It doesn’t sound as if Braves manager Fredi Gonzalez is planning significant changes to his lineup. So don’t expect to see Jason Heyward batting second anytime soon.
Plenty of fans and baseball analysts have opined that Gonzalez should move slugger and on-base-percentage machine Heyward up from his current sixth slot. The No. 2 position – Nate McLouth’s current spot — is a preferred destination of many critics.
The AJC asked Gonzalez about the lineup again before Wednesday’s game, the day after the Braves’ 5-0 win against Florida that included a long Heyward homer and at least one hit from all eight starting position players.
In that Tuesday win, McLouth had a double and a sacrifice bunt that moved a runner to third before a sac fly by Chipper Jones.
Did the performance make Gonzalez even more certain about the lineup (given that he’d already stuck with it despite a lot of bad hitting nights so far by the Braves)?
“Yeah,” he said. “When you make out the lineup, the lineup is a function of the entire lineup – eight guys, not just one guy. Statisticians, numbers crunchers and my SABR [Society for American Baseball Research] people – I’m a member – they shoot holes in that stuff. But you’re dealing with humans in the way the lineup is constructed.
“Yeah, you put this guy in the No. 2 hole, but what are you going to do to the 6-hole? What are you going to do to [No. 5 hitter Dan] Uggla when he’s hitting good?”
Gonzalez believes his current lineup is balanced, and that that balances, along with the alternating left-handed/right-handed situation up and down the order, will cause difficulties for opposing managers when most of the Braves are hitting well.
“Like the situation [Tuesday], when McLouth bunts [Martin] Prado over to third,” he said. “Now are you are going to play the infield in? Are you going to pitch to Chipper or pitch to [No. 4 hitter Brian] McCann? That kind of stuff.
“When everybody doing things like we did yesterday, hitting gappers, hitting some balls out of the ballpark, it makes [the lineup] good.”
Some critics have cited the additional 60-80 plate appearances that Heyward could get if he hit high in the order as a big flaw in Gonzalez’s lineup. He was asked specifically about that fact and if he thought it was outweighed by the overall function of the lineup.
“I think the way the lineup is constructed is more important,” he said, before applying the additional-plate-appearances reasoning to a rhetorical question to reporters: “Then why don’t we lead off [Albert] Pujols? Or [Barry] Bonds? Lead ‘em off.”
Gonzalez then came back to reiterate one of the factors he emphasizes – the “human being” aspect. He’s said several times that part of why he decided in the spring to put McLouth in the 2-hole – besides his speed and bunting ability — was that he wanted him to get more fastballs, to get him going after his career-worst 2010 season.
“Believe me,” Gonzalez said, “when a guy’s going good in a certain spot — he likes it; he’s comfortable – his whole game is [going well], let ‘em play. Let ‘em do it….
“When you’re going bad, you come up with the bases loaded every time. I mean, you can be hitting 11th and it’ll happen. When you’re going good, it doesn’t matter.
“Everybody [in the lineup] has got a function.”
267 comments Add your comment
bravofan
April 14th, 2011
12:11 pm
Nice DOB
KLB
April 14th, 2011
12:21 pm
Timely article, DOB – http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/stop-worrying-about-jason-heywards-line-up-spot/
KLB
April 14th, 2011
12:24 pm
Regardless of lineup, I think the next best question to ask Fredi is how long of a leash does McLouth have? He’s currently hitting 220/.289/.293/.582 (AVG/OBP/SLG/OPS). That’s not good. When does it make sense to see if someone else could do better?
the real filipino flash
April 14th, 2011
12:24 pm
bravo fredi! besides who else can boast they have a line up so strong, jason heyward hits 6th?
Nick
April 14th, 2011
12:26 pm
“Regardless of lineup, I think the next best question to ask Fredi is how long of a leash does McLouth have? He’s currently hitting 220/.289/.293/.582 (AVG/OBP/SLG/OPS). That’s not good. When does it make sense to see if someone else could do better?”
My best guess is probably as long as everyone else who isn’t hitting.
KB
April 14th, 2011
12:28 pm
The hilarious thing is that Fredi goes out of his way to mention that he is a member of SABR. As if that makes him magically understand statistics.
The Choperator
April 14th, 2011
12:29 pm
It was only a matter of time until this came up…
I’m not sure why Fredi thinks Heyward’s greatest asset is his ability to drive in runs. Despite the thumb injury last year, his OBP was top five in the league. When he’s hitting sixth, his OBP is much less effective with Gonzalez, Freeman and the pitcher behind him. It’s a bit frustrating that McLouth will be getting 40-50 8th or 9th inning PAs over Heyward this season.
Also, the idea that McLouth’s performance in one game (a double and a BUNT) validates the lineup is a joke. Although it looks like it was a setup question – what’s Fredi supposed to do, say no?
KLB
April 14th, 2011
12:29 pm
@Nick – Hopefully that’s not the case. Everyone is on equal footing to you? I’m willing to wait a little longer for Dan Uggla to come around because he has a well-defined history. McLouth was abysmal last year and, while it’s only been 11 games, has been even worse so far this year.
justafan
April 14th, 2011
12:30 pm
Yeah….Fredi……tell’em to kiss… your line-up!
ugaman
April 14th, 2011
12:30 pm
It’s one thing to say that you’re using Heyward to protect Uggla, but who protects Heyward? Alex Gonzalez is one of the biggest hackers in baseball, and he’s supposed to protect Heyward? We’re going to see more and more of teams pitching around Heyward all because Fredi doesn’t understand how to construct this lineup.
Art Vandelay
April 14th, 2011
12:33 pm
@KB – What makes you think he doesn’t understand statistics….
1eyedJack
April 14th, 2011
12:34 pm
I don’t want to see Heyward having to bunt a runner over. Batting 11th? Is that the same as batting 2nd?
thunda
April 14th, 2011
12:35 pm
it’s a little early to say who’s gonna do what. I have doubts about McLouth too, based on what he did last year, but playing musical chairs with the lineup before you’ve played 20 games is the sign of a manager who doesn’t trust his own decisions.
jim
April 14th, 2011
12:35 pm
I would prefer to see Heyward hitting 4th. Move Nate to leadoff and bat Prado, Chipper, Heyward, Mac, Uggla, Freeman, Gonzalez — It bunches the 4 best OBP guys in the middle of the order, and moves Freeman out of the #8 hole. If Nate is still the 2010 Nate, then some other change will need to be made, but this lineup bunches the highest OBP hitters, and is still L,R,S,L,L,R,L,R,(P) — no more than 2 left or righthanded hitters in a row.
justafan
April 14th, 2011
12:35 pm
It’s a long season…..the lineup will change! everyone knows it’s April….right?
1eyedJack
April 14th, 2011
12:39 pm
Bobby would have already employed 12 different lineups.
Yakman
April 14th, 2011
12:42 pm
I think an understated element in all of this is the development of Freddie Freeman in the 8th spot. While Freeman may never blossom into a 3-5 hitter, few here would argue that Freddie will spend his entire career in the 8 hole. He is bound to move up at some point. When he is ready, maybe Nate slides down to the 8 spot, and we juggle from there.
Interesting quote – Gonzalez said, “when a guy’s going good in a certain spot — he likes it; he’s comfortable – his whole game is [going well], let ‘em play. Let ‘em do it…
Didn’t Heyward look pretty comfortable in #2 for the majority of 2010?
truth
April 14th, 2011
12:43 pm
I like this lineup
you need a run producer in 6th or 7th spot and someone that can protect Uggla
If you move Heyward to 2nd… 6-9 spots in the lineup will be automatic outs
Fredi
April 14th, 2011
12:43 pm
Kiss my ….lineup!!!!!!!
Luke
April 14th, 2011
12:45 pm
Yeah ugman! You go show him how its done! Go get Fredi! What loser! He’s only been in baseball for 30 somethin’ years. He doesn’t know crap.
Tracey
April 14th, 2011
12:46 pm
If Uggla is not going to be hitting until May, then why can’t he be moved down in the order temporarily.
Matt
April 14th, 2011
12:47 pm
Heyward hitting sixth is just silly. Uggla is majorly slumping but I realize the $ keep him where he is. Chipper still gets on base constantly so put someone else who gets on base around him.
Put Heyward in 2nd or 4th, move Uggla down until he gets hot and then adjust.
Dumbo
April 14th, 2011
12:49 pm
Don’t blame Fredi G., Blame useless WREN, he assembled this team just like he assembled last years error prone lite hitting crew….ughhhhhhhh
Copy and Paste
April 14th, 2011
12:50 pm
DOB never responds to anyone. It’s just a waste of time to ask him a question.
jim
April 14th, 2011
12:53 pm
Dumbo,
Lest an elephant forgets, last year’s error prone, light hitting crew made it to the playoffs.
Tip O'Cap
April 14th, 2011
12:54 pm
Fredi needs a legit leadoff hitter w/speed, so Prado can hit second.
Jason will ultimately be hitting third or cleanup.
David O'Brien
April 14th, 2011
12:55 pm
Jim, you beat me to it. I would just add that those Braves won 91 games, topped in the NL only by San Francisco (92) and Philadelphia (97).
justafan
April 14th, 2011
12:59 pm
Let’s see……we have…. what 150 games left to play! …..please!….let the boys play some ball!!!!!!
Sir Cranium Bonds
April 14th, 2011
1:01 pm
Fredi just needs to add a little juice to the line up–know what I mean. Looks like I will not be going to jail, after all, so I am available. Yeah, baby . . .
the truth..............
April 14th, 2011
1:02 pm
McLousy to #8…he minimizes his at bat times and gives him the opportunity to be on base for the first of the lineup….with him at the eight spot the pitcher can bunt him over if he gets on…
The point about Heyward having more at bats is huge…give him more and McLousy less….
Doesnt’ sound like rocket science to me…..
David O'Brien
April 14th, 2011
1:03 pm
DOB never responds to anyone. It’s just a waste of time to ask him a question. -– Copy and Paste
Copy and Paste: Yes, a waste of time. Only been answering readers’ questions on blog and Twitter — and writing that lineup article — for a couple of hours this morning. Carry on. Don’t wait for a reply.
Rupert
April 14th, 2011
1:03 pm
I get that it’s important to Fredi because McLOUTH is comfortable in the 2 hole, which he has said in numerous interviews. So Fredi’s argument is that you try to make “people” happy or comfortable by placing them where they can succeed. I am down with this notion. Obviously players play better when placed where they feel the best in the lineup. HOWEVER, you don’t torpedo a lineup just to keep a guy who may nor may not hit comfortable. McLouth simply strikes out too much, and does not make enough contact/get on base enough to be a high in the order hitter for a contending team. I get that you may lose protection for Uggla or weaken the lower part your order throwing him down there, plus he may not be happpy, but at the end of the day, a lineup has to be about getting the best players up early, and then progessing downward, otherwise, you’d hit Chipper 3rd and Mac 7th to “balance” everything out. I will also say that McLouth’s inability to make consistent contact will rear it’s ugly head much more when the offense starts hitting more consistently. Don’t forget the run that DOB and everyone talks about last year started with, among other things, Heyward moving up to 2nd in the order.
jim
April 14th, 2011
1:08 pm
The notion of protection in the lineup is overstated. Gehrig protected Ruth, and Mantle protected Maris because there was more than one batter in the lineup that was “the guy you went into the game planning not to let beat you” Pujols protects the guys hitting in front of him, because you don’t want anyone on base when facing him, but as good a hitter as Holliday is, he is not likely to get Pujols better pitches to hit. A pitcher will still rather take his chances with Holliday than give in to Pujols. Heyward has not gotten Uggla better pitches to hit — he’s been fed a diet of breaking balls and changeups. The bases have been empty most of the times Heyward has come to bat this season — the Sat. AB against Oswalt a notable exception. Who protected Ernie Banks or Ralph Kiner in their lineups?
