-stadium-could-raise-suite-revenue-for-falcons/

Bullseye

May 20th, 2010
10:10 am

I hate the mall-like atmosphere of the GA Dome. Nothing worse than going indoors to watch a Pro Football game. Might as well be in the Mall Of Georgia. The best games I ever seen have mostly been outdoors and the weather was a factor in the game.

Atlanta people complaining about weather!!! You ever been to a game in Miami in October? How about a game in NY or Foxboro in December? You guys are big fat PANSIES.

GetwhatUpayfor

May 20th, 2010
10:10 am

Who cares what Bear and Packer fans think..if they like the cold and Rain… find with me.

And 1

May 20th, 2010
10:12 am

A real FAN and Newspaper person take care of their responsibilities. DOL – Protect your Family Team you worry to much about Opinion of other cities. Go write for them. BYE

smoore54

May 20th, 2010
10:13 am

Orlando –

Yeah, Bears and Packer fans are laughing at us and I have no problem with that while I sit my comfy butt in climate control. When Atlanta starts bringing in the CHAMPIONSHIPS of the Bears and Packers then maybe we can reevaluate how much discomfort a fan is willing to withstand in order to go and see the Birds. Until then, let’s make it better / easier on the fans to want to go and spend money at the stadium for a team that is celebrating just having back-to-back winning seasons as if it were our own little Super Bowl victory.

D. Orlando Ledbetter

May 20th, 2010
10:14 am

INDOOR OPTIONS IN PHILLY
Luxury Suites 172 Suites
Club Seats 10,828

Club Seats

In a dramatic departure from the confines of the Vet, the new Lincoln Financial Field will include 9,000 Club Seats that will allow patrons to experience events and entertain guests in maximum comfort. Club seats, set in prime sideline locations, will be extra wide and padded. Club patrons will also enjoy waiter service. The Club Seats will be accessible from a luxurious, air-conditioned club level that will house lounge seating, sports bars, video walls, and will feature a pre-game buffet.

Luxury Suites

The number and location of the luxury suites at the new Lincoln Financial Field will represent a significant improvement over the suites controlled by the Eagles at Veterans Stadium.

The suites in the new stadium will be located between the lower bowl and the club seating sections as well as between the club seating section and the upper bowl. The lower level of suites will be among the closest to the field of any NFL stadium. By comparison, the suites controlled by the Eagles at the Vet sit atop the stadium, further from the field than any other suites in the league.

Each of the suites will feature retractable glass windows, allowing fans the opportunity to watch the game in climate-controlled comfort or with the open-air experience.

SOURCE: http://WWW.FOOTBALL.BALLPARKS.COM

GetwhatUpayfor

May 20th, 2010
10:15 am

It don’t make a damn what fans want..its all about the MONEY!

Forget your option ORLANDO.

And 1

May 20th, 2010
10:15 am

@bullseye – Name calling is a real thoughtful way to convince someone to spend hard earned paycheck on sitting in the RAIN COLD WET. I pay as a fan. The players are paid millions to be in the RAIN COLD WET.

Man up bullseye

FalconFan

May 20th, 2010
10:19 am

FalconsFan (you stole my name, jk),
I agree that the stadium needs to be downtown, but I disagree with your argument. My job requires considerable travel, which has allowed me to experience numerous stadiums around the country. I disagree that suburban stadiums are a logistical nightmares or taint the surrounding neighborhood. The Dolphins Stadium is a prime counter-example to your logistical nightmare. They literally have created exits off of major highways that lead only to and from the stadium. The flow of traffic to and from the stadium was the smoothest I have ever experienced. If you have ever been to the new Patriots stadium, you would see a perfect example of how the stadium has actually helped the local economy thrive and prosper. The stadium literally has a mall attached to it, which drives a lot of business to its restaurants, shops, and movie theater. My arguement is that it requires due-diligence and proper planning to make a suburban stadium work, as well as a downtown stadium. Again, I prefer a downtown stadium because of the ambiance it generates, but a suburban stadium can be successful.

FalconsFan

May 20th, 2010
10:19 am

You have to wonder if the Falcons have done any research to see how many Season Ticket Holders they would lose or gain if they move to an open air stadium. I know as a ticket holder I get surveys several times a year regarding the Falcons and I haven’t once seen a question about the new stadium. If the Falcons have a hard time filling a 70 degree, dry stadium they’re going to have a lot of fun filling a new outdoor one in December.

D. Orlando Ledbetter

May 20th, 2010
10:22 am

INDOOR OPTIONS IN SEATTLE

Luxury Suites 100 Suites
Club Seats Unknown
Source: Football.Ballparks.com

Club Level and Club Lofts at Qwest: http://www.qwestfield.com/eventbooking/qwestfield.aspx

Suite Level at Qwest: http://www.qwestfield.com/eventbooking/qwestfield.aspx
Source: Qwest Field website

The piano genius

May 20th, 2010
10:22 am

That pirate ship is gay

Bullseye

May 20th, 2010
10:22 am

Pansie 1. Maybe they will install recliners for you at your new Dome. I don’t care if you come to the game or not. Tell me the number of times you’ve sat in the rain for a game. Freezing rain at that. OHHHH the WIND!!!!! I’m COLD!!!!!!!!!

FalconsFan

May 20th, 2010
10:22 am

Dolphins stadium literally has nothing around it. From that Miami natives they won’t go near that place once it gets dark out.. it’s in a really bad part of town. Suburban stadiums COULD be successful, but I think the Yuppies who don’t already attend games would be in for an eye opener when they spend 1-2 hours leaving a game that might be a few miles from their home.

And 1

May 20th, 2010
10:25 am

Never bought the luxury suite/box stuff. I guess that is for the folks who want Outdoor stadium hang out. I work for a living. I dont live to work.

