Falcons make some moves after market settles


Mike Peterson and Brett Romberg were added to the Birds’ nest.

The Falcons have been slow and extremely deliberate in free agency. By contrast, last season they were swift and decisive in adding running back Michael Turner, safety Erik Coleman and the rest of the group.

Peterson has played weakside and middle linebacker. He comes “cross-trained.” He was also a former captain in Jacksonville before falling out with head coach Jack Del Rio last season.

But Falcons coach Mike Smith never had any issues with Peterson. Word coming out of Flowery Branch is that their bond is still pretty tight and that allowed the deal to get done so quickly.

Despite his falling out with Del Rio, Peterson still led the Jags in tackles with 84. He missed six starts after Del Rio misinterpreted Peterson’s attempt to fire up the team as a selfish celebratory move. It was also the last year of Peterson’s contract and well, he thought he should have been extended.

But all that is in his rear view mirror.

Peterson steps into a unit that needs some direction and playmakers. Peterson and Stephen Nicholas can go at it for the weakside spot. If Peterson wins, then Nicholas could slide over to strongside and possibly play on passing downs if he can’t beat out Coy Wire. Wire started on running downs late last season for Boley.

Now, if something happens to Curtis Lofton, Peterson can also play the middle.

Romberg gets reunited with offensive line coach Paul Boudreau and gives the Falcons another solid interior lineman behind center Todd McClure and guards Justin Blalock and Harvey Dahl.

Romberg, 29, has started 18 games over the last three seasons. He started his career in Jacksonville after playing at Miami.

Do you like the new Falcons?

308 comments Add your comment

Greg

March 10th, 2009
10:39 am

One slightly above average pick (Peterson); one average pick (Romberg). Nothing to get a fan excited. Tampa, Jacksonville, and New Orleans have all, on balance, upgraded considerably ahead of the Birds. TD better pull a couple rabbits out of the hat before this is all over. Right now no one would say we’re a stronger team than we were last year.

Todd

March 10th, 2009
10:40 am

I am pretty happy with these two additions. The slow pace of their FA signings is irritating, but completely understandable. The possible addition of TE LJ Smith doesn’t really do much for me, since he has a dubious injury history. The secondary needs addressing right away, because I thought they should have kept Milloy for one more season.

Tale of Woe

March 10th, 2009
10:44 am

I like both moves…I just hope we are not done. Without a doubt, Peterson is an upgrade over Brooking. We need some DL to help out next and maybe someone else in the secondary. Then I will feel much better about what the draft might bring us. We had a great draft last year, but it is hard to strike lightening twice.

D Money

March 10th, 2009
11:02 am

The Romberg move was okay but I don’t expect to see him play really. The Peterson move is just okay too. We just signed a backup middle linebacker (Gilbert) and I expect Nicholas to take the weakside linebacker spot. If he’s strictly backup great. If we draft a solid SLB then I will feel comfortable with the LB corp.

eric

March 10th, 2009
11:04 am

Yes, I’m happy with both moves, but clearly not overjoyed. The secondary needs big help, and I hope they’re not banking on the draft to upgrade this portion of the team. They’re still uner the salary cap=correct, so why not make more free agency splashes?

D Money

March 10th, 2009
11:05 am

What’s the word on Trey Lewis? Is he 100% yet? We need a hog in the middle to take some of those double teams off Abraham.

bert

March 10th, 2009
11:12 am

Just remember, we can still re-sign Milloy, I don’t believe he’s signed with anybody else. As far as these two signings go, I see them as adding depth and that’s about it.

Deangelo Falls

March 10th, 2009
11:12 am

I’m okay with the moves. They’re not flashy but serviceable. I think if a guy like Leroy Hill was available we would have made a big move. I would have liked to have seen Sean Jones visit. Seeing that he signed for just one year in Philly it seems like we could have made a play on him. Oh well, Delmas will be perfect if we can get him.

clthurman

March 10th, 2009
11:13 am

These are moves a solid team does to strengthen an already great team. For us this does nothing to solidify a weakened defense and no realistic targets we can count on to get in the draft. A backup center,whoopee and another Jacksonville reject. Who’s next the receiver who just got busted Matt Jones. It used to be we were the VA TECH graveyard now we get the Jacksonville rejects. Very dissapointed so far and yes I was wrong about Ryan but jury is still out on OUCH I’M HURT AGAIN SAM BAKER and the others from this so called great draft last year. It was the free agents that got us as far as we did….that and a quarterback who could throw a short slant and not decapitate his receiver.

Khao$

March 10th, 2009
11:15 am

I’m pleased with the acquisition of Peterson. On the previous blog, I harped on the Falcons need to get some veteren leadership in the lockeroom, without breaking the bank. Well, we have that with Mike Peterson. This accomplishes a few things:
1) The Falcons have a guy who can show the youngsters, on the field, how to do their business
2) He probably won’t break the bank
3) We’re still able to build through the draft
4) He knows Smitty’s system.
I like Lofton. However, after just on year, he’s not ready to lead. We needed somebody who could step in and bring leadership until Lofton is ready to be the leader.

clthurman

March 10th, 2009
11:15 am

Oh and stay the hell away from that crappy TE from Philly…Smith. All we need is another wimp sitting HURT? in a whirlpool.

Falconian

March 10th, 2009
11:19 am

The Falcons would be a better team with or without free agent signings simply because of more experience with Ryan, and the same offense/defense coordinators and schemes. I love the way the Falcons are building this thing…only getting players that fit your exact scheme, and not just going after big names. Just like the Patriots have done it for years!!!!

falconsavvy89

March 10th, 2009
11:22 am

I’m happy they made the moves the linebackers got a good quality veteran as well as the offensive line. I think the falcons need to be more active in the free agent market, but i believe that the draft will help them in some of their needs.

Marcus

March 10th, 2009
11:24 am

Hope Peterson still has something in the tank. I was wondering if this is the same deal like when Parcells moved to teams there seemed to be a couple of players he liked to bring with him (Pepper Johnson?, Bryan Cox?, Keyshawn Johnson?).
What this also (hopefully) does is make us less desperate to find an immediate starter at a NEED position in the draft and/or add more flexibility to use one of our two 5th round picks as a package to swap draft positions to move up if we see someone we like (kinda like we did last year with Sam Baker).

Leon

March 10th, 2009
11:28 am

EXACTLY RIGHT Falconian! Building slow and steady. If anybody needed a change of scenery it was Peterson, he will be a HUGE upgrade over Keith Broken and Romberg gives us depth on the OL. clthurman you need to drink a big ol’ glass of chill the f*** out.

wr

March 10th, 2009
11:29 am

I like the Peterson move, I don’t have much knowledge about Romberg but the depth he adds can only help. The Peterson move at least brings in veteran leadership that hopefully will help the young players we have and rookies that we may acquire through the draft. Also, he was only signed for two years so he won’t hurt the salary cap much if his tank happens to be half empty. I continue to be worried about the secondary, especially the position vacated by Milloy. D Led, what is your take on L.J Smith, it seems that many people feel he is an inadequate blocker, but when healthy he seems to play pretty well. Also, any other word on his potential signing with the falcons. I think that the falcons can afford to draft a tight end in later rounds and be okay with what we have, Peele looked pretty decent last year and I would rather have a young tight end that can develop and grow as Matt Ryan continues to develop and grow rather than a stop leak tight end, which seems to be the overall concern of most bloggers when considering L.J Smith.

Dogbyte

March 10th, 2009
11:33 am

The Falcons are doing what they need to do, slowly and methodically. They are getting help from the middle-level pool that does not break the bank. Yesterday, some idjit said they should have signed Haynesworth. For $100 mil+?! Thank God “he” is in charge of nothing more important than his sand box.
No, TD is doing a good job and with a couple of more small pieces + the draft he will solve the puzzle. The Falcons will be sound in 09!

Charlene Samuels

March 10th, 2009
11:41 am

I think the birds are not going out overpaying FAs. Our GM knows talent better than we do. I like the new guys we are signing because they are blue collar workers. The birds have been burned in the past in the FA market and sometimes it is not GOOD to jump to big names. Our GM is the best in the business right now and I predict a 12-4 season with home field. I think people on this line should set back and re-examine their comments. The birds are sleeping gaints in their division. We also will win our divison. Last year I said we will be 12-4 I was wrong by one game. To be champions, you must learn to fit the pizz and football is just like this idea. Look at the steelers and tell me do they have high price big name players??? NOPE

Brian Hunt

March 10th, 2009
11:42 am

I like both signings a lot. Peterson guarantees that the LB corps is at the very least, as good as last year with the potential to be better. Romberg provides depth that is important and he has a lot of experience. Both of these moves will allow the Falcons to focus more on the Defensive line and secondary in the draft.

Barry

March 10th, 2009
11:43 am

Hey Y’all:

Good solid and safe moves. These players, especially Peterson, will fill that playmaker role that we need a linebacker. His ability to also play the middle will build some great flexibilty in the Falcons defense. Now we have to get some “BIG NASTIES” to fill up the middle and on the ends on defense. Hopefully, we can find some of these young studds in the draft and/or through free agency. If fullfilled, then we will be moving in the right direction to beat all the teams we have on the schedule this year.

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is a SECRET from a FAlCON FAN!!!! TELL EVERYBODY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

“ONE HEARTBEAT, BABY!!!”

clthurman

March 10th, 2009
11:44 am

Leon sorry to have scared you with my passion for all things Falcons. Peterson is a middle LB….we have one already..who is pretty good. I cant complain about Romberg just not really a need and any dollars spent away from our glaring needs seems well stupid. You cannot win in this league consistently without a good to great defense….you might get lucky one year but the teams that do well in this league consistently play good D…we do not. And we will not unless we upgrade with ready to play caliber studs. You don’t get those very often in the draft, especially as one as weak as this one is.

steve'o

March 10th, 2009
12:01 pm

Hey clthurman you need another glass!

T.C

March 10th, 2009
12:07 pm

Great pickup at linebacker,i would sign spudwebb to replace brooking.

Greg Smith

March 10th, 2009
12:11 pm

clthurman chill!!!!!! Try sex with a womean or something. The FO and coaches proved last year that they know what they are doing so I’m going with them until they prove me wrong.

Reno 911

March 10th, 2009
12:13 pm

BARRY’s back! TELL EVERYBODY!

Dr Henry / Augusta

March 10th, 2009
12:15 pm

after last season, I don’t question any moves these people (Falcon FO and coaching staff) make.

Seth

March 10th, 2009
12:19 pm

I think the Evil genius of TD is gonna trade our #1 off to a team who is low on salary cap space and probably couldn’t afford to sign a #2, like Indianapolis, so then we pick up a 29th, 55th, 59th and 90th and prolly all 4 will be starters. People wont like it but I have a feeling by the time our pick comes around most of the people we would take would be off the board already.

clthurman

March 10th, 2009
12:22 pm

Alright I will just trust in the solid foundation that is the Falcon history of year in and year out good decision making. Ever wonder why organizations like the Steelers, Cowboys, Eagles always seem to be competitive…one reason is their fans just don’t sit blindly after 1 season and say all is good. No they demand excellence. I’m not gonna sit here and say all is doom and gloom for the Falcons….their Offense is bad-ass. But I’ll be damned if I offend or confuse people with my high expectations. And right now I am worried about our D and what Dimtroff is thinking. As a fan and I have been one since the Gritz Blitz days living in DC no less, I have high hopes this year and I want us to have 2 good years in a row, and not settle for 1 here and 1 there.

clthurman

March 10th, 2009
12:28 pm

Nice Greg have “sex with a woman” I believe is your quote…would that be like a woman like you? If you want to debate what I said without getting personal then I’m fine with that. But if you are trying to show some type of clever humor then do a better job. Falcon Fans insulting other Falcon Fans ….yea that makes sense.

Mitch

March 10th, 2009
12:32 pm

I don’t want TD to make any stupid additions. Who would we add? Does Indy and NE do that? No. They build through the draft and add pieces as needed. They don’t add stars, just team players. If a guy gets too big for the team, they let him go. That is what I want here in the ATL. Don’t bring in any idiots. Build long term.
This team showed they can with with what most were saying would win 2 games. They will do the same again.
I hope us Falcon Fans will wise up and start wishing the new guys would do what has failed for so many years just because we want some news.

D. Orlando Ledbetter

March 10th, 2009
12:34 pm

D. MONEY: Falcons haven’t given us medical updates. We’ll have to get one on Trey when offseason workouts start this month.

BERT: Don’t think Milloy is an option. When a team issues a release and says they are not signing a guy, that usually means good-bye. . . you know, like forever.

WR: Wouldn’t overpay for L.J. But if he can still get up the field and catch the ball, he could be a nice weapon for Ryan. Problem is that they could get Jared Cook or Chase Coffman in the draft for a much cheaper price.

T.C.: Spud Webb at weakside. We know he’s fearless.

BARRY: Welcome back!!! ONE HEARTBEAT BABY!!!

SirReal

March 10th, 2009
12:37 pm

I think its a good move if we look at the big picture here. We definitely need a proven, solid veteran in EACH level of the D. I think the next thing to address is the secondary. I am starting to think twice about the L.J. Smith thing though. Guys, I dont know much about him. Is he really that bad or just too injury-prone? If he is, we don’t need that here.

Greg Smith

March 10th, 2009
12:46 pm

clthurman u are getting personal with your comments about FO and staff. I’m not sure u are a Falcons fan. I’ve followed them since 66 so I’ve seen everything. And I know that the moves they made last year were heads up above what the last group did. You still need to chill.

cutter

March 10th, 2009
12:46 pm

What is your opinion on Atlanta’s 1st round pick or do you think they trade down?

Falcon 8211

March 10th, 2009
12:50 pm

DOL, do you think we might get Rodney Harrison to fill the gap while we groom our future SS.

1eyedJack

March 10th, 2009
12:55 pm

clthurman

I just can’t believe that ANY team in the NFL would allow their fans to dictate what they do. That would be a disaster.

D. Orlando Ledbetter

March 10th, 2009
12:56 pm

CUTTER: I think you keep that pick. A really good player will fall to you at No. 24.

FALCO 8211: Harrison is a tough hombre. Doesn’t fit the long-term goals. His range has been questionable for a few years now after those severe knee problems.

Cameron

March 10th, 2009
12:57 pm

What are we paying Peterson over the three years? How much guaranteed?

clthurman

March 10th, 2009
12:57 pm

Greg, your comment is WTF? First off I am a Falcon Fan. I have in no way made any personal attack on the FO and staff. I am questioning their plans. And not their sexuality I might add either. So you have been a fan since 66 I respect the hell out of that…I have not for that long because I am not that old. I seem to remember other great starts we have had here and they have not ended well for us. So if I play the doubting Thomas to coin a phrase its because I care enough to not want to repeat the mistakes of the past. And Atlanta has not had a good track record. Fans who care want their teams to succeed, and not say all is well after just ONE SEASON…as a Falcon Fan you should know this. And again Greg…I would enjoy sex with a woman…what are you a parrot….I was in the porn business and ran a strip club as well…I have had more women than that little hand of yours has ever dreamt about…and still do.

clthurman

March 10th, 2009
1:01 pm

Orlando…do the FO and stuff think that highly of Decoud and Fudge to think they are ready right now? Or is a real prospect or 2 been mentioned as wants thru the draft.

Greg Smith

March 10th, 2009
1:15 pm

clthyurman this is different. It is only one season but these people are running an organization the way it should be run. And it is America and you have the right to be wrong. You are bitching about what the have done so far. Last year they made early moves when they needed to. This year there was no one there of need or financially that they needed. Wait until the season starts and criticize. Of all the years I’ve followed the Falcons, this group of people, fron the FO to the coachiong staff, gives me more hope than I’ve ever had for the future of this franchise.

steve'o

March 10th, 2009
1:21 pm

I am not saying that after one season all is well but, I will let the GM and coach build the team because they have the expereince to do so. If they don’t get it right it will be shown on the field and then we as fans can question what the heck they are doing. Until then I will enjoy seeing a team being built for season after season not a one trick pony which is what we are use to. Loven the change!! Keep it up TD!!

fanATicaL

March 10th, 2009
1:24 pm

Bad teams make big splashes.The better the team .Tne smaller the splash.The teams that are consistent year in and year out.Are solid teams from GM/Owner to Physical therapist/towel guy.Everybody needs to do his/her job.If anyone in the league as FALCONFANS.We know what disfunction looks like.Dis Aint It

clthurman

March 10th, 2009
1:27 pm

And I can respect that Greg. I was so excited over the development of our offense last year that I was really hoping we addressed the defense just as well. I agree that no free agents really stood out and am glad we avoided the HAYNESWORTH hype. I do feel Foxworth was a big mistake letting him go. I just don’t see any real help in this years draft that will help us right away…so 2 steps back looks to be a reality no matter how smart our FO and staff are now.

falconsavvy89

March 10th, 2009
1:28 pm

Above all falcon fans the Falcons are signing based on their needs and also who fits into their style of play. I think at the osistion the Falcons are at in the draft, a real qualtiy player could fall at that 24 spot in the 1st round. maybe……. michael johnson….hmmmmmm

Greg Smith

March 10th, 2009
1:29 pm

Nice comment fan. That is exactly what i’m talking about

willie

March 10th, 2009
1:32 pm

Great additions. Over and over, you hear T.D. talk about how he loves players that can play multiple positions. That is clearly something he believes in. These guys both give you that flexibility, which is a great commodity. These are the solid players you need to build a foundation that will be competitive for years to come. Remember, it’s not all about next season with this regime…..they want to be good EVERY season. I’m liking it.

Old School

March 10th, 2009
1:35 pm

I’m on board with the thumbs up crowd. Folks, this is a 50 man team, if you spend all your time concentrating on the big moves, you wind up with no foundation and guys like these are the foundation. Quick – name more than 2 or 3 defensive starters with the Super Bowl Cardinals last year. Most probably can’t – because what’s hopefully happening here in Atlanta is what it takes to build a winner – concentrate on forming a winning team, not a team with as many stars as possible and fill out the roster with whatever is left over that other teams cut.

I point to the Redskins for an example. In the last 16 years they have all of TWO playoff wins and ONE division title (by the way, the Falcons have FIVE playoff wins and TWO division titles in that span). The point is, they always go out and sign the big name. Have an owner that spends lavishly. Builds the largest staduim in the NFL – and for over a decade and a half, has been less successful than Atlanta.

Moral to the story – we don’t need to spend freely, just spend wisely (and carry a big draft board!).

Matt Winkeljohn

March 10th, 2009
1:37 pm

D-Led,

I love the bow tie, but where are your glasses?

Mitch

March 10th, 2009
1:38 pm

I love the moral Old School. “Spend wisely and carry a big draft board”. That’s it.

oldbrave

March 10th, 2009
1:40 pm

peterson is going to start not back up anyone hes has always been a smith favorite and plays hard and fast and at 32 hes 4 years younger than brokings and hes always played hard and is a head hunter even after rios stupid move costing peterson six games he still lead jags in takles

FalconDawg

March 10th, 2009
1:41 pm

I like the pace they are moving at.Not rushing to go after who everyone says they should. Build your team to play how you want it to. I like the peterson move he’s playied strong over the years a good defensive leader i can’t believe that Jacksonville actually let him go. I’ve seen him play alot in Jaxs. Romberg will be good in case a injury occurs or when mcclure desides to retire. I feel all the right guys will come with time. As a fan that sucks waiting but for the long run whatever’s best for ATL

Deep South Falcon

March 10th, 2009
1:42 pm

All I have to say, is that last time checked DL and LB’s don’t cover WR’s very well. I am more concerned about the secondary now after the Peterson signing. We have three holes on the secondary to fill. I am not sold on Von Hutchins, Chris Houston, Chevis Jackson, or David Irons to be the answer at starting CB position, and I don’t think Jamal Fudge and Thomas DeCoud are much more than special teamer’s. I hope the ofense is awesome this year, because our secondary is going to get burnt all year. Hope we can put up 56 a game, to give the sorry excuse of a defense some room for error!!

