<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/2009/06/13/a1-addition-to-mix-up-the-pace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Your forum for feedback and about improving the print and online AJC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:29:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PhillDoc</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379/comment-page-1/#comment-2773</link>
		<dc:creator>PhillDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379#comment-2773</guid>
		<description>Great post as for me. I&#039;d like to read something more concerning this matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post as for me. I&#8217;d like to read something more concerning this matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patnap</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379/comment-page-1/#comment-2496</link>
		<dc:creator>Patnap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379#comment-2496</guid>
		<description>Where do the Republicans come off making a decision on health care reform for me.  I refer you to the article in Sec. B pg. 1 where they want to amend the state constitution to prohibit Washington from enforcing health care.  Talk about socialism.  Since when do republicans make decisions for all.  What if I want healt care reform...what right do you have to prevent me from getting it? Where is the democracy here.  This demonstration yesterday on the Capital steps shows everyone that some of us want this plan and you (Republicans) have no right to try to prevent this from happening.  If you want to see demonstrations...just try this.  You would rather continue to see people lose their homes due to the high cost of health care (which is the leading cause of foreclosures) than pass a health care bill? Amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do the Republicans come off making a decision on health care reform for me.  I refer you to the article in Sec. B pg. 1 where they want to amend the state constitution to prohibit Washington from enforcing health care.  Talk about socialism.  Since when do republicans make decisions for all.  What if I want healt care reform&#8230;what right do you have to prevent me from getting it? Where is the democracy here.  This demonstration yesterday on the Capital steps shows everyone that some of us want this plan and you (Republicans) have no right to try to prevent this from happening.  If you want to see demonstrations&#8230;just try this.  You would rather continue to see people lose their homes due to the high cost of health care (which is the leading cause of foreclosures) than pass a health care bill? Amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patnap</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379/comment-page-1/#comment-2491</link>
		<dc:creator>Patnap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379#comment-2491</guid>
		<description>While CNN was talking about bi-partisanship in honor of Kennedy, I received a phone call from Tom Price, Rep. Cong. asking me to come to a meeting to defeat Obama&#039;s health care plan.  How is that for bi-partisanship.  They could not even wait for his burrial to enlist support for their cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While CNN was talking about bi-partisanship in honor of Kennedy, I received a phone call from Tom Price, Rep. Cong. asking me to come to a meeting to defeat Obama&#8217;s health care plan.  How is that for bi-partisanship.  They could not even wait for his burrial to enlist support for their cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sluggo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379/comment-page-1/#comment-2474</link>
		<dc:creator>Sluggo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379#comment-2474</guid>
		<description>I thought Cynthia McKinney and her race baiting ways were leaving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Cynthia McKinney and her race baiting ways were leaving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turd Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379/comment-page-1/#comment-2473</link>
		<dc:creator>Turd Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379#comment-2473</guid>
		<description>The AJC makes a great fanny wiping paper plus it costs less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AJC makes a great fanny wiping paper plus it costs less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bat boy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379/comment-page-1/#comment-2472</link>
		<dc:creator>Bat boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379#comment-2472</guid>
		<description>Well it&#039;s been some months since the AJC launched the &quot;new AJC&quot; with a slimmer format and a supposed new perspective on balance and fairness. How are they doing?
From my perspective...no change. Its still the same elitist, we know best liberal journalism.  Stories about democrat corruption are deep sixed. Republican corruption stories are highlighted.  The talk about being sensitive to being fair is talk.  No more time for talk. No more time for conservatives to give the new AJC a chance. It&#039;s time to leave, time to stop the subscription, time to take the AJC our of  my internet reading list.  Time to look to a source for news that is more interested in the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s been some months since the AJC launched the &#8220;new AJC&#8221; with a slimmer format and a supposed new perspective on balance and fairness. How are they doing?<br />
From my perspective&#8230;no change. Its still the same elitist, we know best liberal journalism.  Stories about democrat corruption are deep sixed. Republican corruption stories are highlighted.  The talk about being sensitive to being fair is talk.  No more time for talk. No more time for conservatives to give the new AJC a chance. It&#8217;s time to leave, time to stop the subscription, time to take the AJC our of  my internet reading list.  Time to look to a source for news that is more interested in the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: serene</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379/comment-page-1/#comment-2466</link>
		<dc:creator>serene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379#comment-2466</guid>
		<description>The AP is reports:
A federal jury has seen video of a former Louisiana congressman accepting a suitcase filled with $100,000 in cash outside a northern Virginia hotel.

Will we see this story in the AJC.  No chance. Wrong party</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AP is reports:<br />
A federal jury has seen video of a former Louisiana congressman accepting a suitcase filled with $100,000 in cash outside a northern Virginia hotel.</p>
<p>Will we see this story in the AJC.  No chance. Wrong party</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billy bob from cobb</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379/comment-page-1/#comment-2463</link>
		<dc:creator>billy bob from cobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379#comment-2463</guid>
		<description>Lets be honest,  the ajc is dieing because it sucks.I have done ads with them for the last ten years and spent well over 2 million dollars in that time. This year I moved my ad money to the radio because I do not feel like the Ga population shares the same views as the ajc. If I wanted the Obama news I can always go to cnn. They call themselves the black news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets be honest,  the ajc is dieing because it sucks.I have done ads with them for the last ten years and spent well over 2 million dollars in that time. This year I moved my ad money to the radio because I do not feel like the Ga population shares the same views as the ajc. If I wanted the Obama news I can always go to cnn. They call themselves the black news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A very silent public editor it appears</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379/comment-page-1/#comment-2462</link>
		<dc:creator>A very silent public editor it appears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379#comment-2462</guid>
		<description>The Sunday Paper has brough up some very legitimate questions about the 
AJC&#039;s coverage of the Atlanta Police Dept.

Even though they were directed to Julia Wallace, Ms. McIntosh is on here claiming to address reader&#039;s concerns.

Are you willing to address the concerns like a true, objective newspaper ombudsman would, or are you in reality just a glorifed PR flak?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sunday Paper has brough up some very legitimate questions about the<br />
AJC&#8217;s coverage of the Atlanta Police Dept.</p>
<p>Even though they were directed to Julia Wallace, Ms. McIntosh is on here claiming to address reader&#8217;s concerns.</p>
<p>Are you willing to address the concerns like a true, objective newspaper ombudsman would, or are you in reality just a glorifed PR flak?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: serene</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379/comment-page-1/#comment-2461</link>
		<dc:creator>serene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=379#comment-2461</guid>
		<description>From the July 5 AJC. 
Michelle Obama brings her superstar glamour to Moscow this weekend as she accompanies her husband on his summit with the Russian president.

Really?  Really?

I personally like Ms. Obama but this fawning coverage is just over the top.  When did the AJC stop being a newspaper?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the July 5 AJC.<br />
Michelle Obama brings her superstar glamour to Moscow this weekend as she accompanies her husband on his summit with the Russian president.</p>
<p>Really?  Really?</p>
<p>I personally like Ms. Obama but this fawning coverage is just over the top.  When did the AJC stop being a newspaper?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