D. Orlando Ledbetter

May 20th, 2010
10:26 am

The piano genuis — Be nice!!! The Pirate Ship is kinda cool. Give ‘em credit for that.

D. Orlando Ledbetter

May 20th, 2010
10:27 am

GetWhatUpayfor — I don’t have an opinion. NEUTRAL/OBJECTIVE. What are you talking about? Just passing along information and some insight, hopefully.

David

May 20th, 2010
10:27 am

There doesn’t seem to be a problem with them filling it for UGA or GT…well UGA…hah..I think people are analyzing it too much…if the falcons put a quality product on the field..fans will show up…you all are just wimps really..boo hoo its 50 degrees outside and raining…thats what jackets are for genius…and I feel with a new stadium they wouldnt lose many fans b/c its A NEW STADIUM! I’ve never heard the saying wow that new stadium sure has a hard time selling out b/c its all NEW and such…i repeat…wimps..

And 1

May 20th, 2010
10:32 am

KIDS ha ha – have no real SENSE of what is REAL

The piano genius

May 20th, 2010
10:32 am

I often hear that football is meant to be played outdoors. I hear this from a few media scribes that either get to set in the comfortable, shaded and wind protected press box, or talking heads on the radio that go to one or two games a year. The other people that maintain football must be played outside are the brain dead fans that believe these wind bags.

When the game was invented, engineering techniques were not advanced enough to construct facilities large enough with roofs. Had those techniques been possible, I can assure you most, if not all games would have been played indoors.

Atlanta in the winter is not the issue. Atlanta in August until mid October is. Hot, humid and miserable. I am willing to bet that most of you who pine for an outdoor facility are not season ticket holders and are just repeating garbage you read or hear.

The Dome is already in place. It’s cheap and will not cost tax payers, or fans the additional monies required to construct a new stadium.

D. Orlando Ledbetter

May 20th, 2010
10:34 am

The piano genius — You’ve been heard. (Just take back the pirate ship comment though!)

FalconsFan

May 20th, 2010
10:35 am

Dled, how long have you lived in Atlanta? I don’t think you truly understand the Falcons fan base that make up your readers. You can paste snarky comments about other fans laughing at the Falcons fans but let’s be really honest here, unless the Falcons build a 50,000 seat stadium they’re NEVER going to fill an outdoor stadium. People have gotten used to the GA Dome over the last 10+ years, and the Falcons STILL have a hard time filling every seat, even during an 11-5 season.

Atlanta isn’t Chicago, or Greenbay or Philly, it is it’s own breed in many,many ways to compare it to any other city in the South or any other is unfair. I’ve lived in 13 states over my life and I’ve never seen a city like Atlanta.

john powell

May 20th, 2010
10:37 am

Not no, but hell no!

FalconsFan

May 20th, 2010
10:37 am

David,
You can’t compare UGA which is a COLLEGE sport to a PRO sport, there’s no inbred loyalty to many, many Pro teams. The Falcons have been around since the 1960’s, UGA 1785… the loyalty factor is bound to be different.

D. Orlando Ledbetter

May 20th, 2010
10:38 am

Not trying to be mean here, but are the folks complaining about the rain the same ones who can’t seem to get into the Dome before the game starts? Leave a half hour earlier. Shut down the tailgate in enough time to be in your seats by kickoff, indoor or outdoors.

Art Vandalay

May 20th, 2010
10:38 am

To all you folks talking about wanting the stadium on the North side you either are delusional or aren’t looking at the big picture. The furthest north the stadium could be is Buckhead, for a number of reasons. first, it needs to be accessible from as many highways as possible, meaning 75/85 via the downtown connector as well as I-20, the city is obviously accessible from the most highways in one place. I think the new stadium could be closer to the highway though and the site at Northside and Simpson st. backs right up to where the connector lets out at Ivan Allen, it would need major work though because it backs up now as it is. second, MARTA, you may not use it to go to games but plenty of people do including the tourists and conventioneers who make it possible to have a new stadium. And last but certainly not least, flexibility in use. Do you honestly through all your unfounded prejudices of Atlanta get that one logical thought out, do you REALLY believe a World cup, Super Bowl, Final Four, ACC/SEC Tournament, SEC Championship, Chick-fil-a kick off, Chick-fil-a bowl etc.. would want to be hosted in say Alpharetta? Nobody is going to have an even in ATL and travel here to stay on Windward Parkway 50 miles from the airport, eat at Chili’s and tailgate in the North Point Mall parking lot. Look at the big picture. They are the ATLANTA Falcons their fans are not exclusively from the north side and from the games i’ve been to looks like most them aren’t.

D. Orlando Ledbetter

May 20th, 2010
10:38 am

And 1 — Been there, done that.

FalconsFan

May 20th, 2010
10:39 am

The piano genius,
Basketball is played indoors why? Because it originated that way, more kids play basketball outdoors than indoors though because they CAN, Football should be played indoors and outdoors because it CAN be.

The piano genius

May 20th, 2010
10:39 am

Whats wrong with gay? I have numerous gay friends. It’s not OK to be gay?

JJ

May 20th, 2010
10:44 am

Bunch of freakin pansies. Waaaaaaahhhh…..it’s too cold. Waaaaaahhhhh…….it’s too hot. Waaaaaahhhhhhh…….it’s raining. Just stay home and watch from the comfort of your own living room if you can’t stand the elements. Football is a tough sport that’s meant to be played outside. Grow a pair pansies!!!!!

The piano genius

May 20th, 2010
10:45 am

JJ?…..Are you a season ticket holder?

Bullseye

May 20th, 2010
10:46 am

Face it. Metro Atlanta is just full of mall strolling Pansies. It is just so hot,cold,windy and rainy here.