Southside Falcon

March 10th, 2009
1:47 pm

WELCOME BACK BARRY! now thats a FAN! TD and the rest of the FO know exactly what they are doing. Spending frugal with solid veterans, building through the draft and NOT OVER SPENDING ON MEDIOCRE OVER HYPED PLAYERS!! Look at the last team to try and build a REAL team instead of a FANTASY one, The REDSKINS and COWBOYS and neither of those teams went any where in late December. TD comes from where!? Oh thats right the friggin PATRIOTS name one huge free agent contract that they gave out excluding Adalius Thomas. Ive sat back far too long and listened to far too much bad mouthing. Look what they did last year whith nothing, They have proved themselves to me and the rest of us in Falcons Nation.That should be enough,let them work. ONE HEARTBEAT!! WELCOME BACK BARRY!

Barry

March 10th, 2009
1:49 pm

Hey Y’all:

Glad to be back, but really I am resting and waiting for another great Falcon season. I got this weird feeling we are going to be in it to win it in “ONE HEARTBEAT!!!”. Also, I am just rallying the fans in
“ONE HEARTBEAT!!!!” We FALCON FANS will be full force when the season starts. So, “GET READY FOR SOME FOOTBALL!!!!!” WE ARE DOWN WIT THAT.

GO FALCONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
This is a SECRET from a FALCON FAN. TELL EVERYBODY.

“ONE HEARTBEAT, BABY!!!!!!!”

Peter Griffin

March 10th, 2009
1:53 pm

GUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILTYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!

falconsavvy89

March 10th, 2009
1:53 pm

Just a quick quesrtion do you think that Sean Jones would have been a great addtion to the franchise if he did not sign with another team???

Tibo

March 10th, 2009
1:55 pm

I really like those 2 guys but im still concerned by our DBs… What is your opinion on Leigh Bodden? did he fit in our schemes?

And with our first pick, LB or S? what are your favorites???

falconsavvy89

March 10th, 2009
2:00 pm

Your rgiht Deep South Falcon it looks like im not the only one who noticed that the conerbacks especially Chris Houston got scorched down the field most of the time. Unless they step up, the secondary is a huge concern for me.

falc

March 10th, 2009
2:20 pm

Great…now we have a 32 year old weakside linebacker playing out of positon (he’s really an inside backer)who made 84 tackles last year and didn’t play 6 games because he couldn’t get along with the coach. He’s replacing a 5 year All-Pro,about the same age, who lead the team in tackles for 8 years in a row (over 130 tackles last year)even though he was playing out of position, who was an acknowledged leader by both his coaches and peers. Now how is this such a great move, most of the “know all” fans will probably say Peterson never made tackles 15 yards down field. Maybe he couldn’t get there or maybe it takes hustle to get there. Upgrade….I don’t see it.

I do like bringing in a back up offensive lineman, it’s tough in the trenches and they need all the help they can get.

ndadome

March 10th, 2009
2:20 pm

Was that the “real” Matt Winkeljohn on the previous page? Miss that guy. . .one of the best!

ndadome

March 10th, 2009
2:24 pm

Not throwing rocks at DLed, though. .just enjoyed Matt a great deal. I like the bowtie as well.

danga

March 10th, 2009
2:30 pm

safety roy williams would be a great help to our defense just look at his stats.before dallas went to a 3-4 scheme he was one of the top safetys in the game plus we need a safety that puts fear in a receiver coming accross our middle. Sign him and we could do alot of different things with that first pick

clthurman

March 10th, 2009
2:46 pm

Hope we can draft some serious beef for that defensive middle to help our linebackers and secondary some. We will not get the BC monster nor it looks like any of the smart USC backers so what is realistic for us at 24. The safeties are not that good for that high a pick and I should say strong safety since that is what we really need. Johnson from Tech seems like a combine beast but takes too many plays off. Any ideas on corners since I hope Grimes and Jackson are not our go to plan.

Andy

March 10th, 2009
2:50 pm

I agree with clthurman. I don’t think falcons can just assume they can get a miracle corner like they did last year. I think the coaching staff is great–the falcons way overachieved because of great coaching. It would be nice to get some solid help on d that is not at the 99 cent store for free agents. I know the coaches are great and really good—they will draft well. But a repeat of anything close to last year draft would be lighting in a bottle twice. Maybe the falcons can finally break the curse . Lets get back to back winning seasons baby!!!!

danga

March 10th, 2009
2:51 pm

Enter your comments here

clthurman

March 10th, 2009
2:55 pm

For all those questioning the secondary thank you…I have been taking a beating today from posters who feel I am to hard on the FO and staff. Deep South Falcon right on sir. There was not much at stopping the pass last year except for Foxworth and they didn’t have to go there much because Houston was getting toasted. Grimes is too small period. Jackson is a nickle back at best and who is Von Hutchins?

hawesg

March 10th, 2009
2:56 pm

I like the Peterson move. It gives you depth and experience at LB. Does he have enough juice left in his legs to play WLB? I thought it would make more sense to put a big Hoss at SLB. Romberg is just a dept signing, but you need that.

If they could (they won’t) sign Bodden, then you’re in a great position to fill SS, TE and maybe OLB or DE in the draft.

I could see them trade down a few slots if they got a good return and were confident they could still land a safety they want.

steve'o

March 10th, 2009
2:57 pm

Coach Smith has proved he knows how to build a great defence! Do some of you truly believe he has no ideal what to do about the secondary!! If foxworth was all that I’m sure he would have kept him! Let the facts speak for themselves, coach know how to build a defence!!

Webhead

March 10th, 2009
2:58 pm

Sorryass signing Leadership,really? From someone in the doghouse of the head coach. Someone upset because the club didn’t extend his contract. Someone who did not have near as many tackles as Brooking. Something is wrong with you guys, this guy isn’t half the player Brooking is not to mention Boley. Jeez

steve'o

March 10th, 2009
3:03 pm

Whatever webhead.

buc_wild1

March 10th, 2009
3:06 pm

Everyone, take a step back and listen to yourselves. You guys act as if you’re a part of the FO and Coaching Staff, you don’t get paid for opinions (which we are all entitled to). All we are doing is called wishful thinking. I would be nice to acquire some of the FA talent that was available out there, but someone knows something more than we do, that’s why those certain impact players haven’t been signed here. I personally, will sit back and watch what unfolds in Flowery Branch and wait for the season to start. Let’s just hope for the sake of sanity that “OUR FALCON BRASS” does make the right moves and we do get our back to back winning seasons…….GO FALCONS!!

clthurman

March 10th, 2009
3:10 pm

Steve-o I am curious. Do you think Baltimore has had a good defense these past few years? Who paid Foxworth the big bucks? I trust Newsome for defensive schrewdness at talent jusdgement especially on the defensive side of the ball….after all he did pass on signing on Hartwell and how did that turn out for us. And if Foxworth was not “all that” then why go thru the trouble of getting him here and then letting him start. I gotta hand it to TD he got that guy for a 7th round pick…are you saying we will pick up the equivalent of Foxworth in this or even the next draft for sure. We had a good young corner with a giant upside …leave. They are not easy to find much less replace.

falconsavvy89

March 10th, 2009
3:10 pm

lol i hope that they make the right moves too buc_wild1 but what is a post without everyone’s opinion lol!!!! the Falcons will be fine as long as the secondary can either improve or be improved

Spud Webb

March 10th, 2009
3:13 pm

I love it. Dmitroff is going to build this thing with the draft. SMART free agent signings like these give a team depth and versatility and flexability. DB’s will see at least 2 new faces via the draft. TE if LJ smith doesnt sign here and probably another LB. Good job Falcons.

D. Orlando Ledbetter

March 10th, 2009
3:16 pm

CAMERON: Checking on the loot.

MATT: The bow tie is goofy enough. Didn’t pose with the glasses, too.

buc_wild1

March 10th, 2009
3:20 pm

I agree totally, but all this guessimation by the blog experts just makes me laugh. You’ve heard the old phrase, “OPINION ARE LIKE_ _ _HOLES!” Bottom lines is that we all want OUR FALCONS to succeed no matter what talent gets brought in. There is the one little word we should all have – FAITH, that they do make the right decisions concerning personnel. I, for one thought letting Foxworth escape was a bad idea, but hey it happened. I think the concept the team is using is a great formula, get as many 2nd tier players who has been with other teams (most who’s accustomed to winning) and bring them in to help develop our younger players into buying into Coach Smith philosophy.

clthurman

March 10th, 2009
3:29 pm

Faith and Falcons….haven’t always been able to associate those 2 together. How about we be cautiously optimistic. And opinions are what blogs are for. Leave the blind faith at church.

doodoobailey

March 10th, 2009
3:29 pm

GET ROY WILLIAMS!!!!!!!!!!!!! OUR DB’S ARE AVERAGE!!!!!!!!!

Andy

March 10th, 2009
3:30 pm

These are the thoughts of the nfc south beat writer. The falcons could have gotten booking cheaper than peterson? why not get both?

Just got the numbers on Mike Peterson’s deal with Atlanta and they’re pretty interesting.

Peterson didn’t get the one-year deal you’d expect for a 32-year-old linebacker on the downside of his career. He got a two-year deal that could be worth as much as $6.6 million. That’s a pretty good indication that the Falcons plan to use Peterson as a starter.

That’s a little bit of a gamble. Peterson’s spent much of his career as a middle linebacker. The Falcons are set there with Curtis Lofton and they apparently will shift Peterson to the outside after letting Keith Brooking and Michael Boley walk in free agency.

I know coach Mike Smith has a history with Peterson in Jacksonville and knows his abilities. But you have to wonder how much Peterson has left and how he’ll handle a move to the outside? I’m not sure that Peterson is any better than Brooking at this point in their careers.

Brooking got a four-year deal in Dallas that averages $2.6 million. In other words, the Falcons could have kept Brooking for less money than it took them to get Peterson. Yes, Brooking struggled at times last season, but I’m not sure Peterson will be an upgrade.

doodoobailey

March 10th, 2009
3:31 pm

The draft does not look too enticing for us this year; low round picks, hope TD can package something together. Unlike how GT coach Paul Johnson cannot package a polo that fits him correctly due to him being a loser.

buc_wild1

March 10th, 2009
3:34 pm

Boy oh boy, idiotic people just don’t know when to stop when they are ahead.

doodoobailey

March 10th, 2009
3:44 pm

Hell yes clthurman! ; I think he is talking to you buc_wild1, the part about taking your faith and lackofneedforopioness of the blog; like coach Paul Johnson taking off his ill fitting polos that do not fit him because he is a loser.

GATORZONE

March 10th, 2009
3:44 pm

LOVE THE PETERSON SIGNING…

ANOTHER GATOR!!!!

ANYONE CALLING FOR ROY WILLIAMS NEEDS HIS HEAD EXAMINED! HE CANNOT COVER ANYONE AND RECENTLY HE HAS NOT HIT ANYONE WITH REAL AUTHORITY EITHER! TOO OLD AND TOO SLOW!

buc_wild1

March 10th, 2009
3:49 pm

Could truly care less, it’s his opinion doodoobailey. And what”s with the GT mess, this is a Falcons blog. As for the blind faith, yeah leave it for the bible bandits, this is about FOOTBALL!

GATORZONE

March 10th, 2009
3:49 pm

2 year contract for a 32 year old linebacker is not too much. That would have him end his contract the same age as Brooking when he left. Or am I wrong about that? Anyway, I know Ray Lewis wanted a 3 year last year and he was 34, so it is not uncommon.

crabapplejoe

March 10th, 2009
3:51 pm

oldbrave wrote: ” and at 32 hes 4 years younger than brokings and hes always played hard and is a head hunter”

Well, actually, if you look at the facts ‘petersons’ is only eight months younger than ‘brokings’ as you call him. So we let ‘old’ KB56 walk and then go out and sign a malcontent who is essentially the same age. Not to mention he plays MLB, and I think we can all agree we already have one of those that’s pretty good. Its funny how suddenly I don’t see anybody talking about “impact plays” anymore. LOL. Let’s see, petersons had zero forced fumbles, zero ints., 0 PDefs, and one little sack in 2008. And while KB56 was starting every game for the last three years, petersons was riding the pine for about one third of the games due to injuries and/or screaming at his coaches…Yep, heck of a pick-up for us.

GATORZONE

March 10th, 2009
3:53 pm

what kind of name is doodoobailey anyway? YOU MUST BE A BULLDAWG FAN!!!!!

clthurman

March 10th, 2009
3:54 pm

Well now we have only the draft realistically to get other players. The free agents that are left are there for a reason, and why bother with someone else’s trash. Let’s hope TD can find some hidden gems this year to start defensively,cuz the ones we have…will have a hard time even beating the Bucs this year.

Hannbird

March 10th, 2009
3:56 pm

Like the signings but (and this is a long shot) I think there is going to be some sort of deal between ATL and CAR. I think they are going to work out a deal so CAR gets Vick and ATL gets Peppers. Think about it…

smauricio

March 10th, 2009
3:56 pm

I went in favor for the Brooking exit, but I think we will miss him….
I prefer him than Peterson…

clthurman

March 10th, 2009
3:59 pm

If we can get anything for Vick that would be a bonus. Beacause he is our trash.

marko

March 10th, 2009
4:01 pm

Peterson fits with what the Falcon’s brain trust says they want to accomplish, namely he can help at more than one position. Is he a back up or a starter? From what I’ve seen of Smith so far I Don’t think it matters much. He rotates players faster than a hockey coach juggles lines. Peterson will get his uniform dirty and Smith trust him to get the job done. That’s good enough for me.

doodoobailey

March 10th, 2009
4:04 pm

GATORZONE: i think you are a loser that makes out with his mother in jean shorts; that is why you type in all caps so much and have such a basic name like GATORZONE. It should be “imaf*ckingloserzone”…did you catch all that? Roy Williams could probably knock your head and jean shorts off though.

buc_wild1: sorry about the GT stuff; those polos he wears make me sick, go falcons!

steve'o

March 10th, 2009
4:05 pm

clthurman, have you ever coached a strong NFL defence? Has coach Smith? I’m sure coach knows what he is doing. I’ve been through ups and downs with this franchise since the late 70’s, this is truly the first time I’ve felt confident about the direction of the team! Goog to be a Falcon fan isn’t it!!

marko

March 10th, 2009
4:07 pm

Orlando, I had felt that the Falcons would go linebacker in the first round. Do you think signing Peterson to a two year contract will alter their plans. I’d think D-line or cornerback would now be top priorities.

Reno 911

March 10th, 2009
4:17 pm

Not pursuing Sean Jones in FA and signing Peterson and resigning C. Davis means either:
A)
1st: Safety– Delmas, Western Mich. or Sean Smith, Utah.
2nd: DT – Ziggy Hood, Mizzou.
3rd: TE– Casey, Rice or Coffman, Mizzou

or

B)
1st: DT – Peria Jerry, Miss.
2nd: Safety – Rashad Johnson, Alabama
3rd: TE– Casey, Rice or Coffman, Mizzou

If Pettigrew is there at #24 (as many think he will be), should the Falcons take him? Ugh, though I think he’d be great, our defense is too thin right now not to put the first two picks on that side of the ball. I’m still on the Clay Matthews bandwagon at OLB, but our needs are greater elsewhere.

clthurman

March 10th, 2009
4:27 pm

Yes Steve-O it good to be a Falcon fan. No i have never been a defensive coach but you did not answer the question. I’m a dick because I want us to keep winning and I point out the 800 pound gorilla in the room. We have no secondary and you do not continue winning in this league without a consistent defense. I don’t care if Coach Smith has sex with Dick Butkus, if he was an avowed genius Jacksonville would have not let him go. He is a damn good coach and whether it be him or TD I will call them on being cheap when it comes to Foxworth and the fact we have NO DAMN SECONDARY!!!!

doodoobailey

March 10th, 2009
4:36 pm

steve’o….it’s “DEFENSE”….dumba$$. And work on your comma splices too.

steve'o is a hom'o

March 10th, 2009
4:39 pm

Steve’o: Is Defence a privacy fence or a chain link fence?

doodoobailey

March 10th, 2009
4:41 pm

steve'o

March 10th, 2009
4:42 pm

clthurman. I don’t thinks it’s bad that you want us to keep on winning. I just don’t think we need to get so bent out of shape til we see the finished product. Heck man, you’ve already desided to cave in and give the Bucs a leg up on us! Remember alot of us fans threw the towel in this time last year. And by the way I had my far share of crow. Glad we’re both passionate Falcon fans looking forward to the season kickoff!

steve''''''''''o

March 10th, 2009
5:02 pm

Thanks doodoobailey for the spell check, spelling has always been a weakness for me. Is the coma better??

smauricio

March 10th, 2009
5:03 pm

Changing the subject:
What are you think if crowd of Falcons begin to do that in the home games?
I found wonderful way to support his team…
Sport Club Internacional, of Porto Alegre, Brazil
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlcQl1UeH2c&feature=related

SeminoleWarrior

March 10th, 2009
5:04 pm

Not sure how I feel about the Peterson deal. It provides depth and I guess he will be the “coach on the field” as Lofton and the LBs we draft next month come along. We WILL draft LBs for Wire and Peterson are not long-term solutions. As far as the draft goes, here are my picks: Rd #1: SS Patrick Chung; 2) OLB Marcus Freeman; 3)DT Roy Miller; 4) OLB Zach Follett. GO FALCONS!!!

steve''''''''''o

March 10th, 2009
5:11 pm

Didn’t realize I was picking on anyone doodoo. To me it was two adults having an adult conversation. I would highly advise not to critique my grammer you’ll be a busy man. LOL!

doodoobailey

March 10th, 2009
5:16 pm

No problem steve””””’o, gotta go. It is a lot of fun having people type doodoo on their keyboards though, hahahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!! Bring back Audrey Bruce, YEAH COME-ON!!!!!

hawesg

March 10th, 2009
5:20 pm

Amazing that apparently you can’t criticize decisions on a BLOG. Wasn’t that the whole point of blogs in the first place?

A lot of people say we shouldn’t chase free agents like Leigh Bodden and build through the draft like the Patriots did.

Well, the Pats just signed Leigh Bodden.

The critics of the critics are right. We’re not NFL coaches, so I’m guessing that the Falcons like what they see from what appears to me to be a bunch of nickel backs parading as corners. You might need to draft both a CB and a SS with the first two picks, then hope Travis Beckham or – please, please – Shawn Nelson falls to the third round.

steve''''''''''o

March 10th, 2009
5:21 pm

Take care doodoobailey. God Bless.

cutter

March 10th, 2009
6:03 pm

SeminoleWarrior- If Roy Miller goes in the 3rd round I think the Miller family and myself would be shocked, right now he is projected somewhere in the 7th round. If we wait till 3rd for DT I would say Dorrell Scott maybe. 1st OLB (Matthews Jr. or Cushing), 2nd TE (Jared Cook or Shawn Nelson), 3rd DT (Dorrell Scott), 4th CB (Keenan Lewis or Kevin Barnes) 5th OLB (Jason Williams),5th OT (Alex Boone) 6th FS (Troy Nolan). This is assuming Decoud is at FS and Coleman moves to SS also I think they are leaning toward C. Jackson at corner and Hutchins at nickel. O.K. guys criticize away.

D. Orlando Ledbetter

March 10th, 2009
6:35 pm

MARKO: They can go value in the first round now. Best Safety (Delmas/Moore) LB or TE (Pettigrew).

