<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thanks for all the feedback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/2009/04/28/thanks-for-all-the-feedback-and-discussion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/2009/04/28/thanks-for-all-the-feedback-and-discussion/</link>
	<description>Your forum for feedback about improving the print and online AJC.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:12:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Haselden</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/2009/04/28/thanks-for-all-the-feedback-and-discussion/comment-page-3/#comment-2486</link>
		<dc:creator>John Haselden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=228#comment-2486</guid>
		<description>Julia,  You should not believe your own words.  I think most people don&#039;t even think the paper is worth commenting on.  So don&#039;t think the happy readers aren&#039;t commenting.  The AJC has become the worst paper I have ever read.  I&#039;ve been a sub. for 26 years.  National content and the front page is terrible, sports coverage outside of Atlanta is almost nonexistent. For example, I missed the end of the golf match yesterday and today there were only about 50 words?!  NASCAR was a list of who won and the print for scores could hardly be read.  I will not renew and I hate that, but this paper is not worth reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia,  You should not believe your own words.  I think most people don&#8217;t even think the paper is worth commenting on.  So don&#8217;t think the happy readers aren&#8217;t commenting.  The AJC has become the worst paper I have ever read.  I&#8217;ve been a sub. for 26 years.  National content and the front page is terrible, sports coverage outside of Atlanta is almost nonexistent. For example, I missed the end of the golf match yesterday and today there were only about 50 words?!  NASCAR was a list of who won and the print for scores could hardly be read.  I will not renew and I hate that, but this paper is not worth reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi S.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/2009/04/28/thanks-for-all-the-feedback-and-discussion/comment-page-3/#comment-2469</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=228#comment-2469</guid>
		<description>Bert, I remember when you used to cover Clayton County School Board meetngs in the old days.  You&#039;ve come a long way.  All new reporters ought to start off with a Clayco assignment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bert, I remember when you used to cover Clayton County School Board meetngs in the old days.  You&#8217;ve come a long way.  All new reporters ought to start off with a Clayco assignment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaphpasesse</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/2009/04/28/thanks-for-all-the-feedback-and-discussion/comment-page-3/#comment-2449</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaphpasesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=228#comment-2449</guid>
		<description>А как на вашу рсс-ленту подписаться? что то не пойму</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>А как на вашу рсс-ленту подписаться? что то не пойму</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qdetzgho</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/2009/04/28/thanks-for-all-the-feedback-and-discussion/comment-page-3/#comment-2444</link>
		<dc:creator>Qdetzgho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=228#comment-2444</guid>
		<description>1XTKKN comment4 ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1XTKKN comment4 ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaipitiampind</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/2009/04/28/thanks-for-all-the-feedback-and-discussion/comment-page-3/#comment-2432</link>
		<dc:creator>jaipitiampind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=228#comment-2432</guid>
		<description>Дизайн у Вас интересный, я вот тоже для блога искал - стала прикручивать, а все посты куда то делись. Эээх... буду писать заново</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Дизайн у Вас интересный, я вот тоже для блога искал &#8211; стала прикручивать, а все посты куда то делись. Эээх&#8230; буду писать заново</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hector Fernandez L'Hoeste</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/2009/04/28/thanks-for-all-the-feedback-and-discussion/comment-page-3/#comment-2294</link>
		<dc:creator>Hector Fernandez L'Hoeste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 13:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=228#comment-2294</guid>
		<description>Your new design looks like a re-fried version of USA Today. If you want to save costs on paper, you need to consider tabloid. Look at Newsday, for example.

In the future, little printed press will survive. My students—a bunch of millennials—certainly lack the habit of reading printed newspapers. You&#039;re romanticizing a medium that, for economic and ecological reasons, is bound to disappear in its printed form.The sooner you adjust to this reality, the better.

In addition, you have failed to adapt to shifts in Atlanta&#039;s population. Despite all the cosmetic changes, you&#039;re still writing for a public that no longer exists: an eminently Southern population, educated in a conventional way at homegrown institutions. Wake up and smell the coffee. The power of the Sun Belt comes from elsewhere, and it involves a multiplicity of reading habits and tastes. It&#039;s impractical to imagine your audience as a homogeneous whole. I arrived to ATL ten years ago, bought the AJC for five years, and then stopped. Your paper never spoke to me—nor to many other imports to the ATL metro area. The day your staff reflects ATL&#039;s population, you&#039;ll have a better chance—in the meantime, you&#039;re still caught in a time warp and have failed to evolve fast enough.

