Smith likes the USC linebackers
USC linebacker Kaluka Maiva puts a hit on Arizona State's Terry Richardson.
Dana Point, Calif. — Falcons coach Mike Smith and the rest of the NFC coaches met with the media Wednesday morning at the NFL Owners meeting.
Smith, the Associated Press reigning coach of the year, was a popular guy.
Reporters from Detroit wanted to know what went into the Falcons decision to draft Matt Ryan, how they scouted him, what kind of workout he went through and want he likes to eat for breakfast.
They were doing their due diligence on Georgia quarterback Matt Stafford.
Rey Maualuga having a bad hair day.
Smith also talked about the linebackers for USC, who are eligible for the draft. At least two of them could be on the board when the Falcons select with the 24th pick in the draft.
Clay Matthews Jr. dishing out some pain.
Brian Cushing and Rey Maualuga are being projected to go early in the first round. Clay Matthews Jr., who’s father played for the Falcons, and Kaluka Maiava will be available at 24. Maiava is not generally considered a first round pick and could be taken later in the draft.
“They are very impressive,” Smith said. “There are four guys that are definitely going to have an opportunity to play in the NFL. It’s been well documented that there are going to be some guys that get drafted very early.”
Smith seems some similarities in the group of USC linebackers.
“I think there is one common theme that these guys have and that’s they enjoy playing the game of football,” Smith said. “That’s very obvious when you watch those guys on tape. They play with a lot of intensity. They play with a lot of passion. They have different sizes. They run differently, but the one thing that they do is that they play, very, very hard.”
The Falcons are rebuilding their linebacking corps after Keith Brooking (Dallas) and Michael Boley (New York Giants) left during free agency.
Which one of the USC linebackers would you like to see the Falcons take?
Tell us what you think about the site
Customer Care »
Vacation stops, manage subscriptions and more
AJC Services
Sections
Other Editions
Guides
Visitor Agreement | Privacy Statement
© 2010 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
161 comments Add your comment
mudcat
March 25th, 2009
12:56 pm
Maualuga and Cushing will probably be gone by the 24th pick, but Mathews wound be a great pick, although I would love to see TD take Sean Smith the hybrid CB/SS with this pick. Maiava has good speed and intensity, but at 6-0, 230lbs. I think he’s not an every down player and may be a good pickup in the 5th round. Go Birds!
I MUS.WRITE
March 25th, 2009
1:06 pm
Maualuga
Green Tea
March 25th, 2009
1:14 pm
Which one? Maualuga, that’s a no brainer. Never happen though.
here’s my question D’Led, where do you think he’ll go in the draft and what would the Falcons potentially have to do to get him??
Pete
March 25th, 2009
1:16 pm
James Laurinaitis…………….from Ohio State.
Just as physical and talented but more leadership qualities than all 3 USC’s players combined.
Michael W.
March 25th, 2009
1:17 pm
Unless Maualuga can move outside and play either SAM or WIL, I don’t see the Falcons picking him. They’ve got their MLB in Lofton, and they need LBs on the outside. I don’t think Maualuga can move outside.
mil mascaras
March 25th, 2009
1:21 pm
Pete,
Let me guess. You are an Ohio State fan/grad. Laurenaitis is going to be a nice pickup for someone who is looking for a technically proficient tackler/leader. He is not at all in the same class speed wise with the SC guys, I don’t think. Maybe his dad could teach him how to put on pregame makeup, though.
TrueFalconFan
March 25th, 2009
1:23 pm
I like Clay Matthews Jr. definitely a sleeper in this draft. Greatest compliment came from Pete Carroll, he felt if Matthews was playing more in the Oregon St. game they would have beaten Oregon St.
foxdog
March 25th, 2009
1:28 pm
1- Cushing
2- Matthews
3- Look somewhere else
Doug
March 25th, 2009
1:29 pm
New England is notorious for not wanting the first round pick. We should trade our second and third round for NE 23rd pick and we should take two of the USC linebackers.
Greg
March 25th, 2009
1:31 pm
We shouldn’t be taking ANY LB in the first round. We’re actually pretty solid at LB. But we have glaring weaknesses at DT, S, and even DE with JA’s tendency to tweak his groin and get in for only about half the plays. Our inability to get pressure from the front four on the QB’s of good teams was our numero uno problem last year. We have GOT to get a big improvement there, or we will be lucky to win 10.
JJ
March 25th, 2009
1:32 pm
SI.COM – ” Matthews shows inconsistent skills as a run defender due to his inability to take on bulky offensive lineman at the point of attack”.
If stopping the run is our first priority, then I’d pass on matthews. I’m leaning toward DT – Ron Brace, Ziggy Hood or TE – Pettigrew. We MUST stop the run first and break out the grits!
Wes
March 25th, 2009
1:32 pm
I understand if we taken an OLB in the first round, but is anyone not concerned about the lack of a safety? Lawyer is still a FA, bring him back! He may not be great at this point, but starting a rookie at so many key defensive positions is very concerning, especially without a big DT up front..
D Money
March 25th, 2009
1:35 pm
Sintim our of Virginia. I believe all of them will be gone before 24
welikebaseball2
March 25th, 2009
1:36 pm
Surely not Maualuga. Why would we go with an ILB & put him at OLB? I’m convinced part of the reason Brooking was released was the fact that he was a liability in coverage. I’ve got a feeling Maualuga & even Cushing would be the same story.
Willie Coyote
March 25th, 2009
1:37 pm
Best available defensive player would be just fine. One who will help the pass rush would be preferable.
ATLHOMER
March 25th, 2009
1:37 pm
Not sure who I want the Falcons to take, but I know I don’t want Maualuga, he may turn out to be ok, but I don’t want players on my team that scores a 7 on the Wonderlic test. Lbs need to be smart, be able to decipher whether is run, or pass. Look at Vick he scored low and was a GREAT talent and I mean GREAT, but just could not make a good decision on or off the field. Same with Vince Young and many other players. I trust that the brass with the Falcons’ know this and trust them to make good decisions.