NiteOwl

March 10th, 2009
6:36 pm

To all the knights who say…”nay” (and yes, I know it’s “ni” I’m just making a point):

(1) “Finally” did something in FA? Check.
(2) Veteran leader on defense? Check.
(3) Upgrade at weakside LB? Check.
(4) Another playmaker on defense? Check.
(5) Improved offensive line depth? Check.

Peterson fits (1) through (4), while Romberg fits (1) and (5).

We have a very good, very tenacious LB corps now. I’ll go to bat with Peterson, Lofton, and Wire/Nicholas any day, especially in our scheme. They will hit, they will cover, and they all have motors that won’t quit. And we’re probably not done upgrading the LBs yet.

As for the secondary, I’m fine with Houston and C.Jackson at corner. C.Jackson was drafted to be a quality CB for the long haul, and that’s what he’ll be.

C.Jackson already has a better resume now than Foxworth did before the beginning of the 2008 season. He held down the nickel spot very well as a rookie, and not many rookies have done that. He’s only going to get better, as will Houston.

At safety, we have two guys (Fudge/DeCoud) who already are better in coverage than Milloy would have been. We’ll probably get a stud in the draft who will make this moot.

As for DT, find another body or two in the draft. If Lewis is healthy, then you’re in pretty good shape for years. Babineaux, Lewis, high-round draft pick, Moorehead, Jefferson—that’s a pretty deep and serviceable DT rotation. That’s not counting J.Anderson sliding over. Yes, it would be nice to find the second coming of Ted Washington, but you can’t have everything.

The way I see it, the offseason is a success provided we get a stud at safety, DT, and tight end. I think TD can handle that with three out of the seven picks. If he hits on any of the other four picks, it’s a bonus as far as I’m concerned.

ShamusThacker

March 10th, 2009
7:16 pm

Good moves.

Foxworth woulda been nice to keep, but not at the salary he ended up getting.

I too am a 40+ year Falcons fan. I wouldn’t trade our owner, front office, or coaching staff, for ANY in the league. WE’VE GOT THE BEST OF THE BEST! I’ve NEVER BEFORE had that feeling. I’ll question NOTHING these guys do till they prove me wrong, and I DON’T see that hap’nin.

cutter

March 10th, 2009
7:23 pm

I believe we draft a OLB in 1st round to sit and learn behind Peterson there are no true 1st round safeties…middle second yes.

Terrance (the d-bag) Moore

March 10th, 2009
7:42 pm

I think picking up Peterson and getting rid of Brooking is a great move. It increases the number of black players in the starting lineup and decreases the number of white players. What is not to love? It is a win-win situation!

crabapplejoe

March 10th, 2009
7:48 pm

“(3) Upgrade at weakside LB? Check.
(4) Another playmaker on defense? Check.”

Did we pick up another LB in free agency besides Peterson today? Peterson: zero ints.; zero FF; zero PDefs….playmaker indeed. Screaming at his coaches…priceless.

falcon21

March 10th, 2009
8:06 pm

Crabapplejoe, wow man you are unreal. Give it a rest.

VICK SUPPORTER 2

March 10th, 2009
8:12 pm

PRO FRANCHISE RANKINGS

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/nfcsouth/0-9-60/Carolina-wins-NFC-South—-again.html

ACCORDING TO THE ABOVE ARTICLE CONDUCTED RANKING ALL PRO SPORTS FRANCHISES, THE FALCONS RANKED 67 OUT OF 122 AND ONLY 22ND OUT OF 32 NFL TEAMS, FALLING WAY BEHIND CAROLINA AND EVEN TAMPA & NEW ORLEANS WHO BOTH MISSED THE PLAYOFFS.

THE RANKINGS WERE BASED MAJORITY ON STADIUM SELL OUTS, WHERE THE FALCONS FINISHED A DISMAL 89 PERCENT IN ATTENDANCE – NO MV7…COINCIDENCE? :)

falcon21

March 10th, 2009
8:25 pm

Hello VS2, whats going on man? Good info but coincidence, no. Falcons are moving in the right direction, but as I said, good info.

NiteOwl

March 10th, 2009
8:28 pm

No, Crabapple Joe, I was referring to Peterson. Mike Smith and TD consider him a leader, a playmaker, and an upgrade at LB, and that’s good enough for me.

I have another statistic for you: number of minutes you have been an NFL GM or coach: zero.

Watching you eat crow this year: priceless.

VICK SUPPORTER 2

March 10th, 2009
8:28 pm

FALCONS 2006 ATTENDANCE

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/attendance?year=2006

NOTE: THIS WAS MV7 LAST SEASON AND THE ATTENDANCE WAS 101 PERCENT AND 2008 IT DROPPED 12 PERCENT TO 89 PERCENT. THIS IS REALLY BIZARRE CONSIDERING THE 2006 TEAM FINISHED BELOW .500 AND THE 2008 TEAM FINISHED 11-5. ANOTHER COINCIDENT?

Terrance (the d-bag) Moore

March 10th, 2009
8:53 pm

Vick Supporter 2: Go watch the sociopath in the UFL if you like him so much. I wish you people would give up the whining. Vick is gone, is not a Falcon, will never be a Falcon. Matt Ryan is the new QB and the Falcons are a better team for it. The only thing missing are the ghetto thugs who filled the seats while vick was in a Falcons uniform. Now that he is off the team they can use their ticket money to pay up on their child support.

By the way, I think the Caps Lock key on your keyboard is broken.

D3

March 10th, 2009
9:11 pm

Reno911, good analysis on how the Peterson signing affects the draft & NiteOwl good points about what exactly we do have and how they can contribute. For me, this definitely puts me at ease somewhat because I was worried about all the starters we lost: SS,CB,2 OLB, DT, & TE. I think its safe to say that, if TD drafts good which we assume he will, you can get solid starters through round 3, but moving into round 4 is a little of a crapshoot.

Knowing Peterson has cross-trained and can play an outside spot has calmed my nerves about our defense a great deal. Having Wire, Nicholas, and now Peterson competing for 2 spots @ OLB can produce some good quality. If nothing else he can bridge the gap adequately enough and more athletic, younger than Brooking, giving us another year of drafting. Simply can’t fill all those holes through the draft.

I also believe our secondary is not in as bad of shape as many think, assuming Von Hutchins can return to form. The key then comes to David Irons and if he can finally elevate to being steady enough to play well in dime coverage.

I’d be shocked if we sign LJ Smith now. We filled one of our key spots and now can focus on SS, TE, DT, & CB. Assuming we don’t sign LJ Smith the key comes down to which is more important/which is deepest in the draft. SS & TE are a given to be drafted in the top 3. The question basically goes to who can step up the quickest or has the most potential: Trey Lewis @ DT or Chevis Jackson @ CB?

YuleeFalcon

March 10th, 2009
9:14 pm

Adding Mike P. is a step up, a moderate step, but still in the right direction. Living in the Jax suburbs for the last few years and watching Mike P. play, I feel he will bring more to the game now that he is working for Smitty. Some here in Jax feel he was a casualty of the personnel meltdown that was the Jag’s last year (or 2) and that last year was an exception for him. I am more concerned with his durability. He may not have lost as much as Brooking has, but he won’t be able to stay on the field as long as Keith could.

I do feel letting Foxworth go will come back to haunt us. Some times you have to pay good money for good talent.

danga

March 10th, 2009
9:29 pm

im with doodoobailey sign roy williams and we would have plenty options with those 1st three picks

Big Ray

March 10th, 2009
9:42 pm

I guess Crabapple Joe doesn’t like any veteran LBs not named “Brooking.” :) Just pickin’ at ya, Joe…

Seriously, I like the addition of Mike Peterson, though I wouldn’t hop up and down in excitment. Why? Because the guy knows, and respects Mike Smith. And Smith thinks enough of him to sign off on bringing him here. On top of that, Peterson can play inside and outside. There’s nothing wrong with versatility. That, and he’s already shown he can lead on defense. Okay, so he had a falling out with Jack Del Rio. These things happen. Del Rio doesn’t coach the Falcons. Problem solved…

clthurman,

I admire your passion for the Falcons. I too have had concerns about the defense. We’re still rebuilding, though man. And sometimes, that means growing pains, regardless of what last year’s record says. However, I know Dimitroff, Smith, and Van Gorder would not be happy with a less effective defense. Free agency is not yet over. We’ll probably add another player or two here and there. On the flip side, I wasn’t thrilled to see Foxworth go either. I felt like he was a good player, though not stellar. He DID help out a lot. Letting him go may have been a mistake, or it may not. Dimitroff isn’t perfect, so he will make mistakes. But I don’t think he’ll make many.

I think things will shake out okay, but I am rather anxious to see what we do in the draft, and what later free agency moves come to pass.

crabapplejoe

March 10th, 2009
9:49 pm

falcon21 wrote: “Crabapplejoe, wow man you are unreal. Give it a rest.”

I notice you did not address the “playmaking” stats our new LB put up last year….you just attack the messenger not the message…..I didn’t make up the stats, they’re from NFL.com. I have heard over and over how KB56 did not make any ‘impact plays’…yet, when I point out the fact that our new mediocre LB that everyone is drooling over had no impact plays, nobody wants to talk about it…curious isn’t it?

crabapplejoe

March 10th, 2009
9:52 pm

NiteOwl wrote: “Watching you eat crow this year: priceless.”

Oh, we’ll be talkin’ dude…just promise me you will be posting under the same moniker. I notice you didn’t address the “playmaking” stats of our new stud LB…why not?

D3

March 10th, 2009
9:57 pm

Maybe its me, but is DeCoud seriously being considered to be a starter in the secondary? I guess I just missed him playing, but if he’s ready to step in, then all the better.

Cutter, I like your potential draftees, but do we still look at OLB first since we just added Peterson? It would make sense only if they don’t think Wire or Nicholas is good enough mid-range term. Or you might be right simply because the top-end is so deep at OLB.

I do know I can’t wait until the draft. I could see us drafting OLB, DT, or TE before SS in the first round. SS just doesn’t seem that deep or talented in the top-end. I mean, is there really that much difference between Delmas and Rashad Johnson? I’m scared to death of William Moore. How do you totally drop off the cliff and disappear from one season to the next?

falcon21

March 10th, 2009
9:58 pm

I have no need to comment anymore tonite. Big Ray you are the man. If Peterson would not have been a good pickup, Mike and TD would not have brought him in. He is a good player and will help the younger talent. Look at what we had last season. Nuff said.

NiteOwl

March 10th, 2009
9:58 pm

D3: now that was some thorough analysis. Good question on Lewis vs. C.Jackson.

I think Chevis is quick, fast, tenacious, and also a fast learner. I don’t think it’s a question of “if” but “when.”

Trey was really starting to break out when he got hurt. If he’s healthy, he’s the real deal right now.
I truly believe our coaches don’t get enough credit for being able to take a guy and put him through OTAs, training camp, and the preseason, give him a role in the scheme, and really get the most out of him in that role.

They did that with so many guys last year, starting at the top with Matt Ryan and continuing on through the whole offensive line, defensive line (especially Babineaux), Lofton, and even our special teams. Another offseason of work means that much more progress.

Yulee, thanks for the insight on Peterson. TD looks at the whole body of work; we didn’t base Sam Baker on his senior season alone, which was a good move.

Enough of my yakkin. Let’s boogie! (Sorry, Spinal Tap reference.)

Terence (the d-bag) Moore

March 10th, 2009
10:07 pm

Danga, you and doodoobailey are smoking and licking crack! Roy Williams hasn’t been worth a d@mn since they outlawed his b!tch@ss tackling style.

Phil of Playaz Ball

March 10th, 2009
10:12 pm

Can someone explain the hoopla of signing a 10-yr linebacker (Peterson) when we already had a 10 yr linebacker (Brooking)? Why did we get rid of Brooking? And don’t tell me Peterson is an upgrade – his stats don’t even come close to Brooking’s, and he was benched on a crappy Jacksonville team.

falcon21

March 10th, 2009
10:20 pm

Crabapplejoe, don’t attack the player, stats does not mean anything. Let us see what he can do. Your hero is not here anymore, so let it go. Be a fan and hope we can depend on TD and Mike Smith too make the right decisions. It’s not a war it’s football. GO FALCONS.

danga

March 10th, 2009
10:25 pm

different people perform better under different schemes. All im saying is look at his stats in a 3-4 compared to a 4-3. Multiple pro bowls many interceptions and the hardest hitter atl would have had since jessie tuggle plus the guy is only 28 years old.With our current roster who in the hell is going to scare any receiver from coming accross the middle or better yet who do we have that the opposing qb is going to fear? My money is on roy

D3

March 10th, 2009
10:27 pm

BTW, Peterson still led the team in tackles after being benched for a game and not even starting many others. TD knows what he’s doing. What were Foxworth stats before we got him? The Broncos obviously thought so little of him to trade for Dre Bly. Never know.

Nice analysis Owl. Good reference. D@mn is it the weekend yet?

NiteOwl

March 10th, 2009
10:37 pm

Oh, one more thing and then I gotta fly the coop:

Crabapple Joe, I am already fired up for the season. I’ve been a fan since I was a wee lad and I think we finally have the right stuff to make a consistent winner—finally!

I look forward to staying in touch with you throughout the season to see how Peterson pans out.

I hope you are wrong, but I’ll give you your due if you’re right.

If he’s a bust, I’ll wear a Cowboys Keith Brooking jersey every Sunday during next offseason and change my screen name to NiteChicken (terms subject to change without notice).

If Peterson does the job, you have to wear a Peterson jersey and change your screen name to Silk Spectre.

Seriously though, I loved Brooking. He is a class act and gave his all for this franchise. That said, I do agree with the decision to let him go.

As for your stats, I’ll say this: when they help me, I’ll quote them all day. When they don’t, I’ll say there’s lies, damned lies, and statistics.

All in good fun, my man. Respect to you and all Falcon fans. Remember, the true enemy is the Buccaneers. We owe them a lot of payback.

crabapplejoe

March 10th, 2009
10:59 pm

@NiteOwl: Good post…see you in the Fall…if not before. By he way, KB56 is not my “hero” as others have posted. It is just comical to me how folks can embrace this guy “petersons”, having trashed Brooking when the two of them are really, essentially, the same in terms of productivity in their waning years….that’s all. And ‘Brookings’ doesn’t have the malcontent baggage. I just don’t see this as an upgrade in any sense.

NiteOwl

March 10th, 2009
11:30 pm

I hear ya Joe. Guess we’ll find out. I think Peterson is perceived as a harder hitter, better cover guy, etc. Just in the mix more and a little more disruptive.

Over his career he has had impact stats, and they’re looking at last year as an aberration.
Also, he is one of Coach Smith’s guys, so I don’t see attitude being a problem. I think the dustup with Del Rio was frustration (and overreaction) at a crappy season by both coach and player. Don’t see it happening with Smitty.

Heard Peterson on the radio this afternoon and he sounded ready to get after it and prove himself.

Have a good one. I need the draft to start, like, tomorrow. Can’t wait. (Not to mention the season.)

D. Orlando Ledbetter

March 10th, 2009
11:34 pm

NITEOWL: You know you’re real BIG in my world. Lunch soon. Our mutual friend has joined a Church and is trying to re-direct some things.

Also, glad to see we’ve got some civility on the blog. That goes for VS2, also!!!

Let’s keep it going.

hawesg

March 10th, 2009
11:50 pm

So? First pick in the draft? If they are content to go into the season with Houston/Hutchins/Chevis/Irons at CB, then maybe they pass up some of the CB talent? Safety looks like the biggest hole, but there’s not a clear first round talent there. If they believe in Trey Lewis do they pass on Peria Jerry? Another LB? Or maybe they go with Pettigrew (I can’t believe they would do that when Cook or Nelson could be around by the second pick)

Does the Peterson signing mean they probably won’t pick a guy like Matthews, Cushing or Sintim with the first pick?

Ced Black

March 11th, 2009
12:16 am

We hated to see you leave cheese country and for that who cares what happens in the birds nest, just don’t bring those damn birds back to wisconsin.Go Packers

NiteOwl

March 11th, 2009
1:06 am

You got it, D. Thanks and glad to hear the good news.

Nice to know I’m not the only one who never sleeps.

Hawesg, for whatever my two cents are worth (I know you were probably addressing DOL), I’m really curious about the first pick.

We know TD says need and scheme instead of best player available. Other than that, I don’t have a clue. If you’re thinking 5 and 10 years down the road, we still need a lot.

I think the only positions we don’t look to upgrade with a first-round talent are QB, RB, LT, and MLB. To me, every other position is fair game because we are looking so long term.

I believe in our roster “as is” to handle 2009, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see our first-rounder sit a year or two, then start for ten years.

We might get a TE or safety that starts right away, but other than that, I think he sits. Maybe I’m loco.

Good night and good luck.

"falconsR4real"

March 11th, 2009
1:42 am

get over it folks…

falconsR4real

ty TD
ty coach “don’t follow the jones” smith
ty “_____” BKA “Blank”

D. Orlando Ledbetter

March 11th, 2009
1:43 am

NITEOWL: Good night!!!

CED BLACK!!!: Glad to see some of my Packers folks checking in. The Birds have done well up in the Dairyland. Roddy White definitely wants to come back! He got it all in — in the the first half — last season. Tell the Packers to stop that Lambeau Leap stuff. Act like they’ve been in the endzone before!!! (Ced, you coming down for the ACC tourney or what? Rolling with the Memphis Tigers again? Our boy Rod Strickland still coaching with Coach Cal?)

NCAA TOURNEY TIP: WATCH out for those CLEVELAND STATE VIKINGS!!! Where’s Mouse McFadden, Clinton Ransey, Clinton Smith and Kevin Mackey? Bobby Knight was never the same after getting Moused by the Vikings in 1986!!!

Steve

March 11th, 2009
7:30 am

I think Atlanta is doing okay in free agency. I think they should try to consider signing Roy Williams safety from Dallas and signing Dre Bly corner from Denver. We defently need some help in the secondary and they need to try and draft the safety from Alabama Rashad Johnson . I believe he could come in and play imediately. The secondary wasnt that good last year and what they have let go and lost in free agency I really believe they need to stock up with some Vets in that secondary. I dont believe Rookies in the draft is going to help them next year. I also believe they need to get a good Defensive tackle wether it be in the draft or free agency. The tight end im not sold on LJ Smith he has been hurt more than he has played in Philly. All I say is go Dirty Birds lets have another year like last year.

SCOTT

March 11th, 2009
8:05 am

let have a all white NFL pro team in Atlanta folks that would surly shut the mouths of some of these racist naysayers who are never happy with any black player that the falcons recruit on their team . It would seam that these peoples would be well over the Micheal Vick syndrome . I like both of these player . The falcons can now fill in the blanks with the up coming draft.

Jim

March 11th, 2009
9:20 am

Not great signings but pretty smart. They need depth on Oline and Peterson can be a bridge to next linebacker. These moves allow them to go after safety and TE early on in draft.

Joey563

March 11th, 2009
9:20 am

Come on man, pull your head out of your butt Scott. Not every disagreement or disapproval is racially motivated, if people like you stop blaming race for problems and quit giving racist people someone to “get a rise” out of then, they will eventually stop. Let it go…

hawesg

March 11th, 2009
9:59 am

NiteOwl, the question’s for the board. I like Ledbetter’s blog (better than Dave O’Brien by a longshot), but the point of blogs is to share everyone’s views, not simply read the columnist’s views. That’s what the column’s for. And I think Dimitroff will have at least two starters next year from this draft. Simply because he will have to.