Art Vandalay

May 20th, 2010
10:47 am

They have done a really nice job with the Luckie/Marietta and Centennial Park areas with restaurants and things losing the dome would kill it. Have you seen it for the Chick-fil-a games and SEC Championship? It is as good an atmosphere as there is. I venture to say its better than Jax for FL/GA. Have you been to Jacksonville any other weekend? Probably not if you are still alive. The walk from parking to the Landing feels like a bad horror movie. Build a new stadium and bring FL/GA in too! I’m tired of seeing the mullets and jean shorts every October in Jacksonville, Florigeorgia. Its not even really Florida, Atlanta is better, and this is coming from a Gator fan.

JJ

May 20th, 2010
10:48 am

Damn skippy piano dude.

G'Vegas Dawg

May 20th, 2010
10:49 am

I know things look bad right now, but, sooner or later the economy will improve. I think that everyone involved will be VERY upset if the falcons don’t shoot to build a retractable roof stadium. Not just for football, but for all winter events including concerts, football games, motorcross, etc. Attendance will start to suffer in Atlanta if there is a slight possibility of rain. Fans are used to having the protection from the elements.

The piano genius

May 20th, 2010
10:50 am

100, 200 or 300 level?

JP

May 20th, 2010
10:50 am

Why can’t we just have a retractable roof?

JJ

May 20th, 2010
10:53 am

And for the record, I live north of the city (about 50 miles north actually) and I have NO problem with the stadium downtown. But I’d much rather have an outdoor stadium than indoor. Battling the element…fans going crazy because it’s too freaking cold to feel your feet….ah, yes….football in it’s greatest form.

Ya know….you don’t hear the folks in Philly, NE, NYC, GB, and CHI whining about being too cold to play football outside. And THESE are the greatest NFL cities in the country. Hmmm……wonder why?

Because fans aren’t pansies that want to sit in a nice warm or air conditioned dome and be catered to like little babies.

David

May 20th, 2010
10:53 am

What is your point in asking him that Piano..if hes rich or poor?

Art Vandalay

May 20th, 2010
10:54 am

retractable roof is the only way to go. Look at all the indoor events the dome holds. We have already shown operating one centrally located multi-use facility is extremely viable. Look how quickly the Dome paid for itself, why do they not think they can make up the cost for a retractable roof. Do they not look at projections? The world cup, a couple super bowls, and Atlanta is poised to be an even bigger convention draw in the next 20 years especially if they move the new dome to the site a block north and expand the GWCC into the current dome site as planned. The roof will more than pay for itself and thats hard to argue.

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ATLHOMER, D. Orlando Ledbetter. D. Orlando Ledbetter said: Are you Falcons fans ready to head back outdoors? http://bit.ly/9hGgIN [...]

JJ

May 20th, 2010
10:55 am

LOL….what do want me to do, mail you my ticket stubs? Show you a receipt? I could tell you I sit in section 320, 150, 219 (yes, I’m making that up as I go) and what difference is that to you? Are YOU a season ticket holder? You want to meet at a game or something? LOL…..funny dude you are.

Art Vandalay

May 20th, 2010
10:58 am

A world class stadium and an expanded GWCC could spur some of the on hold projects for the Centennial Park area like the Hard Rock Hotel and Lego World for example. I know there were some other on hold hotels and restaurants too. We need that critical mass around the park and CNN to have that Times Square type feel. We are already a draw but what if we had that to give people in SC, Alabama, Florida, Mississippi etc an option to visiting NYC. You might not like the crowds and tourists but remember they come here and spend A LOT of money that allows us to have nice things where we live.

The piano genius

May 20th, 2010
11:02 am

Section 228. Since 2001

seldomfound

May 20th, 2010
11:03 am

Let’s be real. For all of you who are asking that the stadium be moved away from downtown don’t you really mean closer to where you live? So how close would you want it? If you’re like me you want it close but not too close to impact your property values right?

How far would you drive? So if it’s in Griffin are you OK? Distance from the airport needs to be considered (we like folks flying in and contributing to the local economy).

For those of you who talk about crime – how many of you have ever witnessed a crime on the way to a game – really? And for those of you who beleive car breaki-in will not happen on your side of town – you’re fooling yourself.

Regarding indoor or outdoor or retractable. I believe some form of convertable buiilding is best. How about a transparent (UV filtering) roof with a few large windows/ventalation that can open and close? We can call it the Porch.

The piano genius

May 20th, 2010
11:04 am

And I ask because MOST who whine about wanting to have an outdoor stadium are NOT season ticket holders.

Try not to take it too personally.

JJ

May 20th, 2010
11:12 am

I’m not taking anything personally. And I’m not whining about an outdoor staidum. I’m griping and laughing at all the pansies that whine about the heat, cold, and rain.

You are correct about one thing, the dome is already here so there isn’t exactly an urgent NEED for a new place to play. Depending on the funds available and how they plan to pay for it, I’m not opposed to a new stadium. In other words, if Mr. Blank wants to build it with his, far be it for me to object. If he does, I would love an outdoor stadium. If however he doesn’t, then I’m cool with what we got now.

Bullseye

May 20th, 2010
11:12 am

I want an outdoor venue because I want to see grass, mud and blood on Drew Brees’ uniform after we sack him for the sixth time. I want outdoor so that a 165lb kicker does not beat us with a 56 yard field goal. If it’s raining we pound the football and if it’s nice we can air it out. Indoor fans can go to Mall of Georgia and play your Play Stations.

JJ

May 20th, 2010
11:13 am

Aight, this place has turned dead on me. I’m going to lunch.

truth

May 20th, 2010
11:15 am

Retractable roof is the way to go. Best of both worlds. Only close it if it’s raining.

I am not a season ticket holder.