In sum, unless you embrace even more drastic change, my guess is you will continue to suffer as a cultural product without a solid customer base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your new design looks like a re-fried version of USA Today. If you want to save costs on paper, you need to consider tabloid. Look at Newsday, for example.</p>
<p>In the future, little printed press will survive. My students—a bunch of millennials—certainly lack the habit of reading printed newspapers. You&#8217;re romanticizing a medium that, for economic and ecological reasons, is bound to disappear in its printed form.The sooner you adjust to this reality, the better.</p>
<p>In addition, you have failed to adapt to shifts in Atlanta&#8217;s population. Despite all the cosmetic changes, you&#8217;re still writing for a public that no longer exists: an eminently Southern population, educated in a conventional way at homegrown institutions. Wake up and smell the coffee. The power of the Sun Belt comes from elsewhere, and it involves a multiplicity of reading habits and tastes. It&#8217;s impractical to imagine your audience as a homogeneous whole. I arrived to ATL ten years ago, bought the AJC for five years, and then stopped. Your paper never spoke to me—nor to many other imports to the ATL metro area. The day your staff reflects ATL&#8217;s population, you&#8217;ll have a better chance—in the meantime, you&#8217;re still caught in a time warp and have failed to evolve fast enough.</p>
<p>In sum, unless you embrace even more drastic change, my guess is you will continue to suffer as a cultural product without a solid customer base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Siddons</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/2009/04/28/thanks-for-all-the-feedback-and-discussion/comment-page-3/#comment-2288</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Siddons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=228#comment-2288</guid>
		<description>R.I.P. Atlanta Journal Constitution.  You were once a great paper, even with the ridiculous liberal slant in reporting and editorial.  I predict there will be no printed AJC within a year.  You haven&#039;t figured a thing out.  It&#039;s sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R.I.P. Atlanta Journal Constitution.  You were once a great paper, even with the ridiculous liberal slant in reporting and editorial.  I predict there will be no printed AJC within a year.  You haven&#8217;t figured a thing out.  It&#8217;s sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/2009/04/28/thanks-for-all-the-feedback-and-discussion/comment-page-3/#comment-2286</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=228#comment-2286</guid>
		<description>I understand the economic difficulty that you are facing due to decreased circulation. I don’t believe that you will be able to retain readers with your new format. It is much more difficult to read.  The box scores are unreadable because of the small font as are many of the Sunday comics.  The pages are all far too busy.  

I have been a subscriber for 21 years but will not be renewing my subscription. I will not pay more for a product with less content and readability</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the economic difficulty that you are facing due to decreased circulation. I don’t believe that you will be able to retain readers with your new format. It is much more difficult to read.  The box scores are unreadable because of the small font as are many of the Sunday comics.  The pages are all far too busy.  </p>
<p>I have been a subscriber for 21 years but will not be renewing my subscription. I will not pay more for a product with less content and readability</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/2009/04/28/thanks-for-all-the-feedback-and-discussion/comment-page-3/#comment-2285</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 15:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=228#comment-2285</guid>
		<description>The new paper design is terrible.  who wants a &quot;European daily&quot; looking paper.  The content is scant as well.  The WSJ is going to be the only decent paper left and it is getting to &quot;modern&quot; looking.  If I wanted People magazine or US magazine I would have bought it.

I am seriously considering canceling my 7 day subscription.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new paper design is terrible.  who wants a &#8220;European daily&#8221; looking paper.  The content is scant as well.  The WSJ is going to be the only decent paper left and it is getting to &#8220;modern&#8221; looking.  If I wanted People magazine or US magazine I would have bought it.</p>
<p>I am seriously considering canceling my 7 day subscription.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Richardson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/2009/04/28/thanks-for-all-the-feedback-and-discussion/comment-page-3/#comment-2279</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 21:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/ajc/?p=228#comment-2279</guid>
		<description>I like the format, font, and graphics. Just needs more contrast for readability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the format, font, and graphics. Just needs more contrast for readability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>