Mark (another one)
April 14th, 2011
1:09 pm
The link to the value of lineup positioning that was posted here yesterday claimed that changing things around could lead to 1 additional run over 162 games. That’s an awful fine line to be arguing. Let them get 20-25 games into the season and watch for changes based on performance.
We all appear to agree that NMis the real question mark, and that we expect the rest to perform over the course of the season. With that said, having the Manager focus on giving NM the best chance to perform sounds like a good idea. No one can say that FG isn’t giving NM the opportunity to succeed.
nique
April 14th, 2011
1:10 pm
I def want Heyward to get more ABs but if McLouth and he switched then you’d have 4 (6, 7, 8, 9) hitters in a row. Although presumably you’d also have more runs scrored in 1-5, so maybe that’s ok.
Smart Jay
April 14th, 2011
1:11 pm
Chipper should be number 2 and Heyward 3. Move Nate to 8. This team doesn’t run, cChippee handles the bat well, gets Heyward those extra abs and minimizes Nate’s ab’s.
As for leading off with best hitter, there is a school of thought on doing just that.
nique
April 14th, 2011
1:13 pm
I of course meant to write 4 “weak” hitters in a row…..
RC Chistian
April 14th, 2011
1:13 pm
I think one of the commenters on the fangraphs article hit the nail on the head, at least in regards to the vehemency with which this “issue” is debated. We, as fans, want to see Heyward hit more often. The commenter states this in terms of fantasy owners, but as Braves fans we have another, more profound, reason to object to Fredi’s line-up: we are addicted to watching Jason Heyward hit.
Every since his 450ft bomb off Carlos Zambrano in his first swing last April, we can’t get enough of watching Heyward at the plate. Similar to Michael Jordan in basketball and Michael Vick in football, when #22 makes an appearance with the bat in his hand a whole new realm of possibilities, a realm that doesn’t exist with even the best of the best ballplayer, opens up. His plate appearances are the reason you wait one more inning before flipping off the TV and going to walk the dog or leaving to beat the traffic when your team the Braves are down five runs in the night All the SABRE number lovers are hiding the real argument here, and it is one of aesthetics. Jason Heyward’s swing personifies our love of the game and Nate McLouth (God Bless him!) is Nate McLouth.
RC Chistian
April 14th, 2011
1:14 pm
eh, missed some editing in that last comment. You get the point.
Billy the Kid
April 14th, 2011
1:16 pm
get the he!! of Nate’s back……….
RC Chistian
April 14th, 2011
1:16 pm
Couldn’t resist correcting myself:
I think one of the commenters on the fangraphs article hit the nail on the head, at least in regards to the vehemency with which this “issue” is debated. We, as fans, want to see Heyward hit more often. The commenter states this in terms of fantasy owners, but as Braves fans we have another, more profound, reason to object to Fredi’s line-up: we are addicted to watching Jason Heyward hit.
Ever since his 450ft bomb off Carlos Zambrano in his first swing last April, we can’t get enough of watching Heyward at the plate. Similar to Michael Jordan in basketball and Michael Vick in football, when #22 makes an appearance with the bat in his hand a whole new realm of possibilities, a realm that doesn’t exist with even the best of the best ballplayers, opens up. His plate appearances are the reason you wait one more inning before flipping off the TV and going to walk the dog or leaving to beat the traffic when the Braves are down five runs in the ninth. All the SABRE number lovers are hiding the real argument here, and it is one of aesthetics. Jason Heyward’s swing personifies our love of the game and Nate McLouth (God Bless him!) is Nate McLouth.
Curse of Brett Butler
April 14th, 2011
1:19 pm
Anyone who still thinks Heyward is batting in the wrong spot is illiterate and brain dead. Let Booby Cox’s style of managing end or you will never be happy. The reason Heyward is batting 6 is because the almighty scouting report uses logic instead of bonehead gut regurgitation. Heyward can’t hit three run homers in the no 2 spot. The Braves will always be looking for players like Adam LaRoche and Mark Texiera to spark their offense. So I guess all the weight of the team should be put on Freeman. Way to go Wren. The main problem with the Braves as forever has been the lead off spot because whoever they settle on putting there can do much more damage lower down in the order.
carlchamblee
April 14th, 2011
1:22 pm
DOB thanks for asking the questions that are bandied about here.
That said, Fredi uses the one game where the 2 hitter got a sac bunt and everyone played well as an example.
He’d rather Mclouth see more fastballs than Heyward? WTH? He’d rather Mclouth gets pitched to and Heyward gets pitched around? That “overall lineup” is worth 70 or so less at bats per season for Heyward? What a steamy pile o’ poo.
Yes Fredi we’re dealing with human beings – The human being Jason Heyward belongs at the top part of the order, the human being Mclouth at the bottom.
As for his why not bat Pujols/Bonds leadoff example – uhh Fredi those guys bat 3rd or 4th not buried at 6th.
Bob Leblaw's Law Blog
April 14th, 2011
1:24 pm
Please stop w/ it’s only been 11/12 games for McLouth. This is the same McLouth we saw last year. I didn’t realize hitting .220 meant he was comfortable.
I would also argue FG doesn’t know a lot about statistics if he is using one game as a sample size to justify why McL should be in the 2 hole. Statistics are used as averages over time. I would argue the sample size is big enough for McLouth, esp considering he looks the same as last year. That is also why most people aren’t complaining about Uggla. He has a history of doing this and then bouncing back.
Even Cox gave up on this guy and after watching him manage for 20 years, that’s saying something to me. I don’t mind that this team is 5-7. What bothers me is the manager isn’t doing his best job in maximizing run production from the lineup.
One other thing – EVERY PERSON IN THE LINEUP CANNOT BE PROTECTED UNLESS YOU ARE THE YANKEES. Gonzo & Freeman are very solid for 7 & 8 hitters (I would say the same for McLouth if he were in those positions). If those positions are so flipping important, why not just put your best hitters there? It’s because there not that important. Almost no teams in MLB expect signifcant run production from those holes.
Fols
April 14th, 2011
1:26 pm
This is not a huge issue right now…….what is an issue is why does the ENTIRE team go cold on the same day at least once a week? Is it just me or does this happen nearly every season? I just can’t understand why we look so lost at the plate so often and then praise the pitcher. I would much rather take loses where we don’t look so over-matched.
Reading this blog the past couple years I thought it was TP….clearly it’s just the guys standing with a bat in their hands.
Curse of Brett Butler
April 14th, 2011
1:26 pm
Gut feelings don’t win World Championships, scouting reports do.
Fols
April 14th, 2011
1:28 pm
or maybe it’s that I only watch the Braves and every team does this?
I don’t know, frustrating! I made a great snack last night and by the time I finished it we’re losing 5-0. I wouldn’t have wasted such a great snack on last night’s performance.
Point is, i’m never going to get that snack again….ugh….so depressing. Tonight i’m sticking to a medium snack and if things go well…..then I guess i’m not meant for great snacks!
Atticus
April 14th, 2011
1:29 pm
DOB, it is getting OLD to say “last year’s team”…..did this or that. There is NO guarantee that this team gets hot like last year or that the Phillies or WC teams will fall back. Certainly the season is long and you lose 50, win 50 and what you do with the other 50 is key. But these games mean just as much as they do in September and even though we did make the playoffs last year as a result, that team was not going to win the in playoffs becaus ethey could hit or field.
You don’t panic, I agree, but this organization doesn’t seem to treat every game as important until they get in the summer but last I checked they all mean the same.
Atticus
April 14th, 2011
1:30 pm
, sorry……correction…..Could NOT hit or field
Bob Leblaw's Law Blog
April 14th, 2011
1:30 pm
No one said it would produce 1 extra run over a season, it’s 1 extra win, ON AVERAGE. I believe the optimal lineup would create approximately 10 additional runs/year. I can find several teams over history that would like to have that 1 win. Games in April are just as important as games in September.
But nevermind, Brett Butler just told me I was brain dead. I need to find some updated stats but last time I checked, McLouth has more ABs than Heyward with runners in scoring position. Heyward has also been on base more than McLouth.
Brett, you can keep waiting for the 3 run homer and wonder why you can’t win more games. That philosophy worked out so well for the Braves during their run.
carlchamblee
April 14th, 2011
1:30 pm
I kinda missed it reading the article the first time until some other blogger mentioned it. Fredi actually implied that Nate is comfortable in the 2 hole and “going good”? Seriously?
BravesFanInKy
April 14th, 2011
1:31 pm
What’s getting old is complaints about the lineup 12 games into the season.
Only 150 more to go!
Bob Leblaw's Law Blog
April 14th, 2011
1:32 pm
so the braves just had bad scouting reports for 15 years?
Fols
April 14th, 2011
1:33 pm
Atticus, DOB doesn’t have time to answer you, he’s trying to come up with an idea for my game day snack. It’s going to be epic and i’ll eat it every game day if they win from here until the streak is over. I’m thinking they go on about a 5 game win streak starting tonight.
Don’t quote me on that though……cause i’m not a member of that wicked statistical club. How do I get a membership?
Kevin Banks
April 14th, 2011
1:33 pm
I like Fredi’s idea of hitting McLouth 11th. Although, technically, the second time through the lineup he is hitting 11th, so nevermind.
j/k I may be one of the few people that likes Nate at the 2 spot. I just want him to use his speed more.
Bob Leblaw's Law Blog
April 14th, 2011
1:34 pm
I didn’t like the game last night but in reality, the braves were facing one of the best pitchers in baseball. Let’s get the series today & ATL will be fine. Although, if PHI keeps this up, the braves will be playing for the WC by the end of May.
Fols
April 14th, 2011
1:35 pm
When the team goes hitless for 7 innings does it matter what order it’s in?
P. Bull Terrier
April 14th, 2011
1:35 pm
A line-up of nine one handed dwarfs “hitting gappers, hitting some balls out of the ballpark,” would cause other managers some difficulties, too – when most of them are hitting the ball well. The real question is, how often is that going to happen?
It may be too early to panic and start making changes just for the sake of change, but there comes a point when you have to stop thinking about what looks good on paper and focus on what works in the real world.
carlchamblee
April 14th, 2011
1:36 pm
Mclouth coming off a .190 demoted-to-minors season.
Heyward coming off a near rookie of year season.
Heyward OBP was 95 points higher last year. This year it’s 111 points higher.
Guess who bats at the top of order, guess who bats in second half of lineup.
jim
April 14th, 2011
1:36 pm
Last night the 1-5 hitters got that 1 extra AB than the 6-9 hitters.
Fols
April 14th, 2011
1:37 pm
Again….when NOBODY can hit the ball on nights like last night….you can have Chipper in the 9 hole and it’s not going to make a difference.
I don’t care about the line-up, these guys need to put the bat on the ball more consistant. THEN we’ll see who deserves to move in the order. Right now nobody is truly making a great case.
Bob Leblaw's Law Blog
April 14th, 2011
1:38 pm
But carlchamblee, don’t you see how comfortable McLouth is?
Fols
April 14th, 2011
1:39 pm
carlchamblee…only problem is do you want innings consisting of Gonzo/Nate/Freeman/Pitcher? Yikes, that is a serious concern.
markie mark
April 14th, 2011
1:40 pm
I like the fact that Fredi knows what he wants and why; analysts may not agree with his reasoning but he obviously has put a lot of time, effort, and thought into it. Any guy that is a member of and uses the stats of SABR, while at the same time not loosing site of the “human aspect” , is a guy that I like having as my manager.