HugoStiglitz

May 20th, 2010
11:19 am

I would love a new outdoor stadium. It would be much better and would add more atmosphere to the game. I wouldnt even mind if the season ticket prices went up because of it.

The piano genius

May 20th, 2010
11:24 am

Only pansies go to lunch this early!

Just messing with you.

I’m glad you did pick up on the financials of the Dome already being in place. Think of it like buying a car. You have one that works, is reliable for the most part…..It just isn’t “new”….So what? I tend to drive my car 10 years before I get a new one. The dome has many years left. Save the money from building a new facility and lower ticket prices. Save the money to acquire land for tailgating. Save the money to acquire land for pre and post game activities, bars, hotels……I saw one comment here stating the economy will get better…….We don’t know that. Just because it has in the past does not mean it will happen now. Until we know for certain, lets get all we can out of the Dome.

GetwhatUpayfor

May 20th, 2010
11:25 am

Agree, Retractable roof and everyone will be happy.

Fair & Balanced is that right..Orlando?

GetwhatUpayfor

May 20th, 2010
11:28 am

Are we talking about 6 to 8 years from now?

ChippersLoveChild

May 20th, 2010
11:30 am

Wait… what do you Miller Park and Lambeau have to do with the GA Dome?

BigTimeTECHFan

May 20th, 2010
11:34 am

Retractable Roof would settle the GWCC issue.
Have they not heard ot that?

I liked the 1st few week at Atlanta Fulton County Staduim, but man late in the season it could get rough. I remember one year 1 was one of only about 10 people sitting on the 1st row behind the end zone, cold and rain and everyone moved for cover. I was talking trash and the other team (49ers) knew it was me. Fulton Kykendoll (sp?) told me to keep it up.

NOLA

May 20th, 2010
11:34 am

It doesn’t matter. ‘Cons and their fans will still be the Saint’s B*tch regardless of whether they play indoors or outdoors.

Do you folks know how long we have been playing in the superdome for?

All you folks do is whine. Let’s move to Duluth. Let’s move to Chamblee. Let’s move to Doraville, Let’s move to Mechanicsville. We want to play outdoors. :)

When will the ‘Con nation quit crying, whining, and simply line up and take your butt whippings courtersy of the who dat nation?

Maybe if you threepeat this year you might just get your wish.

‘Cons team goal for 2010: Achieve third consecutive winning season. :)

joey563

May 20th, 2010
11:34 am

What about Reliant Park or university of Pheonix Stadium for a good example of what we are looking forward to? It only cost 420 million and 455 million dollars respectively, (according to a quick google search), and it would be the best of both worlds and can still be used for numerous events.

DMR

May 20th, 2010
11:36 am

Maybe Arthur Blank should be talking to Dan Radikovich (SP). You want to stay downtown, you want an open air stadium, you want to play on grass. Georgia Tech has problems selling out their stadium although with Paul Johnson on the scene, things should get better. The Falcons should focus on a possible revenue share with Georgia Tech. Tech gets the stadium for their Thursday night games/Saturday games…the Falcons get Sunday and/or Monday. The expansion would only need to be approx. 10,000 – 12,000 seats. I have heard that not having the Dome would be harmful to College Sports…i.e. the ACC/SEC Basketball Tournaments, The Chic-fil-a Bowl, The Classic, The SEC Football Championship. I disagree that it would be hurtful to football in any way…Basketball, I can see.

I would explore the financial possibilities and logistics of working with Georgia Tech.

Just a thought to explore. It may not have wheels, but it is worth a glance.

FrankTheFalcon

May 20th, 2010
11:40 am

Forget having an outside stadium! To hell with the World Soccer Whatever! How about a comfortable indoor stadium with even better amenities than we have now! At my age, I will not sit outside in the pouring rain to watch a football game when I can stay home and watch it on my new 40″ Samsung LCD HDTV TV and drink my favorite beverage. AN OUTSIDE STADIUM IS A TERRIBLE IDEA FOR THE FANS, MR. McKay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DLed, to hell with the Green Bay Packers idiots. What person would want to live up there in that God awful weather when they can live in Georgia with our wonderful weather? They sit out in the terrible weather because they have permanent brain damage and have nothing else to do! They go ice fishing, not because they enjoy it, but because they want to get away from the old lady and drink a few beers. They are willing to brave the elements just for some peace and quiet and to get a buzz. Hey, maybe they are smarter than I first thought! LOL

drajax

May 20th, 2010
11:44 am

outdoors would be nice, but since Blank has owned the team the per game price for my season tickets has gone from $33 to $120. I’m worried that the club will finance the new stadium on the backs of the STH by making them pay a license fee. If Blank opts for public financing I’d hope our politicians would make him pledge no license fees.

Jeff

May 20th, 2010
11:46 am

NO. Keep it inside.

florida falcon

May 20th, 2010
11:47 am

Build it anywhere, so long as the birds don’t end up flying to the left coast! It sickens me to think of the dirtybirds as the Los Angeles/Anaheim Falcons!

The piano genius

May 20th, 2010
11:49 am

Lets talk about concessions. Why can’t I get a decent beer? I have to walk a considerable distance to get something other than macro rice and corn beer devoid of character and flavor. When I do walk that distance, my choices are Yuengling, Guinness, a super sweet cider and Sweetwater 420. How nice it would be to get a Terrapin Rye or Big Hoppy Monster. A Redbrick Oatmeal Porter would be great too. If we are going to have Sweetwater beer, how about their IPA? Sometimes I am in the mood for a Belgian Tripel…..Or a light, yet tasty Kolsch. There are over 5 million people in this metro area and I still can only get watered down garbage served from a can…….