Mike

March 11th, 2009
10:35 am

I love the moves nothing crazy that could come back and be a salary cap killer. Peterson is a huge upgrade over Brooking and Roomberg gives us experienced depth at the O-Line. You don’t win super bowls in free agency just look at the wonder boy Dan Snyder.

Lawrence

March 11th, 2009
11:33 am

In football, Free agent signings don’t win championships … Strong drafting does. Look at Dallas and Washington as your FA examples, then look to Indy and NE as your Draft examples … Building through FA only ties up salary cap space and overloads your roster with Contract Fat Cats … Building through the draft enables a team to keep salary cap space open to resigning successful draftees to long-term deals, thus creating stability and consistency and also keeps a team fresh with young hungry players and then select Free Agent pick-ups to bolster the roster … People wanting “splashy” or “flashy” free agent periods are Madden Football/Fantasy Football thinkers … I trust Thomas Dimitroff to continue building a solid Falcons foundation that will enable the Falcons to grow consistently and be perennially playoff contenders and eventual Super Bowl champions for the next decade.

steve-o

March 11th, 2009
11:37 am

100% correct Lawrence!

diesel47

March 11th, 2009
11:42 am

what the falcons need are a couple of corners that are more than 5 foot nothing and arent scared to play tight . in the past all ive seen is them playing 10 yds off and instead of tackling,they try to knock the reciever down. we need a couple of Scott Cases’. for all the new fans he scared the recievers just knowing he was back there.

D3

March 11th, 2009
11:57 am

Jim, great point about Peterson being a “bridge” to the next LB. I’m very curious with what we do with the first pick as well. I starting to think its going to be OLB, DT, or CB. The only reason I think it may be an OLB is due to the enormous depth of top-end talent at LB. Between Cushing, Matthews, Orapko(sic), English, and Maybin, it might be too hard to pass on them, even though English & Orapko are considered 3-4 fits.

I just don’t think its going to be SS. There just is no standout talent worth a 1st round pick, IMO. Delmas maybe, but if you could someone like Cushing, Matthews, Ziggy Hood, or Peria Jerry, then pick up a solid SS in the second round like Rashad Johnson or Patrick Chung.

I also think (and hope) that we could get a solid TE like Jared Cook or Shawn Nelson in the 3rd, maybe wishful thinking.

Would you rather have:

A)Peria Jerry/Rashad Johnson — Clay Matthews/Patrick Chung

or

B)Louis Delmas/Ron Brace

SavFalcon

March 11th, 2009
12:01 pm

I’d of rather kept Brooking. If we are going to have an older linebacker we might as well have kept him. Would have paid him less than we paid Peterson too.

clthurman

March 11th, 2009
12:17 pm

Didn’t we get Abraham in free agency? Free agency is a good thing unless you do abuse like the Raiders and Redskins….there just wasn’t much quality out there this year. At least not in the needs we currently have. A TE definately can be had in this draft and be a quality pick although at our spot in the first round we do not need to go there. 3rd round I am guessing. Man those USC linebackers would be nice to snag at least 1, although Matthews at number 1 is too high despite me personally thinking this guy will be in the league a long time and be a quality get. It looks like unless TD has something up his sleeve and trades up…which I doubt for the BC Beast….God I really have no idea what else is there worth that 24th pick…i do know that no secondary person that would be reasonably thought to be there is worth a 24th. I guess we will overpay someone unless we get one of those linebackers.

Kenny

March 11th, 2009
12:49 pm

Draft 2009 About Football ranks the top outside linebacker prospects in the 2009 NFL Draft based on their potential in the NFL. This is not necessarily a prediction of the order they will be selected, rather a prediction of which projects the best at the next level.

How do you guys think our chances are selecting from this list ?

CB
1. Vontae Davis*, Illinois
2. Malcolm Jenkins, Ohio State
3. Alphonso Smith, Wake Forest
4. D. J. Moore, Vanderbilt
5. Darius Butler, Connecticut
6. Sean Smith, Utah
7. Coye Francies, San Jose State
8. Asher Allen*, CB Georgia 9. Victor Harris, Virgina Tech
10. Jarius Byrd, Oregon
11. Cary Harris, USC
12. Keenan Lewis, Oregon State
13. DeAngelo Smith, Cincinnati
14. Mike Mickens, Cincinnati
15. Bruce Johnson, Miami (FL)
16. Kevin Barnes, Maryland
17. Woodny Turenne, Louisville
18. Jaraud Powers* Auburn
19. Brandon Underwood, Cincinnati
20. Lydell Sargeant, Penn State

We have been beaten with the pass every season. Time for a solid CB !

mars

March 11th, 2009
12:52 pm

Let’s see, at LB we’ve got Peterson, Lofton, Nicholas, Wire, oh yeah and that guy that Lofton JUST BARELY beat out to start MLB last year, Tony Gilbert. Either Peterson or Gilbert could occasionally spell Lofton at MIKE. Peterson could start at WILL and Gilbert would do much better that Boley at SAM. Next move should be to sign Roy Williams and Orlando by God Pace!!!!! Nothing against Clabo, but he is no Orlando Pace. Justin Peele will do just fine at tight end. Any move at that position would be spinning wheels and wasting opportunities. At CB, David Irons time will come.

Reno 911

March 11th, 2009
1:16 pm

D3 – keep the draft talk coming, man. Gotta love it when people are consistently talking Falcons draft, and not trying to shout down each other’s articles of faith (MV7, KB56, etc.)

Though I really, really like Clay Matthews as a long-term player (he’s still improving/developing, as opposed to some of these life-time “blue chip” guys who peaked in their second year of college, like James Laurinaitis), I don’t think he’ll still be there when the Falcons pick at 24. Even if he is, I don’t think the Falcons will take him. Barring any more FA moves in the secondary, the more and more I think about it, I think the Falcons have to go with Delmas in the first round. Rashad Johnson is a guy that may do just as good a job or better over the long term, so if they want to risk it, the Falcons could wait until the 2nd to get him (or used the second 5th rounder to trade up a few spots into the 2nd to be sure), and use the #24 pick on an inside pusher like Peria Jerry. Right now, just too many questions that we can’t answer without inside knowledge: what’s the status on Trey Lewis and the feeling on his ability to do the job up front? Even if he’s healthy and ready to go, with the loss of Grady we’re still going to play a rookie for a good amount of snaps inside. The question is, is that a 1st round DT, or a 3-5th round DT? I guess the good thing about having so many questionables on defense is that, when the 1st and 2nd round picks come around, there are sure to be some good players around who can fill a need at #1 and #2. With James Casey, Jared Cook, Chase Coffman, and Cornelius Ingram out there, I’m still convinced that we can wait until the 3rd round and pick up a pretty good, if not really solid, Tight End. No need to bite on Pettigrew in the 1st. Having a good TE would be a great added threat for the offense, but I don’t think Pettigrew getting 8 catches a game is going to matter much on a day when a team like the Panthers gains 250+ yards on the ground. We need the D.

D3

March 11th, 2009
1:52 pm

Nice list Kenny. Man, after looking at that list I think we could grab a steal in the 4th round @ CB. A Sean Smith in the 3rd/4th or even an Asher Allen in the 5th would be a great pickup. It just comes down to which they think is more ready/which one has long-term potential, Chevis Jackson or Trey Lewis? SS & TE are a given to be in the top 2 out of 3 drafted. Which is more of a pressing need, CB or DT?

Mars, good points. As far as Tony Gilbert is concerned, I don’t know how well he would translate to OLB after watching him first hand when I was at Georgia. He was a great MLB, but he lacked the speed to be effective on the outside. Agree with you on signing a free agent TE, Peele is a servicable pass-catching TE, but I think we should upgrade in the draft.

danga

March 11th, 2009
2:20 pm

we need roy we need roy we need roy. He would be the impact player on defense that michael turner was on offense and a veteran cb wouldnt be so bad also. Come on td get on the ball- lets make the playoffs 2 years in a row. Roy Roy Roy Roy Williams

Chas

March 11th, 2009
2:30 pm

Trust the system everyone and just chill out. Only thing I have to add is the mentality that Milloy and Brooking were actually good players last year. Did you guys even watch the 2008 season? Milloy is old, slow and cannot make plays down the field (ex. the Cardinals game). I have much respect for Brooking, but at this point in his carrer he is unable to even cover a fullback in the open field (Some weakside linebacker). I think everyone should sit back and watch the magic of TD as he leads our dirty birds to the promise land in 2009.

cutter

March 11th, 2009
2:43 pm

Lofton competed against Tony Taylor last year for the MLB position not Tony Gilbert. Tony Taylor went to UGA, they cut him last year.

cutter

March 11th, 2009
2:47 pm

They both went to UGA Gilbert was brought in when Taylor got cut.

Anthony

March 11th, 2009
3:22 pm

Unlike a lot of people, I am happy about the two signings. I think maybe with Lofton in the middle, Peterson(Weakside)and Nicholas(Strongside) that we can make some noise at the LB position. We need hitters that stick their nose in other peoples business and those 3 can provide that. I really was disappointed that Foxworth had to depart, because he was a solid corner that I felt would have been great for years to come. The other four guys were just really part of the team. I have never been a Keith Brookings fan, Grady Jackson was on his last leg. Lawyer Milloy was starting to lose vital steps in the passing game and Boley was more of pass defender. However, we need address two more positioned to be filled through free agency in order to be competitive. A tight end and a seasoned corner would solidify the draft needs. A defensive tackle and SS Louis Delmas would be perfect in the draft. Start Kroy Biermann or anyone at the other defensive end spot to take some pressure off of Abraham, because Jamaal Anderson is not aggressive enough for that position. If his sack total does not increase to a decent number, I suggest that we look for a serious replacement. Last, I think Mike Smith and Tom Dimitroff are doing a good job so far in the process, but let us see a couple of more strong signings.

Ken Falco

March 11th, 2009
3:38 pm

Damn. I miss Wyche.

ATLCane

March 11th, 2009
3:54 pm

Been ready for the Falcons to pick up a guy from the U for a long time. Romberg is a good choice, adds depth and experience to the O-Line, which lost its top vet. Would have been nice to keep Foxworth tho.

Donald L. Baughs

March 11th, 2009
3:56 pm

D-Led,
Having known you for 30 plus years,I can honestly say you have become quite a snazzy dresser! Love the Bow Tie!One question: Is there another D-Led uncensored and off the hook book in the works.Your loyal fans in C-Town,Milwaukee and the ATL want to know.Keep writing what people think, but are afraid to say!

Big Ray

March 11th, 2009
4:06 pm

Reno 911 and D3,

Thank good ness for guys who want to talk about the Falcons and the draft, rather than continually grouse about the fact that Brooking is now gone, and Peterson is now here…..

Unless we take a cornerback with the first of our picks, I think we’ll end up with a guy somewhere along 4-7th on that list.

I’d love to have a guy like Jenkins or Davis. D.J.Moore is pretty good, too, as is Sean Smith. The thing is, you never know where these guys are going to be drafted. Every team in the NFL has needs, but different kinds of talents will be staring them in the face, and many of them will be the kind you don’t want to pass up. That’s our advantage. But then again, we’ll have to face the same thing.

I think that is what a guy like Pettigrew is all about. Sure, we need a good cornerback, defensive tackle, safety, etc. But do you pass on a big solid, blocking/pass-catching tight end like that? A guy that can do both things you want him to do?

I think some very good talent will fall our way at 24th, but we have to be prepared to choose (and choose correctly) when the time comes. And it may not be as cut and dry as offensive player vs. defensive player. We could be choosing between a corner and safety, or a defensive back and defensive tackle.

A guy like Sean Smith is kinda interesting because he is quick enough, yet has enough size to play either corner or safety. But if he doesn’t have that “it” that you look for, then he’s no more than an intriguing prospect with the dreaded “potential.” We don’t need that kind of player.

The thing about this 24th pick is that whatever we grab or don’t grab, all other good prospects in that segment will probably be gone by the time we pick again in the 2nd round. Of course, like I said earlier, talent tends to fall your way when other teams are having a hard time toeing the line with their needs and picking guys that they just can’t resist. But you can’t count on these things….

cutter

March 11th, 2009
4:08 pm

What is the deal with Pettigrew police assault charge in Feb of 08? Is this a red flag plus forty time?? Can he stretch the defense?

cody

March 11th, 2009
4:17 pm

i would love to see us pick up darren sharper

Big Ray

March 11th, 2009
4:38 pm

Interesting comments on NFL.com from three of the analysts. One has us picking cornerback D.J. Moore (who appears to be not much bigger than Grimes). Another has us taking Brandon Pettigrew. And the third says we can’t pass up LSU defensive lineman Tyson Jackson.

If we get a defensive lineman, he better be a good one, ’cause something tells me all the “premiere” defensive backs will be gone by the time we pick in the second round. Then again, what do I know?

Big Ray

March 11th, 2009
4:43 pm

Cutter,

We don’t really know the details on that, and anything we get is media-based. Who knows what happened there, though I’m sure that Dimitroff and his crew will find out all they can if they’re serious in the least bit about considering this guy as their first pick.

That, and combine results just aren’t everything. I think GMs, coaches, and scouts take this stuff into account for certain, but the combine doesn’t necessarily show what you’re going to do every day, or even on your best day. It just shows what you’re likely physically capable of…and it shows how you did that particular day. Not that it doesn’t have relevance (it certainly does), but it’s still a tool. One of many that are used, not the be-all end-all. Jerry Rice was known for having “slow” 40 yard dash times. Heh….imagine that….

They keep saying Pettigrew can do it all, just doesn’t have amazing foot speed. In our offense, he won’t need it. Just block, run routes, and catch the ball. He’ll be a big, safe target. Can’t ask for much more than that on a team that already has good receivers.

SeminoleWarrior

March 11th, 2009
4:50 pm

Cutter, I can not figure out why Roy Miller is rated that low; he had better college numbers at Texas than Glenn Dorsey had at LSU. And he was a force in the middle, disrupting the line and creating many chance opportunities for a good Texas line. And I’m not even a Texas fan? I do not feel good with the first pick being a TE with so many needs on “D”.
I like Pettigrew but I think we could steal Nelson in the third. I also think that the experience gained by Brent Grimes last season will only help him to improve as a corner…don’t give up on him. Houston, on the other hand, I think is entirely too wreckless. GO FALCONS!!

marko

March 11th, 2009
5:19 pm

It Looks like all’s quiet on the Falcon’s front. I was wondering if LJ was still in the works. I liked Reno 911’s picks, but really don’t see much chance of a safety in round one. I’m a little surprised by the lack of interest in Roy Williams. I kinda thought Smith liked Linebackers trapped in safeties bodies.

SeminoleWarrior

March 11th, 2009
5:29 pm

I love Reno911’s comments on defending against the run especially when you consider the division in which we play. TE is not the critical need most think it. This draft must be about the defense…no doubts!! Roy Williams can not cover that is why he is a liability at this time. Patrick Chung, Courtney Greene, or Otis Wiley offer the versatility we need at safety; Marcus Freeman or Clint Sintim the physical nature and flexibility we need at linebacker; Roy Miller ot Terrance Knighton, the big, physical interior presence to clog the middle. GO FALCONS!!

Falcon 8211

March 11th, 2009
6:05 pm

DOL, what did L.J. and his agent say when you called him back and is anybody else coming to vist.

Falcon 8211

March 11th, 2009
6:07 pm

I think you said he[L.J. agent] said call him the next day. Well did you?

cutter

March 11th, 2009
6:35 pm

SeminoleWarrior- Roy Miller may turn out to be one of those hidden gems. Everyboby talks about Albert Haynesworth and his worth and ability but few people talk about Rocky Bernard drafted the sames year as Haynesworth only instead of 1st round he was drafted in the 5th but if you compare the numbers Bernard has just as good if not better career numbers. Haynesworth 100 mill contract Bernard 16 mill contract it makes you wonder.

cutter

March 11th, 2009
6:44 pm

Big Ray- I guess one of my concerns would do we use our 1st pick to get this guy who may have some issues or do we improve our defense and still have the ability to pick up a very good tight end down the line in a Shawn Nelson or Jared Cook among others.

mars

March 11th, 2009
7:39 pm

Oops! Got my UGA Tony’s askew. He’s still projected at strongside by the team. 6′0″ 248. Wish he were a little taller for strongside, covering the tight-end and all.

mars

March 11th, 2009
7:42 pm

What the blankety-blank happened to Tony Taylor? No news on the web.

Stirg d'Nahsif

March 11th, 2009
8:39 pm

You mean to tell Me no one is going to complain about the Falcons not going after Ken Lucas, the Carolina Panthers CB? I just knew I was going to come on here and see about four or five bloggers lobbying for his signing.

Y’all leave TD alone; he knows what he’s doing. If he signs Curtis Payne at strongside linebacker, you better go out and purchase your Tyler Perry throwback.

My GrandPa used tell Me something when I would complain about his “idea” may not work. He would say “Don’t worry about the mule going blind; just sit your ass on the wagon and hold the line.”

trufalconfan

March 11th, 2009
8:45 pm

I really trust that TD knows what he is doing. We can’t spend freely. I think that Roddy will be a free agent in 2009 and will demand top dollars.

D3

March 11th, 2009
8:50 pm

Kind of agree with you, Big Ray, about Pettigrew. It would be really, really tough to pass on him if he falls to 24 (which I don’t think he will, honestly). But, then again, I see what Seminole is saying with picking TE first, because I think TE is pretty deep with Shawn Nelson, Jared Cook, Chase Coffman, James Casey, and even Cornelius Ingram)assuming he can bounce back from injury).

I know that Delmas is projected as a first round safety, but if it comes down to it I’d rather take Brian Cushing, Larry English, Clay Matthews, Brandon Pettigrew, BJ Raji, Peria Jerry, and maybe even Ziggy Hood and couple that with a Patrick Chung or Rashad Johnson.

I’m just glad I’m not TD, too many possibilities. Bringing in Peterson does help narrow our focus a good amount, especially if Nicholas or Wire can step up.

Question: If we don’t draft OLB with first pick, do we pass until 3rd or 4th and pretty much give up on the top-end of the pool?

Look forward to your thoughts. Enjoy the great, respectful debate we got going on. Lots of rational, though-out analyses.

cutter

March 11th, 2009
9:06 pm

D3- That is why I believe you draft OLB in the 1st round if you don’t your choices will be guys like Marcus Freeman who at under 6′1 might have a tough time I see him more as a MLB or Tyrone Mckenzie who may be a project,(4.78) forty time but both are good linebackers I just think a Clay Matthews Jr. or Brian Cushing have alot of upside and can play right now.

Dusty Ramirez

March 11th, 2009
9:28 pm

I like Peterson!! And as far as the TE, screw LJ Smith. I think Owen Daniels and Jeff King are both better options and cheaper. I like to see the birds sign one of them and go all DEF in the draft. Safety, DT, and Corners!!

D3

March 11th, 2009
9:52 pm

Yeach Cutter, completely agree. No way we should pass on Cushing if he drops. The question would be do you take Matthews @ 24 or do you pick a DT, SS, or TE and pray he falls to the second round? I if we drop past Matthews, Maybin, and English, then might as well just try to find value later, say around 4th or 5th.

1)OLB/ 2)SS/ 3)TE/ 4)CB/ 5)DT —- Goes back to the Chevis Jackson v. Trey Lewis argument. Which is a higher need: CB or DT. You can actually go a little farther and see which has more solid depth: is Von Hutchins, David Irons, & Brent Grimes as solid as Jason Jefferson & Kindal Moorehead? I personally think that Chauncey will beat out Jamaal Anderson and they will move him inside. If you just look at the last two years production, Chauncey wins in a landslide.