D Money
March 25th, 2009
1:40 pm
Wes, I think we’ll definitely get one in the second round because there won’t be any at 24 worth a first round pick that fits our system.
Jonathan
March 25th, 2009
1:44 pm
I’m with you Greg…
The Falcons are NOT going to take a LB first. If they were I can bet you that Smith would not have come out and said “we” like these guys.
The Falcons and Demitroff will fill the biggest need in the first round and LB isn’t it.
G State Ben
March 25th, 2009
1:45 pm
Wow, you can weed out the people that know football from this blog.
Maualuga and Cushing will be gone. Matthews will be available but you don’t want him at 24. You have a steady diet of LBs in this draft and Maualuga and Laurinaitis plays MLB which you just drafted Lofton to play that position in 2008.
The Falcons will look hard at a Larry English, Clint Sintim and Matthews as a possibility in the 2nd round if available or even a Marcus Freeman from Ohio State in the 3rd.
1st rounder will be best player available and I don’t see that being a LB. TE, CB or S will be the order I’d project.
ATLHOMER
March 25th, 2009
1:45 pm
Jonathan, why not a LB we need help everywhere on D. and you start with the front 7, that makes the DB’s so much better.
Jonathan
March 25th, 2009
1:51 pm
We have LB’s that can play right now. If they choose to add to that position and they will, it will be later. Like it’s been said earlier by some of the other post, the Falcons have way bigger questions at say DT, S and DE hybrid LB (English).
Please no one think that we need a TE in the first round. TE is not a position we have to excel at, yes it is a great option for our QB but not a 1st round issue.
JJ
March 25th, 2009
1:51 pm
If we have to pick a OLB in the first…Cushing may still be there in late first round (yahoo.sports has him going at #26).
SI.COM – “tough, hard-nosed linebacker with exceptional skills as a run defender who makes a ton of ‘bang-bang’ plays. In coverage, he’s solid in all aspects and plays with outstanding awareness”
Ok – brace, hood or cushing will be fine!
ATLHOMER
March 25th, 2009
1:58 pm
Jonathan you and I are in complete agreement that we do NOT NEED TO DRAFT a TE in the 1st rd, even if the draft was not deep at that position which is is this year. I agree we have some talent at LB that a lot of people don’t know about, but if there is an OLB at the 24th pick that TD thinks is a game changer we need to take him, even though most would agree that Safety is one of the most glaring needs we have.
draft 101
March 25th, 2009
2:01 pm
take pettigrew if he is available. then our offense will just about be complete. If not take alphonso from wake, or the next best corner our secondary is needy. The LB corp is better than what most people think.
JB
March 25th, 2009
2:07 pm
Falcons, do not take a LB with this pick. Plenty to choose from in later rounds. Get a big, head hunting, physical corner who will make a difference…….with 4.4 speed
Jonathan
March 25th, 2009
2:12 pm
I’m not a scout by any means, however I do read a lot and I watch every CFB game that I can. I agree, if there is a LB at 24 that Dimitroff considers to be a “game changer” then by all means get us a “game changer”. I believe in him and his decision reigns over mine, I was just stating my opinion…I just do not think that Matthews is that guy. I think he was good by association with the great help that team had around him.
Honestly, I really do not like our pick at 24, its seems to be a really tough place in this particular draft…
marko
March 25th, 2009
2:14 pm
Maiava’s a little on the small side. No where close to first round material, but if the falcons pass on linebackers in the first , I wouldn’t object to him as a mid rounder.Clay Matthews would make my day. Looks like Mauluga and Dimitroff use the same barber.
ATLHOMER
March 25th, 2009
2:16 pm
TO JB, man if there was a CB like that he would be gone. Besides, there is not a first rd CB in the drart, jenkings is only a frist rouder for lack of better options this year.
ATLHOMER
March 25th, 2009
2:19 pm
To add to my last post, I say this not because I am so GREAT scout, but from what all the “So called experts” think and Mel Kipper and a few others on ESPN seem to be reasonable with their thoughts and opinions, these guys seem to think the CB class is rather weak this year.
draft 101
March 25th, 2009
2:24 pm
I WATCH ALPHONSO SMITH RUN THE DRILLS AT THE SCOUTING COMBINE AND HE WAS A MAN AMONG BOYS IN THE FOOTBALL DRILLS. HIS MEASURABLES CAME UP A LITTLE SHORT BUT THE KIDS A FOOTBALL PLAYER.
VICK SUPPORTER 2
March 25th, 2009
2:25 pm
NUMBER 2 THE NEW FACE OF THE FRANCHISE, BUT NUMBER 7 STILL DOMINATES FALCONS HEADLINES….INTERESTING INDEED
I KEEP HEARING THAT THE NFL LOCKOUT IS STILL LOOMING. LOOKS LIKE VICK’S NEW LEAGUE WILL BE THE ONLY ONE PLAYING FOOTBALL 
CLOCK IS TICKING: “VICK THE RETURN”. HAVE A NICE 2009 GUYS
Stirg d'Nahsif
March 25th, 2009
2:38 pm
I say draft neither. Here’s why: One, we already have Robert James, Coy Wire and Stephen Nicholas to compete for outside linebacker positions. Do we really need to make the linebacker position a priority at twenty-four? Considering our current roster at linebacker, I think we can afford to draft elsewhere; same goes for d-line and cornerback. Secondly, if you’re going to draft for a position that (I’m sure you’ll disagree) is set at linebacker, then draft a multi-functional defenseman like a Larry English, who can play defensive end and linebacker. That way, everybody get to play.
To answer the question, I think Larry English would be the best recruit. Pick 24, however, should be spent on the best safety/defensive back that fit our needs…or Pettigrew. Defensive linemen, linebackers and tight ends will remain in the draft and good players will be available in later rounds.
Big Ray
March 25th, 2009
2:39 pm
D. Ledbetter,
Nice blog article!
Stirg,
Read your research on Dimitroff when he was with New England. Excellent work, man. Excellent work. That does give some insight into this guy. He gets a chance this year to prove that last year’s successful drafting was not a fluke.
Well, I wouldn’t be unhappy with Cushing OR Matthews.