Copy and Paste
April 14th, 2011
1:41 pm
Looks like DOB owned me. Touche, good sir.
Fols
April 14th, 2011
1:43 pm
Copy and Paste….easy to get him to reply to cut you down….try asking him for a good game day snack idea and NOTHING!
SFBrave
April 14th, 2011
1:43 pm
I like Freddi’s idea to hit McLouth 11th. Can we look into that?
Jgainsey
April 14th, 2011
1:43 pm
It really isn’t THAT big of a deal. And to be honest, I really haven’t see a whole lot of “outrage” over the subject. There are simply many of us that would rather see the guy who is probably the best hitter on the team now, hitting 2nd instead of 6th.
Is that going to make the back of the lineup even less effective than it has been lately? Sure, but to me, it seems like a tough argument to make when you want the guy with the best OBP and SLG% hitting in front of the worst hitter.. well, maybe the 2nd worst hitter if McLouth can’t get it together.
That’s not a knock on A. Gonzalez, we all know what kind of player he is. He’s a great glove at SS, and despite looking lost at the plate most of the time, he does have considerably more pop than most SS in the league. But he sure as hell isn’t the guy you want behind the best hitter on the team. Why not force teams to put that team leading SLG and OBP to the test in the 2-hole, instead of being able to consistently avoid the issue by forcing AGon to produce…
Unless you’re one of the teams with a monster payroll, the back end of the line up is almost always going to be inept. It’s not going to be the end of the world if all of the worst bats on the team are at the end of the lineup. Last time I checked, that was usually where you wanted your worst hitters. And the chances are that either McLouth or Freeman will be able to put up decent numbers sooner rather than later, and the 6,7,8 spots won’t be the complete black hole that some are so worried about. Plus, the extra production from a top of the lineup that includes Heyward will probably more than make up for the whatever you’re losing at the back end.
Why are some people making this out to be such a crazy argument?
Bob Leblaw's Law Blog
April 14th, 2011
1:45 pm
I think one thing that is missed in some of this lineup talk, to me at least, is when ATL isn’t putting the best lineup on the field, I am less inclined to go to the games and spend my $$. I have no idea if this is how most fans think. I used to go to about 10 games per year but since the Franceour fiasco w/ BC, I have been to much fewer games because my feeling is if the braves aren’t trying their hardest (manager included) why should I bother giving them my $$?
I’ve already been to 2 games this year but I am quickly getting the same feeling with FG. It’s one thing when people complain on a blog. It’s another when the national media is reporting on how ridiculous it is.
The braves may not miss my money. At best we’re talking about $1000, at worst $500. But I’m not going to give away my money when ATL is playing at a disadvantage the second the lineup cards are exchanged.
Bob Leblaw's Law Blog
April 14th, 2011
1:47 pm
nicely put, Jgainsey.
Fols
April 14th, 2011
1:48 pm
I still don’t know if it’s the line-up or the fact that the Braves look unable to string together 2-3 hits at a time. They lack the speed to swipe a base so in order to generate non-homerun production they just need to simply hit better.
Could it be as simple as swinging the bat and hitting the ball?
Money Handshake
April 14th, 2011
1:48 pm
Atlanta Nate is still Atlanta Nate. We may never see Pittsburgh Nate….Nate’s bunt should earn him another trip to the All-Star game.
The biggest problem that this Braves team has is their pitching staff. Basically, as soon as our pitching staff gives up a run to the opposing team, game over.
steve whitmire
April 14th, 2011
1:50 pm
I am not ripping the manager however if you’ve got a losing record and are already three games behind the Phillies this early in the season you should try something different, start different players, change the order up, whatever it takes to get the offense started. Earlier, someone said Bobby Cox would have already used 10 different lineups by now, duh, isn’t he the guy who is heading for the Hall of fame, pretty good track record I’d say. Try something different Fredi otherwise you just look lazy and stubborn.
jim
April 14th, 2011
1:50 pm
The problem with the offense so far goes far beyond McLouth, Uggla is not hitting, and Mac and Chipper have been contributing mostly singles until the last two games. Freeman is just getting adjusted to ML pitching, and Prado is a much better 2 hole hitter than a leadoff man — he doesn’t walk alot and is not a base stealer. There have only been one or two innings when the team has bunched more than two hits together in the same inning.
Fols
April 14th, 2011
1:51 pm
I’d like to see a homerun wall personally…….true home field advantage would be if we could pull in the fence while we bat, then replace it when the visitor comes up.
I’m just saying….I don’t think it’s been tried so maybe there’s no rule?
Aubrey
April 14th, 2011
1:51 pm
Braves have extended power outages every year. Very frustrating.
Atticus
April 14th, 2011
1:52 pm
Yes I agree. The thing is, McLouth just doesn’t SEE the ball well. He strikes out way too much and he fouls off a boatload of picthes which also says he is not seeing it. He is what he is. I just hate the fact we don’t take each game as serious now as in Sept. They all mean the same! You play every one to win and you put the BEST lineup out there that has a chance to win.
Curse of Brett Butler
April 14th, 2011
1:52 pm
Well, the big issue here is that McLouth had no where to turn last year until the Triple A batting coach got to him. Just because McLouth is in the wrong position and probably doesn’t fit in with this team anymore doesn’t mean Heyward can’t produce in the 6 spot. He is a better hitter there than no.2 The lineup will always be out of whack thanks to Booby Cox’s over-managing .It’s a tradition now to put your first baseman in the lower part of the order. That just tells the rest of teams that you are vulnerable and they can pitch around your ridiculous line up. The line up argument will go on all season long because FG is a BC protégé and everyone is used to BC. So, if FG wants to think outside the box and use a scouting report than more power to him.
Fols
April 14th, 2011
1:53 pm
I agree with Jim…….2 or more hits in an inning so far is just too much to ask for. Doesn’t matter WHERE they bat. Heyward had a bases loaded situation and popped up just a few days ago. THAT is what the difference is. They just aren’t hitting as a team and that will hopefully change!
Bob Horner's Blonde Mullet
April 14th, 2011
1:56 pm
People can argue about lineups all day long, but what it boils down to is that only a couple of guys are hitting at all. Any lineup you run out there is going to look like crap right now. Give Freddie a break for now. Don’t worry, when Uggla heats up, he will carry the team like Glaus did last year. Dude is streaky, but he will hit 10 homers in a month, and the rest of the team will feed off of that. Let’s just hope this happens before we’re 10 games out of 1st place.
billmaier
April 14th, 2011
1:56 pm
Minor, delgado and kk to st louis for colby rasmus
rob from sc
April 14th, 2011
1:57 pm
Heyward should be hitting third. This is only an issue because nobody.is willing to make chipped hit second
Curse of Brett Butler
April 14th, 2011
1:57 pm
“so the braves just had bad scouting reports for 15 years?” No, the refusal to even look at one in the last 15 years.
JF McNamara
April 14th, 2011
1:58 pm
Man, do I wish Yunel Escobar was around. Alas, Bobby couldn’t handle him and we now have a hole for shortstop in the batting order.
Just think, if he were around batting second, the McClouth thing wouldn’t be an issue. McClouth would be protecting Freddie Freeman in the 8 hole and have the ability to steal bases while the pitcher hit to get in scoring position creating RISP opportunities for Prado.
There’s a reason the Braves only one world series, and Cox’s ability to handle players is high on the list. It certainly is the source of our current problem.
Fols
April 14th, 2011
1:59 pm
I think we’ve all given up on the idea of Chipper hitting outside of his 3 hole. Despite what people believe…
what of it?
April 14th, 2011
1:59 pm
Jason Heyward batting numbers 2010:
Batting #2 .281 .393 .430 .823
Batting #6 .359 .469 .846 1.315
I appreciate the balance Freddi’s bringing, and it’s much better than the musical chairs line-up we played last year where no one could find any rhythm or consistency
Curse of Brett Butler
April 14th, 2011
2:00 pm
yeah, the lineup is made around Chipper whether he’s having a good year or not.
Money Handshake
April 14th, 2011
2:00 pm
The Braves season has been pretty ugla so far.
How many more games before Chipper breaks Cal’s streak?
Ozzie Guillen would go Meatloaf on the Braves hitters, if he were the manager.
Do the Braves really need closers?
Curse of Brett Butler
April 14th, 2011
2:01 pm
Escobar had one good year and was a cancer
Fols
April 14th, 2011
2:01 pm
I went a little Meatloaf last night…
Go Dawgs!
April 14th, 2011
2:02 pm
Not to interrupt the McLouth bash-fest, but he’s been hitting better the last few nights. Just sayin’…
what of it?
April 14th, 2011
2:02 pm
If escobar makes the all-star team this year, we’ll have traded two all-star SS since Furcal with nothing to show for it
Bob Leblaw's Law Blog
April 14th, 2011
2:03 pm
the triple a batting coach got him going? Well…..one of us is brain dead. Depending on which sample of stats you want to use, he either hit .222 or .246 following his return. Triple A really didn’t make a difference.
Fols
April 14th, 2011
2:04 pm
Nothing to worry about, we’re the Braves. We’ll explode for 13 runs to make it all feel great tonight.
Our main concern should then be Friday’s game vs the Mets in which we’ll proceed to go hitless.
Braves Bats
April 14th, 2011
2:05 pm
Don’t blame us, we just follow what the hands and arms do.
ncb34
April 14th, 2011
2:06 pm
okay, b mac and uggla (once he gets going) are not going to homer every time they walk up, so move heyward to 2nd in the lineup, then who is going to hit those runs in come june-july? freeman?? gonzo?? i’d rather have heyward for now. if moved anywhere it should be third.
Bob Leblaw's Law Blog
April 14th, 2011
2:06 pm
What of it – care to let us know how many AB’s in the 6 & 2 holes respectively?
Jay Dubu
April 14th, 2011
2:06 pm
As long as Chipper is a player on this team, he’ll be hitting #3, unless he asks to be moved.
Give the lineup a chance. All of the hitters have been sketchy so far, it’s only been 12 games.
Nate
April 14th, 2011
2:07 pm
It was .246, and I was raking.
Brohio
April 14th, 2011
2:07 pm
So stubborn. The Pujols and Bonds comment is irrelevant. Those guys don’t/didn’t hit 6th.
Terry Pendleton
April 14th, 2011
2:07 pm
Funny, I thought that things were supposed to get better the second I was replaced as hitting coach? Maybe I wasn’t the problem after all…
DAM
April 14th, 2011
2:07 pm
“Anyone who still thinks Heyward is batting in the wrong spot is illiterate and brain dead. Let Booby Cox’s style of managing end or you will never be happy. The reason Heyward is batting 6 is because the almighty scouting report uses logic instead of bonehead gut regurgitation. Heyward can’t hit three run homers in the no 2 spot.”
So anyone who thinks it’s a choice between either 2nd or 6th and nowhere else in the lineup must be only slightly better than brain dead. The problem here is that this debate is based on 2 outcomes that are both the wrong answer. Heyward is clearly a #3 or #4 hitter. The underlying problem in all of this is that Chipper is not going to be moved in the order to allow Heyward to hit 3rd where he should be.
Curse of Brett Butler
April 14th, 2011
2:08 pm
If AG is at fault for having more homeruns combined than any other Brave last year then Escobar is to blame because if he wasn’t such a head case, the Braves wouldn’t had to get a player like AG
chris
April 14th, 2011
2:08 pm
talking about scouting. yes, the braves do not emphasize on scouting and watching video on opposing hitters. hitting mechanics yes, but cox and JS always used the method of using the same approach for any opposing hitter.
Farnsworthy
April 14th, 2011
2:08 pm
Depressing start—-If it weren’t for the Mets we’d be dead last.