Big Ray

March 11th, 2009
10:12 pm

Cutter,

Trust me, I see your point. I too, would rather us concentrate on the defensive side of the ball first, but we do happen to have a lot of options there as well. We could definitely go for a different tight end later in the draft. I’m just trying to illustrate some of the thinking that may go on when a guy like that falls to your pick. That’s why teams make “uncharacteristic” picks. Teams always know what they need, but they get all giddy when a particular talent comes around, especially if they didn’t think they had a shot at that person.

That, and sometimes we don’t know what’s going on behind the scenes. While this probably happens more in basketball than football, sometimes you make a pick solely for value. Sometimes that draftee is traded to a team that really wanted/needed him, for somebody that you really wanted/needed. But we’ll see. Believe me, my concerns are more about defense. But I’m not the one doing the picking.

D3,

Very good points you make there. And to be honest, repeating some of what I said to Cutter, for every pick that other teams make for an offensive player, that’s one more defensive guy on the board that we can choose from. There are some special offensive linemen in this draft, and some teams are really in dire need of just that. There are two, maybe three quarterbacks that will get taken before we pick (and we both know quarterback is not even on the radar for US). That automatically pushes more defenders down. I don’t think Pettigrew falls to us, which is probably a good thing. As I said, that’s another defender on the board.

I think big names like Aaron Curry, Orakpo, Raji, and McDaniels, and Vontae Davis will go early on, but I could be wrong. It’s hard to imagine them falling to us. But hey, if they do…… Perhaps some others will go quickly, too. Cushing may be gone by then, and I figure he will be. If teams are wanting massive defensive tackles, Perry will be gone nearly as quickly as Raji.

I like Delmas okay, but I think he’s a bit too small. He played well in the senior bowl, and he did okay at the combine. Sure seems to have a head for the game. The size bugs me though. I’d take William Moore over him, but that’s just me. Moore didn’t have a good senior bowl or combine, but he was magnificent throughout the year. And, he’s got the size.

I think if we don’t draft OLB in the first round, then we better be picking up a dynamic cornerback, safety, or defensive tackle. Unfortunately for simple guys like me, there are only so many of each category, and I worry that we’ll only get 2nd tier players.

Some of the names mentioned at DT around our pick include Tyson Jackson of LSU. Evander Hood appears to be moving up the boards, and might get taken earlier than we think, or he might be a good pick for us. It’s really hard to tell, especially with free agency impacting different things.

At cornerback, we could be okay with Darius Butler or D.J. Moore, but is either guy worth grabbing with our first pick? Could be….or we could be missing out on a good safety. That’s the trap: trying to figure out what will be left by the time we get to our 2nd round pick, and how good the talent will be by then.

D3

March 11th, 2009
10:46 pm

Big Ray,

I’m right with you on Delmas. Somehow he is the same size as Rashad Johnson, but doesn’t get the lack of size critique. I would rather take a chance on Patrick Chung and William Moore in the 2nd or 3rd. William Moore scares me because he totally disappeared this year after having an All-American year last year (I could have it backwards, but I know he totally went off the radar one of those years).

In with you on OLB, if don’t take one with the first pick I’d be a little upset if we picked ANY SS in the first round. If we don’t go OLB with #24, than I say Pettigrew, Hood or Jerry. You’d have to believe that one of them would be available. I think it might be me, but I’m just not in love with this years top-end CB crop. I think they would be great 3rd or 4th round pick-ups, but I would pass on them in the first or second round. I just will find it hard to fathom that we would pass on Cushing, Matthews, or English. BTW, is Larry English that much of a specific fit for the 3-4, because I am not hearing anyone mention him.

I might be wrong, but I think Tyson Jackson is a DE, not a DT. Great rappin’ with you guys.

D3

March 11th, 2009
10:53 pm

Final food for thought guys. Pat Kirwan’s Mock Draft 3.0 just had the Falcons taking Cushing! Man, would that be a dream come true or what? And for back-up choice, Clay Matthews is right behind them going to the Dolphins, and Larry English goes to the Patriots two slots above them. So this confirms my opinion that between Cushing, Matthews, English, Jerry, or Hood we should get one.

Big Ray

March 11th, 2009
10:58 pm

D3,

I’ll say this about DTs: A lot of teams had trouble stopping the run last year. We were one of them. So there may be a premium on DTs. That, and I wonder how Dimitroff/Smith feel about the guys they have now. They do have some depth, having signed Chauncey Davis, which may allow Anderson to move inside, next to Babs. The question is, will that be effective enough against the run, while generating a decent pass rush (which we need)? It may, or Tra Lewis might be back and up to the job. Even then, I would have a hard time passing up a guy like Raji if he fell that far. I’d snag him without a second thought, then look for a secondary player in the second round, because all of the good OLBs are gone by then.

And that’s where I answer your question (hopefully). If we miss out on ‘backers in the first round, I don’t think we’re going to get any “right out of the box” contributors, not even in the 2nd round. I’d take Brian Cushing too, by the way. Very strong, talented guy. If I was going for a ‘backer in that first pick (knowing that Curry and Orakpo aren’t available), I couldn’t ignore him. Otherwise, we’re probably looking at English, Maybin, Laurinaitis, and Maualuga, along with Clay Matthews. Matthews is good, but is he somebody we pick at 24th? Are any of those guys? I don’t have the answer, and I haven’t completely formed my opinion, to be honest.

I’m thinking that as it stands right now, we could get a good safety in the second round. Moore or Chung may be that far down. Even Sean Smith, maybe.

I like Darius Butler’s speed and versatility (he’s a return guy), but I don’t think we’ll get him in the 2nd round. We probably have a better chance at Mike Mickens and DJ Moore. Mickens will drop due to his pre-combine injury.

Right now, I say we get that DT or OLB in the first round. The talent doesn’t impress me much beyond the 2nd, where we will likely have better shot at secondary anyway. Unless of course, Dimitroff/Smith think we’re okay at LB, and will wait ’til next year’s draft.

What’s funny is how free agency affects things. All of the sudden L.T. is staying in San Diego. Now where does that put Knowshon Moreno in the draft?

See, that’s what makes me hopeful. There are some offensive players that teams probably just WON’T be able to resist. 4-6 of them are offensive linemen (J.Smith, Monroe, Oher, A.Smith, Britton, Mack). 2 (Beanie Wells and Moreno) are running backs. 2 are quarterbacks. 3-6 are receivers (Crabtree, Heyward-Bey, Harvin, Maclin, Nicks, Robiskie). And of course, there’s Pettigrew.

While it probably won’t shake out that way, that’s a total of 17 offensive players that could go in the first round before we pick. That leaves 7 more picks before ours.

One thing that goes unnoticed, but must be considered is that teams either have, or are installing specific defenses. We run a 4-3. Some teams run a 3-4, and so they need players that fit that defense. Some of those guys will be “big name” guys, but guys we may not want because they don’t fit our scheme or can’t adjust to it. And then, there are those who CAN….So who are the “big name” defenders that are as likely as not to go before we can get them? Depends on who you ask, but let’s try this list: Aaron Curry, B.J.Raji, Brian Cushing, Peria Jerry, Vontae Davis, Malcolm Jenkins (who I called McDonald on my last post…I don’t know why), and possibly Antonio Smith…or Everett Brown.

No matter who makes the list, that’s somebody that is left off in time for our pick. Of course, that’s if your going with the theory that 17 offensive players will go before we pick….one can only hope….

D3

March 11th, 2009
11:10 pm

Excellent points, Big Ray! Man, that’s what makes it so exciting. So many options you just never know. I go back and forth on Pettigrew. I was actually saying its too deep, but plugging him in would set our offense for the next 5-7 years. I think you’re right about Matthews the more I think about it. #24 might be a touch too high.

Here’s my list of players we should have available, assuming some of the big names won’t be available (ranking them is whole different ballgame): Pettigrew, Jerry, Hood, Cushing, English, Maybin (too young?), maybe Matthews. I’d be happy with any of these cats.

Good banter Big Ray.

Big Ray

March 12th, 2009
12:12 am

D3,

I can’t lie. I’d be THRILLED to get Cushing.

I’m not enthralled with this year’s cornerback crop either, but there are some good ones. I just don’t if any that are likely to be there when we pick are worth 1st (or even 2nd) round picks. Depends on who it is.

You’re actually correct. William Moore did NOT have a great senior year, but I think he’s worth a pick in the second round if A) We have already picked a good OLB or DT, and/or B)There are no 1st/high 2nd-tier DTs or OLBs on the board by then. But that’s just me.

Correct again. Tyson Jackson is listed as a DE. But some sites have him listed as a DE who can play DT in the 4-3 scheme.

Around the net:

NFLDraftDog has us picking Aaron Maybin in the 1st round, Patrick Chung in the 2nd.

Walter Cherepinsky of WalterFootball.com has us taking Pettigrew in the 1st (he says the LJ Smith rumors have died down). He thinks Ryan will be unstoppable with Pettigrew on board. Unstoppable isn’t the word I’m thinking of, but increasingly lethal seems to fit. He has us taking William Moore in the 2nd round.

ESPN is a pile of peckerheads that think their stuff is so good that you have to pay for it (become an “Insider”, wheee!). Screw them, I’ll just go to other sites.

Sports Illustrated says, “Draft? What draft?” Nevermind…

Scout.com (in association with FoxSports) has us taking Peria Jerry in the 1st, Rashad Johnson in the 2nd.

Draft Countdown has some of the most interesting comments. They mention Clay Matthews, Clint Sintim, Robert Ayers as possibilities, and add Peria Jerry as a lineman possibility. They have us taking Larry English in the 1st, but say that many experts see him as an outside ‘backer in a 3-4 scheme (we run a 4-3), and that he might be able to help the Falcons up front or at outside ‘backer. The main thing is he’s a pass rusher. Lastly, they mention Louis Delmas as a possible replacement for Milloy, but say that it’s a bit of a reach. I agree.

In the 2nd round, they have us picking Patrick Chung.

Now NFLDraftSite? They’ve got it all figured out: We’ll take William Moore in the 1st, Max Unger (center) in the 2nd, James Casey (TE) in the 3rd, Rashad Jennings (RB) in the 4th, Alex MaGee (DT) and Coy Francies (CB)in the 5th, Ramon Foster (OT) in the 6th, and Lawrence Sidbury (DE) in the 7th.

Right.

Big Ray

March 12th, 2009
12:16 am

Good talkin’ to ya, D3.

I’m excited about Falcons football and the possibilities in this draft. Don’t worry, I’m back and forth about Pettigrew myself. His level of talent is just so enticing, especially when you plug a big guy like that into the offense. He can and will block, and he can catch. We don’t need him to be Antonio Gates, Shannon Sharpe, or Tony Gonzalez. Look how good Crumpler was, and this guy is bigger (and maybe faster). Imagine him, White, Douglas, Robinson, Jenkins, Finneran, along with Norwood and Turner catching passes out of the backfield. Whoa….

Ooop…gotta focus. Defense, defense, defense. Still….

"falconsR4real"

March 12th, 2009
1:35 am

the DBs are only as good as the DL!

the line gets better, then our DBs will be as good as any……

that said, obviously we’re not through with “the building”

still under constuction (afterall, this is the ATL)

Big Ray

March 12th, 2009
1:51 am

Well, it wasn’t going to happen all in one year…

macon ga

March 12th, 2009
8:14 am

If brookings had been doing his job who knows we may have been playing pitt in the big dance hell yes pete is a good pickup now too be honest i,m sick of norwood tiping in the back field my 15 year old could him lets give 44 a try sometimes and we do need a sure hand vet reciever and a corner but lets just chill and see what our staff will do number 1 fan from the mac town

marko

March 12th, 2009
9:05 am

Just posing a question. Andre Smith was once considered a top five lock. For three seasons he rolled over the best the SEC had to offer, but a couple of brain pharts latter he’s fallen and can’t get up. The question is this, you’re Dimitroff, you have a list of players that fit your needs. Right tackle was definately not part of the plan, but suddenly you find yourself looking at a player with a much higher grade than the player you had intended to select. Do you stay the coarse and fill a need, or do you take advantage of an unexpected opportunity?

chc4

March 12th, 2009
9:09 am

Funny how almost everyone wanted Brooking gone. Now that he is and we signed a replacement everyone’s still complaining… classic! Peterson has more game left than KB does and that’s really not disputable if you’ve watched them play the last 2 years.

DecFalcon

March 12th, 2009
9:22 am

Marko, I keep wondering the same thing; although I do not like dumb players, maybe he is just making dumb mistakes. I am always a fan of drafting lineman in the first two rounds, not playmakers. good point.

Big Mike

March 12th, 2009
9:25 am

We should have gone after Sean Jones great player who lives here and wanted to come home. We have to make smart choices and shore up our defense. I wish people would think football not race Brookings was a good player but age has caught up with him, he got beat 9 of 10 times in every passing down. Coach I am with you speed up the pace.

chc4

March 12th, 2009
11:35 am

Stop it w/ the Sean Jones stuff! We need a STRONG SAFETY and Jones is a FS. Erik Coleman had a very good year and it entrenched at the position.

Ken Strickland

March 12th, 2009
12:24 pm

I haven’t been able to read all of the posts the last few days, but you guys have been doing some serious in depth analyzing, and that’s really good to see. I like the FA signing and I understand the last 2. Peterson is known for being a physical type of LB, which wasn’t Brooking’s strength. He adds the same versatility and leadership qualities that Brooking brought, and likely at a cheaper price. C TMcClure is the senior member of the OL, by a wide margin, and having a vet replacement for the most important OL position is vital.

I still believe we will draft a CB with our 1st pick. If we resolve our DL problems, especially against the run, we won’t need a SS with LB run stuffing abilities. We’ll need a more versatile SS that can read and react. None of us knows enough about SS’s Fudge or McCloud to say neither is capable of getting the job done within our DEF scheme. There are certainly enough big, strong granite type DT’s in this draft for us to get what we need in a lower rd. The key is whether DT TLewis will be back at full strength, and/or if a stud like Jerry or Raji falls into our lap.

Except for DT and CB, I see us drafting for depth. With LB’s CWire and SNicholas already on the roster, and the signing of Peterson, I don’t see LB being a higher priorities than CB. I feel the same way about SS, with Fudge and McCloud available. The draft if filled with large, strong, hard to move DT’s like the ones Smith had when he was the Jaguars DC.

The level of talent usually drops far more drastically among CB’s, after the 1st rd, than the level of talent among LB’s, safeties or DT’s. THESE ARE MY REASONS FOR BELIEVING WE WILL DRAFT A CB WITH OUR 1ST PICK.

Reno 911

March 12th, 2009
2:40 pm

Good points D3, Big Ray, and Cutter. Lots of good potential players will be there at 24, all of whom we could use right away. But after that, the “immediate contributor” herd gets thin, which leaves some questions outstanding. Of these good/”safe bet” players, one or more of them will be there at 24, each of whom could be good for us and be a good fit: P. Jerry, Clay Matthews, Cushing, Delmas, DJ Moore, Alphonso Smith. But the first pick has to fit the plan for the second pick, so unless the Falcons trade one of their two 5th rounders and their 2nd rounder to move up into the early 2nd round, they’ve got to choose which ONE of these positions (DT, OLB, S, C) they can fill with a late second round pick, as well. So, in a way, who TD thinks will be around at #55 MAY drive who they pick with #24. If they go OLB with Matthews or Cushing, at #24, then they HAVE to be betting that a DT or S with starter capability will be there at #55. I’m not sure who that is, really. Maybe Ziggy Hood at DT, or Rashad Johnson at S? Looking at it “glass half-full”, we’re in a good situation, while it seems that we can get two defensive starters/major contributors in the first two rounds, with an improved pass-catching ability at TE in round 3 with Casey, Cook, Nelson, Ingram, or Coffman, all of whom I think are solid (though Nelson and maybe Casey are the only ones of the bunch who can block; the others are H-back TE’s). One note on Cushing: has anyone else watched those NFL Network behind-the-scenes hype pieces on Cushing and gotten the feeling that the guy is on something? Looking at dude’s horse-like teeth/jaws and large forehead, does it seem to anyone else like he might have been chemically-assisted up to now? And if he would have to shut it down when he comes into the league, wouldn’t he be much less of a player than he was supposed to have been? Just talking here, and not accusing, but after all the hype going into the combine, etc, he looked to me like he was the 3rd-best LB among the USC crop. If he falls all the way to 24, I’m not sure if TD won’t let him fall another slot, and I wouldn’t blame him. Another point on Cushing raised on NFL Network the other night: Cushing didn’t play 3rd downs at USC. Is it really worth spending a 1st rounder on a guy who only plays the first two downs when that guy has suspect closing speed to begin with? Just a thought.

chc4

March 12th, 2009
4:13 pm

I may be wrong here but Peria Jerry is more in the mold of Babineaux… smaller, penetrating DT. I think he only goes 285-290 or so. We need a mauler.

Weaknesses: Does not possess ideal bulk…has just average strength…too inconsistent in his technique and can get too high…just a bull rusher at this point…needs to improve his strength versus the run…struggled academically and with injuries…an older prospect…probably limited schematically…played with a top notch defensive end next to him

hawesg

March 12th, 2009
5:00 pm

I was wondering with the signing of Peterson, any chance of the Falcons changing to a 3-4? You don’t have the mauler NT that you would like, but Anderson might work better in a 3-4. Draft a guy like Sintim or Maybin and you’ve got a fair front 7. Did Smith ever run a 3-4 in Jacksonville? (i’m too lazy to look.)

chc4

March 12th, 2009
5:16 pm

hawesg — Mike Smith is a 4-3 guy all the way. No way we are going to a 3-4. Heck… we don’t have enough LBs to do it.

Ken Strickland

March 12th, 2009
5:43 pm

RENO 911-I don’t think Dimitroff and Smith will be looking for a definite starter past the 1st rd. I think they will be looking to draft a starting CB at our #24 slot. It will be possible for them to get a TE, SS and DT with the ability to start after the 1st rd. Considering the FA moves we’ve made, I don’t see them looking to draft a starting LB.

With DT’s JBabineaux and TLewis manning the interior DEF, they will likely draft a big 325lb+ roadblock to solidify the interior DEF when we’re in goalline or short yardage situations. We should be able to acquire somone like Boston college’s Ron Brace(6′3″ 326lbs, or Stillman college’s Samme Lee Hill(6′4″ 328lbs), or Howard Univ’s Chris Baker(6′2″ 326lbs). Both Hill and Baker were very athletic and had amazing times in the 40yd run for players their size. One of these type of players should be available in the later rds.

Having DT TLewis, who’s quicker, faster, stronger and more athletic, with pass rushing abilities, replacing GJackson will definitely upgrade our run DEF and pass rush. Having either CDavis, or an improved JAnderson, along with KBiermann, at RDE will improve our pass rush. Having Peterson, Lofton and either Wire or Nicholas at LB will make us more physical. Having either Fudge, McCloud or a draft pick at SS, will give us more speed and flexibility at SS, and having CJackson or a draft pick at CB will definitely improve our secondary and our overall pass DEF. We just need to come up with a TE that possesses the speed, pass catching and blocking abilities we need. Man, acquiring LB Peterson, and the return of DT TLewis, has really opened up more possibilities for us in the draft.