But if one of the top DTs fell to us at that spot…
I think the question becomes what you can/need to upgrade the most in the first round. If we can upgrade or fortify DT in the second or third rounds, and a good OLB is available in the first, then go for it. If it’s the other way around, then do it the other way around.
The problem is, we still could use an upgrade in the secondary. So where does that fit in all of this? Personally, I wasn’t happy to see Foxworth go, but I’m not willing to believe it was a fatal mistake. An improvement up front will help our secondary. There are some good secondary players available in the draft. But I’m not sure there is going to be anybody at CB or SS available at the 24th pick, that’s worth a pick that high. But what do I know?
I know I’m not worried about Dimitroff and Smith making some good decisions. I know I’m not worried about the guys we have getting better (like Ryan). I’m not throwing all caution and concern to the winds, but I also don’t think there is reason for gloom, doom, and despair.
I certainly hope not. The only thing worse than losing is listening to all the same naysayers, pi$$ ants, and other malcontents that we listen to every year (even last year, which made no sense at all).
Big Ray
March 25th, 2009
2:50 pm
ALTHOMER,
There is some merit to taking anybody that looks to be a true game-changer. Since we’re not scouts, we probably don’t know all the “signs” of that in a player. And while I agree that Kiper pretty much knows his stuff, I don’t take his word for law. Having said that, there doesn’t seem to be a good deal of GOOD depth in the draft this year when it comes to DBs. I think we’ll draft a tight end. Pettigrew might be hard to pass up if he falls to us. But that does start a domino effect on what we do as far as picking defenders.
Glad I don’t have this job. We’d never get anything done.
Stirg,
So are you saying English is the best pick at #24 if we get a non-defensive back? Who’s your idea as a best bet for our #24 pick if we get a DB? We may or may not disagree on this, but I’m not seeing anybody at that position that presents more value for us as our first pick. But then, there’s no telling who falls to us either, though I wouldn’t count on somebody like Jenkins falling…
I’m just saying, I don’t know if there’s a DB at that pick that we can get, who has more of an impact for us on defense than other players at other positions. At least in my opinion, anyway.
Jonathan,
I agree. I wish we had a higher pick. But for now, we just don’t. Gonna have to find a way to make lemons out of lemonade. But, things could be worse. And they were, prior to the Cardinals getting to the Super Bowl. Because they did, we moved UP to the 24th pick. Still, it’s a tough spot…
Stirg d'Nahsif
March 25th, 2009
2:53 pm
Thanks, Big Ray. Anybody wondering what Ray is refering to, I posted this on an earlier blog:
I thought some of you guys would be interested in some information I’ve been researching the past couple of days. I was very interested in knowing what kind of players Thomas Dimitroff showed interest to, in the past. His subtle, but simple, resume include titles of NFL Scout, Area Scout, College Scout; and in 2002, he was hired by New England to be National Scout. Just after one year, the organization elevated his title to Director of College Scouting and he held that position from 2003-’07. That is where I began my research. Although TD was not general manager (not the final word), I’m certain his suggestions and opinions of draftees and players were most relevant. So, I’m suggesting that TD had a hand in evaluating, interviewing, drafting, researching and/or recruiting these names. You can draw your own conclusion, after you consider the player’s status today.
ROUND…OVERALL…PLAYER…POSITION…COLLEGE
2003
1 13 Ty Warren DT Texas A&M
2 36 Eugene Wilson CB Illinois***
2 45 Bethel Johnson WR Texas A&M
4 117 Dan Klecko DT Temple
4 120 Asante Samuel CB Central Florida***
5 164 Dan Koppen C Boston
6 201 Kliff Kingsbury QB Texas Tech
7 234 Spencer Nead TE BYU***
7 239 Tully Banta-Cain LB California
7 243 Ethan Kelley DT Baylor
2004
1 21 Vince Wilfork DT Miami***
1 32 Benjamin Watson TE UGA***
2 63 Marquise Hill DE LSU (Died 052807)
3 95 Guss Scott S Florida
4 128 Dexter Reid S N. Carolina
4 128 Cedric Cobbs RB Arkansas
5 164 P.K. Sam WR FSU
7 233 Christian Morton CB FSU
2005
1 32 Logan Mankins OG Fresno State
3 84 Ellis Hobbs CB Iowa State***
3 100 Nick Kaczur OT Toledo
4 133 James Sanders S Fresno State***
5 170 Ryan Claridge LB UNLV
7 230 Matt Cassel QB Southern Cal.***
7 255 Andy Stokes TE William Penn
2006
1 21 Laurence Maroney RB Minnesota***
2 36 Chad Jackson WR Florida
3 86 David Thomas TE Texas
4 106 Garrett Mills TE Tulsa
4 118 Stephen Gostkowski K Memphis
5 136 Ryan O’Callaghan OT California
6 191 Jeremy Mincey DE Florida
6 205 Dan Stevenson OG Notre Dame
6 206 Le-Kevin Smith DT Nebraska
7 229 Willie Andrews DB Baylor
2007
1 24 Brandon Meriweather S Miami
4 127 Kareem Brown DE Miami
5 171 Clint Oldenburg OT Colorado State
6 180 Justin Rogers LB SMU
6 202 Mike Richardson CB Notre Dame
6 208 Justise Hairston RB Central Conn. State
6 209 Corey Hilliard OG Oklahoma State
7 211 Oscar Lua LB USC
7 247 Mike Elgin C Iowa
Now, I’m certain that most of these names were recruited as situational players. Furthermore, teams draft on need and I’m sure a number of players were drafted, during TD’s tenure, based on positions that were vacant on the roster. Nonetheless, TD was responsible for researching and evaluating the best player to fill those needs. This entry simply gives us an idea of how TD operates. Again, you can draw your own conclusion. What I noted was the type of schools he recruited from and the number of late rounders that eventually rose to national recognition. In conclusion, I decided to shut-up and let TD, and staff, do their thing. What do I know?