The piano genius

May 20th, 2010
11:49 am

Enter your comments here

kenNatlanta

May 20th, 2010
11:52 am

The loss of of future NCAA Regional/Final Fours is gone. The “gimmee” to host the SEC football championship game would be gone. Can you say LP Field and Nashville? The SEC/ACC basketball tournaments? Hello Memphis’ FedEx Forum & the Greensboro Coliseum or Charlotte’s Time Warner Arena! These are real events hosted at the Georgia Dome that bring millions of dollars to Atlanta tourism.

This should not even be a question. Atlanta has an ace with the dome that these other southern citys do not have.

The piano genius

May 20th, 2010
11:52 am

What happened to my beer post? The one where I complained about the poor selection at the Dome.

Tee Tee

May 20th, 2010
11:55 am

Considering I grew up in a household that have been season ticket holders for majority of my life- I think my folks were without season tickets for 2 years (it was a rough time)- season ticket holders for almost 33 years! I remember going to Fulton County Stadium- in the rain (punchos and umbrellas) and the freezing cold (we would take an overisized thermal full of hot apple cider). Don’t recall too many “hot” games- we in the south- it’s supposed to be hot!!! I also remember one game where they literally had to have the crowd be quiet cause the opposing team could not hear the QB count (or whatever they do)…so that whole noise reason won’t fly! cause it can be just as loud and rowdy in an outside stadium. I was young but I have to say those were “adventurous” times in the rain and cold. I prefer indoors any day…but nostalgia-I would go for outdoors-that makes real football players -to be able to play in the elements… A dome-making them wussies if you ask me- they get a lil cold or wet and can’t play!

Falconsforlife

May 20th, 2010
12:01 pm

I’d love an outdoor stadium. However, we need a retractable roof stadium. I don’t understand how Miami can do that for the Marlins but we can’t get that done for an NFL team here in a much larger city.

Infamous

May 20th, 2010
12:12 pm

I am tired of hearing about other NFL cities with open roof stadiums!!

This is Atlanta. Anything in Atlanta has a hard time selling out. No way Atlanta consistently sells out in a stadium with no roof. Forget home field advantage on bad weather days. I would still be there, but I do not want to share our stadium with whatever away teams fans.

Ridiculous

May 20th, 2010
12:17 pm

We absolutely do not need a new stadium … period. If Blank wants a new stadium, let him build it or move the team. While the majority of the Dome’s revenues come from the Falcons, so do the majority of expenses. The Dome without the Falcons would do just fine with college ball, basketball, soccer, motorsports and the like. And, it’s those events – especially the college football and basketball – that bring visitors to our city and fill our hotel rooms. The state should simply say, “No thank you.”

Yurtle_the_turtle

May 20th, 2010
12:18 pm

I hate the Georgia Dome. Who the hell can tailgate there? Part of the fun and experience on game day is to tailgate and you can’t do that downtown. Falcons stay downtown, I won’t come.

Common Cents

May 20th, 2010
12:25 pm

I don’t think anyone has mentioned or questioned if the Falcons deserve a new place to work sponsored partly by the taxpayers of Georgia. Since 1966 their record is 237 wins and 349 loses. That’s less than a 500% winning record. I’m not convinced they deserve to play in the Georgia Dome. Maybe the Falcons should display their worthiness of such planning and expenditures by providing us fans and non fans with a couple winning seasons and more appearances in post season play. Teachers or professional football players? They are playing outside now, outside of our expectations.

Joseph

May 20th, 2010
12:28 pm

In order to maximize all angles and opportunities, the Dome needs to be saved and if a new stadium is to be built, then build it nearby. Otherwise, it makes no sense to demolish the dome and throw away the various events that have bringing in money to the city and state, especially in exchange for a one time soccar event. If you demolish build a new one with a retractible roof. Seems like the only option.

Joseph

May 20th, 2010
12:29 pm

oops… I mean soccer, sorry

froggy

May 20th, 2010
12:34 pm

Outdoor stadium would be a great thing. Football indoors is just wrong. Even with terrible sight lines, the atmosphere at Atlanta Fulton County for Falcons games was 100 times better. Really hoping they follow thru with the outdoors venue — might get me back as a season ticket holder!

Pay attention Arthur

May 20th, 2010
12:37 pm

Indoor stadium? Outdoor stadium? Retractable roof? Who cares…Step 1 is to get the heck out of downtown Atl. Move their butts outside of the perimeter where the people and the money are. Watch the sellouts pile up. All Atl franchises continue to put an iffy product out and yet they expect people to wind their way down to that crime infested craphole of a city night in and night out. Not happening and our support for these teams proves it.

Pi$$onaDAWG

May 20th, 2010
12:46 pm

You fools have forgotten what the Peach Bowl was like outside before 1996. You want to play outside FINE, but don’t ask me to pay more than 30-60 dollars for any seat in an outdoor stadium. You can kiss the Peach/Chick-fil-a Bowl good-bye on New Years Eve Night. If the Falcons could win or play for 14 NFC championships in a row like the Braves in the 90’s-00’s then Talk about a new stadium.

Ben

May 20th, 2010
12:53 pm

Has the idea of a Soldier Field-esque renovation been ruled out? They kept the same stadium site and original shell of the building in tact, just renovated the interior to the point where it was essentially a new stadium. 30-40% of the cost of any construction project is tied up in purchasing the property and civil engineering sitework. A massive renovation to the Ga Dome could provide essentially an entirely new stadium at 60% of the cost. That number could be cut down even more. Say you keep the lower bowl in place and tear down everything from the club level and up, the entire foundation of the stadium is still in tact. Then you design and build a new club level with the suites that Arthur Blank needs, an all new upper deck for the fans that isn’t a mile from the field, and a retractable roof over the top that the GWCC needs. That pleases all parties involved… and it could be done for anywhere from 1/3 to 1/2 the cost that New York and Dallas are spending on their stadiums. Most importantly, it keeps Atlanta in the mix for the highest profile events like Final Fours, Super Bowls, BCS bowls and eventual World Cup games.

eplayerj

May 20th, 2010
1:12 pm

Sorry Gwinnett They didn’t say it was going up there.