Double Zero Eight
April 14th, 2011
2:08 pm
Give him 8 more games to give him the benefit of
any doubt. I am not a McLouth fan. I think this year
will be a continuation of last year. His speed does him
no good if he can’t get on base. I hope I am wrong.
Bobby Cox
April 14th, 2011
2:09 pm
I told you TP wasn’t the problem.
Fols
April 14th, 2011
2:09 pm
We shouldn’t have AG or Escobar………we should have Elvis Andrus but that’s water under the bridge.
Joe
April 14th, 2011
2:10 pm
I’m willing to give McLouth some more time; it’s not like he’s the only guy in the lineup cold for the first 2 weeks.
The bigger issue with Heyward hitting 6th is Uggla’s terrible start in front of him (.152 BA, .188 OBP). Right now, he’s killing innings and leaving Chipper and Mac stranded far too often. How many times has Jason lead off an inning so far? Seems like an inordinate amount. He’s got 3 HRs and slugging .583, yet a total of only 6 RBIs because he’s not getting any ABs with RISP.
To me, the issue with the 5th spots the bigger concern thus far than the 2 hole.
Fols
April 14th, 2011
2:10 pm
Farnsworthy……you just jinxed it…..Mets are gonna roll us now!
Yunel
April 14th, 2011
2:12 pm
I wanted to come back but Fredi said I had too much Hanley in me.
Bob Leblaw's Law Blog
April 14th, 2011
2:13 pm
Joe, here’s the issue with your comment – Uggla had a bad two weeks. McLouth has had a bad year plus. This is the same song and dance we’ve seen since last season.
richie_richie1986
April 14th, 2011
2:13 pm
I have all the faith in the world in Fredi G. managerial skills. Lets give the guy some time!!!! Go Bravos! Gotta pull this one out tonight.
Kentavo
April 14th, 2011
2:13 pm
OK, here’s my lineup:
1. Prado, LF
2. Chipper, 3b
3. Heyward, RF
4. Uggla, 2b
5. McCann, C
6. Gonzo, SS
7. Freeman, 1B
8. McClouth, CF
phil
April 14th, 2011
2:13 pm
Fols
April 14th, 2011
1:35 pm
When the team goes hitless for 7 innings does it matter what order it’s in?
Exactly…it doesn’t matter one bit….these guys couldn’t hit a basketball tossed up there underhanded right now….
I’ve never heard so much whining about batting someone 2nd as opposed to 6th…..if both would just hit the dang ball, period, we’d be in much better shape.
CajunStorm
April 14th, 2011
2:15 pm
Prado
Larry
Heyward
Uggla
McCann
Gonzo
Freeman
McOut
Pitcher
IMHO, you live and die with your top 5-7 players. Whatever McOut gives us is a plus over last year. Uggla should be planted in the 4 spot to keep consistency 1-4 because B-Mac will sit 30 games because you have to either sit your catcher or kill your catcher. Gonzo is an underrated RBI producer so give him more chances with the BEST OBP players in the front 5. Freeman should be in the 6 hole ALL year.
My opinion means as much as the rest of us here on this Blog but hey….we all have opinions right?
phil
April 14th, 2011
2:17 pm
Ugly has been absolutely horrible. I keep hearing that he’ll heat up, but what if he doesn’t? The past is no guarantee of the future. This guy looks worse than joe would out there trying to make contact.
We all heard what McOut would do for us when he came over from pitt….well, we found out in a hurry it wouldn’t be much….
I’ll believe Ugly is some savior when he starts actually hitting the ball somewhere other than straight up the shoot….
bball fan
April 14th, 2011
2:17 pm
The main problem is the Braves have no leadoff hitter. Prado should be hitting second and leave Heyward in the sixth hole. Trade for a leadoff hitter/centerfielder.
CajunStorm
April 14th, 2011
2:17 pm
Dang Kentavo……GREAT POST!!!! LOL I guess there is another mind as brilliant as mine.
billmaier
April 14th, 2011
2:17 pm
go dawgs you are right nate onlystuckouttwo times last night and he didnt hit into any double plays- much better mclouth batting second would not be an issue if we actually had a center fielder that could hit
Joe
April 14th, 2011
2:18 pm
Leblaw,
I’m not demanding either of those spots change right now; McLouth and Uggla have both performed much better than this in their careers, so you expect the performances to improve.
But if people think Heyward’s misused in the 6 spot, I think his lack of run production in that spot has a lot to do with Uggla’s start. Uggla picks it up, Heyward starts getting more ABs with runners on, better pitches to hit, and more RBIs opportunities. So I’m defending Fredi’s decision to have him behind Chipper, Mac, and Uggla…at least for a little bit longer.
carlchamblee
April 14th, 2011
2:18 pm
whatofit, the 2010 numbers for Heyward are misleading. He only batted 6th 39 times, if you remember that was beginning of season when he came out smoking. He batted 10 times as much (388 abs) batting second and put up solid #s. He was moved up precisely because he showed that he could handle it. And i believe if not for the thumb injury his #s would have been stronger.
Besides if you wanna go by last year, how on earth do you explain Mclouth batting 2nd?
richie_richie1986
April 14th, 2011
2:19 pm
I think yal are making to early of an assessment. Nate is hitting the ball pretty darn good and having some good ABs and for what its worth so in Gonzo…. Gonzo has been really working the counts. I actually wouldn’t mind seeing him hit in the 2 spot.
phil
April 14th, 2011
2:19 pm
No, cajunstorm….the blog police will soon ridicule you and demand you stop posting….
I like your argument myself….ugly can’t do much worse hitting 4th….not like Mclard is doing a whole lot there himself….and McOut should be hitting 9th actually since most pitchers hit for better average than him…
phil
April 14th, 2011
2:22 pm
Yeah, I though McOut looked pretty good watching strike three go blazing by early in the game….he looked completely dumbfounded and what’s worse, as usual, as if he didn’t care anyway….
anyone with hair as ridiculous looking as his should’ve been put on waivers BEFORE spring training….looks like a poor man’s escobar with that crap on his head…i keep thinking it’s a joke, but i guess not….
Naboo the Enigma
April 14th, 2011
2:22 pm
I can’t imagine that McDip will stay hitting 2 for more than a couple of weeks. What would be the scenario that he would stay there? You know he isn’t going to bring that avg up so any other scenario? He can bunt really well? I just don’t see it. Yes it’s early but these are the games that will cost come this fall.
Fols
April 14th, 2011
2:25 pm
Not having a true lead-off hitter seems to really set the table for a lot of inconsistant stats.
I agree with whoever posted moving Prado down to the 2 spot and inserting speed up top.
We just don’t have that.
CajunStorm
April 14th, 2011
2:25 pm
BBall Fan…
Minor, McOut (eat half of salary), and a bullpen arm for Ellsbury. Solves our leadoff/cf problem and BoSox get a temp in CF and gets a poyential 5th starter and needed bull pen help. The way they are struggling…that are probably open to a move.
Naboo the Enigma
April 14th, 2011
2:25 pm
DAM, actually he can in any other inning than the 1st. Fact
Spider29
April 14th, 2011
2:26 pm
Last year when Bobby Cox batted Heyward second, lots of people wanted him lower in the order. Now Fredi is batting him lower and people still aren’t satisfied. Maybe we all should just take a breath, wait until the season is 25 to 30 games in and see what is happpening with the lineup. I bet that Fredi will make adjustments accordingly.
richie_richie1986
April 14th, 2011
2:26 pm
@phil,
Everybody strikes out looking man its part of the game. When he’s making contact which is prertty often he has some pop on it. Just isn’t finding the holes right now. Uggla i was hoping would have a better start I’m don’t know about his numbers the first month of the season…keeping my fingers crossed our bravos turn this around soon!
DAM
April 14th, 2011
2:27 pm
There is no possible way to justify putting your best hitter 6th. You just can’t do it. Every article that addresses that issue makes the same point — “It’s only worth maybe 4 runs over the course of the season, so it’s not that big of a deal.” Not one article has been written that says the current lineup actually helps the team score more runs (because it doesn’t); they all just repeat that it doesn’t actually cost us as many runs as we make it sound like it does with all the complaining.
When someone can prove that it is actually going to help us score more runs to place our best hitter 6th (which won’t happen based on all the available data and statistics), then I’ll stop complaining. Until then, there’s no way to justify what we’re doing. It’s inane.
DAM
April 14th, 2011
2:29 pm
Naboo — that wasn’t my comment saying that he can’t hit 3 run homers from the No. 2 spot. I was quoting someone else from the first page. My comments were below the quoted paragraph.
David O'Brien
April 14th, 2011
2:30 pm
There is no possible way to justify putting your best hitter 6th. You just can’t do it. Every article that addresses that issue makes the same point — “It’s only worth maybe 4 runs over the course of the season, so it’s not that big of a deal.” Not one article has been written that says the current lineup actually helps the team score more runs (because it doesn’t); they all just repeat that it doesn’t actually cost us as many runs as we make it sound like it does with all the complaining.
When someone can prove that it is actually going to help us score more runs to place our best hitter 6th (which won’t happen based on all the available data and statistics), then I’ll stop complaining. Until then, there’s no way to justify what we’re doing. It’s inane. — DAM
So despite all those articles you pointed out that note it amounts to a difference of about four runs over the course of a 162-game season, you’re going to continue to think about and vent about this particular subject, even when the manager clearly doesn’t care what critics outside the organization think about the matter?
Uh, well … OK. Go right ahead.
richie_richie1986
April 14th, 2011
2:30 pm
@spider29,
Don’t you know the AJC blog is full of GMs bro! This is where they come to get all their answers that’s how they get paid the big bucks by asking blog posters
phil
April 14th, 2011
2:31 pm
yes, mcout had a good game tues nite…and yes, clearly no one was getting a hit last nite against cy young himself….that pitiful thing FF hit was just blind luck or we probably would’ve finished up hitless….
so that said, mcout HAS looked better so far than all of last year, but we’ve got to have more than .220 out of him….period. would love to see a 3-4 or 4-4 game out of him….
Wazineh Suleiman
April 14th, 2011
2:33 pm
Try seeing my side of this. My husband is a controlling jerk.
richie_richie1986
April 14th, 2011
2:35 pm
well maybe after we play more than 3 series we can get more of a feel on what he’s going to do. Bravos have faced some pretty tough pitching so far. Josh Johnson pitched lightsout last night.
Spider29
April 14th, 2011
2:35 pm
richie, yes, I know you are right! It just strikes me as funny sometimes that folks don’t remember which side of the fence they were on just a short few months ago. When our guys start hitting like they are capable of (and I do believe they will), Heyward will be batting just about where he needs to be.
phil
April 14th, 2011
2:36 pm
Well Dave, do you prefer we all just shut up and go read something else every day? Why the “hate” on DAM? Good grief. You do such a great job but I swear, you’re at least as sensitive as I am….and that’s not a good thing probably…lol…i work and keep up with this blog some during the day now and have fun doing so….but don’t crush the readers for beating a dead horse…
Heyward is an obvious 4 hitter. Not a 2 and not a 6. That’s my take and i’m not overly concerned with what FG thinks about it. If he thinks 6, then 6 it is and we’ll keep our fingers crossed.
nashvillewill
April 14th, 2011
2:36 pm
Hey folks, fiddling with the lineup isn’t going to fix what’s wrong with this team. Simply, this team is lacking in talent. Gonzales is saving games in the field and losing them at the plate–a wash. McClouth is, well, not a very good player. I’m not sure Freeman is ready for the bigs and has little potetial for helping at the plate, though he also makes up for some deficiencies in the field. Chipper has little power left. And Uggla apparently will not be able to produce until May. In short, this team looks like one of the worst hitting teams in baseball. Pitching and fielding help prevent a fiasco, but I don’t expect much. McCann, Heyward, and Prado are the only consistent hitters. We also miss Infante’s production (RISP).