Tyger
March 25th, 2009
2:56 pm
Falcoons in good shape
DL: Davis, Anderson, Babineaux, Abraham, Lewis, Biermann,
LB: Nicholas, Lofton, Peterson, Gilbert, Wire, James
CB: Grimes, Houston, Jackson, Irons, Hutchins
S: Coleman, DeCoud, Fudge
If the season started tommorrow we could win with those guys, we did it all year. Certainly, we’d like to improve, but Mike Peterson was a addition. And I think everybody has DeCoud penciled in as a starter at Safety.
Clearly, the secondary is a concern. Taller more physical corners are in order. Grimes is spunky and plays his heart out, but he’s a backup. Houston has uber-athleticism but he’s still only 5′7, so go figure. Chevis is a step slow. And both Irons, Hutchins coming off leg injuries. CB is the priority. Problem is draft not deep in secondary, especially at CB, pickings are slim.
Safety is next biggest concern. We need depth behind Coleman and DeCoud, could get that in FA however. But I really like L. Delmas, W. Moore, Hamlin.
The DL needs strethening. Abraham is injury prone. Anderson is an underachiever. Lewis is coming off major injury. Davis and Biermann are solid contributors, but they need a young anchor. Ron Brace or Fili Moaloa could be available Rd. 2/3. Brandon Williams, 6′5, undersized sackmaster, TxTech, could be a worthwhile project in Rd. 4/5.
Stirg d'Nahsif
March 25th, 2009
3:10 pm
Ray, if you’re asking me about CB, then I agree with you. There are no CBs worth taking at 24 when, assumably, all the good CBs will be taken by then (Sean Smith made the exception). If you’re asking me about safety, then I like Chung, Chip Vaughn, Kevin Ellison (USC), Emanuel Cook (South Car.).
We can use 24 for a number of players (its such an awkward position to pick from). I think at 24 we choose the best player on the board that fits one of our needs at safety or the front seven. I’d even consider Pettigrew for 24, simply because his position is a need and there is no other player with his calibre.
I MUS.WRITE
March 25th, 2009
3:14 pm
G State Ben…… The question was which one do you refer, nothing about who will be there at 24. Maulauga is the best of the 4 imo-yeah buddy we know he plays inside ????. I wouldnt take a LB in the 1st unless Maybin fell thru the cracks.
I know that TD and Smitty are blowing smoke anyway. I would take Hood if he’s there, Brace wont be there when we pick at 55. we need DT/NT -we can pick up Roy miller in the later rounds …..I keep getting the feeling that pettigrew will be the pick, why pick a LB in the first when Freeman and Follette will be just as good.
I MUS.WRITE
March 25th, 2009
3:20 pm
Jeez man, this blogg eats post like that kite eating tree on Charlie Brown
Atlanta Falcons Talk » Blog Archive » Smith likes USC linebackers
March 25th, 2009
3:23 pm
[...] AJC Source >> Atlanta Falcons Blogs Posted March 25th, 2009 in Atlanta Falcons Blogs. [...]
scott
March 25th, 2009
3:23 pm
GUys, remember, no CB or Saftey will have a shot at a good career without some strong pass rush. We’re better off getting some monsters on the line and at LB and our backfield will be able to heep up.
WR
March 25th, 2009
3:26 pm
First and foremost lets deal with the fascination with Laurinaitis, on second thought, lets not, please save the Brian Bosworth and Audray Bruce dreams for the detroit lions, as falcons fans, we have been there and done that. Back to the draft, if a safety is not available that warrants a 1st round pick, I say go after Pettigrew and continue to build the defense with the remaining draft picks, there won’t be a Defensive lineman that is worthy of a first round pick in this spot and the only other option is to trade the pick for more picks, hopefully another 2nd rounder, but at 24 that would be a stretch. Pettigrew may seem crazy considering the state of the “D”, but considering the state of the “D” and what probably will be available, he would be the best option unless a trade happens. If the falcons can trade for an extra 2nd round pick in order to secure a good safety and Defensive tackle, I’m all for it, if not Pettigrew seems to be a better option than the reach for Cushing, Matthews, English, or Johnson.
D. Orlando Ledbetter
March 25th, 2009
3:32 pm
Good start today. Rather impressive bloggers. You all are HOT!!! At the Long Beach City/Snopp Doggy Dogg International Airport. Heading back to the ATL. Spoke with Smitty today at length. We’ll be dropping more his insights later. But one of them I came away with is that Thomas DeCoud is UP !! The third round pick with get the first shot at Lawyer’s spot.
GREEN TEA: I posted my first mock draft last Friday. We’ll update/revise on Friday. I had Maualagu going to Jacksonville with the 8th pick. Cushing to the Redskins at 13. I had the Falcons passing on Matthews. He was then picked up by Baltimore with the 26th pick. My plan is to revise the Mock Draft every Friday up until the draft.
PETE: Do you live in Columbus or do they just call you Brutus Buckeye? I liked the Animal’s kid when I talked to him at the combine. But I’d stay away from OSU linebackers. Check the track record. Randy Grandishar and Pepper Johnson were the last REALLY good ones (Chris Spielman’s career was cut short). What’s the Hawk kid done for the Packers? Maybe he’ll fit better up there in the 3-4.
MARKO: You must be old school. Don’t like all that hair. TD’s spike hairdo is pretty cool.
Spud Webb
March 25th, 2009
3:44 pm
You can’t take a LB at this spot. DL or DB for sure.
You can LB’s later in the draft.
cutter
March 25th, 2009
4:00 pm
D.O.L.- Decoud is up for SS or FS?
PHIL
March 25th, 2009
4:38 pm
anyone like the TE from Rice somewhere down order?
Nique
March 25th, 2009
4:38 pm
When they drafted Lofton last year one of the reasons why they said they got him is bc he can play both SAM & MLB, if that’s the case & Ray Maualuga drops like some analysis are saying that he will, Orlando do you see us taking him? If not why not?
marko
March 25th, 2009
4:44 pm
Orlando, Safe to say I like everything about Dimitroff but the hairdo. you can tell him that a fellow Mt. biker thinks he has a serious case of helmet hair. If DeCoud gets first crack at SS then I hope Rashad Johnson’s on the radar for FS. I read that some scout did’nt like his open field tackling. Made me wonder which Rashad he’d been watching. the one that plays for Alabama does seem to have any problems in that area.