Huh

March 12th, 2009
6:33 pm

I initially liked the Peterson signing until I checked out his stats and compared them to Brooking’s stats. Looks to me that we took a step down. All you Brooking haters, check it out for yourselves!

chc4

March 12th, 2009
6:34 pm

While I’m not completely satisfied w/ the CBs currently on the roster, they aren’t horrible. Houston had his ups and downs but overall I like him. He just needs to turn his head around quicker on those sideline “go” routes. He got torched by Antonio Bryant in the first half late in the year but came back strong late in the game. So what’s to say Chevis can’t step up in year 2 and take the other starting spot? And Von Hutchins can play if healthy. Don’t forget that last year Grimes started the first few games before getting hurt. You don’t necessarily need household names to get it done… we’ve got some young talent.

cutter

March 12th, 2009
6:38 pm

I believe you build from the inside out if not OLB then DT. If you have a choice between Hood or Matthews Jr. its tough. Jerry doesn’t fit in my opinion and yes I am a little leary of Cushing, I heard somewhere that he uses $1000 plus worth of vitamins and supplements a month…has he topped out??? I don’t see corner though I mean who stands out that will be there at 24? Either you draft a guy who can hit the field and play right now or you take someone with huge upside, Mike Peterson is here for a purpose I hope…and it is to build for the future. Matthews Jr.

cutter

March 12th, 2009
6:42 pm

Haynesworth indicted??

cutter

March 12th, 2009
6:52 pm

Huh- If anything its a step sideways Peterson leads in sacks and interceptions and Brooking did come in one year earlier. Hey they tried to sign Brook he didn’t bite Peterson did… move on.

Stephen

March 12th, 2009
7:48 pm

I am so glad that the decisions as to who gets hired and who is let go by the Falcons is the responsibility of experienced professionals as oppose to the majority of folks posting on this blog with some of these lame suggestions/ideas/comments/criticisms.

Ken Strickland

March 12th, 2009
8:13 pm

HUN-You can’t always use stats to judge the ability of certain players. If Peterson played in fewer gms, or on a DEF with a strong DL, it stands to reason he’d have fewer tackles than Brooking, who atarted every gm and played behind a very pourous DL. It’s like saying that last yr LMalloy was one of the best SS’s in the NFL because he had so many tackles. Is there anyone on this blog that would say former CB Dion Sanders wasn’t the best cover CB in the NFL during his prime? Yet, he never led the NFL in interceptions or passes defended because teams were afraid to throw in his direction. He simply got fewer opportunities.

Obviously our HC, DC and GM didn’t think signing Peterson was a step backward or sideways, and Smith has coached both Brooking and Peterson. I’ll trust their judgement in this matter.

D3

March 12th, 2009
10:03 pm

Ken,
Excellent points on DT. I guess I’ve fell in love with the fact of getting a DT like Peria Jerry or Ziggy Hood, but they may decide to wait until the 3rd or 4th and pick up a guy like Ron Brace, who a lot of tv commentators say was the main reason that Raji was able to do so well.

You’re exactly right on the possibilities that the Peterson signing has opened up. Its been a win-win, because otherwise we would HAVE to draft a OLB first regardless of who was there. Now they do have a lot of options. The only point I disagree on is drafting CB first. Not saying they’re not talented, per se, but I don’t see spending #24 on one unless Vontae Davis or Malcolm Jenkins dropped to us(which isn’t going to happen). Its a tough, tough call but the Peterson signing to me makes me feel that if we add an OLB (Cushing, Matthews, English, Maybin), DT (Jerry, Hood), or Pettigrew.

Reno,
Man, thats some good stuff on 2nd round determining 1st pick. I also tend to think that TD does expect to get AT LEAST two starters, if not three, out of the draft. I’m just not sold on drafting a CB or SS with the first pick. I could definitely see picking a CB before a SS, but do we really want to pick a DJ Moore or Alphonso Smith who are both small corners with the first pick? I hate to keep beating a dead horse, but who is more “ready” to take over: Chevis Jackson, Trey Lewis, or Thomas DeCoud/Jamal Fudge?

I may be totally wrong, but is DeCoud ready to step in @ SS? We are definitely going to be drafting a CB in the first 4-5 rounds. Hate to be a UGA homer, but Asher Allen in the 4th or 5th? Even though we signed Peterson, a Cushing or Matthews pick would/could put them in the Strong-side OLB and “put Coy Wire back in a role player mold.” Not hatin’ on Wire or Nicholas because they are players tough guys, but if we add a stud OLB, we’re set for years at LB with Lofton, Nicholas, Wire, Peterson, and Cushing/Matthews.

After listening to Ken’s arguments I’m starting to think we wait until 4th round and pick up a DT like Brace, Hill, or Baker.

Cutter, hilarious stuff on Haynesworth. There were many on here saying we should sign Haynesworth at all costs. No way. We wouldn’t subscribe to the A-Rod theory of devoting 45% of your salary to one playe, but he was a head case anyway. Think of all the possibilities we have now. Even though I was worried that we didn’t do anything, TD knows what he’s doing and its looking good.

(1-OLB)Cushing, Matthews, English, or Maybin (2-SS)Chung or Johnson (3-TE)Cook, Nelson, Ingram, Casey, or Coffman (4-DT)Brace, Hill, or Baker.

Ray, Reno, Ken, & Cutter…..good stuff guys.

falcon21

March 12th, 2009
10:12 pm

Well said Ken, there are several angles to football to look at and you seem too know all of them. Dion was the best cover I have ever seen. And as far as stats, it depends on the players around you. If you have a great D. your numbers will be limited. As far as Peterson, I think he is a good pickup and probably better than what we had and he is more aggressive.

Falcon 8211

March 12th, 2009
10:34 pm

Is English as good as everyone saying he is? Has anyone seen him play.I think we should sign Rodney Harrison to a 2yr. contract and draft a ss in the 2nd round maybe Chung. he could watch and learn for a couple of years. Rodney would be an upgrade to the lawdog and he could give us leadership in the secondary. I say get Brace in the 3rd round because he will not be there in the 4th. what do you guys think about that.

Ken Strickland

March 12th, 2009
11:21 pm

D3-your comment about CB’s reminded me of something I had forgotten about. Although we recently made the possibility of signing TE Smith a big issue, we still haven’t signed a TE. With our LB situation all but settled, and if our coaches feel confident in our CB’s and SS’s stepping up, we just might see Dimitroff pull the trigger on TE Pettigrew with our 1st pick. He seems to be the best all around TE in the draft and the best fit for what the Falcons want, with the emphasis on being equally effective as a blocker and pass receiver.

Trust me, if we get an effective and consistent pass rush, especially from our front 4, the CB’s and SS’s we already have on our roster will be more than adequate to get the job done. If we don’t get improved run DEF, and an improved pass rush from our DL, it won’t matter much who plays SS, LB or CB. No DEF can be effective against the pass if they have to constantly bring their safeties and LB’s up to defend against the run if their DL gets consistently beaten at the line of scrimmage.

Rushing teams didn’t hurt us much running the edges because both DE’s JAnderson and JAbraham played the run very well. We got killed inside because DT GJackson had no quickness, lateral movememt(couldn’t chase the play down the line) or recovery ability(he couldn’t recover if he went down, or couldn’t effectively change direction). That forced both the LDE(JAnderson) and RDT JBabineaux to cover more ground than normal to compensate. The addition of DT TLewis will improve our interior DEF and our overall DEF tremendously. Our DEF gave up a lot of rushing and passing yardage, but few pts by comparison. If we cut down on the yardage allowed we cut down on opposition scoring opportunities, which correspondingly improves our scoring DEF.

D3

March 12th, 2009
11:21 pm

Yeah Falcon82, I’ve seen him play but his stats are amazing. I mean its tough because he’s from a smaller conference, but he had 31 sacks. I thought he might be a good fit, but he’s listed at 6′2 274, which is WAY to heavy for a true 4-3 outside linebacker. I could be wrong, but its now looking like Cushing, Matthews, or Maybin. Now I guess I understand why English is considered a 3-4 OLB.

D3

March 12th, 2009
11:23 pm

Meant to say I HAVEN’T seen English play, typo.

Big Ray

March 12th, 2009
11:38 pm

Reno911,

I don’t know if that’s true of Cushing or not. It could very well be, but I hope not. However, I have faith in Dimitroff and his “matrix.” This guy takes a very personal interest in scouting, and both he and Mike Smith don’t want anybody who is all hopped up on stuff, has attitude issues, or anything else like that. I think he will do whatever homework is necessary to find out if any guy they are considering, be it Cushing or someone else, is doing things the dirty way. And if they are, we’re not going to draft ‘em. Heh…and if we’re worried about “horse sized teeth”, then somebody should have checked John Elway out a long time ago, LOL! No, seriously…somebody didn’t do their homework on that line of thinking with LaVar Arrington. Same symptoms, and dude was running some freaky 40 yard dash times. He was beating running backs and receivers…easily. Something was up, man. And yet dude never turned out to be anything special. In fact, he was never even “good” in the NFL. Hmmmm.

By the way, your other points were excellent, too.

Ken Strickland,

What’s up man? You could be on the money. We may take a CB in the first round. But who do we get with that pick? Whoever we get, CB or otherwise, will have to be an impact player, that’s for certain. I hope a good CB is available at that pick. I figure that the two top-rated corners (Vontae Davis and Malcolm Jenkins) won’t be available. Antonio Smith may not be either. That leaves Darius Butler, DJ Moore, and Sean Smith (he can play either CB or Safety). And like you say, the talent level drops off dramatically after that. The question is, besides the top two, are any of these guys worth taking at #24?

I agree we could use a dynamic CB. Some say we may be able to get by ok with the guys we have at CB…or Safety…or LB…or DT. We’re all taking different views on those positions. I agree with what you say about our free agent pickups changing how we’ll draft. I also think that what Dimitroff is looking at with our 1st round pick is trying to get the most value. Whomever he picks will need to have the biggest possible impact on the position he plays, whether it’s CB, DT, SS, DT, TE, etc.

So if one of the top cornerbacks isn’t available by the 24th pick, should we just pick one of the best that’s left over, or look for higher value in another position? I don’t know. I’m excited about the whole thing, but man am I glad I don’t have Dimitroff’s job….

chc4,

I read some of the same things you’ve read. Basically what I got from that is that Peria Jerry is talented, but may not be too sharp, and may not fit into certain schemes. That ain’t good. Again though, I trust Dimitroff, Smith, and his crew to thoroughly evaluate these guys and not be blinded by sheer physical talent. If Jerry doesn’t fit what they want, he’s a no-go.

Big Ray

March 12th, 2009
11:44 pm

Ken,

Ha ha! Pettigrew has a way of screwing up your thinking all the way around, doesn’t he? Just when you think you’ve got yourself centered on defense, back you go. Pulling the trigger on this guy means gambling on a couple of things, I think. 1) That the guys you have come season’s star will step up and outperform what you ran with last year, and 2)That you’ll still be able to get quality defenders in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th, and 5th rounds.

D3,

English is listed as a DE/LB. He’s a big fellow. Yeah, that’s why he’s considered a 3-4 guy if looking at him as a ‘backer. However, they’re also hinting that he may be able to play some DE on a 4-3…perhaps. I mean, at 274, he’s got enough size…

Big Ray

March 12th, 2009
11:51 pm

Stephen,

Well, you’re certainly welcome to add YOUR lame ideas/suggestions/concepts/etc. Gee, I guess that’s why they call this a blog, not a “General Manager and Subordinates Only Forum for ideas/Suggestion Box”…..lol…

Cutter,

I think you summarized the way of thinking that I agree with in the latter part of your 6:38 pm post. With that first pick, you’re definitely either getting somebody who can start/play right away, or somebody with great upside. Makes sense to me. Either way, you have to balance getting the most value with meeting the most need.

Big Ray

March 13th, 2009
12:21 am

We may have some good sleepers around in the middle rounds. Found this on Football’s Future.com-

DT Jarron Gilbert, San Jose St.
Gilbert as a solid defensive end for the Spartans during his first two and a half years in the program, but his game took off with a shift inside to tackle. He had 20 tackles for loss and 12 sacks through his junior year, while playing as a good sized end. His shift inside full time as a senior led him to a breakout season in which he finished with an amazing 22.5 tackles for loss and 9.5 sacks. Gilbert has tremendous first step quickness and can just leave the offensive lineman standing as he blows by him into the backfield. He is good athlete, with quick feet, and the speed to finish the play off. He is active and uses his athletic talents to consistently wreak havoc in the backfield. Gilbert has very good natural strength but he may need to pack on some more pounds to better handle engaging players that currently outweigh him by nearly 30 pounds. That light build and not facing the best talent on a game to game basis may keep Gilbert in the middle rounds but he could have an impact much greater than that once he gets on to the field in the NFL.

See Also: CB Jackie Bates, Hampton

DE Lawrence Sidbury, Richmond

clthurman

March 13th, 2009
9:53 am

Anybody who says we take a CB at 24 is not realistic. There are no corners that will be there worth taking that high and pay first round money to. As for someone who stated that our LB situation is settled must be living on a cloud. 2 Middle Linebackers and 2 Special Teamers(although good) is not settled. We need a serious playmaking OLB with speed and nasty disposition. None of the corners we have on the roster are proven and to expect much from them is taking optimism to an extreme.

cutter

March 13th, 2009
12:06 pm

Jarron Gilbert is the youtube guy, nice measureables on him possibly a 3-4 end. I for one have never been crazy about the smaller corners out there the 5-8 and 5-9 guys just seem to be a liability in the run game and I believe it all starts with the run game, I think cover 2 schemes like the bigger corners i.e. Foxworth, Jackson.

VICK SUPPORTER 2

March 13th, 2009
12:17 pm

SEASON TICKETS – EARLY MARKETING CAMPAIGN?

http://www.ajc.com/sports/content/printedition/2009/03/11/falconstix0311.html

ACCORDING TO THE ARTICLE, THIS IS THE SECOND SEASON IN A ROW THAT THE FALCONS HAVE THOUSANDS OF UNSOLD SEASON TICKETS. SINCE MV7 LAST SEASON ON THE ROSTER, SALES HAVE DROPPED 12 PERCENT, EVEN WITH THE CAMPAIGN FOR “THE FACE OF THE FRANCHISE”.

ANOTHER COINCIDENT? I WOULD HAVE THOUGHT SURELY, THE FACE OF THE FRANCHISE WOULD HAVE OUT SOLD A TALENTLESS MOBILE QUARTERBACK :)

INTERESTING INDEED :)

Reno 911

March 13th, 2009
12:39 pm

Interesting point, VS2. Has anyone looked to see how season ticket sales have done for the Leavenworth Penitentiary Intramural Flag Football team the last two seasons? If they’ve spiked, then you’ve got confirmation for your implied hypothesis. Well done.

Reno 911

March 13th, 2009
12:50 pm

D3- yes, and as much as I settle on the thought of the Falcons going defense in rounds 1, 2, and 4, and TE in 3, I keep getting hung up on Pettigrew, too, just like Ken. He’s going to be good. So I go between thinking of how the offense would look with a versatile, dangerous TE like Pettigrew, who can play three downs, block DEs and OLBs, but who can also rack up YAC’s, go down the seam, or pick on small DBs….and then I think of how much damage a TE can actually do, vice the necessity of having a solid run defense. Is it better to have a game where your TE catches 8 balls for 100 yds and a TD, while the defense gives up 250 on the ground, or is it better to have a TE who catches 3 balls for 50 yards and a defense that gives up 150 on the ground? Now I’m not saying there’s a defensive player out there at #24 that will make that hundred yard rushing difference on defense, but I do think that, if that Falcons want to put themselves into position to win a championship in two or three years, a stout, experienced (at that point) run defense is essential. Like Ken (I think) and others have said, maybe we’d be fine taking a Safety in the 2nd, waiting until the 3rd round to grab a space-eater like Ron Brace for the middle, and living with the current LBs for a season. As someone else said: I’m glad that I don’t have TD’s job (and I’m sure everyone else is, too, especially Stephen who, while reading blogs, doesn’t like blogs. okay.)

hawesg

March 13th, 2009
1:13 pm

If you’ve made the decison to go with a DB with your first pick, why not trade down a few notches into the late 1st or early 2nd? Delmas or Sean Smith will still be there. Then you might move up enough to grab a better player in the 3rd round. Also, I don’t think Ron Brace will last out of the second round. I’d rather pick Shawn Nelson in the 2nd Rd than Pettigrew in the 1st, providing you can really fill a need on defense with that first pick.

cutter

March 13th, 2009
1:27 pm

Another part of this process I would imagine is to look ahead to 2010 draft also… how deep is TE next season? How deep is OLB?

Reno 911

March 13th, 2009
1:48 pm

Interesting question, cutter. There’s an OLB out of BC, Mark Herzlich, who looks like he can play and will probably be a late 1st or 2nd rounder in 2010. THe Walterfootball.com site has him going to the Falcons in at #25 their 2010 mock (I think the Falcons will go 8-8 or 9-7 and pick earlier, though.) It’s a possibility, if the Falcons have a season like that and pick around the middle of the pack (14-18), then TE Jermaine Gresham might be there (out of Oklahoma). Not sure if he can block at all, but he’s a great pass-catching/YAC athlete. Anyway, back to Herzlich, I couldn’t help but notice him last year when, with some help from BJ Raji, he seemed to singlehandedly kill my team (Wake) with one (maybe two??) INT for TD’s. He paints his face a la John Randle, does the mo-hawk “look at me, I’m scary” thing, but he’s a good player.

cutter

March 13th, 2009
1:49 pm

Keep in mind Thomas Decoud was one of the three best FS coming out of last years draft. He did well on special teams in 09 and while I think you still draft a safety in the middle rounds, I think they drafted him to start sooner than later. We still have alot to learn about just how good last years draft was I think it will turn out to be a great one.

Reno 911

March 13th, 2009
1:57 pm

Right on. I plead complete ignorance on all things DB (as opposed to partial ignorance on everything else), and have never been able to see when DBs are doing the right thing or not (maybe I was scarred at an early age when I watched in horror while the 49ers threw five TD’s in ONE game on, around, and over Charles Dimry, possibly the worst-played game by a Falcon DB in history.) I hope that the Falcons’ young DBs have a lot of upside (DeCoud, Fudge, Hutchins, Grimes), but I honestly have no idea. I always tend to think that if we have a great front seven (or even a great front four), then DBs start to look better and better. well said, though.

Reno 911

March 13th, 2009
1:59 pm

Does anyone else remember that game, by the way? Or was that just my own nightmare, starring Charles Dimry?

cutter

March 13th, 2009
2:12 pm

Reno 911- I like Mark Herzlich OLB he’s a big kid 6′4 240. Depth wise I don’t see alot though as far as 2010. And Gresham already has more TD’s than any other TE in OU history and stayed in school which says something if he had come out this year he would be a 1st round pick. I keep thinking about those compensatory picks for next year they will come in handy to move up.

VICK SUPPORTER 2

March 13th, 2009
3:44 pm

2011 NFL LOCK OUT PROPOSED

MAN THE “UFL” IS LOOKING BETTER ALREADY, WELL ESPECIALLY BECAUSE THE “GREATEST ATHLETE” EVER WILL BE THE FACE OF LEAGUE :)

BUT YOU GUYS STILL HAVE YOUR BULL DAWGS :)

Reno 911

March 13th, 2009
4:25 pm

Stellar point, again, VS2. And since you brought up dogs…

Reno 911

March 13th, 2009
5:08 pm

Oh, hello. Anyone interested in Samari Rolle? Just released by the Ravens.

Ken Strickland

March 13th, 2009
5:13 pm

Every mock draft that has us taking a CB has us taking the CB out of Vanderbilt, so I checked him out. He’s listed at about 5′9′ which, in my opinion, makes him a virtual replica of what we already have in CB Bret Grimes, who started for us last yr until he was injuried. As important as acquiring a complete TE is to our OFF, if we’re going to take a CB, he’s got to be head and shoulders above what we already have in BGrimes, CJackson and VHutchins. I don’t know enough about what’s available to say that’s the case. I haven’t heard anyone say there’s a Dominique Rogers-Chromarte type in this yrs group.