This team has all the makings of a .500 club. Sorry. Swapping parts around a mediocre machine still leaves a mediocre machine.
Tomahawk
April 14th, 2011
2:39 pm
even if nate rebounds, he still won’t be a fit for the #2 spot and certainly wont be more deserving of a greater number of at-bats than heyward. nate’s more of an rbi guy than a table setter anyways. heyward is both and therefore should be driving in runs AND setting the table. THATS what makes a lineup efficient. if you want rbi’s there has to be men on base. end of story. so, even if nate turns it around, fredi’s only going to be in a position where the team is better off demoting nate. what’s that going to do for his confidence? he does everything asked of him and still gets bumped down 4 spots in the order. not exactly thinking ahead, fredi.
Jack
April 14th, 2011
2:40 pm
I think the elephant in the room is the 3 hole. You have a great career 3 hole hitter still getting it done at age 39, and the future 3 hole hitter who is an absolute stud. I think Chipper has justified (not that he needs to) his spot in the line-up. The question then becomes what do do with Heyward, and when it comes to driving in runs and keeping the line-up balanced and competitive throughout, Heyward hitting sixth is a strong option. I would however like to see the line-up as:
1. Prado
2. Jones
3. Heyward
4. McCann/Uggla
5. Uggla/McCann
6. McLouth
7. Gonzalez
8. Freeman
Just until the offense becomes more consistent. But hey it’s still only April.
jfreak13713@yahoo.com
April 14th, 2011
2:44 pm
Glad to see we have a manager willing to stand his ground. He may be right or may end up being proved wrong but its his team and he wants to earn the respect of his players. McLouth is NOT this teams problem right now. He is simply a part of the machine that is not performing up to its potential. As the season goes on and if McLouth doesn’t starting getting that OBS up then I’m sure Fredi will make a move but its just to early for that right now. If you keep changing things then guys can’t get comfortable or it takes much longer for them to get comfortable.
I like Heyward and think he is really a number 3 hitter but that spot is currently being filled with a HOF 3rd baseman. Heyward is young and will have his chances but the big picture for this season is to determine “IF” McLouth can turn his career around. If not the Braves need to know that by the Allstar break so they can make a move for another hitter. If he can then they can focus on some other need like right handed hitter off bench or bullpen support. McLouths best chance of success is hitting 2nd and I agree with Fredi, for now.
Go Braves!
phil
April 14th, 2011
2:45 pm
nashville, you’re a hater….
only kidding…i think you’re probably somewhat right on the talent. frankly, i think FF needs to hit higher in the order and gonzo or mcout can hit 8th….FF gets nothing to swing at with the pitcher behind him, but he swings anyway, like me trying to swat flies….pitiful.
phil
April 14th, 2011
2:46 pm
jfreak is being secretly paid by DOB to say things like that…it’s a conspiracy started by frank wren…
Joshua
April 14th, 2011
2:52 pm
Heyward should either be hitting 4th or 6th. The reason he’s hitting sixth is because he is much faster than McCann, and that speed will be more beneficial at the bottom of the order where guys are less likely to hit HRs. That is why he is sixth instead of McCann. And I’m fine with that.
And nothing is going to change until we have a significant sample size to observe: probably at LEAST one month. So spare us the whining people.
Slug McGnaw
April 14th, 2011
2:53 pm
Ha ha. Anybody can be a MLB manager. All you have to do is fill out the line-up card.
Joshua
April 14th, 2011
2:55 pm
Chipper Jones is not fast enough to hit second. Period. He’s not going to hit second. So just shut up about it. CHIPPER JONES IS NOT GOING TO BAT SECOND – EVER EVER EVER. So just shut up about it.
billmaier
April 14th, 2011
2:56 pm
bob leblaw you are so dead on.– if i had a nickel for every time ive heard lets give mclousy some more time over the last year and a half i’d have millions— uggla does not have a year and a half of being bad, just the opposite but to keeep saying mclouth will turn it around, weve been riding that horse too long– 20 more games that’s it if he is stillbatting 200– batted 190 last year– then it is time for a change- shafer, and constanza still over 300 at triple a– or trade for a center fileder that can hit teams are looking for pitching my god we have 8 projected starters by august if medlen can come back, teheran shows he belongs– and minor improves– then you have delegado and viziciano in the wings– you cannot use ten starters for the future- we we need a center fielder that can hit.
mathman
April 14th, 2011
3:00 pm
My hat is getting tattered and worn from all of the tipping. Schafer hitting .300 at Gwinnett and getting several walks. McLouse hitting .220 and headed south. The blonde doo hasn’t helped. An eye doctor appointment might.
mathman
April 14th, 2011
3:01 pm
The next pitcher we may be tipping our hat to: Ricky Nolasco. Beachy had better hold them to 2 runs or less.
Joshua
April 14th, 2011
3:04 pm
LOL @ people who still want Schafer rather than McLouth. Sad.
E-6
April 14th, 2011
3:04 pm
Think I’m okay with the Braves manager setting the line-up. He seems to have figured out what somewhat else on this blog pointed out – moving McClouth to 6th gives you a guy trying to straighten out his career hitting in front of a very undisciplined hitter followed by a rookie (followed, of course, by the pitcher). Let’s wait another twelves games before we go into panic mode.
What???
April 14th, 2011
3:11 pm
This whole argument is stupid. The Braves know that it would be a HUGE plus for this team if Nate McLouth starts hitting like he did in Pittsburg and to try a make that happen they have put him in the 2-hole so that he will be protected, see some pitches, hopefully (but doubtfully) get some hits and confidence. If he continues not to produce, he will not be in this lineup long term. The Braves saw this as a way to get Shafer some ABs in the minors for a few months prior to throwing him back in the fire. I expect to see him in another 6 weeks or so if Nate is still sucking it up (which I expect he will be). You people need to look at the broader strategy and realize that it isn’t September, it’s April. The Braves always use the first half of the season to figure out what pieces are going to work and which ones aren’t. I expect that Sherrill and Linebrink will also be replaced after the all-star break by some of the young arms we have down on the farm.
Nate
April 14th, 2011
3:12 pm
Fredi G. is still living in that same old school world that Bobby Cox lived in for so long that failed to win him anything of significance. Fredi will waste away talent trying to turn a career below average hitter into an all-star by batting him in front of Chipper and McCann. Gonzalez will eventually get what he deserves (a pink slip) while the team suffers (with losses and lack of run production) as a result. If you don’t play your best players (Jason Heyward) the most, you deserve to get fired no matter what the reasoning/justification.
Supes
April 14th, 2011
3:18 pm
rob from sc is correct.
The ideal lineup right now would include not only moving McLouth out of 2nd slot and moving Heyward up…but moving Chipper Jones to 2nd.
Chipper Jones still has power (somewhat diminished but 15-20HR) but his on base% is one of the best in the league. Why not USE this to the team’s advantage.
1. Prado
2. Chipper
3. Heyward
4. Uggla
5. McCann
6. Freeman
7. Gonzo
8. McLouth
9. Pitcher
This would be the best lineup as the team is currently constructed (25 man roster).
It makes too much sense…everyone knows it…except Fredi and the people in charge who are in denial.
Heyward is the future, the young man is mature enough hitting 3rd. Move Freeman to 6th where he’ll see more pitches to hit and won’t be pressing as much in the 8th hole. I don’t give a crap where McLouth is “most comfortable” in the order…this isn’t a comfort thing. I’d rather have Freeman going than McLouth (who is only on the team due to his untradeable status – money & craptastic 2010 performance)
brandon
April 14th, 2011
3:19 pm
It’s still early. Seems everything negative about the Braves offense somehow revolves around McLouth. He’ll come around. I’m sure if the Braves would have gotten no-hit last night, it would somehow be Nate’s fault even though everyone else would have went 0-fer. The Braves TEAM is not hitting well…yep, TEAM!
Supes
April 14th, 2011
3:21 pm
Hey Joshua…
have you ever heard of this statistic…it’s called ON BASE PERCENTAGE??? It’s more important than SPEED at the moment for this CURRENT Braves team. Chipper hitting 2nd makes too much FRAKING sense, which is why it won’t ever ever ever happen. Nothing that makes sense lately happens with my favorite team…but yeah good point sir (NOT).
Sammy Slider
April 14th, 2011
3:24 pm
I would be a superior manager as far as actual managing goes.
Tracey
April 14th, 2011
3:26 pm
Mclouth is not the main reason why the lineup is not producing runs. He is actually improving. We need more production from the 4th and 5th spots.
billmaier
April 14th, 2011
3:26 pm
brandon you are right not all on mclouth the whole team is not hitting- but mclouth has not been hitting since he became a brave, i have faith that the team will turn it around, but what gives you faith that mclouth after a year and a ahlf as a brave can or will?
Kal
April 14th, 2011
3:26 pm
Folks, remember we are only 12 games into the season and usually by the end of April a manager is in a better position to change his lineup if needed.
Also, it is irrelevant who is the leadoff hitter since that person will not bat leadoff four times in a game but once or possibly twice.
All will be well soon.
John
April 14th, 2011
3:36 pm
Kentavo
April 14th, 2011
2:13 pm
OK, here’s my lineup:
1. Prado, LF
2. Chipper, 3b
3. Heyward, RF
4. Uggla, 2b
5. McCann, C
6. Gonzo, SS
7. Freeman, 1B
8. McClouth, CF
Ding, Ding Ding. We have a winner. I might switch McClouth and Freeman at this point though. The easiest solution is moving Chipper to the two hole and Heyward to 3, but it is not going to happen. Chipper would be an unbelievable 2 hitter at this point. I like Uggla at 4 and McCann at 5 because as another poster said it creates consistency when McCann sits out. Plus, I feel like McCann has been more productive at the 5 spot throughout his career.
Matt
April 14th, 2011
3:40 pm
I read this somewhere and though it was a good idea…
Trade McClouth and Kawakami to the Mets for Carlos Beltran. Everyone wins. New York gets another sorely needed starting pitching and a CF replacement for Beltran. Atlanta gets a proven slugger, unloads a large contract currently in AA. Beltran gets to play for a better team that are expected to compete for a playoff spot. Kawakami gets to start in MLB again (yeah, that’s how bad the Mets’ pitching is) and McClouth gets the change of scenery he probably needs to re-start his career.
Beltran will be a free agent at season’s end. So, the financial burden isn’t that difficult to bear. It’s not looking like McClouth has much of a future here and Kawakami is in AA. Just getting rid of the Kawakami contract would be a win.
David Granger
April 14th, 2011
3:40 pm
Hard to know what to do here. With the Pirates, McClouth was basically a .250 hitter, but walked about 10% of the time, so his OBP was about .350. Last year with the Braves he only hit .190 playing half-time, which is not good. He still walked about ten percent of the time, but that can’t overcome hitting below the Mendoza line.
I do hope Fredi Gonzalez doesn’t have that Bobby Cox mindset where he picks a lineup and then doesn’t change it WAY past the time it’s clearly not working. Cox had Andruw Jones batting leadoff for a full half season one year, and Jones was about as much of a leadoff hitter as he was a chickadee.
Harvey's
April 14th, 2011
3:42 pm
Could there be a “birther” problem?
Mark
April 14th, 2011
3:43 pm
I think I would settle for MCSUCK getting cut at this point.
I feel the lineup needs tweaking but I guess Uggla should wake up at some point.