Nique
March 25th, 2009
4:47 pm
The only downside that i could see to taking Ray if he does somehow drop to us at 24 is that you might not want to more Curtis after just a year where he seemed to be getting comfortable at MLB & also my concern would be his quickness there, bc last year they had to sub him out on pass coverage downs & if your on the outside they can’t really hide you in coverage. But if we were to make that move & take Ray Maualuga I’m sure that they’d be confident that either him or Lofton had what it took to slide outside. But if that is the case & one of the 2 can, & we take Maualuga, lb has gone front a point of weakness going into the offseason, to NO DOUBT our strongest position!!! LB: Starters Nicholas, Lofton, Maualuga. & then Peterson, Gilbert, Wire, James as reserves, now that’s a dynamic LB core!
But again I wouldn’t go LB in the 1st round, but if they did so with Maualuga who in my mind will be a NO QUESTION pro bowler & left he could play alongside of Lofton, I’d feel better going LB in the 1st than under any other condition.
falcon fan
March 25th, 2009
5:29 pm
I would not be surprised to see the falcons trade down if the price is right to land some additional picks. Who knows what T.D. and smitty have up their sleeve.
darrell starks
March 25th, 2009
5:55 pm
IF CUSHING IS GONE you have to take SEAN SMITH OF UTAH WHO I THINK WILL BE A STILL FOR US at 24# him a coleman at safety will be awesome.GO FALCONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
D. Orlando Ledbetter
March 25th, 2009
6:01 pm
(Layover in PHX at the Sky Harbor)
CUTLER: He’s a free safety. But they’ll try him as a Hybrid free-strong safety. That’s what every body is going to. He will have to cover and sometimes go down in the box. He has to have range, be able to cover and have striking power.
JerseyFalcon
March 25th, 2009
6:56 pm
why is everyone picking Maualuga and Laurinaitis when they are both middle linebackers? Didn’t they alredy plant in Loften in that position and add Peterson! Pick a OLB, TE or a SS w/ the first pick..maybe sean smith, mathews, or possibly larryEnglish..remember Abe was an LB when he was with the Jets.
RJS
March 25th, 2009
7:02 pm
Quizz Rodgers loved those USC linebackers too- because they couldn’t tackle him. Cushing looked especially bad (and slow) in their loss to Oregon State.
marko
March 25th, 2009
8:13 pm
JJ, for the sake of sanity, S.I. rated Ryan Leaf ahead of Peyton Manning. Do you really care about how they feel about clay Matthews?
marko
March 25th, 2009
8:40 pm
There seems to be a lot of Ron Brace supporters out there. Our good friend Strig d’Nahsih provided you with five years worth of drafts that Dimitroff contributed to. Can anybody show me a single lard butt in the bunch?
JJ
March 25th, 2009
8:42 pm
marko, for the sake of sanity, can u cut,paste that for me? I’m just trying to research all these options and not be a “lazy ass” throwing out names without some knowledge. Do I know how good these guys are? Hell no, I’m a GSU grad and we still dont have football.
I did not know SI.COM was A JOKE. Funny, I really enjoy peter king and his associates writing about the nfl. My bad marko, I guess I’ll quit researching the web and go with you’re analysis! Just trying to add to the blog buddy and you’re ryan leaf for manning is bogus, come back with some facts please!
SeminoleWarrior
March 25th, 2009
8:43 pm
The Falcons will pass on any LB from USC in the first round. This pick will be either a safety or cornerback. Stay tuned for more details.
JJ
March 25th, 2009
8:58 pm
FSU, their are no cb/ss worthy of 1st rd. pick. Second/Third round has plenty, chung?
Colorado Bulldog
March 25th, 2009
9:01 pm
Smith is a former D line coach. Both he and TD agree that the strength of a good d is the D-line. If Jerry is available, I say we take him. And maybe we trade up to get him and if Raji falls out of the top 10, they might go get him.
Nique
March 25th, 2009
9:10 pm
Yeah Marko
A stud named Vince Wilfolk!
Green Tea
March 25th, 2009
9:12 pm
The question was which if the USC guys would you like to have. Out of the 4 I’d rather have Maualuga, hands down. Not that the Falcons need a middle linebacker but out of the 4 it’s a simple answer.
Some of you guys have some really good posts btw…
D3
March 25th, 2009
9:21 pm
DOL, two blogs in two days. You’re da man. Keep rockin’ it out, the power of the bow tie is strong with you.
The class of the pure OLB group this year, after Curry of course, is Cushing. I know we have many o’ discussions on here about ‘To draft an OLB, or not to draft an OLB,’ but it becomes really easy if Cushing falls to us. No-brainer. Assuming Raji or Jerry’s not available and Cushing is, easy pick. He’s been a stud at the highest level of college football for awhile. Great work ethic, fiery play, and solid measurables. I think this argument is all for not, because he will be long-gone.
I know we’ve predicated the fact that we ’should’ be solid at OLB with Lofton, Peterson, Nicholas, Wire, & James, but Peterson is a short-term fix; Wire played solid, and Nicholas worries me because he couldn’t beat out Wire when Boley started tanking. Playing Devil’s advocate a little here. As Cutter helped me realize, James is 5′10, 219(not one to get hung up measurables, but not the ideal sized OLB when you gotta take on TE’s, T’s, & pulling G’s.
Concerning pure OLB’s, the decision becomes much more difficult if Matthews is available instead of Cushing. Personally, I like Matthews and think he would set us up for a young, tough LB corps for years to come. The final vote comes to TD, Smitty, & Van Gorder on how they feel about the depth of their LB’s and if Nicholas or Wire is truly ready to take over.
Mauluga is a MLB or a 3-4 ILB to my knowledge, and we already got a stud there in Lofton.
Aaron Maybin & Larry English provide a little more of a quadary. They have the potential and that sacred versatility TD & Smitty are looking for to be a OLB or DE. I don’t know if it would be the best idea to draft an OLB with our #24, but I’d be happy with Cushing/Maybin/Matthews/ or English.