It’s not inconceivable that Dimitroff might feel a TE upgrade at #24, would be easier, and more beneficial in the long run, than trying to upgrade at CB in this yrs draft. After all, Dimitroff might feel that the return of both BGrimes and VHutchins is the equivalent of drafting a CB in this yrs draft, except they’ll be less of a risk since they have NFL experience.

I’ll tell you one thing, I hope the other GM’s around the league are as uncertain as most of us are about who we’ll draft at #24. I believe we’ll draft either a TE or CB. It will be very interesting to see what we do if DT PJerry is available at #24. One things for certain, with MLB Lofton, OLB’s Peterson and Nicholas all but assured of starting, it’s highly unlikely we’ll draft a backup LB with our 1st pick, especially with other pressing needs. None of us can lose sight on the fact that all of this is just SPECULATION, AND LITTLE ELSE.

VS2-Like you, I was also a MVick fan, but his self created demise changed all of that. I’ve never been, nor will I ever be, a fan of selfishness, stupidity, and a total disregard for common sense. I guess that’s where we differ when it comes to MVick. As a long time, and long suffering Falcon fan, I’D MUCH RATHER SELL FEWER TICKETS AND SEE THE FALCONS MAKE THE PLAYOFFS WITH A 11-5 RECORD, THAN SELL OUT EVERY SEAT AND MISS THE PLAYOFFS WITH AN 8-8 OR 7-9 RECORD, LIKE WE DID MVICK’S LAST 2 SEASONS. HOW ABOUT YOU?

Reno 911

March 13th, 2009
5:43 pm

Huzzah, Ken. On point, across the board.

Zup

March 13th, 2009
5:49 pm

Sign Rolle from the Ravens TOMORROW!

ray

March 13th, 2009
6:52 pm

ROFL @ Reno911…from 12:39 post…

ray

March 13th, 2009
6:59 pm

ROFLMAO…AGAIN @ Reno911…12:50 post

Too funny.

I agree, we can probably live with our linebackers (I’m guessing). But I wouldn’t be sad if a very good one fell to us and we took him.

I have to admit, I’m like the rest of you: I want that monster DT or that dynamic CB (which we won’t get, but what do I know..), but I can’t look past Pettigrew.

And it was me that said I’m glad I don’t have Dimitroff’s job. I’d be more wishy-washy than a cheap laundromat…

Falcon 8211

March 13th, 2009
9:13 pm

I think we need to go after Samari Rolle. He has always been a good corner even @ FSU. What you guys think.

falcon21

March 13th, 2009
10:02 pm

I’m not a big ACC fan and don’t follow the Ravens. How old is Rolle and how good is he? I guess I’m stupid, I don’t know that much about him. Help me if you can but I know I can’t do anything about the stupid part.

Soulman45

March 13th, 2009
10:03 pm

The Birds will be o’k with a up gread in the DB field with the picks they have can be done.

danga

March 13th, 2009
10:32 pm

we need to trade our 1st pick for additional early round picks. If we could get a high 2nd and 3rd pick to go along with our on 2nd and 3rd we could get 4 quality players and dont have to pay as much. Lets face it after the 1st 15 to 20 players drafted ur really just feeling in for need anyway. Theirs no top corners and every other position player we need can be gotton in the 2nd and 3rd round. Tell me what u think fellas

falcon21

March 13th, 2009
10:53 pm

danga, I agree with you about trading the first pick but talent can still fall to us with that pick 24 but we need to wait until as late as possible before it is done. I think TD will make the right decision.

VICK SUPPORTER 2

March 13th, 2009
11:00 pm

COMPENSATORY DRAFT PICKS? NFL SAYS NONE/ZERO/ZILCH…..SO SORRY :)

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/nfcsouth/0-9-70/Looks-like-NFC-South-shut-out-on-compensatory-picks.html

SO MUCH FOR “GM” BRILLIANCE :)

darrell starks

March 14th, 2009
12:03 am

1st pick BRIAN CUSHING OF USC OR JAMES LAURINAITIS OF OHIO STATE WE NEED PLAY MAKER ON DEFENSE NOT GUYS WHO RUN 4.2 IN THE FORTY OR BENCH PRESS 225 100 TIMES IN 10 SECONDS 2ND PICK TD I NEED YOU TO WORK YOUR MAGIC AND DO WHAT every it take to get SEAN SMITH FROM UTAH THIS GUY WILL BE A BEAST IN THE NFL HE CAN play safety or corner back but i would play him at safety with coleman and 3rd pick DT DORRELL SCOTT FROM CLEMSON A BIG AND STRONG PLAYER THAT WE NEED TO CLOG UP THE MIDDLE.GO FALCONS!!!!!!!!!!

falcon21

March 14th, 2009
12:16 am

No one expected any compensatory picks in this years draft vs2, so try again. Next year is the year. The GM is smarter than you think.

Ken Strickland

March 14th, 2009
12:31 am

VS2-it’s obvious you’re not a Falcon fan, and you’re an attention seeker. Otherwise, why would you, or anyone, waste so much time bringing up trivialities like attendence or compensatory picks. First, why would you make an issue compensatory picks this yr when Dimitroff didn’t expect to get any. We didn’t lose any significant FA’s last yr(ACrumpler and WDunn were cut and DHall was traded). We acquired a number of significant FA’s like RB-MTurner, DT-KMorehead, CB-VHutchins, C-AStepanovich, TE-BHartsock, FS-EColeman and K-JElam. We got far more that we lost, so why would you say “SO MUCH FOR GM BRILLIANCE? Wouldn’t any football fan, or person of moderate intelligence, think that any GM that acquired far more for his team than he lost VERY SUCCESSFUL?

Now, come back with that ignorant comment next yr when we’ll receive our share of compensatory picks for losing LB’s Brooking and Boley, SS LMalloy, DT GJackson and CB DFoxworth, all highly rated starters that we lost to FA. IGNORANCE IS NOT BLISS!!!!!!!

danga

March 14th, 2009
2:19 am

I still beleive if we trade down we can still get a ss,te,dt and cb all in the 2nd and 3rd round and all our other picks would be for depth.If I was running this draft for atl this is how I would build my team for this season. Theirs alot of pro bowlers in the nfl thats come from the 3rd round on down and theirs alot big name projected 1st rounders who turn out to be bust.Just because they were great in college doesnt translate to greatness in the pros.Personally I beleive its more of a teams scheme than any thing else thats why I would trade down. what you think

Falcon 8211

March 14th, 2009
8:10 am

J. Michael Moore the falcons website admin. said that the falcons have private workouts with Clay Matthews Jr. also Michael Johnson.

Falcon 8211

March 14th, 2009
8:32 am

falcon 21: Rolle is 33 years old. he missed a time over the last couple of years due to injury. he can still play and was more like a shut down corner in college. teams did not go after him much.

richbrave

March 14th, 2009
9:08 am

D. ORLANDO:

My eyes got wider and wider as FA after FA stepped to the street and vamoosed out of town. Wha’s up with that? Were those (other than BROOKING whom I understand) closet disaffected playa’s in SMITH’s program? Something like HALL was before, but the strong silent types? Who wouldn’t get excited about f-balling with the likes of MATT RYAN? Or is that MOSE RYAN?

richbrave

March 14th, 2009
10:02 am

KEN STRICK:

I value your take on the FA goings and comings. Whas’ up? Will the reconstituted FALCONS continue flyin’ higher and higher ’till MOSE RYAN wings them to the promised land? I hope so. Since the playin’ days of EDDIE LeBARON I’ve been pulling (sort of) for the birds. The ‘SKINS have been my team since the era of SAMMY BAUGH, but now that the ol’ TEXAN has met his maker something’s changing inside my feelings toward the NFL in general and the REDSKINS in particular.

DAN SNYDER reminds me too much of GEORGE PRESTON MARSHALL. Not his racist views, but rather, its the huckerism that seems unsettlingly familiar. Its less about a winning franchise and more about fannies in the seats and tee-shirts at $100.00.

And those frickin’ ads on T.V. Attempt a field-goal – time out. Two minutes off for ads. Kick-off – time out. Two MORE minutes of ads. Cut half-time to twenty minutes so there can be ten MORE minutes of ads. It destroys the continuity of the game and makes it more on the order of a circus act not a football game. Thank God I remember far enough back to limited substitutions when you played without much pause – hurt or not. And T.V. was new AND incidental to the game.

Great. Got that burr out of my saddle. ANYWAY, KEN what do you think about FA stuff?

Ken Strickland

March 14th, 2009
11:24 am

What up RICHBRAVE? I don’t think Dimitroff and Smith expected or intended to fill every hole or weakness in 2 drafts or through 2 yrs of FA. I believe next yr might be the yr we go all out in the draft. They’re building for the long haul, like the Patriots have done, and you can only do that through the draft, not through FA. Next yr, we’ll have our full complement of picks, plus a number of compensatory picks since we’ve lost far more FA value than we’ve signed. Those supplemental picks will allow us to trade up and get the quality we want at a given position without giving up our alloted number of picks. After this yrs draft, the Falcons will be at a point where they can seriously start valuing QUALITY over QUANTITY.

Unless we sign a FA TE, we’ll likely draft one with one of our 1st 2 picks. I remember the time right after we traded Brett Farve to Green Baym when Packer GM Ron Wolf realized what he had in Farve. He said he needed to go all out and surround him with the talent needed to get the most out of his ability, and we all know the rest of that story. Well, we have a young, talented QB that’s proven to be far more advanced than BFarve, PManning or almost any other QB in NFL history, this early in his career. You can bet Dimitroff is going to do with QB MRyan exactly what RWolf did with BFarve. Therefore, Matty Ice will get his quality TE, and our OFF will become the next coming of the IRRESISTABLE FORCE, with QB MRyan throwing those lazer guided spirals to our deep, talented REC corp and RB MTurner running through the fields.

I honestly believe the plan is for 2010 to be the yr for THE FLIGHT OF THE FALCONS. Every team on next yrs schedule now realizes, after last yrs success and this yrs upgrades, that the only way they will be able to defeat the Falcons will be to stop our OFF. NEXT YRS FALCONS DEF WON’T BE IN THE SAME CATEGORY AS THE DEF’s OF THE BUCS, BEARS, PATRIOTS OR STEELERS, BUT NEITHER WILL IT BE IN THE SAME CATEGORY AS THE PREVIOUSLY WEAK FALCON DEF’s. THE MUCH IMPROVED 2009 FALCONS WILL BE MORE THAN ABLE TO MEET THE CHALLENGES OF A STRONGER SCHEDULE, BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT GOOD TEAMS DO. AND WE ARE, AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE, A GOOD TEAM. JUST WATCH, THE FALCONS WILL BECOME THE SAME WINNING ORGANIZATION UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF GM TDIMITROFF AND HC MSMITH, THAT THE BRAVES BECAME UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF FORMER GM JSCHUERHOLTZ AND MGR BCOX.

Ken Strickland

March 14th, 2009
11:33 am

BIG RAY-what’s up to you? Man, I haven’t been this excited or this involved in the Falcons since the DIRTY BIRD era. I was heavily involved in the MVick discussions, but that proved mainly unpleasant and unrewarding. As a franchise, we sank about as low as a franchise, or team, could sink in 2007. But, like the mighty PHOENIX, this team and franchise has risen to new and exciting heights, with a long winning future ahead of us. There are still distractors and none believers, like MV2, who still want to feast on Falcon flesh. But after next season, they will be left with nothing to feast on but humble pie, crow and their own stupidy. Well, with that menu, at least they’ll never go hungry.

falcon21

March 14th, 2009
12:01 pm

Falcon 8211, Thanks for the info.

crammy

March 14th, 2009
3:18 pm

First time posting–good site. For what it’s worth I think TD and mS’s version of “process” is different than the fans. They are moving to be competitive and make the playoffs. I assume that everything is geared towards making the playoff because winning the Super Bowl has so many uncontrollable variables–momentum, injuries, etc.

It’s hard not to like the moves so far. Peterson is similar to a basketball team adding P.J. Brown or a younger Robert Hoary–he’s got skills and he’s a pro. He’s aware of why he ticked off Rio and probably won’t make that mistake twice.

I’m thinking they maybe package their 2nd and a fifth or sixth to move up. If the word by the scouts is wrong on Johnson and if Pettigrew falls–which I think he does (there was something about him atthe combine I can’t put my finger on) the Falcons will have another really strong draft.

Stirg d'Nahisf

March 14th, 2009
3:26 pm

I don’t like this. There’s no action. There are no signings, no movements, no SITREPs (situation reports, for you non-military) on any visits from prospects, draftees or free agents; can’t even get a good updated article on the nest. What’s up, Mr. Orlando, Wii got you occupied?

crammy

March 14th, 2009
3:59 pm

Another thought on Pettigrew–if he’s a better blocker than any of our guys and a true con trol reciever underneath our pass protection, passing AND running improves dramatically. Imagine Norwood, Jenkins, White and Pettigrew coming at you and Turner pounding you. That’s an upgrade that’d be difficult to pass up.

Asfor defense a team that gets Lofton with a 3rd probably deserves some patience–I’ve still got this Johson thing–Coming off the edge with Abraham–that covers up a lot of secondary issues–screws up double teams and let’s you bring a linebacker up. I just watched a highly rated 1st round corner get his AZZ eaten in the Super Bowl–seems to me like a position that ALWAYS needs to be coached up unless you have a Deion or Lem Barney and there’s not one.

Ken Strickland

March 14th, 2009
5:11 pm

CRAMMY-you’re scaring me man. What do you know about Lem Barney, Detroit’s great CB, kick and punt returner? You have to be a little OLD SCHOOL to know about him. Anyway, welcome to the forum, we can always use someone with your keen observations and thought process.

The more I analyze our possible moves the more my thoughts end up like the result of a sawed off shotgun blast, buckshot scattered all over the place.

(1)If we don’t sign a FA TE, we have to draft one. Having a complete TE will make an already potent OFF much more potent. If Pettigrew falls into our lap, will Dimitroff pull the trigger, or does he know of a diamond in the rough?

(2)Are there any CB’s available in this yrs draft that are any better than the one’s we have returning from IR, and are they worthy of our #24 pick?

(3)DE CDavis resigned with us after indicating he wanted to be a starter. Does that mean he’s the front runner and we won’t draft a DE in the 1st 3 rounds?

(4)With MLB already determined, and 3 veteran OLB’s ready to battle for a starting spot, will we draft an OLB in the 1st 3rds?

(5)What is the coaching staff’s assessment of returning SS’s Fudge and McCloud? Will that assessment prompt Dimitroff to draft a SS with one of our 1st 2picks?

(6)And what about DT? What are they looking for? Are they looking for smaller playmaking DT like PJerry, EHood or Sen’Derrick Marks, or are they looking for a roadblock type DT’s like Sammie Hill, Raji or Ron Brace? Just for the record, Jerry has moved ahead of Raji as the top DT in the draft.

DO YOU SEE WHAT I’M DEALING WITH?

richbrave

March 14th, 2009
5:35 pm

KEN STRICK:

Thanx for the low-down bro’.

Jack G.

March 14th, 2009
6:14 pm

after seeng the hair on some of the Player (and TD) I think they need to sign a BARBER.

Stirg d'Nahisf

March 14th, 2009
6:20 pm

Ken, keep in mind that the draft choices have to fit our need. Just because a highly favored “name” may still be on the board at 24, does not mean that player fit our needs. I notice that the names you listed as favorites for the DT position are all three technique tackles (P.Jerry, E.Hood, SenD.Marks) and we already have a starter at that position. Instead, we need a stuffer to replace Gravy Jackson. Someone like, you mentioned, a Sammie Hill or Ron Brace. I think that, because Sammie Hill went to a small college, he will be available late. The top five nose tackles in the draft are Raji, Brace, Dorell Scott, Hill and Myron Pryor from Kentucky. Chris Baker from Hampton University would make a nice fit as well and will be available late.

Another position I see a lot of Falcon-bloggers are trying to fill with big names is linebacker. Folk, Clay Matthews, Brian Cushing, Clint Sintim are not 4-3 linebackers. I noticed one fan even lobbying for James Laurinaitis, who is not even an outside linebacker. We might as well have kept Brooking and Boley. Our middle linebacker position is locked and weakside linebacker is competitive. Our need is at strongside linebacker and the top names in the draft, at that position, is Aaron Curry, Tyrone McKenzie, Marcus Freeman, Zack Follett and Nic Harris.

Lastly, the safety position is a top priority position for the Falcons but we already have a free safety. That eliminate names like Sean Smith, Louis Delmas, Rashad Johnson, who are all free safeties. Although I would love to see any of those names on the back of a Falcon jersey, it would not be wise to draft at that position. The exception is Sean Smith, however, who is more of a hybrid player that can play all DB positions. The top five strong safeties in the draft are William Moore, Patrick Chung, Chip Vaughn, Emanuel Cook, Courtney Greene.

TD is wise enough (and patient) to evaluate a player for his worth to the team, not because of his name. I think we get so caught up in the names of players and overlook what these players do for the team. We should get away from the names like Pettigrew and Matthews just because they are great players (that, I don’t dispute). Instead, lets focus on the position to be filled and see if the player fit.

My mock draft includes Patrick Chung, Sammie Hill, Marcus Freeman, Jared Cook…all starters.

Falcon 8211

March 14th, 2009
7:21 pm

just seen a rumour that lj smith will pick a new team in the next few days and they beleive it is going to be the falcons.

VICK SUPPORTER 2

March 14th, 2009
7:22 pm

A.J. SMITH IT IS…..SO MUCH FOR PETTIGREW :)

hawesg

March 14th, 2009
7:23 pm

Stirg, the Falcons have said they want safeties who can play both FS and SS. That’s their preference, so they can mix up looks in the secondary. I think that’s why they’re so high on Delmas, he has the skills of a FS and the tackling of a SS. And the character that, say, Jimmy Williams lacked.

Anyway, looks like we are on the verge of signing LJ Smith. Booooooo. Smith is always injured, always whining and can’t block. This is a natural by-product of not getting good defensive FAs in here. They have to sign a poor TE to get a pass catcher in here (for the ten games where he’s healthy enough to play) so that they can fill more needs through the draft, despite the fact that they will have the second coming of Dallas Clark coming in Shawn Nelson available in the mid-second round.

Hey, I hope I’m wrong and Smith finally plays to his ability. But Hope ain’t a plan.

hawesg

March 14th, 2009
7:24 pm

BTW, here’s the link for the Smith sigining since D.Led is apparently taking a nap…

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/nfcsouth/0-9-71/Smith-says-he-s-going-to-Atlanta.html

hawesg

March 14th, 2009
7:26 pm

AJC ate my link. Pat Yasinkas at ESPN quotes Bob Brookover of the Philly Inky as saying that Smith is coming to Atlanta.

Oh, the joy…

Well, at least we won’t have to laugh at those numbskulls having the Falcons pick Pettigrew with their Mock Drafts (accent on the mock).

danga

March 14th, 2009
8:37 pm

I hope somewhere in this draft they sign TE jared cook.He’s a really tall really fast TE that would give LBS and SS-FS fits. Theirs noway matty ice could ever miss him. The next ozzie newsome perhaps

Stirg d'Nahisf

March 14th, 2009
8:56 pm

hawesg, I stand corrected. You right, the Falcons did say they wanted to mix it up in the backfield (defensively) and Louis Delmas, Sean Smith, Sherrod Martin would do excellent back there. That way, QB wouldn’t know if he’s playing corner, safety, sam, will, nickel, cheerleader, waterboy; the options are endless with a Delmas, Smith or Johnson. Hmmm, that just might solidify our guess at the Falcons first pick, considering none of those names will be available come second pick.