Robert

May 20th, 2010
1:13 pm

I would love to see a new home for the Falcons. I think they should move it out of the downtown area and more into the northern metro area. I am in north ga and i am not found of takeing my kids down to the dome for a late game because of the parking problems and two the safeness of marta i hope they will take some of these problem in concedration.

Outdoor Man

May 20th, 2010
2:07 pm

THE GAMES MUST BE OUTSIDE. Only girls play inside – with their little dollies. This is a man’s sport. I am tired of going to the mall for a football game!!!!!!!! We should have the General Lee fly through the goal post after every touchdown. And after a visiting team scores a TD the jumbotron should say “Frankly we don’t give a damn”

Freddie : G

May 20th, 2010
3:04 pm

The people who write in support of a new outdoor Stadium will be the first ones to make excuses about the weather when attendance is poor. The Dome is fine and if they are to go outdoors they are going to lose several fans including me when it is rainy and cold.

Freddie : G

May 20th, 2010
3:05 pm

What is wrong with the Dome? Just win baby it is not the Dome.

Jim

May 20th, 2010
3:06 pm

I work for an ad agency. I just wish Tony would use facts to support his conclusion. If he used ESPN Research or any other research service then Mr. Barnhard would write a different story because the NFL and College football are equally as popular in Atlanta. This is not a college football town…it is a FOOTBALL town…college and pro. Get it right or at least admit that you are writing from your personal perspective!

MDub

May 20th, 2010
3:11 pm

Football is an outdoor sport! Bring it back outside!

Freddie : G

May 20th, 2010
3:15 pm

How could Arthur Blank and the Falcons ownership expect taxpayers to fund a stadium at this time when so many people are hurting economically. If he is willing to use his money without any taxpayers dollars then by all means do with your money whatever you wish.

KnightInATL

May 20th, 2010
3:35 pm

Wow! I am almost ashamed to call myself an Atlantan after reading some of these cry-baby posts by some of you. Really…you won’t go to a game because its outside? And you call yourself a MAN?!? Listen to yourselves!! Football is a game that is meant to be played outdoors on real grass…not inside some air-conditioned sterile box. Some of you cream puffs need to get a grip.

Obviously the best scenario would be a retractable. That way we would still be able to host the occasional Final Four’s, ACC Bball Tourney’s, and even guarantee us another Super Bowl.

But with the choice between a dome and Open-Air…its not really a choice at all. Give us the stadium for where the game was intended…outside.

D. Orlando Ledbetter

May 20th, 2010
3:42 pm

I forgot to ask one key question. Will the press box be open air on enclosed? But since they haven’t gotten to the design portion of the program, that’s probably not been decided. Let me go check the voting in the poll.

D. Orlando Ledbetter

May 20th, 2010
3:48 pm

POLL UPDATE:

Are you ready to go back outside?

Yes, football is an outdoor sport. (45%, 252 Votes)
No, I love the Georgia Dome. (32%, 181 Votes)
It doesn’t matter, I’m going indoors or outdoors. (15%, 83 Votes)
Yes, it doesn’t make sense to play indoors when it’s 80 degrees outside. (8%, 45 Votes)

Total Voters: 561

Angus

May 20th, 2010
4:03 pm

“We have to pay attention to other sites in the event that we are unable to reach a deal with the authority that’s satisfactory to them and that’s satisfactory to us,” McKay said.

Watch out folks, here it comes – threat after threat after threat to move until some city or county agrees to pay for it.

The COA and metro Atlanta have enough problems as it is given the economy – now is not the time. I’m a life-long fan and a six-year STH, but if you threaten to move, I’ll be the first to say good-bye.

rudyt

May 20th, 2010
4:37 pm

Football is an OUTSIDE sport. Domes are for sissys who don’t want to get their panties wet during the rain or their backside cold in the winter.

Gbaby

May 20th, 2010
4:54 pm

Matty (I choke in big games)Ice, could use all the help he can get. he has a slew of weapons now but have turnoveritis. He had a good rookie season but there is enough tape on him now to game plan against him. T.O. is a changed person in my opinion sign him for the league minimum. He still has to be respected by defenses.

Martin

May 20th, 2010
5:25 pm

two words – Retractable Roof

Msfolly

May 20th, 2010
5:43 pm

Well, they can sell my 89 club level seats to someone else.
My money will be spent on something else, and Atlanta can return to enjoying blackouts on Sunday.

NO WAY am I going to sit in the rain, sleet, smog, humidity or mosquitos!
They must be MAD!

Msfolly

May 20th, 2010
5:44 pm

That’s 8 club level seats. Not 89!

Typo…

PaulD

May 20th, 2010
5:46 pm

For everyone wanting the stadium out of down town – is your choice of area for the new location willing to pay for the stadium? Read the article – the stadium is paid for by a Hotel/Motel tax in the city of Atlanta and the Atlanta Falcons (read ticket holders). If they move it outside of Atlanta, the Hotel/Motel tax goes away – the Falcons are not going to pay for the whole thing so where is the rest of the money to come from? And to all of you season ticket holders – no matter what type of stadium they build , I lay odds you see a PTL.

DR DMAN

May 20th, 2010
6:09 pm

A SHARED SOLUTION: GA TECH could use a bigger stadium, and the Falcons want a new stadium. Why not pool resources and build one that would work for BOTH…???