I also do know that, IMHO, there is not the value to draft a CB or SS @ #24. And besides Raji & Jerry, Hood may be a bit of a reach as well. Tough, tough decisions.
D3
March 25th, 2009
9:47 pm
mudcat – right with you Matthews. Talk about a stud work-ethic. Sean Smith would be a great pick-up, but not necessarily worth #24, IMO. We should have one fall to us between Delmas/Chung/S.Smith/& R.Johnson in the second round. Prefer Chung & Smith.
TrueFalcon – again, I’m a big fan of Matthews too, but I do think it would be a tough decision if the choice were between Matthews or Jerry.
JJ – usually right with you, but I’d have a hard time taking Hood or Brace before Matthews in the first round, particularly Brace. I think we could get as good a value with someone like Sammie Hill/Fili Moala/Chris Baker/Terrance Taylor in the 3rd or 4th round.
Willie Coyote – man, love your simplicity. We get wrapped up so many times on positions, depth, etc., but any number of guys could be a solid pick to our DEF. Particularly, OLB, DT, or DE.
G State Ben – nice thoughts on LB. It definitely isn’t our biggest needs, but I’d have to say that S & CB do not have top-end talent this year worthy of #24 pick, with the exception of Vontae Davis or Malcom Jenkins who’ll be long one. Only TE would be Pettigrew, but TE is soooo very deep this year.
JB – love to get a stud CB with our first pick, but unfortunately all the ones that will be available, Alphonso Smith/Darius Butler/DJ Moore, are all 5′9. We have two of those in Grimes and Irons that have experience.
Mookie
March 25th, 2009
10:05 pm
1. CB V. DAVIS ILLINOIS
2. S W. MOORE MISSOURI
3. NT R. BRACE B.C.
4. TE S. NELSON S. MISS
5. DE L. SIDBURY RICHMOND
6. OT J.BELL FURMAN
6. LB K. MAIAVA USC
SeminoleWarrior
March 25th, 2009
11:05 pm
Here is my mock: 1) SS/FS Chung…I just think when all is said and done, he will be the best safety in this draft. 2) CB Jarius Byrd of Oregon, big and physical CB; 3) TE Shawn Nelson; 4) OLB Marcus Freeman; 5a) DT Terrance Taylor 5b)OLB Morty Ivy; 6) OL Joel Bell
Go Falcons!!
SeminoleWarrior
March 25th, 2009
11:06 pm
D3, check out CB Jairus Byrd of Oregon. I think he is just what you and I are looking for in a big, physical corner.
D3
March 25th, 2009
11:06 pm
Stirg & Big Ray, ya’ll are men among boys on this blog, glad to see you back. I’m nominating one or both of you to take over for the Bird Babe(not hatin’, but when was the last time she posted, and ever over 3 sentences).
Big Ray – you couldn’t have put it better about drafting @ #24. I say it revolves around OLB and DT, as well. 2nd Rd. I say should be reserved for SS, Chung/S.Smith/R.Johnson. And I think 3rd we should pick up a TE Nelson/Cook/Coffman. If Jerry falls to us, I say pull the trigger, but if its between Hood and Matthews/Maybin/English (assuming Cushing, Raji, & Jerry were gone), I’d say take Matthews/Maybin/English and take our chances with a DT run-stuffer we could snag in the 4th such as Chris Baker/Sammie Hill/Fili Moala/or Terrance Taylor.
Stirg – man, you’re research is the S—! Dimitroff is gonna gold mine us some talent in the later rounds, and at the minimum, even if he wasn’t the sole engineer, he at least scouted them and helped in the decision making at NE.
Tyger – spot on analysis of current depth. We pulled smoke and mirrors last year, and what we lost in experience (Brooking,Jackson,Milloy), we can make-up for in talent, desire (Nicholas,Lewis,DeCoud).
Seminole – what’s up G? C’mon man, you really think we’re taking a CB or S in the first @ 24? I could be way wrong, but I just don’t see us taking a 5′9 CB or Safety in the 1st. Chung/Smith/Johnson will be available in the second, and maybe Delmas, who knows.
Have a good night guys, we’ll see you in the BirdCage again tomorrow!
D3
March 25th, 2009
11:11 pm
Seminole – you’re the general! Like Jarius Byrd, haven’t even heard about him yet. Like your mock, BTW. Great stuff. I would change it just a touch:
1)Clay Matthews – OLB
2)Patrick Chung – SS
3)Shawn Nelson – TE
4)Chris Baker/Sammie Hill/Fili Moala/Terrance Taylor – DT
5)Best available CB
Great stuff, man. Take it easy Seminole.
SeminoleWarrior
March 25th, 2009
11:42 pm
D3, Mookie, Nique, and all my brother in the room.. I’ll buy the brews at the ESPNZONE on draft day if Chung makes it to us in the second round. No way that will happen. The guy is too good and given where we are late in the first, given the need at SS, we must take him. I really like DeCoud but I just have this feeling Chung is a beast waiting to happen at safety.
Stirg d'Nahsif
March 26th, 2009
12:37 am
Thanks, D3. Question: Are we fanatics?
Rottie
March 26th, 2009
5:43 am
Best player available. If you start “looking” for a position, often times you overpay and end up being disappointed. The linebacker crop this year is excellent – probably the strength of this draft when you factor in hybrid DE/OLBs. I keep hearing people say TE Pettigrew in the 1st. Monumental mistake…the guy is too slow for the NFL. He’s a big target with nice hands and a decent blocker, but he lacks separation speed.
tbhawksfan
March 26th, 2009
6:52 am
I think I’ve looked at about 200 mocks in the last months. It seems that given our needs, #24 is not looking good. I’m prone to trading up or down.
According to Smitty and TD, we are actually set at every position. If this is true, do we draft to improve now, or for the future?
It seems like the best options at #24 will be either OLB/DE or TE. Our problem is that the OLB/DE players don’t fit our scheme. We play a 4-3, not a 3-4. Guys like English are proto-type 3-4 OLBs.
I also see our most glaring need being DT, CB or SS. The only player that might be available and a good pick at #24 is V. Davis CB.