Question; You would really use a number two pick for TE?

danga

March 14th, 2009
9:13 pm

jared cook.He’ll be the best choice in the 2nd round to me . REally fast and tall and can actually catch the ball.I dont really no about his blocking skills playing for spurier but i do he’ll strecth the field and cause all kinds of problems opposing db’s.

Ken Strickland

March 14th, 2009
9:59 pm

STIRG D’NAHISF-nice analysis. The problem I have with the DT situation is I have no idea how they intend to use 6′3″ 323lb DT TLewis, who’s returning from IR and should be stronger than before and ready to go. Do they feel they need to draft a quality backup for TLewis or JBabineaux, and how does DT KMorehead figure in the decision?

With our current vet LB’s, we can afford to draft a talented project in the later rds to be developed over the next couple of yrs. DE is the most puzzling position of them all. Will DE CDavis earn the starting RDE position, or will JAnderson finally take the next step and become the complete DE one would expect of a top pick after 2yrs of experience as a starter? The way KBiermann came on near the end of last season, and if he continues to improve, we could have something special. Either way, when you consider how injury prone JAbraham is, we can certainly benefit from having at least 2 of the 3 DE’s step up.

Stirg d'Nahisf

March 14th, 2009
10:41 pm

You know, that is something that We greatly overlook…a DE behind JAbraham. I don’t think he’s had a healthy full season his whole career, has he? I wouldn’t waste a top pick on a DE but I would certainly consider the need. How far do you think Michael Johnson will drop? He certainly fits the versaltility the Falcons are looking for.

chad

March 14th, 2009
10:45 pm

The coaching staff and gm the falcons have now seem to have there act together. Just give the guys a chance, remember last year was supposed to be horrible and look what happened. Unlike past years I truly believe the falcons have the right pieces at the top to get it done. I will be happy with a winning season this year since back to back has never been done in the franchise’s history. Have to learn how to walk before you can run. Go Falcons, beat there ass!

darrell starks

March 14th, 2009
11:01 pm

We have to go defense with the first 3 picks and not only that we need guys who can step in day one and starte I NO we already have a middle LB BUT drafting LAURINAITIS who is absolutely a playmaker and can in my opinion play weakside LB WOULD be perfect for the falcons, we always get caught up in this combine STUFF but this guy have football speed that is deceiving lets look AT THE PATROITS LB WHEN THEY WON THREE SUPERBOWL neither one had 4.5 speed but they had football speed and could make plays thats the difference can you make plays AND DRAFTING CUSHING OR LAURINAITIS WILL BE AND UP GRADE ON DEFENSE. GO FALCONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Stirg d'Nahisf

March 14th, 2009
11:22 pm

Ken Strickland

March 15th, 2009
12:06 pm

DARRELL STARKS-the problem with drafting a LB with our 1st pick is it might not improve our DEF significantly. Peterson has extensive experience at both ILB and OLB positions and we also have TGilbert ss the backup MLB. Can anyone really say there’s a LB in this yrs draft that can outperform SNicholas, CWire or Peterson to an extent that we should use our top pick on them when we have more pressing needs?

The Patriots play a 3-4 DEF, and in that DEF, the LB, along with NT, is always the most prominent position. You see it with the Steelers and the Ravens. Besides, speed isn’t a major factor for 3-4 LB’s because they don’t have as much territory to cover, since there are 4 of them. In fact, a lot of 3-4 LB’s are former or converted DE’s.

The position upgrades that would have the greatest impact on the Falcons are TE, DT, SS and DE.

TE-adding a TE that can block and REC would vastly improve our 1st and 2nd down OFF and make our no huddle OFF deadly. You see, it takes away the element of surprise when you substitute a pass catching TE, or WR, for your blocking TE. When you switch to your no huddle OFF, you want to give your QB a 3rd pass receiving option without tipping your hand by substituting for your blocking TE. Having a REC TE in the gm prevents the SS, or a LB, from focusing exclusively on stopping the run.

DT-our DEF has been very weak up the middle for several yrs. We’ve solved the MLB problem with Lofton, now we need to address the DT problem. Other than JBabineaux, TLewis has been the only other DT that’s demonstrated any consistent pass rushing ability. Solidify our interior DL and our LB’s, safeties and CB’s won’t end up among the team leaders in tackles.

DE-part of our secondary and overall pass DEF problems were the result of not having an effective pass rush. Other than DE Jabraham, we would have been at the bottom of the league in sacks. Even with him we were near the bottom. If we can generate a pass rush from RDE, we won’t have to move Abraham around to make it more difficult to double team him. Everyone knows that a effective pass rush can cover a multitude of secondary problems.

SS-we saw the result of not having a SS with cover ability in the big playoff gm against Arizona. A poor interior run DEF forced us to use our SS more as a LB. Using Malloy more as a LB put a lot of pressure on our CB’s, FS, and the LB that had to cover his man. Having a SS with cover skills improves our pass DEF immeasurably, especially on 1st and 2nd down passing situations when we haven’t substituted.

These are my reasons for thinking we won’t likely draft a LB with our 1st pick. The positions mentioned above are also positions of need and upgrading them would have more impact.

cutter

March 15th, 2009
1:30 pm

Evander Hood is a big DT with solid numbers in the mold of what Mike Smith likes . It appears Atlanta is about to sign L.J. Smith, if that happens the drafting of TE is out the window. I guess some assume Peterson has many years left to play I for one don’t so do you wait untill he’s done to acquire high level replacement? Strickland you asked if drafting OLB 1st could improve the DEF significantly…if you are referring to this season maybe not but this is a process of building. Clay Matthews Jr. is scheduled for workouts with the Falcons after his Pro day. Atlanta Falcons.com is projecting Matthews Jr. as 24th pick. All of these players can potentially improve the team. We are all speculating because we don’t have a clue as to what the Falcons will do. I would like to see us sure up the linebacking core and the DT positions first, it all starts with the line of scrimmage.

cutter

March 15th, 2009
1:58 pm

Jarod Mayo drafted by THE New England Patriots in 1st round 40 yd dash 4.54… speed always matters. There are alot of college DE that convert to OLB in 3-4 at pro level why because they can rush the passer and they have the hips and enough speed to drop and play in coverage.

cutter

March 15th, 2009
3:04 pm

Louis Delmas is a free safety Sean Smith is a corner/fs, if Erik Coleman does not move to SS then we need a SS not a FS. Thomas Decoud is a FS. The SS has to be the guy who can come up into the box for run support. Patrick Chung fits the versatile type SS TD would like if he were to go SS with first or second pick. The safety we draft will probably be in a back-up role unless TD feels Decoud is not the guy and well he did draft him so he did his homework on this guy.

darrell starks

March 15th, 2009
3:20 pm

EXCELLENT POINT KEN STRICKLAND I MY SELF LIKE NICHOLAS AND I NO THAT WE RUN A 4, 3 BUT I STILL LIKE CUSHING OR LAURINAITIS, LOFTON AND PETERSON AS THE STARTER AND WIRE, NICHOLAS AS BACKUP YOU ALWAYS WANT TO HAVE SOLID BACK UP AT THE LB POSITION. GO FALCONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

March 15th, 2009
3:39 pm

CUTTER YOU ARE RIGHT SOMETIME SPEED DOES MATTER BUT WHAT SPEED ARE WE TALKING ABOUT SOME PLAYER HAVE THAT KIND OF SPEED THAT IS DECEIVING LOOK AT JERRY RICE, EMMIT SMITH, RAY LEWIS THREE OF THE BEST PLAYERS IN FOOTBALL HISTORY AND NOT ONE OF THEM RAN A 4.5 FORTY BUT THEY WHERE PLAY MAKER AT THERE POSTION. GO FALCONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Big Ray

March 15th, 2009
4:09 pm

Ken,

You’re right that we had some coverage issues from the safety position. But as you say, it was due in large part to having poor run defense. Well, will adding a new safety with the first pick mean better run defense? It would mean better run SUPPORT, but not initial run defense.

For that reason, we could very well be looking at a DT, then a safety. And yet, if not a good enough DT, then we may indeed be looking at a good OLB. I think if that happens though, then Dimitroff and company do so because they are willing to stick with the guys they have (move Anderson inside and count on Tra Lewis being healthy and ready) on the defensive line. They may then decide to go with higher value by drafting a good LB to play with Lofton and the others.

I don’t know. So many ways to go. Maybe draft a ‘backer and safety/corner, then go for an offensive lineman and defensive lineman later in the draft. Who knows.

Cutter,

I think I agree with that. Peterson will get the “Keith Brooking” treatment the minute he slows down (especially by Crabapple Joe, heh heh) and we don’t want to get caught having to use our safeties as LBs again. And Matthews is a good guy. I wonder just HOW good of a player he is. Dimitroff and Smith will sniff it out if he’s got what they want.

Similarly, we MUST shore up the defensive line, and although I’m anxious to see why TD likes Tra Lewis, I’m not entirely sure Lewis will get the job done. And we don’t know what Anderson will give us this year. Has to be more than he did last year. I’d take Evander Hood. He’ll help, just as Babineaux has.

I don’t know about y’all, but I’m about ready for some new news…

Big Ray

March 15th, 2009
4:16 pm

Well, I guess the signing isn’t official. LJ Smith may or may not be that good for us, but after reading the article, it seems that Mularkey will probably only be looking to get around the same amount of catches from him as he provided the Eagles last year. Doubt if he’ll be expected to catch 50-60 balls. All we need is for the offense to be opened up.

Doesn’t mean we won’t draft a tight end, just maybe not Pettigrew. Besides, we have always known we need defensive help. I still wouldn’t say Pettigrew is an impossiblity. If he’s on the board when we pick….well, asset management is something only good GMs understand. Dude could always be traded for another piece (or picks) that really helps us. But the odds aren’t stacked in favor of us drafting Pettigrew if Smith actually signs.

cutter

March 15th, 2009
4:20 pm

I IMAGINE WHEN YOU ARE SCOUTING A PROSPECT SOME OF THE THINGS YOU LOOK AT WOULD HIS COLLEGE CAREER STATS, HIS FILM, AND HIS MEASUREABLES. OBVIOUSLY THERE IS NO WAY TO DETERMINE THAT SMITH, RICE, LEWIS WOULD BE AS GREAT AS THEY TURNED OUT TO BE BUT IF LEWIS HAD BETTER FORTY TIMES HE PROBABLY WOULD HAVE BEEN DRAFTED HIGHER THAN THE 26TH PICK IF RICE HAD A BETTER FORTY TIME HE PROBALY WOULD HAVE BEEN DRAFTED HIGHER THAN THE 16TH PICK AND THE SAME CASE FOR SMITH. HEART AND DESIRE ARE TWO THINGS DIFFICULT TO MEASURE, THE PLAYERS YOU NOTED HAVE TONS OF BOTH. AT THE SAME TIME, THERE WERE TEAMS THAT PASSED ON THESE GUYS FOR SOME REASON WHAT DO YOU THINK THE REASON WAS?

darrell starks

March 15th, 2009
4:22 pm

IF TD DECIDE NOT TO GO WITH ANY LB IN THE 1ST ROUND THATS COOL BECAUSE I DO FEEL THAT NICHOLAS, WIRE, PETERSON, AND LOFTON CAN GET THE JOB DONE THEN I WOULD DRAFT SEAN SMITH OF UTAH WITH MY FIRST PICK SECOND PICK ASHER ALLEN OF GEORGIA WHO IN MY OPION IS BETTER THAN CHRIS HOUSTON AND THIRD DT DORRELL SCOTT OF CLEMSON WHO IS BIG AND STRONG AND CAN CLOG THE MIDDLE ALL THREE PLAYER SEAN SMITH, ASHER ALLEN, AND DORRELL SCOTT CAN BE DAY ONE STARTERS FOR THE FALCONS. GO FALCONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Big Ray

March 15th, 2009
4:27 pm

Darrell,

Interesting ideas, and they might work. Why do you type in all caps?

The question is, do we need a SS or FS? Isn’t Fudge our SS? I thought Decoud and Coleman were FSs?

Ken Strickland

March 15th, 2009
4:41 pm

The fact is, none of our opinions and suggestions are right or wrong. We’ll likely benefit regardless of which position we draft first. I’m in agreement with BIG JAKE about upgrading our DL. That upgrade will improve our rushing DEF, pass rush, LB, CB, safety play, and our overall pass DEF. As I’ve said before, I don’t think this yrs draft is the definitive draft for Dimitroff and Smith. That will probably come next yr. While we have muliple areas that need addressing, some of those areas need addressing more than others. With the vet LB’s we now have, I just don’t think LB is as much of a need as DT, DE, SS or even CB. Then again, Dimitroff and Smith might not see it that way and draft a LB, who knows. Either way they choose to go, they won’t get any argument from me.

In last yrs draft, when Dimitroff selected QB MRyan over DT’s CEllis or JDorsey, I was so upset I stopped watching the draft. Well, his decision made me eat crow, but he got my utmost respect. That’s why all of this speculation is just entertainment for me now, because regardless of what player or position he gets, it will still lead the Falcons and iheir fans to what we all want to be, WINNERS.

darrell starks

March 15th, 2009
5:05 pm

I am sorry BIG BROTHER RAY i just think that coleman is physical enough to play ss position and if you look at coleman and milloy they both have the same phsique and drafting sean smith who can play cb or safety would definitely be and up grade for us in the backfield i dont no to much about DECOUD IS HE GOOD CAN HE BE A PLAYMAKER but i do no these SEAN SMITH IS A BEAST. GO FALCONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

cutter

March 15th, 2009
5:21 pm

Sean Smith will be a FS at the next level not that much better than Decoud or Coleman at this point in the game to pull the trigger on.

D3

March 15th, 2009
10:35 pm

What’s up guys? Man, what does it take to get a new blog up every couple of days? Not trying to hate on DOL, but DOB and Chip Towers by comparison get one up every other day, even if not every day. I know its a dead time and all, but us bloggers have no problem talking about the draft, returning players, schemes, starting spots, etc.

Seeing some great analyses on here. In all honesty, if the LJ Smith rumor is true I’ll be somewhat disappointed I guess. I know he has the skills to have a really good year, but he’s injuried all the time. I thought we’d have to fill at least one need through free-agency and I assumed we were probably done looking at LJ after we signed Peterson. Let’s be honest, if the falcons really wanted him I think they would make it happen, but its been like over a week now since he made his visit, which probably about the same time as the last new post topic.

Smith is the top TE available in free agency, but I think it would be a shame not to draft a TE in this year’s group, even if we don’t grab Pettigrew, there’s Cook, Nelson, Coffman, Ingraham, or Casey. Is there any way we still draft a TE in the 3rd or 4th if we sign Smith. It appears to be still rumor at this point because I can’t find any substantiating on NFL.com or ESPN, besides Yasinkas post.

Like Ken and others have said, I can’t see drafting a CB or SS in the first round. The value is just not there this year in those groups. Vontae Davis and Malcolm Jenkins would be the only CB’s worth #24, but they’ll be long gone. As Ken noted, do we really want to spend our #24 on a 5′9 CB? We have Brent Grimes, who has experience of starting.

I go back and forth on drafting a OLB first. In one aspect I want to draft a guy like Cushing, Matthews, and Maybin and be set at LB for years. But on the other hand if Nicholas is ready to take over than that would make the Peterson signing seem non-sensical. I’m starting to go back on my original statement that we should wait on a TE for 2nd, 3rd, or 4th round. But taking Pettigrew would set up our OFF for years to come and give Matty Ice a great, young target.

As far as DT, I think obviously Raji or Jerry would be awesome to take, but they’ll be long gone as well. Maybe Ziggy Hood is worth a #24, but I think he’s got the same body type as Babineuax and we’ll need at least one big man. Glad I’m not TD. I’m kind of pulling against the Smith signing, just b/c personally I want us to grab Pettigrew.

richbrave

March 15th, 2009
10:46 pm

Well you FALCONS FANATICS won’t have to worry about the ‘SKINS taking a CB off the board before you pick. Left DE and OLB’s are their primary concerns on defense. GUARDS and TACKLES on offense. ORAKPO from TEXAS looks to be their #1.

danga

March 16th, 2009
12:00 am

we need DT’s that can clog the middle and demand double teaming.Last year our goal was to get an offensive line that was big mean and nasty.I think that should be our same focus on the defensive line.I also hope we can find a real kickoff return man norwood is fast but he has no agility and he’s always falling down everytime he cuts.

Chaos2

March 16th, 2009
4:57 am

I like the way the Falcons do business. I’m excited to get another season started and I trust and support the moves that management has made thus far. Regardless of the outcome, I know we have a great organization and Arthur is the new Ted. Go Birds!

al duncan

March 16th, 2009
7:27 am

Jamal Anderson needs to get in gear this year to me he has been a bust with only 2 sacks in 31 games we need to sure our defense up quickly hope that they work harder during the draft than they did in the early off season.

marko

March 16th, 2009
8:19 am

earth to Orlando, earth to Orlando, do you copy?

Ken Strickland

March 16th, 2009
10:18 am

There are a couple of issues that will play an important role in who we draft and when. One is COACHING and the other is SCHEME. Last yrs OFF turnaround, especially our OL, is a case in point. Our OL play has taken a beating over the previous 3yrs, and rightfully so. Last yr we added a rookie LT(Baker) and a 3rd yr castoff(Dahl) to basically the same players we’ve been complaining about(OT’s-TWeiner, TClabo, QOjinnaka, MButterworth & RFoster, OG’s-JBlalock & NBennett C’s-TMcClure & BWilkerson). Some serious OL coaching by one of the NFL’s best, and a OFF scheme that took full advantage of their talents, made an unbeliveable difference. These two attibutes represent something we simply haven’t have in yrs.

We just might see this same philosophy take root with our DEF. After all, how many teams have ever given up as many rushing and passing yds as we did last yr, and still managed to rank where we did in points allowed? Cutting down on the rushing and passing yrds allowed will correspondingly cut down on the oppositions scoring opportunities, which will further reduce points allowed. The best and most effective way to reduce rushing yrs allowed is at the point of attack, or DL, not LB. The best way to improve your pass DEF is by improving your pass rush, and reducing the QB’s time in the pocket and his options. In a 4-3 DEF, that’s best accomplished with a pass rushing front 4. Depending on your CB’s, safeties and LB’s to maintain coverage until DE’s like JAnderson and DT’s like GJackson can get to the QB just doesn’t work.

The question is, how much will our staff rely on coaching and scheme to get the job done, and how much will they rely on talent. Those two issues will determine who and what we draft and where we draft them.

atl1netime

March 17th, 2009
12:09 pm

Wow…..It is good to see so much energy on the fanboards…..pretty funny though….you would think that with success then some type of harmony would prevail in the fanbase…….well here I go….I like many would like to see more action in FA…with that being said I like and agree with every move so far…I have been a falcons fan for over 30yrs and I have never been more anxious for a season to get started. I think we will still be able to grab a FA or two that we need and pick up a nice starter or two out of the draft. At any rate we kept the offense together and the defense will be upgraded from last year so what is the worst that could happen we go 11-5 again and make the playoffs….darn…..that would be just terrible……RELAX FALCON FANS WE ARE ON THE UPSIDE OF THE NFL EXPERIENCE…..just think you could live in DETROIT.

mobetter

April 22nd, 2009
12:14 am

There is a olb that might not be drafted by the name of willie wilams this guy has stop being knuttulhead. why am i putting this out here is he pro day was better then aaron curry and runs a4.5 40 i hope falcon pick he up in 6.

mobetter

April 22nd, 2009
12:27 am

I have been saying all week long falcons will trade out of the24pick and will have 3 2nd round pick1ss/fs 1 nt 1te mark this words.