Falc Fan

May 20th, 2010
6:41 pm

I am a Season Ticket Holder in Section 227 and I want the Falcons outside. To tell you the truth I will be a season ticket holder whether they are inside, outside, or under a retractable roof. All of these fair weather fans that say they will not renew their tickets if the Falcons are outside are a disgrace. I am sure plenty of those same “fans” to to Tech or UGA games in the dreaded outside. I want the Falcons outside under the sun on grass. It will change the whole feeling of going to a Falcons game and it will be great.

As for the PSL argument that is a slippery slope. I have a feeling a PSL would be coming for lower and mezz seats in a new stadium and they will probably leave the upper level NON-PSL like the Jets are doing with New Meadowlands Stadium. Although I would not be happy about paying for a PSL I like the benefit of being able to buy tickets to any event that comes to the new stadium as well . I would assume the Falcons PSL prices would be significantly lower than the ones the Jets and Giants are trying to sell now. $2000 for a PSL in the Mezz would be understandable but that would drive a lot of the long time season ticket holders out of the lower sidelines which would probably have PSL’s at 10k to 15k.

Pi$$onaDAWG

May 20th, 2010
8:40 pm

falc fan I bet you were all hot and bothered to get the DOME when all we had was Atlanta Fulton County Stadium. I bet the Battle of the Bands would to play outside and dance in the mud. Think about all the events the Dome can have no matter the weather. Outside will cost Atlanta many events because that is why we built it. That was the sales pitch to get the Dome in the late 80’s-early 90’s was it not?

Ole...OleOleOle

May 20th, 2010
8:46 pm

@Msfolly – God forbid you have to endure an occassional rain shower or mosquitoes, or [gasp] maybe even have to wear a jacket to watch a game outdoors in the fall. Imagine those poor souls up in DC, NY, or Green Bay to deal with the cold; or how about the Dolphins or Bucs fans in Florida? It’s a wonder they’re still alive after sitting in the Florida humidity for a couple hours to watch a game. It must be torture to watch games in the outdoors.

But I digress. You seriously need to get a grip of yourself, grow a sack, and enjoy some football, Nancy. It’s an outdoor sport…deal with it.

Falc Fan

May 20th, 2010
10:09 pm

PI$$onaDAWG,

I’m in my late 20’s so I don’t know about the sales pitch for the Dome back then. But I agree that the Dome has been a great thing for Atlanta allowing more events to come downtown. I think everyone is jumping to conclusions too fast on having the Falcons outside and losing those events.

This is what I think is going on. The Falcons organization truly wants a outside stadium with retractable roof. That is the best option but at the same time very costly. The Falcons know the GWCC wants to keep the SEC Championship, Kickoff game, etc at the GWCC site. To begin the negotiations the McKay goes to the GWCC and says we want an outside stadium and we have the option of building the stadium elsewhere if you don’t give us what we want. The GWCC would prefer a covered stadium to keep those events coming to Atlanta so they are going to be somewhat opposed to an all outdoor stadium but want the Falcons to stay on the GWCC site. Now they are doing the study on the Dome to figure out the cost of keeping it, renovations, or tearing down. The Falcons are then going to say to the GWCC help us build a new outdoor stadium with the hotel motel tax money and keep the Dome for the other events since it will be paid off. The GWCC will say that it is too costly to keep up the Dome just for those events so the Falcons will counter by saying lets add a retractable roof to the outdoor stadium and tear the Dome down and then everyone is happy. This approach will allow the Falcons to have more negotiating leverage with the GWCC in the long run. I think in 5 to 7 years the Falcons will be outside at the GWCC site and the Dome will be torn down. Hopefully the Falcons (ie Season Ticket Holders) and the GWCC can come to some agreement on a retractable roof and we keep all the other events and have more.

I also think that having the Falcons outside will make the feel of the game more like a college atmosphere that people will find they like a lot more.

The Solution

May 20th, 2010
10:47 pm

Option 1: State-of-the-art retractable roof stadium downtown in place of Dome. With leadership, this could be a great building that builds civic pride and serves everyone’s needs. But, we’re out of money and our credit is maxed out. If this happens, I’ll eat my tie.

Option 2: Open air stadium for NFL football, soccer, and the like at the old GM plant site. Still inside the perimeter but very good access for most of metro area (including north side d-bags) via I285 from I85, GA400, I75, US78, PIB, and MARTA rail on site. Opportunity to plan it right with adequate space to allow for great tailgating but to also be a positive Mon-Sat space for the community (maybe a new idea like excavating and sinking most of the bowl below ground level rather than a looming edifice). Keep the Dome but rehab it to be even more viable for its revised mission – hosting once a year events like ACC/SEC/NCAA basketball tournaments, concerts, motorcross, truck pulls, Circ-du-soleil, large convention meetings, college football kickoff, Chick-fil-a bowl, SEC Champ, possible UGA-FL……makes a certain amount of sense but requires too much thought and effort to do right – won’t happen.

Option 3: Tear down that crappy housing high rise (across from Grant Field), the Tech Alumni House, and a few other buildings in the large block bounded by North Ave., Luckie St., Merrits Ave., and Techwood Drive. The block abuts the current campus boundary on the east and north. Build a 75,000 seat outdoor stadium to be financed and used by both Tech and the Falcons. Tear down Grant Field to give Tech space to replace lost buildings and for additional growth. Marta station at Spring and North Ave is reasonably close. As mentioned by someone previously Falcons/Tech sharing of cost would hopefully reduce need for taxpayer funding. But, you’d need creative financing to retire the bonds Tech is still paying on for Grant Field addition and the impact to the adjacent Techwood mixed-income housing development and Coca-cola campus would require ingenuity in design. Requires even more thought, effort, political skills, and cooperation – extremely unlikely.