For a long time I was thinking trade down. Now I’m thinking; trade up.
With our CBs and T. Lewis coming back healthy, we seem to have some depth at every position; except SS. Every year there are numerous FA’s to plug holes. Why stockpile late picks that rarely make strong contributions?
What about our #24 and one of our mid-rounds to move up about 10 spots in the draft and get an impact player at a position of need; DT/SS/CB?
Would it really hurt us to ‘loose” one mid round pick in this draft? Wouldn’t the drafting of Jerry DT or Jenkins CB (potential 2009 impact players at need position) be better than a marginal player at #24 and a mid-round pick? I say, yes.
I trade up, #24 and #125 for #14 or so. Given that move, here’s my mock:
#14: Jerry DT
#55: Delmas SS
#90: Francies CB
#143: Maiava OLB
#160: Hughes CB
#196: TE
This senario would give us two potential impact players at positions of greatest need and extra depth at other areas of need. We sacrifice at TE to improve the D.
ndadome
March 26th, 2009
8:19 am
This is my brain +++++++++++. This is my brain after all these mock drafts & opinions #@$#@!@#$%$#!!!
kclubmember
March 26th, 2009
8:44 am
I really like Clay Matthews and Brian Cushing,but Rey Maualuga is a game changer.
The Robot Nesbitt
March 26th, 2009
8:52 am
The Robot has determined that the Atlanta Falcons Football club will select a player that will provide pass rush. A review of all available data indicates that pass rush, probably defensive end, will be addressed in the primary round. The secondary round will address offensive tackle. The middle rounds will address the secondary, the tight end, and linebacker, though not in that particular order.
[Warning: Internet blog postings appearing prior on this page include factual errors.]
The Robot has determined the proper order of the “USC” linebackers, based on the results of 32,435 career simulations, taking into account overall career performance, injuries, and teams played for. The results:
Rey Maualuga
Kaluka Maiava
Clay Matthews Jr.
Brian Cushing
That is all. I must use my processing power now on producing weather reports.
TheManMike
March 26th, 2009
10:15 am
Rey Maualuga is our pick – Anyone who even RESEMBLES Troy Polumalu should be taken. Or we could trade our entire secondary for Good ol1 Troy….
All kidding aside…i still agree…hahaha..
No really tho – i love Troy P. I know TD has mentioned he wants a Troy P type player – WHO IN THIS DRAFT DO YOU GUYS/GALS SEE AS BEING THE CLOSEST MATCH TO A TROY P? Is there even a close match??
I truly beleive that Troys “Locks of Love” are what make him so damned dominating and intimidating. Rey Maualuga has that hair man!
Thoughts??
I MUS.WRITE
March 26th, 2009
10:46 am
Robots that dude Lol…… So you now to get beer from the fridge – Can u pour mixed drinks -I could use u at my next mixer.
doodoobailey
March 26th, 2009
10:46 am
I like the idea of moving up and getting impact guys, falcons kind of suck with late round picks(see Martrez Milner???)
and don’t get another danm tight end…
Supes
March 26th, 2009
11:02 am
I don’t think trading UP is the right way to go here, unless the Falcons are LOCKED into a player they deem to be a “game changer” for the Franchise.
If anything, if they aren’t 100% sold on players available at 24, they should TRADE down, and pick up (hopefully) an extra pick, maybe a 3rd rounder, late 2nd round?
I believe in a deep draft (esp. defensively) like this one, picks in the 2nd and 3rd round are like gold. Cheaper (as far as signing them), and in some cases, just as good as 1st rounders (later on).
One more thing…If the Falcons can grab Maiava in round 5 or later, DEFINITELY a steal. Out of all of USC, LB, he is the one that DOMINATED the most against Penn State in the Rose Bowl. Not sure if that had anything to do with Penn State “paying extra attention” to his “bash brothers” at LB, but I remember he made plenty of tackles and big hits.
Jonathan
March 26th, 2009
11:10 am
Mike – Are you kidding me??
Of course there isn’t a Troy is this draft, if there was he wouldn’t be hanging around at #24. The closest player to Troy is Taylor Mays (at USC now).
Troy’s looks have nothing to do with intimidation…he brings it on the field and everyone knows it. My thought is you need to move to Pitt and follow up on your man-crush.
JJ
March 26th, 2009
11:14 am
We need a pass/blocking TE to improve our 3rd down efficency and give OUR kid another weapon, just not at #24.
- CUSHING/ZIGGY/BRACE, – CHUNG, – COOK
One mock draft has us taking Michael Johnson DE, the kid is a beast but I just dont see our brain trust taking that gamble. But damn, the kid is huge!
Jonathan
March 26th, 2009
11:39 am
Michael Johnson is huge and is in the best shape a man can be in. I like his style to drop and cover and/or blitz. However…he never ever showed up in big games with tech, he was usually dominated by players he should have easily over powered. I don’t see the Falcons drafting MJ. Unless the Falcons trust think that Tech didn’t utilize him in the right ways. My guess is that MJ will be drafted in the 2nd and he’ll be a bust as a dominant player.
Ken Strickland
March 26th, 2009
11:45 am
I can’t tell you guys how much I’ve enjoyed reading your comments and suggestions. I can see the wisdom in almost any of the choices that are available. I’ve come to see how we could benefit from drafting a TE, CB, SS, DE, OLB or DT with our first pick. Remember, we’ll have a chance at a large number of the players that will be drafted in the lower rds when they get cut during training camp. Also, a lot of the drafted players that make their teams will cause veteran players, some we might be able to use, to be released. FREE AGENCY ISN’T OVER.
Jonathan
March 26th, 2009
11:50 am
I’m glad you pointed that out Ken…because we had no idea??
Atlanta Falcons Talk » Blog Archive » Mike Smith likes USC LBs
March 26th, 2009
12:06 pm
[...] Mike Smith likes USC LBs [...]