LARRY PARRISH
April 14th, 2011
3:44 pm
IF I CAN GET HORNER TO LAY OFF THE OUTSIDE PITCH, AND HUBBARD TO BE MORE AGGRESSIVE………..
brandon
April 14th, 2011
3:46 pm
Uggla’s hitting .152…should we hit him 8th??? Just wondering…
cs95
April 14th, 2011
3:50 pm
to everyone putting chipper NOT in the 3hole. stop. it’s not happening. you have a much better chance of nate and heyward moving, heck even mccann or uggla moving than chipper. The only other player that is most likely not to move at all in the lineup this season is prado.
DOB,
as for the lineup, do you personally agree with fredi? For me it’s not so much a question of agreeing or disagreeing, but more so a situation of I cannot think of anywhere else to hit nate. His skill set really is best utilized in the 2-hole. I just cringe at the thought of a bottom lineup of nate, alex, freddie and pitcher. reminds me of KJ, frenchy, pitcher from a couple years ago. I actually would be more willing to see him go uggla, heyward, mccann or heyward, uggla, mcann for the 4-6 hitters. everyone else i am happy with there spots in the lineup.
DAM
April 14th, 2011
3:53 pm
DOB — yep, pretty much, and since I have your permission now, I think I will go right ahead. Thanks.
Joshua
April 14th, 2011
4:04 pm
Supes,
Chipper Jones will never bat second. And I truly enjoy how irate that makes you.
moriler
April 14th, 2011
4:06 pm
Well, now we know why most of you are posting on a blag instead of managing a team.
There aren’t even 15 games in the books yet and you whiz kids are gripin’ your heads off. Half of you probably never even bothered to go through everyone’s hits and outs and chart how many were “well hit, but rightatem” — which isn’t surprising, it’s a lot easier to just gripe because we’re not 11-3.
Joshua
April 14th, 2011
4:10 pm
Here’s a little secret: throughout the course of a 162 game seasons, your offense is going to wax and wane. It is just natural. Remember the Phillies terrible streak last year when they got shut out like 3 games in a row and couldn’t score to save their lives for like 2 weeks? I mean God, you whiny little babies really are irritating. Some teams start hot, some start cold. It’s going to happen again before the season is over, and there are going to be streaks where a ton of runs are scored. Anyone who doesn’t understand this shouldn’t be posting on this blog.
Now, after an entire month, if we are still having problems like this, then its time to tweak the line-up. Until then, just pipe down.
cs95
April 14th, 2011
4:12 pm
you guys realize that mclouth has a better avg. than freeman and uggla. mclouth also has a higher OBP than prado, alex, freeman and uggla. lastly, if nate keeps doing what he did tuesday night (1-3 2B, advance prado to 3B(who scored on chipper’s SF)) then i am fine with him hitting second.
DHD
April 14th, 2011
4:13 pm
I’m tired of people questioning Fredi when they are NOT in the clubhouse and have no clue as to what is going on. How many games have we played?
Shaun
April 14th, 2011
4:19 pm
“Yeah,” he said. “When you make out the lineup, the lineup is a function of the entire lineup – eight guys, not just one guy. Statisticians, numbers crunchers and my SABR [Society for American Baseball Research] people – I’m a member – they shoot holes in that stuff. But you’re dealing with humans in the way the lineup is constructed.”
How does the fact that he’s dealing with humans negate the fact that Heyward is a better on-base guy than all but maybe one of his teammates, that he is as good a slugger as all but maybe one or two of his teammates and that hitting him sixth versus second could cost him over 50 plate appearances?
“Yeah, you put this guy in the No. 2 hole, but what are you going to do to the 6-hole? What are you going to do to [No. 5 hitter Dan] Uggla when he’s hitting good?”
What’s wrong with Uggla staying where he is an McLouth hitting sixth? I’m not sure what he’s implying here. What are you doing to the number 2-hole? The number two hitter comes up a lot more often and ahead of better hitters than the number six hitter. So why would you put one of your four weakest hitters in the number two spot just so that you have a good hitter behind your number five hitter?
“Like the situation [Tuesday], when McLouth bunts [Martin] Prado over to third,” he said. “Now are you are going to play the infield in? Are you going to pitch to Chipper or pitch to [No. 4 hitter Brian] McCann? That kind of stuff.”
What about the possibility in that situation of having Prado on second with no outs and Heyward, Chipper, McCann and Uggla due up?
“When everybody doing things like we did yesterday, hitting gappers, hitting some balls out of the ballpark, it makes [the lineup] good.”
Yes, when everyone gets a lot of extra-base hits, that’s a good thing. Over the course of the season, hitting one of your best hitters, if not your best, higher than sixth would lead to more extra-base hits.
“I think the way the lineup is constructed is more important,” he said, before applying the additional-plate-appearances reasoning to a rhetorical question to reporters: “Then why don’t we lead off [Albert] Pujols? Or [Barry] Bonds? Lead ‘em off.”
The additional plate appearances aren’t the only consideration. That’s just one piece. There is also giving your best hitter a chance to hit with a runner on base in the first inning and about putting your best or second-best on-base guy in a spot where he can be both a table-setter and have a shot at a fair number of chances to advance the leadoff hitter (and possibly hitters at the bottom of the order who get on base) in addition to the extra plate appearances. One reason (namely additional plate appearances) alone is not enough to hit Heyward higher in the order. But that one reason combined with others is reason enough.
“Believe me,” Gonzalez said, “when a guy’s going good in a certain spot — he likes it; he’s comfortable – his whole game is [going well], let ‘em play. Let ‘em do it….
“When you’re going bad, you come up with the bases loaded every time. I mean, you can be hitting 11th and it’ll happen. When you’re going good, it doesn’t matter.
“Everybody [in the lineup] has got a function.”
It doesn’t seem very likely at all that McLouth’s successful Spring was due to him hitting second. He’s facing major league pitchers. They are going to throw whatever it takes to get a hitter out, no matter where he’s hitting. In fact, if anything, I would guess that pitchers are tougher on number two hitters because they know they need to get an out before the middle of the order comes up. Plus there is the fact that McLouth’s performance in the 6th and 7th spots in the order are better than his overall career performance. I don’t see any reason to believe McLouth has to hit second in order to get “going well.” If there were an inferior hitter who seems to have a need to hit third in order to get going well, would he consider moving Chipper from third? I doubt it. So why move Heyward for an inferior hitter?
Bernard
April 14th, 2011
4:21 pm
…as I’ve written on numerous occasions, “Mc OUT!!!” OUCH!!!!!
reckingball
April 14th, 2011
4:25 pm
At the end of the story, the fact is, that Fredi G. is the manager and all you belly-achers are not.
You all have the right to bitch, complain, hate, and say what you would do, or what should be done.
But, it really doesn’t mattter what your opinion is, because no one really gives a fudge, other than yourself or maybe some of your pi$$ing and moaning brothers and sisters.
reckingball
April 14th, 2011
4:29 pm
Chillax, the Braves will start hitting.
It’s only baseball, anywho.
Elonbrave
April 14th, 2011
4:31 pm
DOB, as always, I apologize if this has been answered before… BUT
I read what Gonzalez said about the “human being” aspect of the lineup. I understand that Freddie thinks that mentally, McClouth could benefit from seeing more fastballs that the no. 2 hitter sees with Chipper protecting (allegedly, I mean, because with all these articles amy wittle bwain I’ze just don’t know what to thinks anymore!!!… sorry). I’m sure it’s also a vote-of-confidence type of thing to say “we trust you enough to put you in the 2 hole”. Ok, I get that, I guess. But I’m curious about the other side of that “human” thing.
What does Heyward think about it? Does he care? Back when I was a 21 year old baseball phenom (I wasn’t) I sure LOVED seeing a bunch of fastballs, given that I was still developing, still learning, etc. Is he too talented for it to matter?
I guess to me, it seems like while McClouth could indeed benefit from the spot, the Braves AND Heyward could benefit from Heyward hitting second. Besides, SABRmetrics can’t account for things like Heyward having a real knack for coming through in late-inning, tied ballgames… or CAN it?
coonhound
April 14th, 2011
4:32 pm
Well Pujols & Bonds hit 3rd & 4th not 6th Mr. Fredi G. !!!
coonhound
April 14th, 2011
4:36 pm
Why do my comments need moderating ? All the stuff you let go on these blogs and my normal comments need moderating ?
Mike
April 14th, 2011
4:40 pm
I didn’t read all the blogs so maybe this has been mentioned. I recall last year that many people on this blog were complaining because Heyward was hitting second and he should hit lower so he could drive in runs. Sounds to me like we have a lot of complaining for the sake of complaining.
George Stein
April 14th, 2011
4:44 pm
“When you make out the lineup, the lineup is a function of the entire lineup – eight guys, not just one guy.”
What does that even mean? Can anyone make any sense of that statement.
As to the folks who have suggested moving Chipper to 2nd and Heyward to 3rd, that would be the proper lineup and the one that would generate the most runs while also forcing opposing managers to use more of the bullpen later in games to get righty-righty/lefty-lefty matchups.
coonhound
April 14th, 2011
4:48 pm
I think daily & nightly hitting sessions with Albert Pujols or Tony Gwynn are the only shots at fixing McOut !
Dennis Reynolds
April 14th, 2011
4:49 pm
Unbelievable. The answer is so simple. Bat Nate leadoff. Bat Prado second. Keep Chipper third. Bat Heyward fourth.
I hate when people make such a huge deal out of the 4 hole. Just because you think of a Serranno when you think of a “clean up guy” doesn’t mean it has to be a prototypical “clean up guy”
If you think about that lineup with Nate getting on, opening more holes for THE prototypical 2 hole hitter, Prado, and stealing some bags from time to time, its pretty interesting. Just because Prado is getting on out of the leadoff role doesn’t mean thats the best spot for him. Just because Uggla will probably lead our team in HRs this year, doesn’t mean he has to bat 4th either. Everyone has their own opinion on this topic- and I mean everyone- but if you know anything about your players, you could see why this lineup would be at least better than the current one.
1. Nate
2. Prado
3. Chipper
4. Heyward
5. Uggla
6. Mac
7. Freeman
8. Gonzo
Pete*
April 14th, 2011
4:49 pm
Matt: “I read this somewhere and though it was a good idea…
Trade McClouth and Kawakami to the Mets for Carlos Beltran.”
Beltran retired yesterday.
glove51
April 14th, 2011
4:50 pm
Aaaarrrrrgggghhhh! The old legit lead-off hitter with speed argument rears its head. A leadoff hitter needs to get on base.
coonhound
April 14th, 2011
4:50 pm
Heyward has actually been the most consistent hitter other than McCann (who needs to hit 4th). Why hit Heyward 6th when Nate isn’t worthy to hit 2nd ?
Lew
April 14th, 2011
4:51 pm
I don’t like to see McLouth bat period.
coonhound
April 14th, 2011
4:52 pm
Dennis, the 4th place hitter needs to be the power hitter. Your goal is 1 thru 3 to get on and 4th hitter deliver a grand slam.
Versiroth
April 14th, 2011
4:52 pm
David O’Brien…. did you ever find out Kimbrel’s closer music?
Versiroth
April 14th, 2011
4:53 pm
“I don’t like to see McLouth bat period.” He has an OBP higher than Prado and Uggla right now…
Dennis Reynolds
April 14th, 2011
4:53 pm
I propose this lineup only because I know that Fredi will NEVER move Chipper from the 3 hole. Chipper is still a great hitter, but on this team at this stage of his career, he shouldn’t bat 3rd.
If I knew Fredi had the balls to make such a bold move in his first year, I would actually prefer to see this lineup:
1. Prado
2. Chipper
3. Heyward
4. Uggla
5. Mac
6. Freeman
7. Gonzo
8. Nate
Dennis Reynolds
April 14th, 2011
4:59 pm
coonhound-
very appropriate name for you by the way.