Option 4 – Build generic, run-of-the-mill open air stadium exclusively for Falcons downtown within feet of the Dome. Design and build it on the cheap so that it will inspire no one and be obsolete in 10 years. On game day mornings, check the weather forecast and the mood of season ticket holders. If its supposed to rain or be hot or cold, play the game in the dome. If it’ll be 78 and sunny with a light breeze, bring it outside, y’all. BINGO!!!!

mark

May 20th, 2010
11:43 pm

R U CRAZY? I had enough COLD rainy days at Fulton County Stadium. November and December are not that lovely in ATL. Also an enclosed stadium can serve many more functions. I don’t think too many fans want the SEC Championship Game or The Chick-fil-A Bowl outdoors.

Chief Wiggum

May 21st, 2010
12:19 am

Whaaaaaaah!!!! I might get cold! I might get too hot! I might get a little wet!!!! Bunch of babies. As Orlando said, fans in other cities would laugh about the pansies here who make those whiny comments.

I’m not a season ticket holder. I’ve never even been to a pro football game. Can’t afford it. Back in the day (7+ years ago), I have been to many college games, from hot games (sun in my face, 90 degrees) to cold games (freezing temps). Same goes for high school games. Maybe I don’t get the pro game (maybe that’s why I haven’t ever been), but it seems a lot of the fans are whiny and fair-weather. If you want to be comfy, spend your money on a good couch and a big-screen TV. I promise you can keep it at 72 and have all the room you need.

[...] Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog) [...]

MaxxFalcon

May 21st, 2010
7:13 am

Outdoor Football is sorely missed in Atlanta. We love watching and playing games in the elements. Retractable is really the way to go. If not, then we need an open roof, so we can experience football in the elements.Football is supposed to be played outside, in the elements, unlike Baseball or Basketball

Greg from Marietta

May 21st, 2010
12:13 pm

The Falcons are being very narrow-minded and acting a bit selfish. As a tax payer who’s money will be used to build a new stadium I think building an open air only stadium is a very bad financial investment. The Falcons currently play in the dome 10 to 14 day out of 365 that is about 3% of the year. The dome is used for many other activities than just the Falcons and since it is a dome and not an open stadium the weather is not a concern for any activity scheduled there. If a new stadium is required then the ONLY option to consider is one with a retractable roof despite what the Falcons say. That way the Falcons could play in the heat, the rain, and the cold if they want to and all the other activities that use the new stadium could have the comfort of an enclosed structure.

Greg from Marietta

May 21st, 2010
12:35 pm

I just finished reading all of the comments on this blog and can easily see that there are some that understand the financial impact that a multi-use enclosed facility has on the local economy. Then there are others who are so ignorant that they only see a stadium as a place to play football and a majority of those have some misplaced machismo that to be a real fan of a football team you must suffer out in the elements along with the team. I played football in both High School (in GA) and College (in PA) and believe me when I say that playing in the wet and the cold is not football but slop ball. There are many more injuries that result from playing on poor field conditions than on a good dry field. But those that have never played the game wouldn’t know that.

SeasonTicketHolderToo

May 21st, 2010
12:39 pm

I will not renew my tickets for an outdoor only stadium. Too hot early in season and too cold and rainy in late season.

Toshie

May 21st, 2010
12:46 pm

Go look at your own grass if you are that fond of it. Do you people that we play football in the winter and its, wet and disgusting.

Toshie

May 21st, 2010
12:48 pm

I also will not renew my tickets go sit outside. Been there/Done that. NO MORE OUTSIDE FOR ME.

Toshie

May 21st, 2010
12:51 pm

MAXFALCON I don’t know who we are, but don’t put all of the fans in that catagory as outside fans, because I for one am not included.

keeping it Real

May 21st, 2010
1:38 pm

For all you nuts need to keep it real I am from the south 32 degree raining wind blowing and 90$ a ticket is no fun. now a dome top that let back is the way to go!! The other way is cheep cheep way to go. Box seat is always in doors. You can put a falcon and a nest with a roll back top, people get real 32 degree and raining you have lost your cotton picking mind! I went to the Falcon game in 1978 philly VS Falcon cold as hell no way I am going to spend 2k to freeze!

STHolder

May 21st, 2010
3:24 pm

If the Atlanta wants to foot the additional cost for a retractable roof, then leave it downtown… If not, then build an open stadium on the north side and leave the dome for all the other downtown events. GA State’s new football team could play in the dome as well as the SEC tourneys, final fours, Chik-fil-a Bowl etc…

Atlanta without a dome would be a disaster…

Barry

May 21st, 2010
4:55 pm

Hey Y’all:

We need a retractable roof stadium. If it rains and/or snow we can pull the roof on. Heck, if it is too cold, we can pull the roof on. But when the weather is great, we can open up the sky. Putting a retractable roof on the Georgia Dome would be great. Therefore, I recommend the engineers to start figuring out how to make it happen. If they can’t , then Blank need to think about building a new stadium to his liking. I hope it is a retractable stadium. That is the only way Atlanta is going to get s Super Bowl here. The weathe is too unpredictable in Atlanta,especially in the winter season.

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
This is a SECRET from a FALCON FAN. TELL EVERYBODY!!!!!!

………………..”ONE HEARTBEAT, BABY!!!!”………….

jetset335

May 22nd, 2010
10:19 am

I’ll be watching the weather. If it’s cold or raining, I won’t be there. Plus I will not be able to buy in advance. All home playoff game will be in 33 degree rain. Not for me.

Bestoink Dooley

May 25th, 2010
2:00 pm

A new stadium will never be built anywhere with lots of parking and easy access. You will be forced to use public transportation. Arthur Blank is not Joe Robbie.

toby

May 26th, 2010
6:40 am

I hated when they built the dome.However I went to a UGA game early in the season,sat in the sun and sweat my but off.Went to the Falcons gane in tampa last season and froze my butt off. I think I might be spoiled now.