Nique
March 26th, 2009
12:14 pm
SeminoleWarrior
I really think that he could be! He rated as the 3rd best safety on many ppl’s boards & if we don’t take a safety at 24, there might not be one taken in the 1st round period! With that being said Chung is ranked behind Delmas & William Moore as the 3rd best SS on the board on many boards, so if no SS goes in the 1st, bc the popular conscious is that there isn’t 1 SS with a 1st round grade in this years draft, then there is a good chance that 3 won’t go in the 2cnd round b4 we pick. I personally would be ok with any of those 3. The fallacy that i see on here is ppl saying draft Shawn Nelson in the 3rd & Ron Brace in the 3rd, or even where we are in the 2cnd! Neither of those players will be there where ppl are selecting them in mock drafts…NO WAY!!!! & ppl talking about trading up, that’s just not smart, we have TOO many holes to be getting rid of picks, we need to trade down & get additional picks!
Think realistically we NEED (not wants right now) a new starting NT, SS, & CB (& we want a new TE, OLB, & I personally would like to see a new Tackle to really solidify our O-line, bc while we ranked towards the top in rushing, there were games when we simply could not move the ball on the ground! I.E. anytime we played really dominant D’s & the playoff game against Ari. truly dominant running games, like the Steelers, Panthers, & Giants don’t have that problem bc of the quality they have up front)Sorry for getting sidetracked! But yeah so to walk away with 3 to 4 no questioned starters in the draft like we need, I don’t think that we can afford to trade any picks away trying to move up!
JJ
March 26th, 2009
12:23 pm
Interesting mock draft from “The football Expert”:
- 24 – Peria Jerry DT 6-3 295
- 55 – Shawn Nelson TE 6-5 242 DALLAS takes chung at 51
- 90 – Chip Vaughn SS 6-2 215
I could live with that, all 3 could start. Of course it all depends on FA yet to be named!
Robot – is it true you have a thing for wall-E?
JJ
March 26th, 2009
1:03 pm
Stirg
Answer: YES! GO FALCONS!!!
Jamison
March 26th, 2009
2:50 pm
I think that our linebacking core is not the issue early in the draft. With the pick up of vet Peterson and strong play at the end of the season from Coy Wire and the emerging Lofton, i think we need to focus on patching up the secondary and focusing on our D-line. Anderson is a bust, big Grady to Detroit, leaves us with two big names on defense. John Abraham and Mike Peterson. FREE AGENTS ARE STILL OUT THERE DIMITRIOFF!
BLACK AND RED DAWG
March 26th, 2009
4:56 pm
Hey, let’s do it the “New England” way and draft a multi-use/dementional player. Larry English gives you the best of both worlds and provides depth @ two positions and can be used on special teams. But, that will be left for the falcon brass. One thing that a good pass rush can do, is cover up a subpar to fair defensive back field. D-line is priorty 1. Our offense needs very little tweaking.
Stirg d'Nahsif
March 26th, 2009
4:57 pm
I can’t agree with some of your suggestions about drafting one of the USC linebackers. First of all, only one or two of those linebackers are legit; everybody else is just surrounded by good football players. If you put me back there with Cushing, Maualuga and Maiava, even I’ll look tempting enough to draft. Why are we salivating over drafting one of these guys, at 24, when we can get Clint Sintim or Tyrone McKenzie in a later round? Sometimes I believe that some of us don’t read about, or research, other players. I think that you desire a player because you seen him on ESPN or Fox Sports. Fellows, read, research, then react.
I got my own mock:
Brandon Pettigrew
Patrick Chung
Clint Sintim
Sammie Lee Hill
Cameron Morrah
Do not be suprised to see TD go tight end with the number one pick, especially with Pettigrew’s skills still on the board. In fact, look for him to take two pass-catching tight ends. It’ll definitely confuse the defenses when we use two-tight end sets; and it will make our offense the most potent in the NFL. With what we already have on defense, we can afford the two tight ends with a Sintim, Hill and Chung.
Like that?
marko
March 26th, 2009
5:25 pm
JJ, The insanity crack was uncalled for. I’m sincerely sorry. Anybody that had to park at Georgia State, not to mention eating at the Bite and Die for four years deserves better.
mudcat
March 26th, 2009
5:29 pm
D3 & dbhawksfan-love your mocks! We have a lot of really good blogs and very knowledgeable fans. My mock is Sean Smith DB/S Utah or Larry English DL, James Casey TE from Rice in the 2nd rd, Alex McGee DT/DE Purdue in the 3rd rd and Zack Follet OLB from Cal SJ in the 4th. Keep the good stuff coming guys!
marko
March 26th, 2009
5:32 pm
Nique, you’re right nobody’s mistaking Vince Wilfolk for a swimsuit model. the only way a guy could make that kind of mistake would be standing Vince up next to Ron Brace.
JJ
March 26th, 2009
5:34 pm
no prob, go concrete campus! watch out uga/gt! lol
tbhawksfan
March 26th, 2009
6:06 pm
Anyone that would drive to GSU deserves to eat there. Mass transit guys. I used to enjoy some of the little hole in the wall eateries hidden around GSU.
danga
March 26th, 2009
6:15 pm
I think we should trade our 1st pick to the cardinals for cb dominique rodgers cromartie. Lets face it we’re gonna need at least 1 good cb to compete and we dont have that and we arent getting 1 out the draft iether.I would give them a 1st this year and a 2nd for next year.We’ll have plenty compensary picks next year for the free agents we had to give up this year.
Edgar
March 26th, 2009
6:20 pm
Connor Barwin
Cincinnati
Ht: 6-4
Wt: 256
40: 4.66
Ken Strickland
March 26th, 2009
6:25 pm
STIRG D’NAHSIF-I like you mock draft except for the 2 TE’s. I’d take a different approach. My mock draft is as follows:
1st rd-DE/LB Aaron Maybin(6′3″ 249lbs) or Larry English(6′2″ 255lbs)
2nd rd-CB Sean Smith (6′3″ 214lbs)
3rd rd-SS Courtney Green (6′ 212lbs)
4th rd-TE Cameron Marroh(6′3″ 244lbs)
5th rd-DT Sammie Lee Hill(6′3″ 329lbs)
These 5 picks addresses all of our key OFF/DEF needs. What do you think?