Only the fans who aren’t actually knowledgeable when it comes to baseball go by your rule. Just because you think of a bug hulking badass when you think of the 4 hole, doesn’t mean thats who has to hit there. Lineups vary for each team. In this case, if Fredi No Balls decides he’s too scared to move the franchise player from the 3rd slot, then Heyward shouldn’t bat 2nd, 5th or 6th. 4th would be the best spot for him.
Create an original idea from time to time. What do you think keybangers like you said when LaRussa said he would bat the pitcher 8th??
2,700 wins later………
Pete*
April 14th, 2011
5:03 pm
coonhound: “Dennis, the 4th place hitter needs to be the power hitter. Your goal is 1 thru 3 to get on and 4th hitter deliver a grand slam.”
Coon, how many times does that happen? Ill take my power hitter (especially if he has a reasonably high BA) in the 3rd slot, same as Cards and Pujols.
glove51
April 14th, 2011
5:04 pm
Here si the line-up I’d prefer:
1. Chipper
2. Heyward
3. Uggla
4. McCann
5. Prado
6. McLouth or Gonzo
7. Gonzo or McLouth
8. Freeman
Dennis Reynolds
April 14th, 2011
5:07 pm
coonhound-
Yea cuz if you have 3 guys who get on base, you’re almost guaranteed a grand slam. Some people.
If more fans would actually COME TO SOME GAMES instead of sitting home keybanging all night, they would actually know something about baseball. Its no wonder were so frequently made fun of by other cities with good fan bases. I understand New York, Boston and Philly, but whats St. Louis got that we don’t? In packed cities such as NY and Boston, its easy for ppl to get to the stadium where as in Atlanta its more rural. In turn making it more difficult to go see a game on a regular basis. But the same goes for St. Louis and they have one of the strongest fan bases in the game. I would never stray from the Braves so don’t even start with the whole “go be a card fan then”, I would just like to see Atlanta embrace a team who’s actually trying to win a championship. 13,000 people on ANY day is pathetic.
Jimmy Beam, you are my friend
April 14th, 2011
5:09 pm
Freddi, you are the manager; and I sir, TIP MY HAT to you for standing up for yourself….
Dennis Reynolds
April 14th, 2011
5:12 pm
Glove51 and coonhound-
If you intend on making such terrible suggestions, then find a little league team to follow and blog about them.
Robert Bailey
April 14th, 2011
5:15 pm
Every since his 450ft bomb off Carlos Zambrano in his first swing last April, we can’t get enough of watching Heyward at the plate..
I had enough watching him strike out in the playoff.
Einsteindawg
April 14th, 2011
5:15 pm
Hey Fredi, I’ve got a suggestion. Why not reverse the entire batting order and see what happens? Are you aware that “insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting different results”. Or, “the thinking that got us here is different than the thinking that will get us out of here”. Just a suggestion.
cs95
April 14th, 2011
5:17 pm
dennis reynolds, i actually like your poster with nate leadoff. although, i could also see a lineup where uggla hits fourth and then mccann/heyward hits sixth with alex hitting seventh.
Supes
April 14th, 2011
5:21 pm
Hey Joshua,
the fact that Chipper won’t bat 2nd in the lineup doesn’t bother me nearly as much as the IGNORANCE of someone like you who doesn’t seem to understand the VALUE of having a guy with a tremendously high on base percentage bat INFRONT of your 3rd and 4th hitters in a lineup.
While Chipper can still drive in runs from the 3 hole with singles, it’s much more productive to have the power of Jason Heyward hitting 3rd…and while McLouth can be “at best serviceable on base percentage wise” he isn’t as good as Chipper is at getting on base.
The whole point is Fredi G. isn’t maximizing his player’s usefulness in his LINEUP.
Conyers Braves Fan
April 14th, 2011
5:21 pm
What is amazing is all these wantabe managers on the AJC blogs continue to post worthless advice about how the Braves batting order should be set. Now at last the real manager has said it WILL NOT change. Yet these people continue to waste their time posting something they know nothing about.
Explicit
April 14th, 2011
5:24 pm
1. Heyward
2. Prado
3. Chipper
4. McCann
5. Uggla
6. McLouth
7. Gonzalez
8. Freeman
glove51
April 14th, 2011
5:26 pm
Dennis R.: can you outline why it is such a terrible suggestion. I’d be willing to wager I have coached at least 50 times as many baseball games (up to American Legion level) as you and watched in excess of 1,500 Braves games and studied baseball and how to win baseball games more than all the books on any subject you have read, if you can even read.
glove51
April 14th, 2011
5:29 pm
Batting McLouth lead-off is THE SINGLE-MOST idiotic idea posted in this entire thread.
NO MORE BOBBY
April 14th, 2011
5:37 pm
We got a younger (but not as good) Bobby Cox for manager. MLB blog today said – Fredi Gonzalez’s boys have been doing a little too much hat tipping during the season’s first 12 games.
I’m used to slow starts in April by now with the Braves but something seems different about this one.
Maybe because we were all told that swagger was back and it’s not. Looks like same old limping out of the gate team to me.
Steve
April 14th, 2011
5:51 pm
Dave what would be your lineup. You asked Freddi the question now I’m asking you how would you construct the lineup. I really have no problem with Heyward batting 6th, having a .280ba 100/100rbi/r with 30HR’s out of the 6th spot doesn’t bother me. On top of that he gives Uggla good protection and has the patients/eye to not chase pitches if he’s pitched around. If the lineup needs to be changed I would go with 1. Prado 2. Chipper-great OBP/BA/can hit to all fields(great bat control) 3. Heyward-hard to argue he’s not the best hitter in the lineup 4. McCann 5. Uggla 6. Freeman-he won’t see any pitches hitting 8th(kinda tough on a rookie) 7. Gonzalez 8. McClouth
stew
April 14th, 2011
5:56 pm
Freeman shouldn’t bat 8th. Put McLouth 8th Freeman 6th and Heyward 2nd. We gotta take advantage of Freeman’s ability to drive in runs and Heyward’s ability to get on base. Plus, the 8 hitter sometimes becomes the leadoff hitter. McLouth is better in that role than Freeman.
carlchamblee
April 14th, 2011
5:59 pm
Geez DOB excuse everyone for venting and giving their opinion on a BLOG for gosh sakes!
I’m sorry you don’t just report to us what Fredi says and we’re all baby birds opening our mouths to receive the regurgitation.
And why use the old lame blogument that since the manager doesn’t care what we think it means we should just shut up. That’s weak and I must say quite haughty of you.
Did you think you were gonna post what Fredi said about Heyward batting 6th and there was gonna be a universal “oh yeah that makes sense, brilliant”?
Truth is baseball people not just Braves fans have questioned it. And as far as that 4 runs a year hooey I don’t buy it. You can’t quantify the effect of a dynamic offensive player like Heyward on a study alone. You actually think with Heyward getting 70 more PAs and Mclouth 70 less PAs wouldn’t matter much? Please
Brave New World
April 14th, 2011
6:05 pm
Conyers Braves Fan April 14th, 2011 5:21 pm
What is amazing is all these wantabe managers on the AJC blogs continue to post worthless advice about how the Braves batting order should be set. Now at last the real manager has said it WILL NOT change. Yet these people continue to waste their time posting something they know nothing about.
CBF: I agree with you. My guess is most of these “experts” would be in the corner of the Braves’ dugout in a fetal position if they ever were given the responsibility of managing this team. Fredi was the right choice to manage this team, and the Braves will win about 90 or so games this year. GO BRAVES!
Ralph Nader is a loser
April 14th, 2011
6:05 pm
.
real braves fan
April 14th, 2011
6:21 pm
Great comments from Fredi. I love how all of you fools think you know more about baseball than a man who is getting paid millions of dollars to know about baseball. How many times do I see people posting on here wanting the braves to get away from the bomb squad mentality and move on to base stealing and bunting? Nate bunts and runs better than anyone on the team. Do you people honestly want to see 6 foot 5 Jason Heyward laying down a bunt to manufacture a run instead of coming up with runners on with a chance to score them with a double? If you say yes you are an idiot.
carlchamblee
April 14th, 2011
6:22 pm
Nate has bunted once. He has zero stolen bases. He did get picked off of first base however.
real braves fan
April 14th, 2011
6:24 pm
The year Nate came to the braves he was 100% in stolen bases…
David O'Brien
April 14th, 2011
6:31 pm
carlchamblee, regarding your 5:59 comment — Once again, since you seem to, a. have trouble unlike others grasping this, and/or b., are really into creating straw men to make your point: No one is telling or suggesting to you to stop complaining about the lineup. No one cares if you vent; we actually encourage it, because it’s good for business. Cool?
As for the four runs, that certainly isn’t me that came up with that. I’d have no idea where to even begin to quantify how many runs it’d be worth having Heyward in the 2-hole instead of the 6-hole. I just took that from FanGraphs, which used some complicated formula to come up with an exact number. Blame those guys at that site if you want to blame someone, not me.
Now please, feel free to continue criticizing any and all managerial decisions, coverage of the team, or anything else (outside of politics or religion) that feels good to get off your chest.
Just drop the straw man routine.
ExBraves Fan
April 14th, 2011
6:31 pm
The problem is NOT where these guys bat. The problem IS that these guys CANNOT HIT! THAT is the problem. They simply cannot hit. They are overrated for what they get paid. Chipper has had a very good career. McCann is a nice hitter. Jason still has a way too go. Prado is a decent player. NOT great, but good. The rest of them, you can have them all. Remember, Uggla had a great year LAST year. He has always hit HRs, but did not hit for high averages. He fans A LOT. He is a defensive liability. This basically, sadly, is a normal Atlanta Braves team. Decent pitchers, a couple of fair hitters and bunch of AAA or AA players in the field. This team has not had a TEAM of HITTERS since back when Matthews, Aaron, Torre, Mack Jones, F. Alou, Rico Carty, Clete Boyer, Felix Millan, Orlando Cepeda were all roving around together at one time or the other. These guys were the LAST of the GREAT GREAT hitting Braves. Murphy and a few others since.
N8
April 14th, 2011
6:38 pm
““Like the situation [Tuesday], when McLouth bunts [Martin] Prado over to third,” he said. “Now are you are going to play the infield in? Are you going to pitch to Chipper or pitch to [No. 4 hitter Brian] McCann? That kind of stuff.” Fredi Gonzalez
Or…. you could just have Heyward try and drive the ball to the right side, which would net the same result. Or (GASP!) might actually result in a base hit, or maybe even an extra base-hit, rather than giving up an out.
12 games in, and I’m growing tired of Fredi’s logic on some things. Ultimately, actions speak louder than words. He can say all day that he’s not moving Heyward up, but if does it in the next few weeks, we’ll all know that he was thinking the same thing we were and just waiting for the right time to do it.
Unfortunately, we appear to have a manager that didn’t recognize that OPENING DAY wasn’t soon enough to have Heyward in either the 2, 3 or 4 spot of the lineup.
It’s OK though. As long as Chipper gets to face Choate 15-20 more times this year, his HR total will be alright.
carlchamblee
April 14th, 2011
6:38 pm
Thanks for the permission DOB!
Maybe you prefer straw man arguments? A lot of valid counterpoints were made in response to Fredi’s defense of the lineup. Not by me alone of course but by many. I didn’t see you engage any of those other than a dismissive response to the one blogger.
Anyhoo , I did and do thank you for asking the questions that are tossed out here and for reporting the answers.
N8
April 14th, 2011
6:42 pm
DOB, perhaps I’ve asked you this before. But I’ll ask it again…. flat out.
You obviously are close to the team, but ultimately are not a “Braves fan”. But clearly somebody with inside knowledge of many things and are likely the only non coach, player to have literally “lived” with the club since February.
Where would YOU bat Heyward if you were in charge of the lineup card? Same 8 guys. Nothing else changes. Assuming everybody is healthy and erasing the recent memory of the first 12 games. Throw the results out the door.
If you were the Braves manager, upon leaving spring training, where would Heyward hit in your lineup?
carlchamblee
April 14th, 2011
6:43 pm
N8 what frosts me is Fredi saying he likes Mclouth seeing more fastballs at 2. How ’bout the far superior offensive weapon NOT seeing junk and “unintentional” walks with the dregs of the order following him?
Natey has racked up a 220 avg seeing all those meat pitches, guess it worked he hit 190 last year. He is “comfortable” and “going good”
carlchamblee
April 14th, 2011
6:45 pm
Asking DOB that might be akin to asking a political reporter who he would vote for. I can see where he might dodge that question N8.
N8
April 14th, 2011
6:51 pm
The first mistake is going all winter with Nate being in position of “his job to lose” in CF. Unfortunately, his contract dictated this – this is my only gripe about Liberty Media. The Mets just decided to cut bait on Castillo and Oliver Perez.
Clearly two guys that they DIDN’T WANT on their team. Feeling that even though they’d have to eat the money, they’d rather not compound the mistake of a bad contract by insisting on playing said player because of said contract.
Not only did Liberty Media and Wren insist on keeping Nate around, now the manager is insisting on batting him in a prime “up in the first inning of every game” spot in the order.
Bad contract. Bad decision to not eat said contract (and bring in another player). Worse decision to play the guy anyhow. Worst decision yet to bat him 2nd (which coincides with batting the face of the franchise 6th).
I thought Bobby was leaving after last year? Seems like a lot of the same crap to me.
Fredi had a chance and opportunity to come in and make his stamp. Basically saying “the old man was crazy” not batting Heyward up higher from the get go.
He had a chance to hinge his first season replacing the legend on Jason Heyward’s ability to lead this team.
He instead has chosen to let it ride on Nate McLouth.
Yikes.
Coach (2011 and Fredi G. a GO!)
April 14th, 2011
6:51 pm
One stolen base.
ONE. which is already ranked dead freaking last in the Majors. This one stat alone tells me everything I need to know about the mentality of our new manager.
N8
April 14th, 2011
6:51 pm
He’s answered similar questions in the past. But you might be right.
FACTS
April 14th, 2011
6:57 pm
Someone posted earlier that we are only 12 games into the season….totally true that = about 1\16 of the season…..well what happens when it’s 22 games or 32 games deep….will everyone including Fredi still be comfortable with where they are batting & the pitches they are seeing then…..just a thought Braves fans…..not venting it was just a thought!
robert
April 14th, 2011
7:00 pm
Fols i read all your comments about snacks and it made me laugh ha good sense of humor.. but about the baseball thing i agree i dont see what difference it would make heyward hitting 2 if no one hits like we tend to do once a week
Coach (2011 and Fredi G. a GO!)
April 14th, 2011
7:01 pm
That’s right.
We are ranked as follows:
26th in walks.
26th in batting average.
29th in OBP
29th in RBI
30 in stolen bases.
But no, Fredi is gonna keep his line up intact. Good luck is all I have to say.
carlchamblee
April 14th, 2011
7:01 pm
I thought for sure Nate would be out, or at least relegated to bench/platoon, or then maybe 7th or 8th in order.
CF wasn’t adressed nor was leadoff in the offseason. Now we have a good hitter (Prado) batting out of position and a bad hitter at 2.
carlchamblee
April 14th, 2011
7:03 pm
Meant to add that’s on GM for keeping him but on the mgr for putting him 2nd. A real organization-wide effort. At least they helping Nate fund his Dobie Gillis hair dye look
Coach (2011 and Fredi G. a GO!)
April 14th, 2011
7:04 pm
O yea, We have scored two runs or less in eight of twelve games played so far.
FACTS
April 14th, 2011
7:05 pm
I know Braves fans don’t like this guy……Nyjer Morgan, I said all off season this guy would make splash this year….that is the kinda of infusion the Braves need in our lineup….maybe we could do without his character….we need a jumpstart at the top of the batting order nuff said!
Bravefaninok
April 14th, 2011
7:37 pm
well that lineup change sure worked out for the braves……..good job boys
THE CURSE OF DAVID JUSTICE LIVES IN THE ATL
April 14th, 2011
7:52 pm
FREDI YOU ARE ONE STUPID DUMB@$$ COACH,WHY IS NATE EVEN IN THE GAME?
THE CURSE OF DAVID JUSTICE LIVES IN THE ATL
April 14th, 2011
7:53 pm
BOBBY COX IS ALREADY MISSED!
CJ
April 14th, 2011
8:04 pm
as of right now…… McLouth’s OBP (304) than Prado’s (291).
CJ
April 14th, 2011
8:05 pm
as of right now…… McLouth’s OBP (304) is better than Prado’s (291). lol
BlackCracker
April 14th, 2011
8:17 pm
Why is he talking about Mcdoodle, who gives a damn what he needs. Heyward is one of the faces of the franchise, along with Bryan Mcann, who is clearly more deserving and capable of helping the team with those atbats. Terrible stragety and lineup, worst explanation.
David O'Brien
April 14th, 2011
8:31 pm
Where would YOU bat Heyward if you were in charge of the lineup card? Same 8 guys. Nothing else changes. Assuming everybody is healthy and erasing the recent memory of the first 12 games. Throw the results out the door.
If you were the Braves manager, upon leaving spring training, where would Heyward hit in your lineup? — N8
I’d bat him fourth or fifth.
Jake
April 14th, 2011
8:40 pm
Fredi’s a smart guy, and it’s cool that he’s a “feel” guy rather than one who goes by the book all the time. I like him a lot. I hope it works out for him.
rbrave
April 14th, 2011
9:08 pm
Like the lineup, just need to start hitting ! Pendelton is still standing too close to the batters box
Churchy
April 14th, 2011
9:14 pm
Lineups are over-rated.
M10
April 14th, 2011
9:34 pm
Well I guess F.Gonzalez does’nt won’t a job because if he keeps puting up this lineup he’s going to find himself without one,because this lineup is anemic at best.He needs to move Heyward up plain and simple.
Jim Bakker
April 14th, 2011
10:02 pm
Always next year.
DWAYNE
April 14th, 2011
10:14 pm
heyward is hurt
DWAYNE
April 14th, 2011
10:15 pm
you dont take him out unless he is hurt again. watch and see
.
DWAYNE
April 14th, 2011
10:16 pm
you dont double switch your all star
E-6
April 14th, 2011
10:30 pm
Hang tonight’s loss on Beachy. Gives up a three spot, we get him the lead, he immediately gives it away. Like every other Brave pitcher he can’t bunt. Reminds me eerily of Chuck James.
Cecil
April 14th, 2011
10:31 pm
Send McLough to Jackson with a one way ticket.
dilly
April 14th, 2011
10:37 pm
Jason is not a #3 hitter, never will be. He is not disciplined enough to hit there. If you bat him after Mac, you have 2 lefties back to back. I think the line up will come around. Give Fredi a chance and quit being so critical. After the all star break – if things are still the same – then criticize. Fredi should know who needs to be where in the line up by that time.
Bob Leblaw's Law Blog
April 14th, 2011
11:16 pm
so the rookie who was tied for 4th in walks last year is not a disciplined hitter?
FACTS
April 14th, 2011
11:29 pm
For those who don’t know who the Atlanta Negro League team they were called ***The Atlanta Blackcrackers****…..found it kinda eerie when I so that handle being used on this post…..my greatgrandad had an old poster that was in pretty bad shape.
Columbus
April 15th, 2011
1:09 am
I totally agree with Fredi. Also Nate is going to be fine. He had faced some good pitching and raised his average alreay and has been hitting the ball deeper. He is going to have a good year. However McCann leading the team in steals must end like NOW. To all of you Chipper Jones haters that want him out….you obviously do not know him or baseball well. He will lead the team in walks, RBI’s, OBP and likely BA and possibly be the starting 3rd basemen in the All-star game and was leading the team in RBI’s and hitting over 300 before Thursday…morons. By the way EVERYBODY CHILL out until at least mid-MAY. It’s ridiculous to evaluate a TEAM before then unless someone is playing horrible defense or a pitcher throwing too many gopher balls or walking everyone.
iTiSi
April 15th, 2011
1:17 am
DDDY SOB’s——Different Day, Different Year, Same Old Braves !!!!
Husker Tony
April 15th, 2011
1:31 am
Boys first time I have made it to the ol’ blog since spring training. Expect the Braves to now sweep this weekend. You can thank me when it happens. Just tip of the cap will do…..
Savannah Seer
April 15th, 2011
5:23 am
If we don’t move one of our two young closers for a legit CF who can hit, then we’ll be out of it in May. Nice job Wren. If you were in charge of all the deserts, pretty soon we’d have a shortage of sand!!!
tim
April 15th, 2011
6:21 am
makes no difference who you bat where if they cannot or are not hitting it will not make a difference. this is a average team at best sure glad I was so jacked about the season getting here. Going to be a long hot summer.
bill
April 15th, 2011
7:23 am
The same guys complaining now had Chipper needing to retire, Heyward a sophomore bust,and Hanson as a head case. They need to admit they do not know diddly about baseball or start predicting the weather.
Nevada Roy
April 15th, 2011
11:11 am
My lineup would be:
1-Prado
2-Jones
3-Hayward
4-Mccann
5-Uggla
6-Freeman
7- Gonzalez
8- McLouth
Pelu Maad
April 15th, 2011
11:47 am
Man…are you guys in for a long Fredi summer. Go Fish!
Fredi Gonzalez continues to bat Jason Heyward sixth | HardballTalk
April 15th, 2011
12:31 pm
[...] Dave O’Brien of the AJC has an extended discussion of the problem today. The upshot: Fredi Gonzalez likes balance and lefty-righty stuff and, hey, you can’t let opposing teams pitch around Dan Uggla! Dan “.160/.192/.360″ Uggla. Heaven forfend. He’s sticking with Heyward in the six-hole. At this point it wouldn’t shock me if he was doing it simply so that no one can say he caved to the pressure that I and other complainers are applying. [...]
Fredi Gonzalez continues to bat Jason Heyward sixth | HardballTalk
April 15th, 2011
12:31 pm
[...] Dave O’Brien of the AJC has an extended discussion of the problem today. The upshot: Fredi Gonzalez likes balance and lefty-righty stuff and, hey, you can’t let opposing teams pitch around Dan Uggla! Dan “.160/.192/.360″ Uggla. Heaven forfend. He’s sticking with Heyward in the six-hole. At this point it wouldn’t shock me if he was doing it simply so that no one can say he caved to the pressure that I and other complainers are applying. [...]
ramblingman
April 15th, 2011
12:33 pm
“The same guys complaining now had Chipper needing to retire, Heyward a sophomore bust,and Hanson as a head case. They need to admit they do not know diddly about baseball or start predicting the weather.”
No, they just move on to complaining about something else until they are proven wrong. The current whine du jour seems to be the lineup.
Doesn’t matter what they complain about, as long as they are complaining. Most of them are actually fans, they just like to moan and b*tch and whine. Heck, some of them have never said one positive thing about the Braves. Kinda hard to claim to be a fan that way, if you ask me.
My two cents worth – the Braves don’t make the best decision every single time. That doesn’t change how I feel about the team. This is my team. I support them. I supported them in the bleak years in the 70’s and 80’s. Those teams would make the heads of some of these whiny posters explode.
Go Braves. You have true fans out here. We support you.